nach oben

Cognitive Computation

Erschienen in:

10.01.2018

Mood Impact on Automaticity of Performance: Handwriting as Exemplar

verfasst von: Clara Rispler, Gil Luria, Allon Kahana, Sara Rosenblum

Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The goal of this study was to assess how existing handwriting research can contribute to understanding how moods impact the automatic processing of handwriting performance. We based our hypotheses on extensive research connecting mood with cognitive functions, because handwriting production was shown to be an automated cognitive task impacted by cognitive load. As far as we know, no previous research has examined the direct relationship between affect and handwriting (transcription and text generation when writing by hand). Specifically, evidence exists only for a general relationship between affect and writing (using written words to express ideas or opinions). In this experiment, 62 participants were divided into three mood groups (positive, negative, and neutral). Mood manipulation was conducted according to accepted methods of memory recall and film induction and was evaluated using the PANAS scale. Online measurements of the participants’ handwriting were captured with a tablet and electronic pen. Results showed that the strokes in the negative mood manipulation were shorter in duration and shorter in width and height. The findings presented in this article make a twofold contribution to the cognitive and biologically inspired computational studies: by integrating the study of affect with the study of cognition and by exploring additional objective performance-based evaluation of functional capabilities with the aid of a computerized device. Practical implications are discussed, as are ideas for further research.

Vorheriger Artikel Emotional Human-Machine Conversation Generation Based on Long Short-Term Memory

Nächster Artikel Evaluating Integration Strategies for Visuo-Haptic Object Recognition

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Kiefer M, Schuler S, Mayer C, Trumpp NM, Hille K, Sachse S. Handwriting or typewriting? The influence of pen-or keyboard-based writing training on reading and writing performance in preschool children. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2015;11(4):136–46. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0178-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rosenblum S. Handwriting measures as reflectors of executive functions among adults with developmental coordination disorders (DCD). Front Psychol. 2013;4:357.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fisher, C. D., &NobleC. S. Affect and performance: a within person’s analysis, Academy of Management Proceedings, OB (C6). 2000.

Kiefer M, Schuch S, Schenck W, Fiedler K. Emotion and memory: event-related potential indices predictive for subsequent successful memory depend on the emotional mood state. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2007;3(3):363–73. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10053-008-0001-8.CrossRef

Reinhard M, Dickhauser O. How affective states, task difficulty, and self-concepts influence the formation and consequences of performance expectancies. Cognit Emot. 2011;25(2):220–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931003802640.CrossRef

White CJ. Towards an understanding of the relationship between mood, emotions, service quality and customer loyalty intentions. Serv Ind J. 2006;26(8):837–47.CrossRef

Rodríguez LF, Ramos F. Development of computational models of emotions for autonomous agents: a review. Cogn Comput. 2014 Sep 1;6(3):351–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-013-9244-x.CrossRef

Chepenik LG, Cornew LA, Farah MJ. The influence of sad mood on cognition. Am Psychol Assoc. 2007;4:802–11.

Martin EA, Kerns JG. The influence of positive mood on different aspects of cognitive control. Cogn Emot. 2011;25(2):265–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.491652.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Lopez-de-Ipiña K, Alonso JB, Solé-Casals J, Barroso N, Henriquez P, Faundez-Zanuy M, et al. On automatic diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease based on spontaneous speech analysis and emotional temperature. Cogn Comput. 2015;7(1):44–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-013-9229-9.CrossRef

11.

Van Drempt N, McCluskey A, Lannin NA. Handwriting in healthy people aged 65 years and over. Aust Occup Ther J. 2011;58(4):276–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00923.x.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Smits-Engelsman BCM, Van Galen GP. Dysgraphia in children: lasting psychomotor deficiency or transient developmental delay? J Exp Child Psychol. 1997;67(2):164–84. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1997.2400.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Luria G, Rosenblum S. Comparing the handwritings of true and false writing with computerized handwriting measures. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2010;24(8):1115–28.CrossRef

14.

Rosenblum S, Werner P, Dekel T, Gurevitz I, Heinik J. Handwriting process variables among elderly people with mild major depressive disorder: a preliminary study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010;22(2):141–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324787.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Luria G, Kahana A, Rosenblum S. Detection of deception via handwritings using a computerized tool: toward an evaluation of malingering. Cogn Comput. 2014;6(4):849–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-014-9288-6.CrossRef

16.

Alonso-MartinezC, Faundez-ZanuyM, MekyskaJ. A Comparative study of in-air trajectories at short and long distances in online handwriting. Cogn Comput. 2017;1–9.

17.

Jones D, Christensen CA. Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. J Educ Psychol. 1999;91(1):44–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.44.CrossRef

18.

Bargh JA. The ecology of automaticity: towards establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effect. Am J Psychol. 1992;105(2):181–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/1423027.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Longstaff MG, Heath RAA. Nonlinear analysis of the temporal characteristics of handwriting. Hum Mov Sci. 1999;18(4):485–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9457(99)00028-7.CrossRef

20.

Chartrel E, Vinter A. The impact of spatio-temporal constraints on cursive letter handwriting in children. Learn Instr. 2008;18(6):537–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.11.003.CrossRef

21.

Parush S, Lifshitz N, Yochman A, Weintraub N. Relationships between handwriting components and underlying perceptual-motor functions among students during copying and dictation tasks. OTJR Occup Particip Health. 2010;30(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20091214-06.CrossRef

22.

Graham S, Harris K. The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educ Psychol. 2010;35(1):3–12.CrossRef

23.

Rosenblum S, Samuel M, Zlotnik S, Erikh I, Schlesinger I. Handwriting as an objective tool for Parkinson’s disease diagnosis. J Neurol. 2013;260(9):2357–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6996-x.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Rosenblum S, Luria G. Applying a handwriting measurement model for capturing cognitive load implications through complex figure drawing. Cogn Comput. 2015:1–9.

25.

Ashby FG, Isen AM, Turken AU. A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychol Rev. 1999;106(3):529–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.529.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Sun R, Wilson N, Lynch M. Emotion: a unified mechanistic interpretation from a cognitive architecture. Cogn Comput. 2016;8(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-015-9374-4.CrossRef

27.

Luomala H, Laaksonen M. Contributions from mood research. Psychol Mark. 2000;17(3):95–233.CrossRef

28.

Beedie C, Terry P, Lane A. Distinctions between emotion and mood. Cognit Emot. 2005;19(6):847–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930541000057.CrossRef

29.

Hamer M, Dye L, Mitchell ES, Layé S, Saunders C, Boyle N, et al. Examining techniques for measuring the effects of nutrients on mental performance and mood state. Eur J Nutr. 2016;55(6):1991–2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-015-1143-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Goldenberg L, Forgas JP. Can happy mood reduce the just world bias? Affective influences on blaming the victim. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012;48(1):239–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.007.CrossRef

31.

Siemer M. Mood-specific effects on appraisal and emotion judgments. Cognit Emot. 2001;15(4):453–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930126083.CrossRef

32.

Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Russell JAA. Circumplex model of affect. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39(6):1161–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714.CrossRef

34.

Mitchell RLC, Phillips LH. The psychological, neurochemical and functional neuroanatomical mediators of the effects of positive and negative mood on executive functions. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45(4):617–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.030.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Braun-LaTour KA, Puccinelli NM, &Mast FW. Mood, information congruency, and overload. Cornell University, School of Hospitality Administration site. 2007. http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/articles/312. Accessed 11 Sep 2015.

36.

Rowe G, Hirsh JB, Anderson AK. Positive affect increases the “breadth” of cognitive selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104(1):383–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605198104.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Seibert PS, Ellis HC. Irrelevant thoughts, emotional mood states, and cognitive task performance. Mem Cogn. 1991;19(5):507–13. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199574.CrossRef

38.

Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD. Bad is stronger than good. Rev Gen Psychol. 2001;5(4):323–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323.CrossRef

39.

Faundez-Zanuy M, Hussain A, Mekyska J, Sesa-Nogueras E, Monte-Moreno E, Esposito A, et al. Biometric applications related to human beings: there is life beyond security. Cogn Comput. 2013;5(1):136–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-012-9169-9.CrossRef

40.

Alonso-Martinez C, Faundez-Zanuy M, Mekyska J. A comparative study of in-air trajectories at short and long distances in online handwriting. Cogn Comput. 2017:1–9.

41.

Latash LP. Automation of movement: challenges to the notions of the orienting reaction and memory. In: Latash ML, editor. Progress in motor control. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1998. p. 51–88.

42.

Dixon RA, Kurzman D, Friesen IC. Handwriting performance in younger and older adults: age, familiarity, and practice effects. Psychol Aging. 1993;8(3):360–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.8.3.360.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Rosenblum S, Werner P. Assessing the handwriting process in healthy elderly persons using a computerized system. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2006;18(5):433–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324840.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Luria G, Rosenblum S. Computerized multidimensional measurement of mental workload via handwriting analysis. Behav Res Methods. 2012;44(2):575–86. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0159-8.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Broeder S, Nackaerts E, Nieuwboer A, Smits-Engelsman BC, Swinnen SP, Heremans E. The effects of dual tasking on handwriting in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience. 2014;263:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.01.019.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Horowski R, Horowski L, Vogel S, Poewe W, Kielhorn FW. An essay on Wilhelm von Humboldt and the shaking palsy: first comprehensive description of Parkinson’s disease by a patient. Neurology. 1995;45(3):565–8. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.45.3.565.CrossRefPubMed

47.

McLennan JE, Nakano K, Taylor HR, Schwab RS. Micrographia in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci. 1972;15(2):141–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510X(72)90002-0.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Ondo WG, Satija P. Withdrawal of visual feedback improves micrographia in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2007;22(14):2130–1. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.21733.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Teulings HL, Contreras-Vidal JL, Stelmach GE, Adler CH. Adaptation of handwriting size under distorted visual feedback in patients with Parkinson’s disease and elderly and young controls. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72(3):315–24. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.72.3.315.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Scherrer MC, Dobson KS, Quigley L. Predictors of self-reported negative mood following a depressive mood induction procedure across previously depressed, currently anxious, and control individuals. Br J Clin Psychol. 2014;53(3):348–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12053.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Skidmore FM, Yang M, Baxter L, Von Deneen K, Collingwood J, He G, et al. Apathy, depression, and motor symptoms have distinct and separable resting activity patterns in idiopathic Parkinson disease. NeuroImage. 2013;81:484–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.012.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Knouse LE, Barkley RA, Murphy KR. Does executive functioning (EF) predict depression in clinic-referred adults? EF tests vs. rating scales. J Affect Disord. 2013;145(2):270–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.05.064.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Darke S. Effects of anxiety on inferential reasoning task performance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;55(3):499–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.499.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Sorg BA, Whitney P. The effect of trait anxiety and situational stress on working memory capacity. J Res Pers. 1992;26(3):235–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(92)90041-2.CrossRef

55.

Ashcraft MH, Kirk EP. The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001;130(2):224–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.224.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Fraser K, Ma I, Teteris E, Baxter H, Wright B, McLaughlin K. Emotion, cognitive load and learning outcomes during simulation training. Med Educ. 2012;46(11):1055–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04355.x.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Sesa-Nogueras E, Faundez-Zanuy M, Mekyska J. An information analysis of in-air and on-surface trajectories in online handwriting. Cogn Comput. 2012;4(2):195–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-011-9119-y.CrossRef

58.

Sabbe B, Hulstijn W, Van Hoff JJM, Zitman FG. Fine motor retardation and depression. J Psychiatr Res. 1996;30(4):295–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(96)00014-3.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Yu K, Epps J &Chen F. Cognitive load evaluation of handwriting using stroke-level features. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on intelligent user interfaces. 2011; 423–426.

60.

Werner P, Rosenblum S, Bar-On G, Heinik J, Korczyn A. Handwriting process variables discriminating mild Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006;61(4):228–36.CrossRef

61.

Rosenblum S, Weiss PL, Parush S. Product and process evaluation of handwriting difficulties. Educ Psychol Rev. 2003;15(1):41–81. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021371425220.CrossRef

62.

Lecci L, Wirth RJ. Methodological and practical issues in the experience, induction and assessment of mood states. In: Clark AV, editor. Psychology of moods: new research. New York: Nova Science; 2006. p. 37–55.

63.

Mokhtari S, Buttle H. The effect of observers’ mood on the local processing of emotional faces: evidence from short-lived and prolonged mood states. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2015;11(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0167-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Badarna M, Shimshoni I, Luria G, Rosenblum S. The importance of pen motion pattern groups for semi-automatic classification of handwriting into mental workload classes. Cogn Comput. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-017-9520-2.

65.

Froese T, Suzuki K, Ogai Y, Ikegami T. Using human–computer interfaces to investigate ‘mind-as-it-could-be’ from the first-person perspective. Cogn Comput. 2012;4(3):365–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-012-9153-4.CrossRef

66.

Gross MM, Crane EA, Fredrickson BL. Effort-shape and kinematic assessment of bodily expression of emotion during gait. Hum Mov Sci. 2012;31(1):202–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2011.05.001.CrossRefPubMed

67.

Kang GE, Gross MM. The effect of emotion on movement smoothness during gait in healthy young adults. J Biomech. 2016;49(16):4022–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.044.CrossRefPubMed

68.

Guillot A, Collet C. Duration of mentally simulated movement: a review. J Mot Behav. 2005;37(1):10–20. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.37.1.10-20.CrossRefPubMed

69.

WatsonD, ClarkLA. The PANAS-X: manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. 1999.

70.

Subirats JL, et al. Multiclass pattern recognition extension for the new C-Mantec constructive neural network algorithm. Cogn Comput. 2010;2, 285(4):–290.

Titel: Mood Impact on Automaticity of Performance: Handwriting as Exemplar
verfasst von: Clara Rispler
Gil Luria
Allon Kahana
Sara Rosenblum
Publikationsdatum: 10.01.2018
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Cognitive Computation / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1866-9956
Elektronische ISSN: 1866-9964
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-017-9540-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

The Fundamental Code Unit of the Brain: Towards a New Model for Cognitive Geometry

Discriminative Deep Belief Network for Indoor Environment Classification Using Global Visual Features

Simultaneous Feature Selection and Support Vector Machine Optimization Using the Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm

Emotional Human-Machine Conversation Generation Based on Long Short-Term Memory

Extreme Learning Machines for VISualization+R: Mastering Visualization with Target Variables

Rank-Adaptive Non-Negative Matrix Factorization