nach oben

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Erschienen in:

16.09.2016 | REVIEW ARTICLE

On design optimization for structural crashworthiness and its state of the art

verfasst von: Jianguang Fang, Guangyong Sun, Na Qiu, Nam H. Kim, Qing Li

Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Optimization for structural crashworthiness and energy absorption has become an important topic of research attributable to its proven benefits to public safety and social economy. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the important studies on design optimization for structural crashworthiness and energy absorption. First, the design criteria used in crashworthiness and energy absorption are reviewed and the surrogate modeling to evaluate these criteria is discussed. Second, multiobjective optimization, optimization under uncertainties and topology optimization are reviewed from concepts, algorithms to applications in relation to crashworthiness. Third, the crashworthy structures are summarized, from generically novel structural configurations to industrial applications. Finally, some conclusions and recommendations are provided to enable academia and industry to become more aware of the available capabilities and recent developments in design optimization for structural crashworthiness and energy absorption.

Vorheriger Artikel Grayscale-free topology optimization for electromagnetic design problem of in-vehicle reactor

Nächster Artikel Reliability-based design optimization of composite stiffened panels in post-buckling regime

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abbasi M, Ghafari-Nazari A, Reddy S, Fard M (2014) A new approach for optimizing automotive crashworthiness: concurrent usage of ANFIS and Taguchi method. Struct Multidisc Optim 49:485–499

Abdullah K, Wild P, Jeswiet J, Ghasempoor A (2001) Tensile testing for weld deformation properties in similar gage tailor welded blanks using the rule of mixtures. J Mater Process Technol 112:91–97CrossRef

Abramowicz W, Jones N (1984) Dynamic axial crushing of square tubes. Int J Impact Eng 2:179–208CrossRef

Abramowicz W, Jones N (1986) Dynamic progressive buckling of circular and square tubes. Int J Impact Eng 4:243–270CrossRef

Abramowicz W, Wierzbicki T (1989) Axial crushing of multicorner sheet metal columns. J Appl Mech 56:113–120CrossRef

Acar E (2010a) Optimizing the shape parameters of radial basis functions: an application to automobile crashworthiness. Proc Institution Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng 224:1541–1553CrossRef

Acar E (2010b) Various approaches for constructing an ensemble of metamodels using local measures. Struct Multidisc Optim 42:879–896

Acar E, Rais-Rohani M (2009) Ensemble of metamodels with optimized weight factors. Struct Multidisc Optim 37:279–294

Acar E, Solanki K (2009a) Improving the accuracy of vehicle crashworthiness response predictions using an ensemble of metamodels. Int J Crashworth 14:49–61CrossRef

Acar E, Solanki K (2009b) System reliability based vehicle design for crashworthiness and effects of various uncertainty reduction measures. Struct Multidisc Optim 39:311–325

Acar E, Guler MA, Gerceker B, Cerit ME, Bayram B (2011) Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of tapered thin-walled tubes with axisymmetric indentations. Thin-Walled Struct 49:94–105CrossRef

Ahmetoglu MA, Brouwers D, Shulkin L, Taupin L, Kinzel GL, Altan T (1995) Deep drawing of round cups from tailor-welded blanks. J Mater Process Technol 53:684–694CrossRef

Alexander J (1960) An approximate analysis of the collapse of thin cylindrical shells under axial loading. Quarter J Mech Appl Math 13:10–15MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Allahbakhsh HR, Saetni J (2011) Design optimization of square and circular aluminium extrusion damage columns with crashworthiness criteria. Indian J Eng Mater Sci 18:341–350

Allahbakhsh HR, Saemi J, Hourali M (2011) Design optimization of square aluminium damage columns with crashworthiness criteria. Mechanika:187–192

Antony J (2002) Design for six sigma: a breakthrough business improvement strategy for achieving competitive advantage. Work Stud 51:6–8CrossRef

Aspenberg D, Jergeus J, Nilsson L (2012) Robust optimization of front members in a full frontal car impact. Eng Optim 45:245–264CrossRef

Astori P, Impari F (2013) Crash response optimisation of helicopter seat and subfloor. Int J Crashworth 18:570–578CrossRef

Avalle M, Chiandussi G (2007) Optimisation of a vehicle energy absorbing steel component with experimental validation. Int J Impact Eng 34:843–858CrossRef

Avalle M, Chiandussi G, Belingardi G (2002) Design optimization by response surface methodology: application to crashworthiness design of vehicle structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 24:325–332

Bae GH, Huh H (2012) Comparison of the optimum designs of center pillar assembly of an auto-body between conventional steel and ahss with a simplified side impact analysis. Int J Automot Technol 13:205–213CrossRef

Bandi P, Schmiedeler JP, Tovar A (2013) Design of crashworthy structures with controlled energy absorption in the hybrid cellular automaton framework. J Mech Des 135:091002CrossRef

Baril C, Yacout S, Clement B (2011) Design for six sigma through collaborative multiobjective optimization. Comput Ind Eng 60:43–55CrossRef

Belingardi G, Beyene AT, Koricho EG (2013) Geometrical optimization of bumper beam profile made of pultruded composite by numerical simulation. Compos Struct 102:217–225CrossRef

Beyer H-G, Sendhoff B (2007) Robust optimization–a comprehensive survey. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196:3190–3218MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Bi J, Fang H, Wang Q, Ren X (2010) Modeling and optimization of foam-filled thin-walled columns for crashworthiness designs. Finite Elem Anal Des 46:698–709CrossRef

Bisagni C, Lanzi L, Ricci S (2002) Optimization of helicopter subfloor components under crashworthiness requirements using neural networks. J Aircr 39:296–304CrossRef

Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford university press

Blumhardt R (2001) FEM - crash simulation and optimization. Int J Veh Des 26:331–347CrossRef

Bojanowski C, Kulak RF (2011) Multi-objective optimisation and sensitivity analysis of a paratransit bus structure for rollover and side impact tests. Int J Crashworth 16:665–676CrossRef

Borvik T, Hopperstad OS, Reyes A, Langseth M, Solomos G, Dyngeland T (2003) Empty and foam-filled circular aluminium tubes subjected to axial and oblique quasi-static loading. Int J Crashworth 8:481–494CrossRef

Breyfogle III FW (2003) Implementing six sigma: smarter solutions using statistical methods. John Wiley & Sons

Chen WG (2001) Optimisation for minimum weight of foam-filled tubes under large twisting rotation. Int J Crashworth 6:223–241CrossRef

Chen W, Allen JK, Tsui K-L, Mistree F (1996) A procedure for robust design: minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors. J Mech Des 118:478–485CrossRef

Chen Z, Qiu H, Gao L, Li X, Li P (2014) A local adaptive sampling method for reliability-based design optimization using Kriging model. Struct Multidisc Optim 49:401–416

Chiandussi G, Avalle M (2002) Maximisation of the crushing performance of a tubular device by shape optimisation. Comput Struct 80:2425–2432CrossRef

Cho Y-B, Bae C-H, Suh M-W, Sin H-C (2006) A vehicle front frame crash design optimization using hole-type and dent-type crush initiator. Thin-Walled Struct 44:415–428CrossRef

Cho Y-B, Bae C-H, Suh M-W, Sin H-C (2008) Maximisation of crash energy absorption by crash trigger for vehicle front frame using the homogenisation method. Int J Veh Des 46:23–50CrossRef

Choi W, Park G (1999) Transformation of dynamic loads into equivalent static loads based on modal analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46:29–43MATHCrossRef

Christensen J, Bastien C, Blundell MV (2012) Effects of roof crush loading scenario upon body in white using topology optimisation. Int J Crashworth 17:29–38CrossRef

Christensen J, Bastien C, Blundell MV, Batt PA (2013) Buckling considerations and cross-sectional geometry development for topology optimised body in white. Int J Crashworth 18:319–330CrossRef

Chuang C, Yang R (2012) Benchmark of topology optimization methods for crashworthiness design. In: 12th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Dearborn, Michigan, USA

Chuang C, Yang R, Li G, Mallela K, Pothuraju P (2008) Multidisciplinary design optimization on vehicle tailor rolled blank design. Struct Multidisc Optim 35:551–560

Coello CAC, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS (2004) Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. Evol Comput, IEEE Trans 8:256–279CrossRef

Costas M, Díaz J, Romera L, Hernández S (2014) A multi-objective surrogate-based optimization of the crashworthiness of a hybrid impact absorber. Int J Mech Sci 88:46–54CrossRef

Couckuyt I, Deschrijver D, Dhaene T (2014) Fast calculation of multiobjective probability of improvement and expected improvement criteria for Pareto optimization. J Glob Optim 60:575–594MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Craig KJ, Stander N, Dooge DA, Varadappa S (2005) Automotive crashworthiness design using response surface-based variable screening and optimization. Eng Comput 22:38–61MATHCrossRef

Cristello N, Kim IY (2007) Multidisciplinary design optimization of a zero-emission vehicle chassis considering crashworthiness and hydroformability. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng 221:511–526CrossRef

Das I, Dennis JE (1997) A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems. Struct Optimization 14:63–69CrossRef

Davis SC, Diegel SW, Boundy RG (2013) Transportation energy data book. 32 edn., Oak Ridge National Lab

Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. Evol Comput, IEEE Trans 6:182–197CrossRef

Draper NR, Smith H (1981) Applied regression analysis 2nd ed

Du Bois P et al. (2004) Vehicle crashworthiness and occupant protection

Duan S, Tao Y, Han X, Yang X, Hou S, Hu Z (2014) Investigation on structure optimization of crashworthiness of fiber reinforced polymers materials. Composit Part B-Eng 60:471–478CrossRef

Duddeck F (2008) Multidisciplinary optimization of car bodies. Struct Multidisc Optim 35:375–389

Esfahlani SS, Shirvani H, Shirvani A, Nwaubani S, Mebrahtu H, Chirwa C (2013) Hexagonal honeycomb cell optimisation by way of meta-model techniques. Int J Crashworth 18:264–275CrossRef

Fang H, Rais-Rohani M, Liu Z, Horstemeyer MF (2005) A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization. Comput Struct 83:2121–2136CrossRef

Fang J, Gao Y, Sun G, Zhang Y, Li Q (2014a) Crashworthiness design of foam-filled bitubal Structures with uncertainty. Int J Non-Linear Mech

Fang J, Gao Y, Sun G, Zhang Y, Li Q (2014a) Parametric analysis and multiobjective optimization for functionally graded foam-filled thin-wall tube under lateral impact. Comput Mater Sci 90:265–275CrossRef

Fang J, Gao Y, Sun G, Xu C, Li Q (2015a) Multiobjective robust design optimization of fatigue life for a truck cab. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 135:1–8CrossRef

Fang J, Gao Y, Sun G, Zheng G, Li Q (2015b) Dynamic crashing behavior of new extrudable multi-cell tubes with a functionally graded thickness. Int J Mech Sci 103:63–73CrossRef

Fang J, Gao Y, An X, Sun G, Chen J, Li Q (2016) Design of transversely-graded foam and wall thickness structures for crashworthiness criteria. Compos Part B 92:338–349CrossRef

Farkas L, Moens D, Donders S, Vandepitte D (2012) Optimisation study of a vehicle bumper subsystem with fuzzy parameters. Mech Syst Signal Process 32:59–68CrossRef

Forrester A, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45:50–79CrossRef

Forrester A, Sobester A, Keane A (2008) Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide. John Wiley & Sons

Forsberg J, Nilsson L (2006) Evaluation of response surface methodologies used in crashworthiness optimization. Int J Impact Eng 32:759–777CrossRef

Forsberg J, Nilsson L (2007) Topology optimization in crashworthiness design. Struct Multidisc Optim 33:1–12

Friedman JH (1991) Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann Stat:1–67

Fu Y, Sahin KH (2004) Better Optimization of Nonlinear Uncertain Systems (BONUS) for vehicle structural design. Ann Oper Res 132:69–84MATHCrossRef

Gedikli H (2013) Crashworthiness optimization of foam-filled tailor-welded tube using coupled finite element and smooth particle hydrodynamics method. Thin-Walled Struct 67:34–48CrossRef

Ghamarian A, Zarei H (2012) Crashworthiness investigation of conical and cylindrical end-capped tubes under quasi-static crash loading. Int J Crashworth 17:19–28CrossRef

Goel T, Haftka R, Shyy W, Queipo NV (2007) Ensemble of surrogates. Struct Multidisc Optim 33:199–216

Goel T, Stander N, Lin Y-Y (2010) Efficient resource allocation for genetic algorithm based multi-objective optimization with 1,000 simulations. Struct Multidisc Optim 41:421–432

Gu L, Yang R, Tho CH, Makowski M, Faruque O, Li Y (2001) Optimization and robustness for crashworthiness of side impact. Int J Veh Des 26:348–360CrossRef

Gu J, Li GY, Dong Z (2012) Hybrid and adaptive meta-model-based global optimization. Eng Optim 44:87–104CrossRef

Gu X, Sun G, Li G, Mao L, Li Q (2013) A Comparative study on multiobjective reliable and robust optimization for crashworthiness design of vehicle structure. Struct Multidisc Optim 48:669–684

Guo L, Tovar A, Penninger CL, Renaud JE (2011) Strain-based topology optimisation for crashworthiness using hybrid cellular automata. Int J Crashworth 16:239–252CrossRef

Gupta NK, Velmurugan R (1999) Axial compression of empty and foam filled composite conical shells. J Compos Mater 33:567–591CrossRef

Haftka R, Villanueva D, Chaudhuri A (2016) Parallel surrogate-assisted global optimization with expensive functions–a survey. Struct Multidisc Optim 54:3–13

Hajela P, Lee E (1997) Topological optimization of rotorcraft subfloor structures for crashworthiness considerations. Comput Struct 64:65–76MATHCrossRef

Hamza K, Saitou K (2012) A co-evolutionary approach for design optimization via ensembles of surrogates with application to vehicle crashworthiness. J Mech Design 134

Hamza K, Shalaby M (2014) A framework for parallelized efficient global optimization with application to vehicle crashworthiness optimization. Eng Optim 46:1200–1221CrossRef

Han J, Yamazaki K (2003) Crashworthiness optimization of S-shape square tubes. Int J Veh Des 31:72–85CrossRef

Hanssen AG, Langseth M, Hopperstad OS (2000) Static and dynamic crushing of circular aluminium extrusions with aluminium foam filler. Int J Impact Eng 24:475–507MATHCrossRef

Hanssen AG, Langseth M, Hopperstad OS (2001) Optimum design for energy absorption of square aluminium columns with aluminium foam filler. Int J Mech Sci 43:153–176MATHCrossRef

Hanssen AG, Stobener K, Rausch G, Langseth M, Keller H (2006) Optimisation of energy absorption of an A-pillar by metal foam insert. Int J Crashworth 11:231–241CrossRef

Hardy RL (1971) Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces. J Geophys Res 76:1905–1915CrossRef

Helton JC, Johnson JD, Sallaberry CJ, Storlie CB (2006) Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliability Eng Syst Saf 91:1175–1209CrossRef

Hohenbichler M, Rackwitz R (1982) First-order concepts in system reliability. Struct Saf 1:177–188CrossRef

Hong UP, Park G (2003) Determination of the crash pulse and optimization of the crash components using the response surface approximate optimization. Proc Institution Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng 217:203–213CrossRef

Horstemeyer MF, Ren XC, Fang H, Acar E, Wang PT (2009) A comparative study of design optimisation methodologies for side-impact crashworthiness, using injury-based versus energy-based criterion. Int J Crashworth 14:125–138CrossRef

Hou S, Li Q, Long S, Yang X, Li W (2007) Design optimization of regular hexagonal thin-walled columns with crashworthiness criteria. Finite Elem Anal Des 43:555–565CrossRef

Hou S, Li Q, Long S, Yanga X, Li W (2008a) Multiobjective optimization of multi-cell sections for the crashworthiness design. Int J Impact Eng 35:1355–1367CrossRef

Hou S, Li Q, Long SY, Yang XJ, Li W (2008b) Multiobjective optimization of multi-cell sections for the crashworthiness design. Int J Impact Eng 35:1355–1367CrossRef

Hou S, Li Q, Long S, Yang X, Li W (2009) Crashworthiness design for foam filled thin-wall structures. Mater Des 30:2024–2032CrossRef

Hou S, Han X, Sun G, Long S, Li W, Yang X, Li Q (2011) Multiobjective optimization for tapered circular tubes. Thin-Walled Struct 49:855–863CrossRef

Hou S, Dong D, Ren L, Han X (2012) Multivariable crashworthiness optimization of vehicle body by unreplicated saturated factorial design. Struct Multidisc Optim 46:891–905

Hou S, Liu T, Dong D, Han X (2014a) Factor screening and multivariable crashworthiness optimization for vehicle side impact by factorial design. Struct Multidisc Optim 49:147–167

Hou S, Tan W, Zheng Y, Han X, Li Q (2014b) Optimization design of corrugated beam guardrail based on RBF-MQ surrogate model and collision safety consideration. Adv Eng Softw 78:28–40CrossRef

Hou S, Zhang Z, Yang X, Yin H, Li Q (2014c) Crashworthiness optimization of new thin-walled cellular configurations. Eng Comput 31:4–4

Huang X, Xie YM, Lu G (2007) Topology optimization of energy-absorbing structures. Int J Crashworth 12:663–675CrossRef

Hunkeler S, Duddeck F, Rayamajhi M, Zimmer H (2013) Shape optimisation for crashworthiness followed by a robustness analysis with respect to shape variables. Struct Multidisc Optim 48:367–378

Ingrassia T, Nigrelli V, Buttitta R (2013) A comparison of simplex and simulated annealing for optimization of a new rear underrun protective device. Eng Comput 29:345–358CrossRef

Jacob GC, Fellers JF, Simunovic S, Starbuck JM (2002) Energy absorption in polymer composites for automotive crashworthiness. J Compos Mater 36:813–850CrossRef

Jansson T, Nilsson L, Redhe M (2003) Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization – with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming. Struct Multidisc Optim 25:129–140

Jeong SB, Yi SI, Kan CD, Nagabhushana V, Park G (2008) Structural optimization of an automobile roof structure using equivalent static loads. Proc Institution Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng 222:1985–1995CrossRef

Jeong SB, Yoon S, Xu S, Park G (2010) Non-linear dynamic response structural optimization of an automobile frontal structure using equivalent static loads. Proc Institution Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng 224:489–501CrossRef

Jiang Z, Gu M (2010) Optimization of a fender structure for the crashworthiness design. Mater Des 31:1085–1095CrossRef

Jin R, Chen W, Simpson TW (2001) Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Struct Multidisc Optim 23:1–13

Jin R, Du X, Chen W (2003) The use of metamodeling techniques for optimization under uncertainty. Struct Multidisc Optim 25:99–116

Kang B, Choi W, Park G (2001) Structural optimization under equivalent static loads transformed from dynamic loads based on displacement. Comput Struct 79:145–154CrossRef

Kaushik A, Ramani A (2014) Topology optimization for nonlinear dynamic problems: considerations for automotive crashworthiness. Eng Optim 46:487–502CrossRef

Kaya N, Oeztuerk F (2010) Multi-objective crashworthiness design optimisation of thin-walled tubes. Int J Veh Des 52:54–63CrossRef

Keane AJ (2006) Statistical improvement criteria for use in multiobjective design optimization. AIAA J 44:879–891CrossRef

Khakhali A, Nariman-zadeh N, Darvizeh A, Masoumi A, Notghi B (2010) Reliability-based robust multi-objective crashworthiness optimisation of S-shaped box beams with parametric uncertainties. Int J Crashworth 15:443–456CrossRef

Kiani M, Gandikota I, Parrish A, Motoyama K, Rais-Rohani M (2013) Surrogate-based optimisation of automotive structures under multiple crash and vibration design criteria. Int J Crashworth 18:473–482CrossRef

Kiani M, Motoyama K, Rais-Rohani M, Shiozaki H (2014) Joint stiffness analysis and optimization as a mechanism for improving the structural design and performance of a vehicle. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng 228:689–700CrossRef

Kim HS (2001) Analysis of crash response of aluminium foam-filled front side rail of a passenger car. Int J Crashworth 6:189–207CrossRef

Kim HS (2002) New extruded multi-cell aluminum profile for maximum crash energy absorption and weight efficiency. Thin-Walled Struct 40:311–327CrossRef

Kim HS, Chen W, Wierzbicki T (2002) Weight and crash optimization of foam-filled three-dimensional “S” frame. Comput Mech 28:417–424MATHCrossRef

Kim S-H, Kim H, Kim NJ (2015) Brittle intermetallic compound makes ultrastrong low-density steel with large ductility. Nature 518:77–79CrossRef

Kinsey B, Liu Z, Cao J (2000) A novel forming technology for tailor-welded blanks. J Mater Process Technol 99:145–153CrossRef

Koch PN, Simpson TW, Allen JK, Mistree F (1999) Statistical approximations for multidisciplinary design optimization: the problem of size. J Aircr 36:275–286CrossRef

Koch PN, Yang R, Gu L (2004) Design for six sigma through robust optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 26:235–248CrossRef

Kurtaran H, Eskandarian A, Marzougui D, Bedewi NE (2002) Crashworthiness design optimization using successive response surface approximations. Comput Mech 29:409–421MATHCrossRef

Lanzi L, Bisagni C, Ricci S (2004a) Crashworthiness optimization of helicopter subfloor based on decomposition and global approximation. Struct Multidisc Optim 27:401–410

Lanzi L, Castelletti LML, Anghileri M (2004b) Multi-objective optimisation of composite absorber shape under crashworthiness requirements. Compos Struct 65:433–441CrossRef

Lee Y, Ahn J-S, Park G Crash optimization of automobile frontal and side structures using equivalent static loads.In: 11th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2015

Lee SH, Kim HY, Oh SI (2002) Cylindrical tube optimization using response surface method based on stochastic process. J Mater Process Technol 130:490–496CrossRef

Lee I, Choi KK, Noh Y, Zhao L, Gorsich D (2011) Sampling-based stochastic sensitivity analysis using score functions for RBDO problems with correlated random variables. J Mech Des 133:021003CrossRef

Lee S-J, Lee H-A, Yi S-I, Kim D-S, Yang HW, Park G (2013) Design flow for the crash box in a vehicle to maximize energy absorption. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng 227:179–200CrossRef

Liang C-C, Le G-N (2009) Bus rollover crashworthiness under European standard: an optimal analysis of superstructure strength using successive response surface method. Int J Crashworth 14:623–639CrossRef

Liao X, Li Q, Yang X, Li W, Zhang W (2008a) A two-stage multi-objective optimisation of vehicle crashworthiness under frontal impact. Int J Crashworth 13:279–288CrossRef

Liao X, Li Q, Yang X, Zhang W, Li W (2008b) Multiobjective optimization for crash safety design of vehicles using stepwise regression model. Struct Multidisc Optim 35:561–569

Liu Y (2008a) Crashworthiness design of multi-corner thin-walled columns. Thin-Walled Struct 46:1329–1337CrossRef

Liu Y (2008b) Design optimisation of tapered thin-walled square tubes. Int J Crashworth 13:543–550CrossRef

Liu Y (2008c) Optimum design of straight thin-walled box section beams for crashworthiness analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 44:139–147CrossRef

Liu Y (2010a) Crashworthiness design of thin-walled curved beams with box and channel cross sections. Int J Crashworth 15:413–423CrossRef

Liu Y (2010b) Thin-walled curved hexagonal beams in crashes - FEA and design. Int J Crashworth 15:151–159CrossRef

Liu S-T, Tong Z-Q, Tang Z-L, Zhang Z-H (2014) Design optimization of the S-frame to improve crashworthiness. Acta Mech Sin 30:589–599CrossRef

Lönn D, Öman M, Nilsson L, Simonsson K (2009) Finite element based robustness study of a truck cab subjected to impact loading. Int J Crashworth 14:111–124CrossRef

Lönn D, Fyllingen Ø, Nilssona L (2010) An approach to robust optimization of impact problems using random samples and meta-modelling. Int J Impact Eng 37:723–734CrossRef

Lönn D, Bergman G, Nilsson L, Simonsson K (2011) Experimental and finite element robustness studies of a bumper system subjected to an offset impact loading. Int J Crashworth 16:155–168CrossRef

Marklund PO, Nilsson L (2001) Optimization of a car body component subjected to side impact. Struct Multidisc Optim 21:383–392CrossRef

Marsolek J, Reimerdes HG (2004) Energy absorption of metallic cylindrical shells with induced non-axisymmetric folding patterns. Int J Impact Eng 30:1209–1223CrossRef

Marzbanrad J, Ebrahimi MR (2011) Multi-objective optimization of aluminum hollow tubes for vehicle crash energy absorption using a genetic algorithm and neural networks. Thin-Walled Struct 49:1605–1615CrossRef

Mayer RR, Kikuchi N, Scott RA (1996) Application of topological optimization techniques to structural crashworthiness. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39:1383–1403MATHCrossRef

McKittrick J et al (2010) Energy absorbent natural materials and bioinspired design strategies: A review. Mater Sci Eng C 30:331–342CrossRef

Messac A, Puemi-Sukam C, Melachrinoudis E (2000a) Aggregate objective functions and Pareto frontiers: required relationships and practical implications. Optim Eng 1:171–188MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Messac A, Sundararaj GJ, Tappeta RV, Renaud JE (2000b) Ability of objective functions to generate points on nonconvex Pareto frontiers. AIAA J 38:1084–1091

Milho JF, Ambrósio JAC, Pereira MFOS (2004) Design of train crash experimental tests by optimization procedures. Int J Crashworth 9:483–493CrossRef

Mohammadiha O, Beheshti H (2014) Optimization of functionally graded foam-filled conical tubes under axial impact loading. J Mech Sci Technol 28:1741–1752CrossRef

Montgomery DC (1996) Desing and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New York, EUA

Naceur H, Guo YQ, Ben-Elechi S (2006) Response surface methodology for design of sheet forming parameters to control springback effects. Comput Struct 84:1651–1663CrossRef

Najafi A, Rais-Rohani M (2012) Sequential coupled process-performance simulation and multi-objective optimization of thin-walled tubes. Mater Des 41:89–98CrossRef

Najafi A, Acar E, Rais-Rohani M (2014) Multi-objective robust design of energy-absorbing components using coupled process–performance simulations. Eng Optim 46:146–164CrossRef

Nguyen VS, Wen G, Yin H, Van TP (2014) Optimisation design of reinforced S-shaped frame structure under axial dynamic loading. Int J Crashworth 19:385–393CrossRef

Oman M, Nilsson L (2010) Structural optimization of product families subjected to multiple crash load cases. Struct Multidisc Optim 41:797–815CrossRef

O’Neill B (2009) Preventing passenger vehicle occupant injuries by vehicle design—a historical perspective from IIHS. Traffic Injury Prevent 10:113–126CrossRef

Ortmann C, Schumacher A (2013) Graph and heuristic based topology optimization of crash loaded structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 47:839–854MATHCrossRef

Pan F, Zhu P (2011a) Design optimisation of vehicle roof structures: benefits of using multiple surrogates. Int J Crashworth 16:85–95CrossRef

Pan F, Zhu P (2011b) Lightweight design of vehicle front-end structure: contributions of multiple surrogates. Int J Veh Des 57:124–147CrossRef

Pan F, Zhu P, Zhang Y (2010) Metamodel-based lightweight design of B-pillar with TWB structure via support vector regression. Comput Struct 88:36–44CrossRef

Park G (2011) Technical overview of the equivalent static loads method for non-linear static response structural optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 43:319–337

Park G, Lee T-H, Lee KH, Hwang K-H (2006) Robust design: an overview. AIAA J 44:181–191CrossRef

Parkinson A, Sorensen C, Pourhassan N (1993) A general approach for robust optimal design. J Mech Des 115:74–80CrossRef

Parrish A, Rais-Rohani M, Najafi A (2012) Crashworthiness optimisation of vehicle structures with magnesium alloy parts. Int J Crashworth 17:259–281CrossRef

Patel NM, Kang B-S, Renaud JE, Tovar A (2009) Crashworthiness design using topology optimization. J Mech Design 131

Paz J, Díaz J, Romera L, Costas M (2014) Crushing analysis and multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of GFRP honeycomb-filled energy absorption devices. Finite Elem Anal Des 91:30–39CrossRef

Pedersen CBW (2003a) Topology optimization design of crushed 2D-frames for desired energy absorption history. Struct Multidisc Optim 25:368–382CrossRef

Pedersen CBW (2003b) Topology optimization for crashworthiness of frame structures. Int J Crashworth 8:29–39CrossRef

Pedersen CBW (2004) Crashworthiness design of transient frame structures using topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:653–678MATHCrossRef

Qi C, Yang S (2014) Crashworthiness and lightweight optimisation of thin-walled conical tubes subjected to an oblique impact. Int J Crashworth 19:334–351CrossRef

Qi C, Yang S, Dong F (2012) Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of tapered square tubes under oblique impact loading. Thin-Walled Struct 59:103–119CrossRef

Qu X, Haftka R (2004) Reliability-based design optimization using probabilistic sufficiency factor. Struct Multidisc Optim 27:314–325CrossRef

Rais-Rohani M, Solanki KN, Acar E, Eamon CD (2010) Shape and sizing optimisation of automotive structures with deterministic and probabilistic design constraints. Int J Veh Des 54:309–338CrossRef

Rakheja S, Balike M, Hoa SV (1999) Study of an energy dissipative under-ride guard for enhancement of crashworthiness in a car-truck collision. Int J Veh Des 22:29–53CrossRef

Ramakrishna S (1997) Microstructural design of composite materials for crashworthy structural applications. Mater Des 18:167–173CrossRef

Ramu P, Kim NH, Haftka R (2007) Error amplification in failure probability estimates of small errors in surrogates. In: SAE 2007 World Congress. Detroit, Michigan, USA

Rangavajhala S, Mahadevan S (2013) Design optimization for robustness in multiple performance functions. Struct Multidisc Optim 47:523–538MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Raquel C, Naval P (2005) An effective use of crowding distance in multiobjective particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, Washington DC, USA. New York, NY, USA, pp 257-264

Redhe M, Nilsson L (2004) Optimization of the new Saab 9-3 exposed to impact load using a space mapping technique. Struct Multidisc Optim 27:411–420

Redhe M, Nilsson L (2006) A multipoint version of space mapping optimization applied to vehicle crashworthiness design. Struct Multidisc Optim 31:134–146CrossRef

Redhe M, Forsberg J, Jansson T, Marklund PO, Nilsson L (2002) Using the response surface methodology and the D-optimality criterion in crashworthiness related problems. Struct Multidisc Optim 24:185–194CrossRef

Redhe M, Giger M, Nilsson L (2004) An investigation of structural optimization in crashworthiness design using a stochastic approach - a comparison of stochastic optimization and the response surface methodology. Struct Multidisc Optim 27:446–459

Reid SR, Reddy TY (1986) Static and dynamic crushing of tapered sheet metal tubes of rectangular cross-section. Int J Mech Sci 28:623–637CrossRef

Reyes A, Hopperstad O, Hanssen A, Langseth M (2004) Modeling of material failure in foam-based components. Int J Impact Eng 30:805–834CrossRef

Roux W (2011) Topology Design using LS-TaSC™ Version 2 and LS-DYNA®

Rzesnitzek T, Müllerschön H, Günther FC, Wozniak M (2002) Two-Stage stochastic and deterministic optimization. In: 1st DYNAMORE Users’ Forum, Bad Mergentheim, German

Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP (1989) Design and analysis of computer experiments. Stat Sci 4:409–423MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Santosa SP, Wierzbicki T, Hanssen AG, Langseth M (2000) Experimental and numerical studies of foam-filled sections. Int J Impact Eng 24:509–534CrossRef

Schonlau M (1998) Computer experiments and global optimization. University of Waterloo

Seitzberger M, Rammerstorfer FG, Degischer HP, Gradinger R (1997) Crushing of axially compressed steel tubes filled with aluminium foam. Acta Mech 125:93–105MATHCrossRef

Seitzberger M, Rammerstorfer FG, Gradinger R, Degischer HP, Blaimschein M, Walch C (2000) Experimental studies on the quasi-static axial crushing of steel columns filled with aluminium foam. Int J Solids Struct 37:4125–4147CrossRef

Shakeri M, Mirzaeifar R, Salehghaffari S (2007) New insights into the collapsing of cylindrical thin-walled tubes under axial impact load. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part C-J Mech Eng Sci 221:869–885CrossRef

Shariati M, Allahbakhsh HR, Saemi J, Sedighi M (2010) Optimization of foam filled spot-welded column for the crashworthiness design. Mechanika:10-16

Sheldon A, Helwig E, Cho Y-B (2011) Investigation and application of multi-disciplinary optimization for automotive body-in-white development. In: 8th European LS-DYNA Users conference, Strasbourg, 23–24

Shi Q, Hagiwara I (2000) Optimal design method to automobile problems using holographic neural network’s approximation. Jpn J Ind Appl Math 17:321–339MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Shi Y, Zhu P, Shen L, Lin Z (2007) Lightweight design of automotive front side rails with TWB concept. Thin-Walled Struct 45:8–14CrossRef

Shi L, Yang R, Zhu P (2012) A method for selecting surrogate models in crashworthiness optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 46:159–170CrossRef

Shi L, Yang R, Zhu P (2013a) An adaptive response surface method for crashworthiness optimization. Eng Optim 45:1365–1377CrossRef

Shi L, Zhu P, Yang R-J, Lin S-P (2013b) Adaptive sampling-based RBDO method for vehicle crashworthiness design using Bayesian metric and stochastic sensitivity analysis with independent random variables. Int J Crashworth 18:331–342CrossRef

Shimoyama K, Shinkyu J, Obayashi S (2013) Kriging-surrogate-based optimization considering expected hypervolume improvement in non-constrained many-objective test problems. In: Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2013 I.E. Congress on, 658–665

Shin MK, Park KJ, Park G (2007) Optimization of structures with nonlinear behavior using equivalent loads. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196:1154–1167MATHCrossRef

Shin MK, Yi SI, Kwon OT, Park G (2008) Structural optimization of the automobile frontal structure for pedestrian protection and the low-speed impact test. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng 222:2373–2387CrossRef

Simpson TW, Poplinski J, Koch PN, Allen JK (2001) Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng Comput 17:129–150MATHCrossRef

Simpson TW, Booker AJ, Ghosh D, Giunta AA, Koch PN, Yang R (2004) Approximation methods in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization: a panel discussion. Struct Multidisc Optim 27:302–313CrossRef

Sinha K (2007) Reliability-based multiobjective optimization for automotive crashworthiness and occupant safety. Struct Multidisc Optim 33:255–268CrossRef

Sinha K, Krishnan R, Raghavendra D (2007) Multi-objective robust optimisation for crashworthiness during side impact. Int J Veh Des 43:116–135CrossRef

Smola A, Schölkopf B (2004) A tutorial on support vector regression. Stat Comput 14:199–222MathSciNetCrossRef

Sobester A, Leary SJ, Keane AJ (2004) A parallel updating scheme for approximating and optimizing high fidelity computer simulations. Struct Multidisc Optim 27:371–383CrossRef

Song X, Sun G, Li G, Gao W, Li Q (2013) Crashworthiness optimization of foam-filled tapered thin-walled structure using multiple surrogate models. Struct Multidisc Optim 47:221–231MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Soto CA (2004) Structural topology optimization for crashworthiness. Int J Crashworth 9:277–283CrossRef

Stander N (2012) An efficient new sequential strategy for multi-objective optimization using LS-OPT®. Paper presented at the 12th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, Dearborn, Michigan, USA

Stander N An Adaptive Surrogate-Assisted Strategy for Multi-Objective Optimization. In: 10th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2013.

Su R, Gui L, Fan Z (2011) Multi-objective optimization for bus body with strength and rollover safety constraints based on surrogate models. Struct Multidisc Optim 44:431–441MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Sun G, Li G, Hou S, Zhou S, Li W, Li Q (2010a) Crashworthiness design for functionally graded foam-filled thin-walled structures. Mater Sci Eng A-Struct Mater Properties Microstruct Process 527:1911–1919CrossRef

Sun G, Li G, Stone M, Li Q (2010b) A two-stage multi-fidelity optimization procedure for honeycomb-type cellular materials. Comput Mater Sci 49:500–511CrossRef

Sun G, Li G, Zhou S, Li H, Hou S, Li Q (2011) Crashworthiness design of vehicle by using multiobjective robust optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 44:99–110CrossRef

Sun G, Song X, Baek S, Li Q (2014a) Robust optimization of foam-filled thin-walled structure based on sequential Kriging metamodel. Struct Multidisc Optim 49:897–913CrossRef

Sun G, Xu F, Li G, Li Q (2014b) Crashing analysis and multiobjective optimization for thin-walled structures with functionally graded thickness. Int J Impact Eng 64:62–74CrossRef

Tang L, Wang H, Li G, Xu F (2013) Adaptive heuristic search algorithm for discrete variables based multi-objective optimization. Struct Multidisc Optim 48:821–836MathSciNetCrossRef

Tarlochan F, Samer F, Hamouda AMS, Ramesh S, Khalid K (2013) Design of thin wall structures for energy absorption applications: Enhancement of crashworthiness due to axial and oblique impact forces. Thin-Walled Struct 71:7–17CrossRef

Toksoy AK, Güden M (2011) The optimisation of the energy absorption of partially Al foam-filled commercial 1050H14 and 6061T4 Al crash boxes. Int J Crashworth 16:97–109CrossRef

Tovar A, Patel NM, Kaushik AK, Renaud JE (2007) Optimality conditions of the hybrid cellular automata for structural optimization. AIAA J 45:673–683CrossRef

Tran T, Hou S, Han X, Tan W, Nguyen N (2014) Theoretical prediction and crashworthiness optimization of multi-cell triangular tubes. Thin-Walled Struct 82:183–195CrossRef

Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. J Mech Des 121:557–564CrossRef

Viana FA, Haftka R, Steffen V Jr (2009a) Multiple surrogates: how cross-validation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor. Struct Multidisc Optim 39:439–457CrossRef

Viana FAC, Haftka R, Steffen V (2009b) Multiple surrogates: how cross-validation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor. Struct Multidisc Optim 39:439–457

Viana FC, Haftka R, Watson L (2013) Efficient global optimization algorithm assisted by multiple surrogate techniques. J Glob Optim 56:669–689MATHCrossRef

Viana FA, Simpson TW, Balabanov V, Toropov V (2014) Metamodeling in multidisciplinary design optimization: how far have we really come? AIAA J 52:670–690CrossRef

Villa A, Strano M, Mussi V (2011) Optimization of Design and Manufacturing Process of Metal Foam Filled Anti-Intrusion Bars. 14th International Conference on Material Forming Esaform, 2011 Proceedings 1353:1656-1661

Vining GG, Myers RH (1990) Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: a dual response approach. J Qual Technol 22

Wang GG (2003) Adaptive response surface method using inherited latin hypercube design points. J Mech Des 125:210–220CrossRef

Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des 129:370–380CrossRef

Wang X, Shi L (2014) A new metamodel method using Gaussian process based bias function for vehicle crashworthiness design. Int J Crashworth 19:311–321CrossRef

Wang H, Li GY, Li E (2010) Time-based metamodeling technique for vehicle crashworthiness optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2497–2509MATHCrossRef

Wang H, Li E, Li GY (2011a) Probability-based least square support vector regression metamodeling technique for crashworthiness optimization problems. Comput Mech 47:251–263MATHCrossRef

Wang H, Shan S, Wang GG, Li G (2011b) Integrating least square support vector regression and mode pursuing sampling optimization for crashworthiness design. J Mech Des 133

Wierzbicki T, Abramowicz W (1983) On the crushing mechanics of thin-walled structures. J Appl Mech-T Asme 50:727–734MATHCrossRef

Witowski K, Erhart A, Schumacher P, Müllerschön H (2012) Topology optimization for crash

Wu JP, Nusholtz GS, Bilkhu S (2002) Optimization of vehicle crash pulses in relative displacement domain. Int J Crashworth 7:397–413

Xiang YJ, Wang Q, Fan ZJ, Fang HB (2006) Optimal crashworthiness design of a spot-welded thin-walled hat section. Finite Elem Anal Des 42:846–855CrossRef

Xu F, Sun G, Li G, Li Q (2013) Crashworthiness design of multi-component tailor-welded blank (TWB) structures. Struct Multidisc Optim 48:653–667CrossRef

Xu H, Majcher MT, Chuang C, Fu Y, Yang R (2014) Comparative benchmark studies of response surface model-based optimization and direct multidisciplinary design optimization. SAE Technical Paper

Xu H, Chuang C, Yang R (2015) A data mining-based strategy for direct multidisciplinary optimization. SAE Int J Mater Manufact 8:357–363

Yamazaki K, Han J (1998) Maximization of the crushing energy absorption of tubes. Struct Optim 16:37–46CrossRef

Yang S, Qi C (2013) Multiobjective optimization for empty and foam-filled square columns under oblique impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 54:177–191CrossRef

Yang R, Tseng L, Nagy L, Cheng J (1994) Feasibility study of crash optimization. ASME 2:549–556

Yang R, Akkerman A, Anderson DF, Faruque O, Gu L (2000) Robustness optimization for vehicular crash simulations. Comput Sci Eng 2:8–13CrossRef

Yang R, Wang N, Tho C, Bobineau J, Wang B (2005) Metamodeling development for vehicle frontal impact simulation. J Mech Des 127:1014–1020CrossRef

Yao W, Chen X, Luo W, van Tooren M, Guo J (2011) Review of uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization methods for aerospace vehicles. Prog Aerosp Sci 47:450–479CrossRef

Yi SI, Lee JY, Park G (2012) Crashworthiness design optimization using equivalent static loads. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng 226:23–38CrossRef

Yildiz AR, Solanki KN (2012) Multi-objective optimization of vehicle crashworthiness using a new particle swarm based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59:367–376CrossRef

Yin H, Wen G, Gan N (2011a) Crashworthiness design for honeycomb structures under axial dynamic loading. Int J Comput Methods 8:863–877CrossRef

Yin H, Wen G, Hou S, Chen K (2011b) Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of honeycomb-filled single and bitubular polygonal tubes. Mater Des 32:4449–4460CrossRef

Yin H, Wen G, Hou S, Qing Q (2013) Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of functionally lateral graded foam-filled tubes. Mater Des 44:414–428CrossRef

Yin H, Wen G, Fang H, Qing Q, Kong X, Xiao J, Liu Z (2014a) Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization design of functionally graded foam-filled tapered tube based on dynamic ensemble metamodel. Mater Des 55:747–757CrossRef

Yin H, Wen G, Liu Z, Qing Q (2014b) Crashworthiness optimization design for foam-filled multi-cell thin-walled structures. Thin-Walled Struct 75:8–17CrossRef

Youn BD, Choi KK (2004a) A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Struct 82:241–256CrossRef

Youn BD, Choi KK (2004b) Selecting probabilistic approaches for reliability-based design optimization. AIAA J 42:124–131CrossRef

Youn BD, Choi KK, Yang R, Gu L (2004) Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact. Struct Multidisc Optim 26:272–283CrossRef

Zabaras N, Ganapathysubramanian S, Li Q (2003) A continuum sensitivity method for the design of multi-stage metal forming processes. Int J Mech Sci 45:325–358MATHCrossRef

Zarei HR, Kroger M (2006) Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of circular aluminum tubes. Thin-Walled Struct 44:301–308CrossRef

Zarei HR, Kroger M (2007) Crashworthiness optimization of empty and filled aluminum crash boxes. Int J Crashworth 12:255–264CrossRef

Zarei H, Kroger M (2008a) Optimum honeycomb filled crash absorber design. Mater Des 29:193–204CrossRef

Zarei HR, Kroger M (2008b) Bending behavior of empty and foam-filled beams: structural optimization. Int J Impact Eng 35:521–529CrossRef

Zarei HR, Kroger M (2008c) Optimization of the foam-filled aluminum tubes for crush box application. Thin-Walled Struct 46:214–221CrossRef

Zarei H, Kröger M, Albertsen H (2008) An experimental and numerical crashworthiness investigation of thermoplastic composite crash boxes. Compos Struct 85:245–257CrossRef

Zerpa LE, Queipo NV, Pintos S, Salager J-L (2005) An optimization methodology of alkaline–surfactant–polymer flooding processes using field scale numerical simulation and multiple surrogates. J Pet Sci Eng 47:197–208CrossRef

Zhang Y, Zhu P, Chen G (2007a) Lightweight design of automotive front side rail based on robust optimisation. Thin-Walled Struct 45:670–676CrossRef

Zhang Y, Zhu P, Chen G, Lin Z (2007b) Study on structural lightweight design of automotive front side rail based on response surface method. J Mech Des 129:553–557CrossRef

Zhang Y, Zhu P, Chen G, Lin ZQ (2007c) Study on structural lightweight design of automotive front side rail based on response surface method. J Mech Des 129:553–557CrossRef

Zhang X, Cheng G, Wang B, Zhang H (2008) Optimum design for energy absorption of bitubal hexagonal columns with honeycomb core. Int J Crashworth 13:99–107CrossRef

Zhang Z, Liu S, Tang Z (2009) Design optimization of cross-sectional configuration of rib-reinforced thin-walled beam. Thin-Walled Struct 47:868–878CrossRef

Zhang B, Yang J, Zhong Z (2010) Optimisation of vehicle side interior panels for occupant safety in side impact. Int J Crashworth 15:617–623CrossRef

Zhang Y, Sun G, Li G, Luo Z, Li Q (2012) Optimization of foam-filled bitubal structures for crashworthiness criteria. Mater Des 38:99–109CrossRef

Zhang S, Zhu P, Chen W (2013a) Crashworthiness-based lightweight design problem via new robust design method considering two sources of uncertainties. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part C-J Mech Eng Sci 227:1381–1391CrossRef

Zhang S, Zhu P, Chen W, Arendt P (2013b) Concurrent treatment of parametric uncertainty and metamodeling uncertainty in robust design. Struct Multidisc Optim 47:63–76MathSciNetMATHCrossRef

Zhang X, Wen Z, Zhang H (2014a) Axial crushing and optimal design of square tubes with graded thickness. Thin-Walled Struct 84:263–274CrossRef

Zhang Y, Sun G, Xu X, Li G, Li Q (2014b) Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of hollow and conical tubes for multiple load cases. Thin-Walled Struct 82:331–342CrossRef

Zheng G, Wu S, Sun G, Li G, Li Q (2014) Crushing analysis of foam-filled single and bitubal polygonal thin-walled tubes. Int J Mech Sci 87:226–240CrossRef

Zhou XJ, Ma YZ, Li XF (2011) Ensemble of surrogates with recursive arithmetic average. Struct Multidisc Optim 44:651–671

Zhou Q, Wu X, Xia Y, Cai W (2014) Spot weld layout optimization of tube crash performance with manufacturing constraints. J Manufact Sci Eng-Trans Asme 136

Zhu P, Shi YL, Zhang KZ, Lin ZQ (2008) Optimum design of an automotive inner door panel with a tailor-welded blank structure. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng 222:1337–1348CrossRef

Zhu P, Zhang Y, Chen G (2009) Metamodel-based lightweight design of an automotive front-body structure using robust optimization. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part D-J Automobile Eng 223:1133–1147CrossRef

Zhu P, Zhang Y, Chen G (2011) Metamodeling development for reliability-based design optimization of automotive body structure. Comput Ind 62:729–741CrossRef

Zhu P, Pan F, Chen W, Zhang S (2012) Use of support vector regression in structural optimization: application to vehicle crashworthiness design. Math Comput Simul 86:21–31

Zhu P, Pan F, Chen W, Viana FAC (2013) Lightweight design of vehicle parameters under crashworthiness using conservative surrogates. Comput Ind 64:280–289CrossRef

Zhu F, Jiang B, Chou CC (2016) On the development of a new design methodology for vehicle crashworthiness based on data mining theory. SAE Technical Paper

Zurada JM (1992) Introduction to artificial neural systems vol 8. West publishing company, St. Paul

Titel: On design optimization for structural crashworthiness and its state of the art
verfasst von: Jianguang Fang
Guangyong Sun
Na Qiu
Nam H. Kim
Qing Li
Publikationsdatum: 16.09.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1615-147X
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-1488
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1579-y

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Remarks on multi-fidelity surrogates

Topology optimization for minimum weight with compliance and simplified nominal stress constraints for fatigue resistance

Bending of beams of arbitrary cross sections - optimal design by analytical formulae

Multi-objective optimization of laminated composite shells for minimum mass/cost and maximum buckling pressure with failure criteria under external hydrostatic pressure

Nonlinear filters in topology optimization: existence of solutions and efficient implementation for minimum compliance problems

Topology optimization for heat conduction using generative design algorithms

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten