nach oben

Group Decision and Negotiation

Erschienen in:

19.07.2015

Negotiation Based on Fuzzy Logic and Knowledge Engineering: Some Case Studies

verfasst von: Erick González, Rafael Alejandro Espín, Eduardo Fernández

Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

One of the most recent mathematical models for negotiation is the Compensatory Negotiation Solution by Knowledge Engineering (CNSKE). In this model a logic system called Compensatory Fuzzy Logic was used, which is more adequate to solve problems of decision making than the classical one probabilistic fuzzy logic system. The idempotency axiom of this system and the continuity of the operators allow the truth-values of the membership function to have a cardinal and not exclusively ordinal semantic meaning. On the other hand, continuity also makes ‘sensible’ the truth-values of the predicates. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the advantages of the CNSKE over other approaches in Game Theory. To show these advantages, some case studies are analyzed, consisting on the solution of three problems in which CNSKE is applied in economic and politic cases of negotiation, and compared with other alternative approaches.

Vorheriger Artikel Group Decision Making with Dispersion in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Nächster Artikel Consistency in MCGDM Problems with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on an Exponential Score Function

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Alonso-Meijide JM, Fiestras-Janeiro MG (2002) Modification of the Banzhaf value for games with a coalition structure. Ann Oper Res 109(1–4):213–227CrossRef

Bazerman M, Neale M (1992) Negotiating rationally. The Free Press, New York

Buchanan B, Shortliffe E (1984) Knowledge engineering. In: Buchanan BG, Shortliffe EH (eds) Rule-based expert systems—the MYCIN experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, pp 147–158

Casagrande T, Ranganathan N (2015) GTFUZZ: a novel algorithm for robust dynamic power optimization via gate sizing with fuzzy games. In: Proceedings of the 2015 design, automation and test in Europe conference & exhibition (pp. 677–682). EDA consortium

Cobanli O (2014) Central Asian gas in Eurasian power game. Energy Policy 68:348–370CrossRef

Dubois D, Esteva F, Godo L, Prade H (2007) Fuzzy-set based logic- an history -oriented presentation of their main developments. In: Gabbay D, Woods J (eds) Handbook of the history of logic. Elsevier, B.V., Amsterdam, pp 325–449

Espín R, Fernández E, Mazcorro G, Lecich M (2007) A fuzzy approach to cooperative n-person games. Eur J Oper Res 176(3):1735–1751CrossRef

Espín R, Fernández E, González E (2011) A logic system for reasoning and decision taking: the geometric mean based compensatory logic (in spanish). Revista Investigación Operacional 32(3):230–245

Espín R, Fernández E, González E (2014) Compensatory fuzzy logic: a frame for reasoning and modeling preference knowledge in intelligent systems. In: Espin R, Bello R, Marx J (eds) Soft computing for business intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–23CrossRef

Fisher R, Ury W (1983) Getting to yes: negotiating an agreement without giving in. Penguin Books, New York

Fitzgerald ME, Ross AM (2015) Effects of enhanced multi-party tradespace visualization on a two-person negotiation. Procedia Comput Sci 44:466–475CrossRef

French S (1986) Decision theory: an introduction to the mathematics of rationality. Halsted Press, New York

González E, Espín R, Mazcorro G (2012) Fuzzy negotiation solutions of N-person cooperative games by knowledge engineering in bargaining. Group Decis Negot 21(2):133–152CrossRef

González E, Espín R, Mazcorro G, Espín R (2013a) Existence and uniqueness of two fuzzy solutions to cooperative games. In: Fourth international workshop on knowledge discovery, knowledge management and decision support. Atlantis Press, pp 64–70

González E, Espín R, Mazcorro G, Muñoz S (2013b) Rationality of two fuzzy negotiation solutions by knowledge engineering to n-person cooperative games. In: Fourth international workshop on knowledge discovery, knowledge management and decision support. Atlantis Press, pp 55–63

Guajardo M, Jörnsten K (2015) Common mistakes in computing the nucleolus. Eur J Oper Res 241(3):931–935CrossRef

Hanscomb S (2015) Assessment and the self: academic practice and character attributes. J Learn Dev Higher Educ 2015(8)

Hart S (1997a) Classical cooperative theory I: core-like concepts. In: Hart S, Mas-Colell A (eds) Cooperation: game theoretic approaches. Springer, New York, pp 35–42CrossRef

Hart S (1997b) Classical cooperative theory II: value-like solutions. In: Hart S, Mas-Colell A (eds) Cooperation: game theoretic approaches. Springer, New York, pp 43–49CrossRef

Hiller T (2015) The importance of players in teams of the German Bundesliga in the season 2012/2013-a cooperative game theory approach. Appl Econ Lett 22(4):324–329CrossRef

Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291CrossRef

Korobkin R (2008) Against integrative bargaining. Case West Reserve Law Rev 58(4):1323–1342

Leng M, Parlar M, Zhang D (2014) Cooperative game analysis of retail space-exchange problems. Eur J Oper Res 232(2):393–404CrossRef

Lewicki R, Weiss S, Lewin D (1992) Models of conflict, negotiation and third party intervention: a review and synthesis. J Org Behav 13(3):209–252CrossRef

Menkel-Meadow C (1993) Lawyer negotiations: theories and realities what we learn from mediation. Mod Law Rev Limit 56(3):361–379CrossRef

Mircică N (2014) Constructive communication in effective negotiation. Anal Metaphys 13:64–72

Mizumoto M (1989) Pictorial representations of fuzzy connectives: part II. Cases of compensatory operators and self-dual operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 32(1):45–79CrossRef

Newton J, Sawa R (2015) A one-shot deviation principle for stability in matching problems. J Econ Theory 157:1–27CrossRef

Peneva V, Popchev I (2006) Models for weighted aggregation of fuzzy relations to multicriteria decision making problems. Cybern Inform Technol 6(3):3–18

Rahaman M, Ahmad R (2015) Fuzzy vector equilibrium problem. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 12(1):115–122

Raiffa H (1982) The art and science of negotiation. Harvard University Press, London

Raiffa H (1991) Contributions of applied systems analysis to international negotiation. In: Kremenyuk V (ed) International negotiation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 5–21

Tao Z, Liu X, Chen H, Chen Z (2015) Group decision making with fuzzy linguistic preference relations via cooperative games method. Comput Indust Eng 83:184–192CrossRef

Thomas L (1984) Games, theory and applications. Wiley, New York

Winter E (2002) The shapley value. In: Aumann RJ, Hart S (eds) Handbook of game theory with economic applications. Elsevier, B.V., Amsterdam, pp 2025–2054

Zadeh L (2002) From computing with numbers to computing with words—from manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci 12(3):307–324

Titel: Negotiation Based on Fuzzy Logic and Knowledge Engineering: Some Case Studies
verfasst von: Erick González
Rafael Alejandro Espín
Eduardo Fernández
Publikationsdatum: 19.07.2015
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0926-2644
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9907
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-015-9446-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Group Decision Making with Dispersion in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Concessions Dynamics in Electronic Negotiations: A Cross-Lagged Regression Analysis

Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis

An Extended PROMETHE II Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Technique Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic for Sustainable Energy Planning

A Hierarchical Clustering Approach Based on Three-Dimensional Gray Relational Analysis for Clustering a Large Group of Decision Makers with Double Information

Team Foresight in New Product Development Projects