nach oben

International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)

Erschienen in:

14.10.2023 | Original Paper

Modelling and simultaneous optimization of environmental, economic, and technological factors in machining

verfasst von: Kuldip Singh Sangwan, Rishi Kumar, Christoph Herrmann, Vijaypal Poonia, Rakhee Kulshrestha

Erschienen in: International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In the current era, manufacturing industries are facing multifaceted challenges related to increasing environmental awareness, decreasing economic gains, and technology obsolesce. These challenges become more apparent during the machining of difficult-to-machine materials due to high tool wear rates, high cutting forces, undesirable surface quality, high tool replacement costs, and a stagnating productivity. The developed approach aims at improving environmental, economic, and technological factors by optimizing four performance characteristics–energy demand, surface roughness, tool wear, and material removal rate during the milling of H13 tool steel by using an integrated artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. The proposed methodology provides Pareto solutions for minimum energy demand, surface roughness, & tool wear, and maximum material removal rate. The novelty of this work lies in generating Pareto fronts for analyzing conflicting responses, and determining preferred solutions without sacrificing environmental, technological, and economic considerations, simultaneously. The present work will be significant to practitioners in adopting better management strategies and simultaneously dealing with these challenges. The potential of the research lies in directly integrating the proposed optimization module with the machine tool system to serve as an online tool for machine tool process optimization.

Vorheriger Artikel Environmental life cycle assessment of an automobile component fabricated by additive and conventional manufacturing

Nächster Artikel Nozzle temperature calibration in 3D printing

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Kara, S., Li, W.: Unit process energy consumption models for material removal processes. CIRP Ann. 60, 37–40 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIRP.2011.03.018CrossRef

Brillinger, M., Wuwer, M., Abdul Hadi, M., Haas, F.: Energy prediction for CNC machining with machine learning. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 35, 715–723 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIRPJ.2021.07.014CrossRef

Newman, S.T., Nassehi, A., Imani-Asrai, R., Dhokia, V.: Energy efficient process planning for CNC machining. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 5, 127–136 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.03.007CrossRef

Wang, C.Y., Xie, Y.X., Qin, Z., Lin, H.S., Yuan, Y.H., Wang, Q.M.: Wear and breakage of TiAlN- and TiSiN-coated carbide tools during high-speed milling of hardened steel. Wear 336–337, 29–42 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2015.04.018CrossRef

Vijayaraghavan, A., Dornfeld, D.: Manufacturing Technology Automated energy monitoring of machine tools. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 59, 21–24 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.042CrossRef

Shen, N., Cao, Y., Li, J., Zhu, K., Zhao, C.: A practical energy consumption prediction method for CNC machine tools: cases of its implementation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 99, 2915–2927 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2550-4CrossRef

Sangwan, K.S., Saxena, S., Kant, G.: Optimization of machining parameters to minimize surface roughness using integrated ANN-GA approach. Procedia CIRP. 29, 305–310 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.002CrossRef

Drouillet, C., Karandikar, J., Nath, C., Journeaux, A., El, M., Kurfess, T.: Tool life predictions in milling using spindle power with the neural network technique. J. Manuf. Process. 22, 161–168 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.03.010CrossRef

Zhu, K., Zhang, Y.: A generic tool wear model and its application to force modeling and wear monitoring in high speed milling. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 115, 147–161 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.045CrossRefADS

10.

Malakizadi, A., Shi, B., Hoier, P., Attia, H., Krajnik, P.: Physics-based approach for predicting dissolution - diffusion tool wear in machining. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 69, 81–84 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2020.04.040CrossRef

11.

Jawahir, I.S., Brinksmeier, E., M’Saoubi, R., Aspinwall, D.K., Outeiro, J.C., Meyer, D., Umbrello, D., Jayal, A.D.: Surface integrity in material removal processes: recent advances. CIRP Ann. 60, 603–626 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.002CrossRef

12.

Rotella, G., Dillon, O.W., Umbrello, D., Settineri, L., Jawahir, I.S.: The effects of cooling conditions on surface integrity in machining of Ti₆Al₄V alloy. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 71, 47–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5477-9CrossRef

13.

Jawahir, I.S., Wang, X.: Development of hybrid predictive models and optimization techniques for machining operations. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 185, 46–59 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2006.03.133CrossRef

14.

Qu, S., Zhao, J., Wang, T.: Experimental study and machining parameter optimization in milling thin-walled plates based on NSGA-II. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 89, 2399–2409 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9265-1CrossRef

15.

Camposeco-Negrete, C.: Optimization of cutting parameters using Response Surface Method for minimizing energy consumption and maximizing cutting quality in turning of AISI 6061 T6 aluminum. J. Clean. Prod. 91, 109–117 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.017CrossRef

16.

Gupta, A., Shah, R., Dave, H., Khanna, N.: Multi-objective optimization of surface parameters such as concavity, straightness and roughness in milling process. Mater. Today Proc. 5, 5296–5302 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.113CrossRef

17.

Han, F., Li, L., Cai, W., Li, C., Deng, X., Sutherland, J.W.: Parameters optimization considering the trade-off between cutting power and MRR based on linear decreasing particle swarm algorithm in milling. J. Clean. Prod. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121388CrossRef

18.

Sangwan, K.S., Sihag, N.: Multi-objective optimization for energy efficient machining with high productivity and quality for a turning process. Procedia CIRP 80, 67–72 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.01.022CrossRef

19.

Kant, G., Sangwan, K.S.: Prediction and optimization of machining parameters for minimizing power consumption and surface roughness in machining. J. Clean. Prod. 83, 151–164 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.073CrossRef

20.

Shokrani, A., Dhokia, V., Newman, S.T.: International journal of machine tools & manufacture environmentally conscious machining of difficult-to-machine materials with regard to cutting fluids. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf 57, 83–101 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.02.002CrossRef

21.

Kene, A.P., Choudhury, S.K.: Analytical modeling of tool health monitoring system using multiple sensor data fusion approach in hard machining. Measurement 145, 118–129 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.05.062CrossRefADS

22.

Denkena, B., Abele, E., Brecher, C., Dittrich, M.A., Kara, S., Mori, M.: Energy efficient machine tools. CIRP Ann. 69, 646–667 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2020.05.008CrossRef

23.

Phokobye, S.N., Daniyan, I.A., Tlhabadira, I., Masu, L., VanStaden, L.R.: Model design and optimization of carbide milling cutter for milling operation of M200 tool steel. Procedia CIRP. 84, 954–959 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.300CrossRef

24.

Bonilla Hernández, A.E., Beno, T., Repo, J., Wretland, A.: Integrated optimization model for cutting data selection based on maximal MRR and tool utilization in continuous machining operations. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 13, 46–50 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIRPJ.2016.02.002CrossRef

25.

Ringgaard, K., Mohammadi, Y., Merrild, C., Balling, O., Ahmadi, K.: Optimization of material removal rate in milling of thin-walled structures using penalty cost function. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 145, 103430 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2019.103430CrossRef

26.

Wu, P., He, Y., Li, Y., He, J., Liu, X., Wang, Y.: Multi-objective optimisation of machining process parameters using deep learning-based data-driven genetic algorithm and TOPSIS. J. Manuf. Syst. 64, 40–52 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMSY.2022.05.016CrossRef

27.

Kumar, R., Singh, S., Bilga, P.S., Jatin, J., Singh, S., Singh, M.-L., Scutaru, C.I.P.: Revealing the benefits of entropy weights method for multi-objective optimization in machining operations: a critical review. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 10, 1471–1492 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.114CrossRef

28.

Hanafi, I., Khamlichi, A., Cabrera, F.M., Almansa, E., Jabbouri, A.: Optimization of cutting conditions for sustainable machining of PEEK-CF30 using TiN tools. J. Clean. Prod. 33, 1–9 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.005CrossRef

29.

Rajemi, M.F., Mativenga, P.T., Aramcharoen, A.: Sustainable machining: selection of optimum turning conditions based on minimum energy considerations. J. Clean. Prod. 18, 1059–1065 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2010.01.025CrossRef

30.

Muaz, M., Choudhury, S.K.: Experimental investigations and multi-objective optimization of MQL-assisted milling process for finishing of AISI 4340 steel. Measurement (Lond). 138, 557–569 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.048CrossRefADS

31.

Fountas, N., et al.: Single and multi-objective optimization methodologies in CNC machining. Statis. Comput. Tech. Manuf. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25859-6_5CrossRef

32.

Langbauer, R., Nunner, G., Zmek, T., Klarner, J., Prieler, R., Hochenauer, C.: Development of an artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict the temperature of hot-rolled steel pipes. Adv. Ind. Manuf. Eng. 5, 100090 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aime.2022.100090CrossRef

33.

Leone, C., D’Addona, D., Teti, R.: Tool wear modelling through regression analysis and intelligent methods for nickel base alloy machining. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 4, 327–331 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIRPJ.2011.03.009CrossRef

34.

Wang, Q., Liu, F., Wang, X.: Multi-objective optimization of machining parameters considering energy consumption. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 71, 1133–1142 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5547-zCrossRef

35.

Winter, M., Li, W., Kara, S., Herrmann, C.: Determining optimal process parameters to increase the eco-efficiency of grinding processes. J. Clean. Prod. 66, 644–654 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.031CrossRef

36.

Bagaber, S.A., Yusoff, A.R.: Multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters to minimize power consumption in dry turning of stainless steel 316. J. Clean. Prod. 157, 30–46 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.231CrossRef

37.

Yan, J., Li, L.: Multi-objective optimization of milling parameters-the trade-offs between energy, production rate and cutting quality. J. Clean. Prod. 52, 462–471 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.030CrossRef

38.

Nguyen, T.T.: Prediction and optimization of machining energy, surface roughness, and production rate in SKD61 milling. Measurement (Lond). 136, 525–544 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.01.009CrossRefADS

39.

Hegab, H., Salem, A., Rahnamayan, S., Kishawy, H.A.: Analysis, modeling, and multi-objective optimization of machining Inconel 718 with nano-additives based minimum quantity coolant. Appl. Soft Comput. 108, 107416 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107416CrossRef

40.

Su, Y., Li, C., Zhao, G., Li, C., Zhao, G.: Prediction models for specific energy consumption of machine tools and surface roughness based on cutting parameters and tool wear. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. B J. Eng. Manuf. 235, 1225–1234 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405420971064CrossRef

41.

Yuce, B.E., Nielsen, P.V., Wargocki, P.: The use of Taguchi, ANOVA, and GRA methods to optimize CFD analyses of ventilation performance in buildings. Build Environ. 225, 109587 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109587CrossRef

42.

Baş, D., Boyacı, İH.: Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. J. Food Eng. 78, 836–845 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024CrossRef

43.

Yi, Q., Li, C., Tang, Y., Chen, X.: Multi-objective parameter optimization of CNC machining for low carbon manufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 95, 256–264 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.076CrossRef

44.

Zhang, X., Yu, T., Dai, Y., Qu, S., Zhao, J.: Energy consumption considering tool wear and optimization of cutting parameters in micro milling process. Int. J. Mech. Sci. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105628CrossRefPubMed

45.

Li, Y., Zheng, G., Cheng, X., Yang, X., Xu, R., Zhang, H.: Cutting performance evaluation of the coated tools in high-speed milling of AISI 4340 steel. Materials (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12193266CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

A. Petrilin, Which is better: dry or wet machining? https://www.ctemag.com/news/articles/which-better-dry-or-wet-machining (Accessed 9 February 2022).

47.

Yan, W., Wong, Y.S., Lee, K.S., Ning, T.: An investigation of indices based on milling force for tool wear in milling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 89–90, 245–253 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00143-0CrossRef

48.

Sagai Francis Britto, A., Edwin Raj, R., Carolin Mabel, M.: Prediction and optimization of mechanical strength of diffusion bonds using integrated ANN-GA approach with process variables and metallographic characteristics. J. Manuf. Process. 32, 828–838 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2018.04.015CrossRef

49.

Palanisamy, P., Rajendran, I., Shanmugasundaram, S.: Prediction of tool wear using regression and ANN models in end-milling operation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 37, 29–41 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-0948-5CrossRef

50.

Peng, A., Xiao, X., Yue, R.: Process parameter optimization for fused deposition modeling using response surface methodology combined with fuzzy inference system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 73, 87–100 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5796-5CrossRef

51.

Deb, K., Datta, R.: Hybrid evolutionary multi-objective optimization and analysis of machining operations. Eng. Optim. 44, 685–706 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2011.604316MathSciNetCrossRef

52.

Li, Y., Jia, M., Han, X., Bai, X.S.: Towards a comprehensive optimization of engine efficiency and emissions by coupling artificial neural network (ANN) with genetic algorithm (GA). Energy (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120331CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Modelling and simultaneous optimization of environmental, economic, and technological factors in machining
verfasst von: Kuldip Singh Sangwan
Rishi Kumar
Christoph Herrmann
Vijaypal Poonia
Rakhee Kulshrestha
Publikationsdatum: 14.10.2023
Verlag: Springer Paris
Erschienen in: International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1955-2513
Elektronische ISSN: 1955-2505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01569-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

Modelling and parametric optimization of EDM of Al 8081/SiCp composite through DEAR approach

Designing temperature-controlled medicine bag using an integrated AHP-QFD methodology

Numerical investigation of cracked metal/ceramic FGM plates repaired with bonded composite patch

Environmental life cycle assessment of an automobile component fabricated by additive and conventional manufacturing

Design of smart operating table based on HCI and virtual visual tracking technology

Performance evaluation for the IoT-based manufacturing system in pharmacy industry

Premium Partner