nach oben

Journal of Business Ethics

Erschienen in:

03.11.2021 | Original Paper

Mobilizing After Corporate Environmental Irresponsibility in a Community of Place: A Framing Microprocess Perspective

verfasst von: Valeria Cavotta, Guido Palazzo, Antonino Vaccaro

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this paper, we take a framing perspective to corporate environmental irresponsibility and focus it on the community of place as one among the most affected, yet rarely examined, stakeholders. In particular, we take a framing microprocess perspective, to study how interactions within a community of place affect a mobilization after corporate environmental irresponsibility. We elicit two framing microprocess, losses display and scale augmentation, and show how they significantly, though differently, affect a mobilization. In so doing, we enrich our understanding of how communities of place mobilize, the types of, and venues, where interactions take place in a community of place—and how these affect a mobilization.

Vorheriger Artikel Vanishing Boycott Impetus: Why and How Consumer Participation in a Boycott Decreases Over Time

Nächster Artikel Does CEO Risk-Aversion Affect Carbon Emission?

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Allan, J. I., & Hadden, J. (2017). Exploring the framing power of NGOs in global climate politics. Environmental Politics, 26, 600–620.CrossRef

Antonetti, P., & Maklan, S. (2016). An extended model of moral outrage at corporate social irresponsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 429–444.CrossRef

Armstrong, J. (1977). Social irresponsibility in management. Journal of Business Research, 5(3), 185–213.CrossRef

Beamish, T. D. (2001). Environmental hazard and institutional betrayal: Lay public perceptions of risk in the San Luis Obispo County oil spill. Organization & Environment, 14, 5–33.CrossRef

Benford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.CrossRef

Bird, R. C., & Soundararajan, V. (2020). The role of precontractual signals in creating sustainable global supply chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 81–94.CrossRef

Brown, P. (1992). Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: Lay and professional ways of knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33, 267–281.CrossRef

Brummans, B., Putnam, L., Gray, B., Hanke, R., Lewicki, R., & Wiethoff, C. (2008). Making sense of intractable multiparty conflict: A study of framing in four environmental disputes. Communication Monographs, 75(1), 25–51.CrossRef

Buell, L. (1998). Toxic discourse. Critical Inquiry, 24(3), 639–665.CrossRef

Cable, S., & Benson, M. (1993). Acting locally: Environmental injustice and the emergence of grass-roots environmental organizations. Social Problems, 40(4), 464–477.CrossRef

Cabrejas, A. (2012). Laciana is black. Greens go Away: Environmentalists as scapegoats in a mountaintop removal conflict in Laciana Valley. Spain. Organization & Environment, 25(4), 419–436.CrossRef

Calvano, L. (2008). Multinational corporations and local communities: A critical analysis of conflict. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 793–805.CrossRef

Campbell, H., & Fitzgerald, R. (2001). Follow the fear: A multi-sited approach to GM. Rural Society, 11(3), 211–224.CrossRef

Chen, Y., Yas, M., & Rejesus, R. M. (2008). Factors influencing the incidence of bribery payouts by firms: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 231–244.CrossRef

Clark, K. D., Quigley, N. R., & Stumpf, S. A. (2014). The influence of decision frames and vision priming on decision outcomes in work groups: Motivating stakeholder considerations. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 27–38.CrossRef

Clemente, M., & Gabbioneta, C. (2017). How does the media frame corporate scandals? The case of German newspapers and the Volkswagen diesel scandal. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26, 287–302.CrossRef

Cornelissen, M., & Werner, J. P. (2014). Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 181–235.CrossRef

Dahan, N., & Gittens, M. (2010). Business and the public affairs of slavery: A discursive approach of an ethical public issue. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(2), 227–249.CrossRef

Dunham, L. D., Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (2006). Enhanced stakeholder practice: A particularized exploration of community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1), 23–42.CrossRef

Edelstein, M. (1989). Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58.CrossRef

Flam, H., & King, D. (2005). Emotions and social movements. Routledge.

Freeman, R. E., Dunham, L., & Liedtka, J. (2001). The soft under-belly of stakeholder theory: Towards understanding community. Darden school working paper.

Giorgi, S. (2017). The mind and heart of resonance: The role of cognition and emotions in frame effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 54, 712–738.CrossRef

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper.

Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17.CrossRef

Gray, B., Purdy, J. M., & Ansari, S. S. (2015). From interactions to institutions: Microprocesses of framing and mechanisms for the structuring of institutional fields. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 115–143.CrossRef

Greve, H. R., Palmer, D., & Pozner, E. (2010). Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 53–61.CrossRef

Han, H., & Strolovitch, D. (2015). What the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street illuminate about bystander publics as proto-players. In J. M. Jasper & J. W. Duyvendak (Eds.), Players and arenas: The interactive dynamics of protest (pp. 275–293). Amsterdam University Press.

Hörisch, J., Freeman, R. E., & Schaltegger, S. (2014). Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: Links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework. Organization & Environment, 27, 328–346.CrossRef

Jasper, J. M. (2015). Playing the game. In J. M. Jasper & J. W. Duyvendak (Eds.), Players and arenas: The interactive dynamics of protest (pp. 9–32). Amsterdam University Press.

Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 145–159.CrossRef

King, B. (2008). A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Business & Society, 47(1), 21–49.CrossRef

Klitsie, E. J., Ansari, S., & Volberda, H. W. (2018). Maintenance of cross sector partnerships: The role of frames in sustained collaboration. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 401–423.CrossRef

Lange, D., & Washburn, N. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 300–326.CrossRef

Littlewood, D. (2014). Cursed’ communities? Corporate social responsibility (CSR), company towns and the mining industry in Namibia. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 39–63.CrossRef

Liu, X. K., Wright, A. M., & Wu, Y. J. (2015). Managers’ unethical fraudulent financial reporting: The effect of control strength and control framing. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 295–310.CrossRef

MacLean, T. (2008). Framing and organizational misconduct: A symbolic interactionist study. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 3–16.CrossRef

Marquis, C., Lounsbury, M., & Greenwood, R. (2011). Introduction: Community as an institutional order and a type of organizing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Miceli, M. P., Near, J. P., Rehg, M. T., & Van Scotter, J. R. (2012). Predicting employee reactions to perceived organizational wrongdoing: Demoralization, justice, proactive personality, and whistle-blowing. Human Relations, 65(8), 923–954.CrossRef

Nadeem, M. (2021). Corporate governance and supplemental environmental projects: A restorative justice approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 173, 261–280.CrossRef

Nigam, A., & Ocasio, W. (2010). Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organization Science, 21, 823–841.CrossRef

Nyberg, D., Wright, C., & Kirk, J. (2020). Fracking the future: Temporality, framing, and the politics of unconventional fossil fuels. Organization Studies, 41, 175–196.CrossRef

Palazzo, G., Krings, F., & Hoffrage, U. (2012). Ethical blindness. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 323–338.CrossRef

Pfarrer, M. D., DeCelles, K. A., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2008). After the fall: Reintegrating the corrupt organization. Academy of Management Review, 33, 730–749.CrossRef

Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2021). Microfoundations of framing: The interactional production of collective action frames in the Occupy movement. Academy of Management Journal, 64(2), 378–408.CrossRef

Scott, S., McSpirit, S., Breheny, P., & Howell, B. (2012). The long-term effects of a coal waste disaster on social trust in Appalachian Kentucky. Organization and Environment, 25(4), 402–418.CrossRef

Siltaouja, M. E., & Vehkaperä, M. J. (2010). Constructing illegitimacy? Cartels and cartel agreements in Finnish business media from critical discourse perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 493–511.CrossRef

Snow, D., Benford, R., McCammon, H., Hewitt, L., & Fitzgerald, S. (2014). The emergence, development, and future of the framing perspective: 25+ years since “frame alignment.” Mobilization: an International Quarterly, 19, 23–46.CrossRef

Snow, D., Rochford, E., Worden, S., & Benford, R. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464–481.CrossRef

Suddaby, R. (2006). What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642.CrossRef

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.

Szasz, A. (1994). Broader political implications? University of Minnesota Press.

Toubiana, M., & Zietsma, C. (2017). The message is on the wall: Emotions, social media, and the dynamics of institutional complexity. Academy Management Journal, 60, 922–953.

Volkovich, Y., Scellato, S., Laniado, D., Mascolo, C., & Kaltenbrunner, A. (2012). The length of bridge ties: structural and geographic properties of online social interactions. In International AAAI conference on web and social media (Dublin).

Walton, S. (2007). Site the mine in our backyard! Discursive strategies of community stakeholders in an environmental conflict in New Zealand. Organization & Environment, 20(2), 177–203.CrossRef

Weed, D. L. (2004). Precaution, prevention and public health ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 29, 313–332.CrossRef

Xu, J., Wie, J., & Chen, H. (2021). Pollution stigma and manufacturing firms’ disengagement effort: Interactive effects of pressures from external stakeholders. Organization & Environment, 34(2), 243–266.CrossRef

Yusuf, H. O., & Omoteso, K. (2015). Combating environmental irresponsibility of transnational corporations in Africa: An empirical analysis. Local Environment. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2015.1119812CrossRef

Zimmermann, A., Albers, N. & Kenter, J. O. (forthcoming). Deliberating our frames: How members of multi-stakeholder initiatives use shared frames to tackle within-frame conflicts over sustainability issues. Journal of Business Ethics.

Titel: Mobilizing After Corporate Environmental Irresponsibility in a Community of Place: A Framing Microprocess Perspective
verfasst von: Valeria Cavotta
Guido Palazzo
Antonino Vaccaro
Publikationsdatum: 03.11.2021
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04983-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Accounting Standard-Setting for an Emission Trading Scheme: The Korean Case

Foreign Institutional Investors, Legal Origin, and Corporate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Disclosure

Disentangling Crowdfunding from Fraudfunding

How to Evaluate Managerial Nudges

Shared Responsibility and Labor Rights in Global Supply Chains

Building Ethical Narratives: The Audiences for AICPA Editorials

Premium Partner