Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Empirical Economics 5/2023

12.05.2023

Multiple dimensions of private information in life insurance markets

verfasst von: Xi Wu, Li Gan

Erschienen in: Empirical Economics | Ausgabe 5/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A growing amount of literature has shown the unavailability of a positive correlation between insurance coverage and ex post risk, even though the risk-related adverse selection is confirmed by other evidence. Such puzzles are suggested to be attributed to the coexistence of multi-dimensional private information. This paper develops a method to identify the risk-related private information in this case. To illustrate, we apply data from US life insurance market. Categorizing individuals’ heterogeneous insurance preferences into different groups and using joint maximum likelihood estimation of a mixture density model, we detect a positive correlation between individual mortality and insurance coverage within each group. This result is consistent with the conventional theory regarding the private information of adverse selection.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Cohen and Siegelman (2010) review and evaluate the recent literature in this field.
 
2
Note that similar to Finkelstein and McGarry (2006), we cannot exclude the effect of this preference-related private information by just controlling a few proxy variables related to it. The reason has been analyzed before.
 
3
Recall that we mentioned that one potential but impractical method to identify risk-related private information in the presence of multi-dimensional private information is to control for a full set of proxy variables to the second type of private information. In contrast, our method only requires a subset of proxy variables.
 
4
We find many life insurance policies being lapsed or purchased during this eight-year time window. To avoid the mortality risk measured in our analysis not necessarily being the same as the risk for an insurer (e.g., the policyholder dies after her lapsation), we only keep the sample whose insurance status has never changed since 2000 and obtain the same conclusion. Results are available upon request.
 
5
According to the current literature, there are two dimensions of private information. One is risk-related, which is both positively correlated to insurance ownership and ex post risk, thus generating a positive correlation between the error terms; the other one is preference-related, denoted as H, which is positively correlated to insurance ownership but negatively related to ex post risk. As shown in Eq. (6), the effect of H has been absorbed into constant terms by assuming it is categorical; we therefore justify the correlation between \(u_{k}^{*}\) and \(v_{k}^{*}\) reflects the presence of the risk-related private information, after conditional on the risk classifications by insurance companies.
 
6
Appendix 1 presents the details for the case in which the probability of both mortality and insurance purchase being equal to one when insurance preferences are divided into two types.
 
7
We also extend the observation window for mortality to 2014 and obtain similar results.
 
8
A different approach to measure the ex post risk is to work on age-sex-race adjusted mortality instead of working on the binary variable of dying. As suggested in Gan et al(2005), this method calculates each individual’s updated survival possibility based on whether he or she has died. For simplicity, we employ the binary variable as the record of the occurrence of insured event in the rest of our analysis.
 
9
One well-known potential problem with self-perceived risk is that individuals have a propensity to report Figs. 0, 50, and 100 (Hurd and McGarry, 2002; Gan et al. 2005). These focal responses suggest that individual subjective probabilities on subsequent mortality can only serve as a noisy proxy for private information.
 
10
We also exclude, respectively, proxies for risk attitudes, the number of years of education, individuals' employment status, and financial conditions. For each of these four specifications, same conclusions can be obtained. Results are presented in Appendix 2.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat American Council of Life Insurers (2020) ACLI 2020 Life Insurers Fact Book American Council of Life Insurers (2020) ACLI 2020 Life Insurers Fact Book
Zurück zum Zitat Beck T, Webb I (2003) Economic, demographic, and institutional determinants of life insurance consumption across countries. World Bank Econ Rev 17(1):51–58CrossRef Beck T, Webb I (2003) Economic, demographic, and institutional determinants of life insurance consumption across countries. World Bank Econ Rev 17(1):51–58CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Browne M, Kim K (1993) An international analysis of life insurance demand. J Risk Insur 60(4):616–634CrossRef Browne M, Kim K (1993) An international analysis of life insurance demand. J Risk Insur 60(4):616–634CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cawley J, Philipson T (1999) An empirical examination of information barriers to trade in insurance. Am Econ Rev 89(4):827–846CrossRef Cawley J, Philipson T (1999) An empirical examination of information barriers to trade in insurance. Am Econ Rev 89(4):827–846CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chiappori P-A, Salanié B (1997) Empirical contract theory: the case of insurance data. Eur Econ Rev 41(3–5):943–950CrossRef Chiappori P-A, Salanié B (1997) Empirical contract theory: the case of insurance data. Eur Econ Rev 41(3–5):943–950CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chiappori P-A, Salanié B (2000) Testing for asymmetric information in insurance markets. J Polit Econ 108(1):56–78CrossRef Chiappori P-A, Salanié B (2000) Testing for asymmetric information in insurance markets. J Polit Econ 108(1):56–78CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chiappori, P-A, and B Salanié (2013) Asymmetric information in insurance markets: predictions and tests. In: G Dionne, (ed) Handbook of insurance, 2nd edn Chiappori, P-A, and B Salanié (2013) Asymmetric information in insurance markets: predictions and tests. In: G Dionne, (ed) Handbook of insurance, 2nd edn
Zurück zum Zitat Chiappori PA, Jullien B, Salanie B, Salanie F (2006) Asymmetric information in insurance: general testable implications. RAND J Econ 37(4):783–798CrossRef Chiappori PA, Jullien B, Salanie B, Salanie F (2006) Asymmetric information in insurance: general testable implications. RAND J Econ 37(4):783–798CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen A, Einav L (2007) Estimating risk preferences from deductible choice. Am Econ Rev 97(3):745–788CrossRef Cohen A, Einav L (2007) Estimating risk preferences from deductible choice. Am Econ Rev 97(3):745–788CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen A, Siegelman P (2010) Testing for adverse selection in insurance markets. J Risk Insur 77(1):39–84CrossRef Cohen A, Siegelman P (2010) Testing for adverse selection in insurance markets. J Risk Insur 77(1):39–84CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cutler D, Finkelstein A, McGarry K (2008) Preference heterogeneity and insurance markets: explaining a puzzle of insurance. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 98(2):157–162CrossRef Cutler D, Finkelstein A, McGarry K (2008) Preference heterogeneity and insurance markets: explaining a puzzle of insurance. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 98(2):157–162CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat de Meza D, Webb DC (2001) Advantageous selection in insurance markets. RAND J Econ 32(2):249–262CrossRef de Meza D, Webb DC (2001) Advantageous selection in insurance markets. RAND J Econ 32(2):249–262CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eckstein Z, Wolpin K (1989) Dynamic labor force participation of married women and endogenous work experience. Rev Econ Stud 56(3):375–390CrossRef Eckstein Z, Wolpin K (1989) Dynamic labor force participation of married women and endogenous work experience. Rev Econ Stud 56(3):375–390CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fang H, Keane MP, Silverman D (2008) Sources of advantageous selection: evidence from the Medigap insurance market. J Polit Econ 116(2):303–350CrossRef Fang H, Keane MP, Silverman D (2008) Sources of advantageous selection: evidence from the Medigap insurance market. J Polit Econ 116(2):303–350CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Feinstein J (1990) Detection controlled estimation. J Law Econ 33(1):233–276CrossRef Feinstein J (1990) Detection controlled estimation. J Law Econ 33(1):233–276CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Finkelstein A, McGarry K (2006) Multiple dimensions of private information: evidence from the long-term care insurance market. Am Econ Rev 96(4):938–958CrossRef Finkelstein A, McGarry K (2006) Multiple dimensions of private information: evidence from the long-term care insurance market. Am Econ Rev 96(4):938–958CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Finkelstein A, Poterba J (2014) Testing for asymmetric information using “unused observables” in insurance markets: evidence from the U.K. annuity market. J Risk Insur 81(4):709–734CrossRef Finkelstein A, Poterba J (2014) Testing for asymmetric information using “unused observables” in insurance markets: evidence from the U.K. annuity market. J Risk Insur 81(4):709–734CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gan L, F Huang and A Mayer (2010) A simple test of private information in the insurance markets with heterogeneous insurance demand. NBER WPS #16738 Gan L, F Huang and A Mayer (2010) A simple test of private information in the insurance markets with heterogeneous insurance demand. NBER WPS #16738
Zurück zum Zitat Gan Li, Hurd M, McFadden D (2005) Individual subjective survival curves. In: Wise D (ed) Analysis in economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 377–411CrossRef Gan Li, Hurd M, McFadden D (2005) Individual subjective survival curves. In: Wise D (ed) Analysis in economics of aging. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 377–411CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gan L and R Mosquera (2008) An empirical study of the credit market with unobserved consumer types. NBER WPS #13873 Gan L and R Mosquera (2008) An empirical study of the credit market with unobserved consumer types. NBER WPS #13873
Zurück zum Zitat Hakansson NH (1969) Optimal investment and consumption strategies under risk, an uncertain lifetime, and insurance. Int Econ Rev 10(3):443–466CrossRef Hakansson NH (1969) Optimal investment and consumption strategies under risk, an uncertain lifetime, and insurance. Int Econ Rev 10(3):443–466CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat He D (2009) The life insurance market: asymmetric information revisited. J Public Econ 93(9–10):1090–1097CrossRef He D (2009) The life insurance market: asymmetric information revisited. J Public Econ 93(9–10):1090–1097CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Helland E (1998) The enforcement of pollution control laws: inspections, violations, and self-reporting. Rev Econ Stat 89(1):141–153CrossRef Helland E (1998) The enforcement of pollution control laws: inspections, violations, and self-reporting. Rev Econ Stat 89(1):141–153CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Henry M, Kitamura Y, Salanié B (2014) Partial identification of finite mixtures in econometric models. Forthcom Quant Econ 5(1):123–144CrossRef Henry M, Kitamura Y, Salanié B (2014) Partial identification of finite mixtures in econometric models. Forthcom Quant Econ 5(1):123–144CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Y (2008) Identification and estimation of nonlinear models with misclassification error using instrumental variables: a general solution. J Econom 144(1):27–61CrossRef Hu Y (2008) Identification and estimation of nonlinear models with misclassification error using instrumental variables: a general solution. J Econom 144(1):27–61CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hurd M, McGarry K (2002) The predictive validity of subjective probabilities of survival. Econom J 112(482):966–985 Hurd M, McGarry K (2002) The predictive validity of subjective probabilities of survival. Econom J 112(482):966–985
Zurück zum Zitat Jullien B, Salanié B, Salanié F (2007) Screening risk-averse agents under moral hazard: single-crossing and the CARA case. Econ Theory 30(1):151–169CrossRef Jullien B, Salanié B, Salanié F (2007) Screening risk-averse agents under moral hazard: single-crossing and the CARA case. Econ Theory 30(1):151–169CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keane M, Wolpin K (1997) The career decisions of young men. J Polit Econ 105(3):473–522CrossRef Keane M, Wolpin K (1997) The career decisions of young men. J Polit Econ 105(3):473–522CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Knittel C, Stango V (2003) Price ceilings as focal points for tacit collusion: evidence from credit cards. Am Econ Rev 93(5):1703–1729CrossRef Knittel C, Stango V (2003) Price ceilings as focal points for tacit collusion: evidence from credit cards. Am Econ Rev 93(5):1703–1729CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lee L-F, Porter R (1984) Switching regression models with imperfect sample separation information—with an application on cartel stability. Econometrica 52(2):391–418CrossRef Lee L-F, Porter R (1984) Switching regression models with imperfect sample separation information—with an application on cartel stability. Econometrica 52(2):391–418CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lewbel A (2007) Estimation of average treatment effects with misclassification. Econometrica 75:537–551CrossRef Lewbel A (2007) Estimation of average treatment effects with misclassification. Econometrica 75:537–551CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis F (1989) Dependents and demand for life insurance. Am Econ Rev 79(3):452–467 Lewis F (1989) Dependents and demand for life insurance. Am Econ Rev 79(3):452–467
Zurück zum Zitat Mahajan A (2006) Identification and estimation of regression models with misclassification. Econometrica 74(3):631–665CrossRef Mahajan A (2006) Identification and estimation of regression models with misclassification. Econometrica 74(3):631–665CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rothschild M, Stiglitz J (1976) Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: an essay on the economics of imperfect information. Q J Econ 90(4):629–649CrossRef Rothschild M, Stiglitz J (1976) Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets: an essay on the economics of imperfect information. Q J Econ 90(4):629–649CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Smart M (2000) Competitive insurance markets with two unobservables. Int Econ Rev 41(1):153–169CrossRef Smart M (2000) Competitive insurance markets with two unobservables. Int Econ Rev 41(1):153–169CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Walliser J and JK Winter (1998) Tax incentives, bequest motives and the demand for life insurance: evidence from Germany. Working Paper Walliser J and JK Winter (1998) Tax incentives, bequest motives and the demand for life insurance: evidence from Germany. Working Paper
Zurück zum Zitat Yarri ME (1965) Uncertain life time, life insurance, and the theory of the consumer. Rev Econ Stud 32(2):137–150CrossRef Yarri ME (1965) Uncertain life time, life insurance, and the theory of the consumer. Rev Econ Stud 32(2):137–150CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Multiple dimensions of private information in life insurance markets
verfasst von
Xi Wu
Li Gan
Publikationsdatum
12.05.2023
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Empirical Economics / Ausgabe 5/2023
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-023-02424-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2023

Empirical Economics 5/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner