nach oben

Erschienen in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Nanoporous Polymeric Membranes for Hydrogen Separation

verfasst von : Rajesh Kumar, Kamakshi, Manoj Kumar, Kamlendra Awasthi

Erschienen in: Nanotechnology for Energy and Environmental Engineering

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In today’s world, it becomes a necessity to develop an eco-friendly and renewable energy source to overcome the pollution and energy requirement problem. Among all renewable energy sources, hydrogen has been found a more attractive energy carrier due to its high efficiency and cost-effective sustainable energy source. For practical use of H₂ as an energy source, it should be separated from a mixture of gases by using hydrogen-selective membranes. In the present chapter, we have reviewed the membrane-based gas separation process. Furthermore, we have summarized the H₂ gas separation data based on the different membranes and approaches to prepare hydrogen-selective membranes.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Versatile 1-D Nanostructures for Green Energy Conversion and Storage Devices

Nächstes Kapitel Functionalized Nano-porous Silicon Surfaces for Energy Storage Application

Al-Mufachi NA, Rees NV, Steinberger-Wilkens R (2015) Hydrogen selective membranes: a review of palladium-based dense metal membranes. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47:540–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.026CrossRef

Apel PY, Blonskaya IV, Dmitriev SN et al (2006) Structure of polycarbonate track-etch membranes: origin of the “paradoxical” pore shape. J Memb Sci 282:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.045CrossRef

Babu DJ, Lange M, Cherkashinin G et al (2013) Gas adsorption studies of CO₂ and N₂ in spatially aligned double-walled carbon nanotube arrays. Carbon NY 61:616–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.045CrossRef

Baker RW, Lokhandwala K (2008) Natural gas processing with membranes: an overview. Ind Eng Chem Res 47:2109–2121CrossRef

Bakhtiari O, Sadeghi N (2015) Mixed matrix membranes’ gas separation performance prediction using an analytical model. Chem Eng Res Des 93:710–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2014.06.013CrossRef

Basyooni MA, Shaban M, El Sayed AM (2017) Enhanced gas sensing properties of spin-coated Na-doped ZnO nanostructured films. Sci Rep 7:41716CrossRef

Beard MC, Luther JM, Nozik AJ (2014) The promise and challenge of nanostructured solar cells. Nat Nanotechnol 9:951CrossRef

Bespalko Y, Sadykov V, Eremeev N et al (2018) Synthesis of tungstates/Ni0.5Cu0.5O nanocomposite materials for hydrogen separation cermet membranes. Compos Struct 202:1263–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.004CrossRef

Bondar VI, Freeman BD, Pinnau I (2000) Gas transport properties of poly (ether-b-amide) segmented block copolymers. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 38:2051–2062CrossRef

10.

Carreon M, Dahe G, Feng J, Venna SR (2016) Mixed matrix membranes for gas separation applications. In: Membranes for gas separations. World Scientific, pp 1–57

11.

Castel C, Favre E (2018) Membrane separations and energy efficiency. J Memb Sci 548:345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.11.035CrossRef

12.

Chakarvarti SK (2009) Track-etch membranes enabled nano-/microtechnology: a review. Radiat Meas 44:1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.10.028CrossRef

13.

Chen Y-H, Chen C-Y, Lee S-C (2011) Technology forecasting and patent strategy of hydrogen energy and fuel cell technologies. Int J Hydrog Energy 36:6957–6969. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2011.03.063CrossRef

14.

Chen Y, Wei Y, Zhuang L et al (2018) Effect of Pt layer on the hydrogen permeation property of La5.5W0.45Nb0.15Mo0.4O11.25-Δmembrane. J Memb Sci 552:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.01.068CrossRef

15.

Cheng YS, Peña MA, Fierro JL et al (2002) Performance of alumina, zeolite, palladium, Pd-Ag alloy membranes for hydrogen separation from towngas mixture. J Memb Sci 204:329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00059-5CrossRef

16.

Damle AS, Gangwal SK, Venkataraman VK (1994) Carbon membranes for gas separation: developmental studies. Gas Sep Purif 8:137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-4214(94)80024-3CrossRef

17.

David E, Kopac J (2011) Devlopment of palladium/ceramic membranes for hydrogen separation. Int J Hydrog Energy 36:4498–4506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.032CrossRef

18.

De Falco M, Salladini A, Palo E, Iaquaniello G (2011) Reformer and membrane modules (RMM) for methane conversion powered by a nuclear reactor. In: Nuclear power-deployment, operation and sustainability. InTech

19.

de Lannoy C-F, Soyer E, Wiesner MR (2013) Optimizing carbon nanotube-reinforced polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes through carboxylic acid functionalization. J Memb Sci 447:395–402CrossRef

20.

Denny Kamaruddin H, Koros WJ (1997) Some observations about the application of Fick’s first law for membrane separation of multicomponent mixtures. J Memb Sci 135:147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00142-7CrossRef

21.

Dicks AL (1996) Hydrogen generation from natural gas for the fuel cell systems of tomorrow. J Power Sources 61:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(96)02347-6CrossRef

22.

Dolan MD (2010) Non-Pd BCC alloy membranes for industrial hydrogen separation. J Memb Sci 362:12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.068CrossRef

23.

Dolan MD, Dave NC, Ilyushechkin AY et al (2006) Composition and operation of hydrogen-selective amorphous alloy membranes. J Memb Sci 285:30–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.09.014CrossRef

24.

Du N, Park HB, Dal-Cin MM, Guiver MD (2012) Advances in high permeability polymeric membrane materials for CO₂ separations. Energy Environ Sci 5:7306–7322CrossRef

25.

Ebrahimi S, Mollaiy-Berneti S, Asadi H et al (2016) PVA/PES-amine-functional graphene oxide mixed matrix membranes for CO₂/CH₄ separation: experimental and modeling. Chem Eng Res Des 109:647–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.03.009CrossRef

26.

Fasolin S, Barison S, Boldrini S et al (2018) Hydrogen separation by thin vanadium-based multi-layered membranes. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:3235–3243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.148CrossRef

27.

Gallucci F, Fernandez E, Corengia P, van Sint AM (2013) Recent advances on membranes and membrane reactors for hydrogen production. Chem Eng Sci 92:40–66CrossRef

28.

Gao H, Lin YS, Li Y, Zhang B (2004) Chemical stability and its improvement of palladium-based metallic membranes. Ind Eng Chem Res 43:6920–6930CrossRef

29.

Ghasemzadeh K, Sadati Tilebon SM, Basile A (2017) Chapter 10—Silica membranes application for hydrogen separation. In: Basile A, Ghasemzadeh K (eds) Current trends and future developments on (bio-) membranes. Elsevier, pp 243–264

30.

Gómez Álvarez-Arenas TE, Apel PY, Orelovitch OL, Muñoz M (2009) New ultrasonic technique for the study of the pore shape of track-etched pores in polymer films. Radiat Meas 44:1114–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.09.002CrossRef

31.

Haider S, Lindbråthen A, Lie JA, Hägg M-B (2018) Regenerated cellulose based carbon membranes for CO₂ separation: durability and aging under miscellaneous environments. J Ind Eng Chem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.10.037CrossRef

32.

Hamm JBS, Ambrosi A, Griebeler JG et al (2017) Recent advances in the development of supported carbon membranes for gas separation. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:24830–24845. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2017.08.071CrossRef

33.

Hashim SS, Somalu MR, Loh KS et al (2018) Perovskite-based proton conducting membranes for hydrogen separation: a review. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:15281–15305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.045CrossRef

34.

Hatlevik Ø, Gade SK, Keeling MK et al (2010) Palladium and palladium alloy membranes for hydrogen separation and production: history, fabrication strategies, and current performance. Sep Purif Technol 73:59–64CrossRef

35.

Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56CrossRef

36.

Iijima S, Ichihashi T (1993) Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. Nature 363:603CrossRef

37.

Isfahani SNR, Sedaghat A (2016) A hybrid micro gas turbine and solid state fuel cell power plant with hydrogen production and CO₂ capture. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:9490–9499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.065CrossRef

38.

Ismail AF, David LIB (2001) A review on the latest development of carbon membranes for gas separation. J Memb Sci 193:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00510-5CrossRef

39.

Ismail AF, Rana D, Matsuura T, Foley HC (2011) Carbon-based membranes for separation processes, pp 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78991-0

40.

Javaid A (2005) Membranes for solubility-based gas separation applications. Chem Eng J 112:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2005.07.010CrossRef

41.

Jones CW, Koros WJ (1994) Carbon molecular sieve gas separation membranes-I. Preparation and characterization based on polyimide precursors. Carbon NY 32:1419–1425. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)90135-XCrossRef

42.

Jose AJ, Kappen J, Alagar M (2018) 2—Polymeric membranes: classification, preparation, structure physiochemical, and transport mechanisms. In: Thomas S, Balakrishnan P, Sreekala MS (eds) Fundamental biomaterials: polymers. Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials. Woodhead Publishing, pp 21–35

43.

Jue ML, Lively RP (2015) Targeted gas separations through polymer membrane functionalization. React Funct Polym 86:88–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.09.002CrossRef

44.

Khatib SJ, Oyama ST (2013) Silica membranes for hydrogen separation prepared by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Sep Purif Technol 111:20–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.03.032CrossRef

45.

Kholmanov I, Kim J, Ou E et al (2015) Continuous carbon nanotube-ultrathin graphite hybrid foams for increased thermal conductivity and suppressed subcooling in composite phase change materials. ACS Nano 9:11699–11707. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b02917CrossRef

46.

Kim JH, Ha SY, Lee YM (2001) Gas permeation of poly (amide-6-b-ethylene oxide) copolymer. J Memb Sci 190:179–193CrossRef

47.

Koohsaryan E, Anbia M (2016) Nanosized and hierarchical zeolites: a short review. Chin J Catal 37:447–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(15)61038-5CrossRef

48.

Kosinov N, Gascon J, Kapteijn F, Hensen EJM (2016) Recent developments in zeolite membranes for gas separation. J Memb Sci 499:65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.049CrossRef

49.

Kumar R, Saraswat VK, Kumar M et al (2017) Hydrogen gas separation with controlled selectivity via efficient and cost effective block copolymer coated PET membranes. Int J Hydrog Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.113CrossRef

50.

Kumar S, Srivastava S, Agrawal S et al (2011) Effect of electric field alignment of MWCNT in PMMA matrix for hydrogen gas purification. AIP Conf Proc 1349:1061–1062. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3606228CrossRef

51.

Kuwahara Y, Morita M, Nagami T, et al (2009) Functionalization of a polymer using nanoparticles immobilized in supercritical carbon dioxide. Jpn J Appl Phys 48:06FF13

52.

Li B, Wen H-M, Yu Y et al (2018) Nanospace within metal–organic frameworks for gas storage and separation. Mater Today Nano 2:21–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtnano.2018.09.003CrossRef

53.

Li L, Song C, Jiang D, Wang T (2017) Preparation and enhanced gas separation performance of carbon/carbon nanotubes (C/CNTs) hybrid membranes. Sep Purif Technol 188:73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.07.019CrossRef

54.

Lin R-B, Xiang S, Xing H et al (2019) Exploration of porous metal–organic frameworks for gas separation and purification. Coord Chem Rev 378:87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.09.027CrossRef

55.

Lindemann P, Tsotsalas M, Shishatskiy S et al (2014) Preparation of freestanding conjugated microporous polymer nanomembranes for gas separation. Chem Mater 26:7189–7193CrossRef

56.

Liu D, Li X, Geng H et al (2018) Development of Nb35Mo5Ti30Ni30alloy membrane for hydrogen separation applications. J Memb Sci 553:171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.02.052CrossRef

57.

Liu J, Wei J (2014) Knudsen diffusion in channels and networks. Chem Eng Sci 111:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2014.01.014CrossRef

58.

Liu Q, Gupta KM, Xu Q et al (2019) Gas permeation through double-layer graphene oxide membranes: the role of interlayer distance and pore offset. Sep Purif Technol 209:419–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.044CrossRef

59.

Ma P-C, Siddiqui NA, Marom G, Kim J-K (2010) Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: a review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 41:1345–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003CrossRef

60.

Ma X, Swaidan R, Teng B et al (2013) Carbon molecular sieve gas separation membranes based on an intrinsically microporous polyimide precursor. Carbon NY 62:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.057CrossRef

61.

Malzbender J (2016) Mechanical aspects of ceramic membrane materials. Ceram Int 42:7899–7911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.02.136CrossRef

62.

McCool BA, DeSisto WJ (2005) Amino-functionalized silica membranes for enhanced carbon dioxide permeation. Adv Funct Mater 15:1635–1640CrossRef

63.

Moss TS, Peachey NM, Snow RC, Dye RC (1998) Multilayer metal membranes for hydrogen separation. Int J Hydrog Energy 23:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(97)00030-XCrossRef

64.

Ng LY, Mohammad AW, Leo CP, Hilal N (2013) Polymeric membranes incorporated with metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: a comprehensive review. Desalination 308:15–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.11.033CrossRef

65.

Nwogu NC, Anyanwu EE, Gobina E (2016) An initial investigation of a nano-composite silica ceramic membrane for hydrogen gas separation and purification. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:8228–8235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.162CrossRef

66.

Ockwig NW, Nenoff TM (2009) Membranes for hydrogen separation. Chem Rev 110:2573–2574. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr078108lCrossRef

67.

Paglieri SN, Way JD (2002) Innovations in palladium membrane research. Sep Purif Methods 31:1–169. https://doi.org/10.1081/SPM-120006115CrossRef

68.

Pandey P, Chauhan RS (2001) Membranes for gas separation. Progr Polym Sci 26:853–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00009-0CrossRef

69.

Patel AK, Acharya NK (2018) Metal coated and nanofiller doped polycarbonate membrane for hydrogen transport. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:21675–21682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.205CrossRef

70.

Phillip WA, O’Neill B, Rodwogin M et al (2010) Self-assembled block copolymer thin films as water filtration membranes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:847–853CrossRef

71.

Álvarez-Fernández R, Beltrán Cilleruelo F, IVM (2016) A new approach to battery powered electric vehicles: a hydrogen fuel-cell range extender system. Int J Hydrog Energy 41:4808–4819

72.

Rahimpour MR, Samimi F, Babapoor A et al (2017) Palladium membranes applications in reaction systems for hydrogen separation and purification: a review. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 121:24–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2017.07.021CrossRef

73.

Robeson LM (1991) Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric membranes. J Memb Sci 62:165–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-JCrossRef

74.

Sadilov IS, Petukhov DI, Eliseev AA (2019) Enhancing gas separation efficiency by surface functionalization of nanoporous membranes. Sep Purif Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.03.078CrossRef

75.

Sadykov VA, Krasnov AV, Fedorova YE et al (2018) Novel nanocomposite materials for oxygen and hydrogen separation membranes. Int J Hydrog Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.182CrossRef

76.

Sanders DF, Smith ZP, Guo R et al (2013) Energy-efficient polymeric gas separation membranes for a sustainable future: a review. Polymer (Guildf) 54:4729–4761. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POLYMER.2013.05.075CrossRef

77.

Sanip SM, Ismail AF, Goh PS et al (2011) Gas separation properties of functionalized carbon nanotubes mixed matrix membranes. Sep Purif Technol 78:208–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEPPUR.2011.02.003CrossRef

78.

Segalman RA (2005) Patterning with block copolymer thin films. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 48:191–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2004.12.003CrossRef

79.

Sharma A, Kumar S, Tripathi B et al (2009) Aligned CNT/Polymer nanocomposite membranes for hydrogen separation. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:3977–3982. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2009.02.068CrossRef

80.

Sharma A, Tripathi B, Vijay YK (2010) Dramatic Improvement in properties of magnetically aligned CNT/polymer nanocomposites. J Memb Sci 361:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.005CrossRef

81.

Sharma A, Vijay YK (2012) Effect of electric field variation in alignment of SWNT/PC nanocomposites. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:3945–3948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.166CrossRef

82.

Shi Z, Wu S, Szpunar JA, Roshd M (2006) An observation of palladium membrane formation on a porous stainless steel substrate by electroless deposition. J Memb Sci 280:705–711CrossRef

83.

Shimekit B, Mukhtar H, Murugesan T (2011) Prediction of the relative permeability of gases in mixed matrix membranes. J Memb Sci 373:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.02.038CrossRef

84.

Sirelkhatim A, Mahmud S, Seeni A et al (2015) Review on zinc oxide nanoparticles: antibacterial activity and toxicity mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett 7:219–242CrossRef

85.

Song N, Gao X, Ma Z et al (2018) A review of graphene-based separation membrane: materials, characteristics, preparation and applications. Desalination 437:59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DESAL.2018.02.024CrossRef

86.

Sridhar S, Bee S, Bhargava SK (2014) Membrane-based gas separation : principle, applications and future potential. 1–25

87.

Sudowe R, Vater W, Ensinger W et al (1999) Basic research on nuclear track microfilters for gas separation. Radiat Meas 31:691–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00179-1CrossRef

88.

Sun M, Li J (2018) Graphene oxide membranes: functional structures, preparation and environmental applications. Nano Today 20:121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2018.04.007CrossRef

89.

Swain SS, Unnikrishnan L, Mohanty S, Nayak SK (2017) Carbon nanotubes as potential candidate for separation of H₂CO₂ gas pairs. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:29283–29299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.152CrossRef

90.

Tao Y, Xue Q, Liu Z et al (2014) Tunable hydrogen separation in porous graphene membrane: first-principle and molecular dynamic simulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:8048–8058. https://doi.org/10.1021/am4058887CrossRef

91.

Tersoff J, Ruoff RS (1994) Structural properties of a carbon-nanotube crystal. Phys Rev Lett 73:676–679. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.73.676

92.

Thakkar H, Lawson S, Rownaghi AA, Rezaei F (2018) Development of 3D-printed polymer-zeolite composite monoliths for gas separation. Chem Eng J 348:109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.178CrossRef

93.

Thomas C, James BD, Lomax FD, Kuhn IF (2000) Fuel options for the fuel cell vehicle: hydrogen, methanol or gasoline? Int J Hydrog Energy 25:551–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(99)00064-6CrossRef

94.

Urch H, Geismann C, Ulbricht M, Epple M (2006) Deposition of functionalized calcium phosphate nanoparticles on functionalized polymer surfaces. Mater und Werkstofftechnik Entwicklung, Fert Prüfung, Eig und Anwendungen Tech Werkstoffe 37:422–425

95.

van Zoelen W, ten Brinke G (2009) Thin films of complexed block copolymers. Soft Matter 5:1568–1582CrossRef

96.

Verweij H (2003) Ceramic membranes: morphology and transport. J Mater Sci 38:4677–4695CrossRef

97.

Wang M, Wang Z, Zhao S et al (2017) Recent advances on mixed matrix membranes for CO₂ separation. Chin J Chem Eng 25:1581–1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2017.07.006CrossRef

98.

Wang Y, Yang Q, Zhong C, Li J (2017) Theoretical investigation of gas separation in functionalized nanoporous graphene membranes. Appl Surf Sci 407:532–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.253CrossRef

99.

Ward TL, Dao T (1999) Model of hydrogen permeation behavior in palladium membranes. J Memb Sci 153:211–231CrossRef

100.

Wee S-L, Tye C-T, Bhatia S (2008) Membrane separation process—pervaporation through zeolite membrane. Sep Purif Technol 63:500–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2008.07.010CrossRef

101.

Wei S, Zhou S, Wu Z et al (2018) Mechanistic insights into porous graphene membranes for helium separation and hydrogen purification. Appl Surf Sci 441:631–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.111CrossRef

102.

Weng T-H, Tseng H-H, Wey M-Y (2009) Preparation and characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotube/PBNPI nanocomposite membrane for H₂/CH₄ separation. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:8707–8715CrossRef

103.

Wijmans JG, Baker RW (1995) The solution-diffusion model: a review. J Memb Sci 107:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(95)00102-ICrossRef

104.

Wijmans JGH, Baker RW (2006) The solution-diffusion model: a unified approach to membrane permeation. Materials science of membranes for gas and vapor separation. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 159–189CrossRef

105.

Yamazaki IM, Paterson R, Geraldo LP (1996) A new generation of track etched membranes for microfiltration and ultrafiltration. Part I: Preparation and characterisation. J Memb Sci 118:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(96)00098-1CrossRef

106.

Yampolskii Y (2012) Polymeric gas separation membranes. Macromolecules 45:3298–3311. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma300213bCrossRef

107.

Yilanci A, Dincer I, Ozturk HK (2009) A review on solar-hydrogen/fuel cell hybrid energy systems for stationary applications. Prog Energy Combust Sci 35:231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PECS.2008.07.004CrossRef

108.

Yu S, Welp U, Hua LZ et al (2005) Fabrication of palladium nanotubes and their application in hydrogen sensing. Chem Mater 17:3445–3450. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm048191iCrossRef

109.

Zhang J, Liu X, Neri G, Pinna N (2016) Nanostructured materials for room-temperature gas sensors. Adv Mater 28:795–831CrossRef

110.

Zhang J, Xin Q, Li X et al (2019) Mixed matrix membranes comprising aminosilane-functionalized graphene oxide for enhanced CO₂ separation. J Memb Sci 570–571:343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.075CrossRef

111.

Zhang W, Gaggl M, Gluth GJG, Behrendt F (2014) Gas separation using porous cement membrane. J Environ Sci 26:140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60389-7CrossRef

112.

Zito PF, Caravella A, Brunetti A et al (2017) Knudsen and surface diffusion competing for gas permeation inside silicalite membranes. J Memb Sci 523:456–469CrossRef

113.

Zito PF, Caravella A, Brunetti A et al (2018) Discrimination among gas translation, surface and Knudsen diffusion in permeation through zeolite membranes. J Memb Sci 564:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.07.023CrossRef

Titel: Nanoporous Polymeric Membranes for Hydrogen Separation
verfasst von: Rajesh Kumar
Kamakshi
Manoj Kumar
Kamlendra Awasthi
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Nanotechnology for Energy and Environmental Engineering
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33773-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-33774-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33774-2_15

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht