nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

On Solving Contact Problems with Coulomb Friction: Formulations and Numerical Comparisons

verfasst von : Vincent Acary, Maurice Brémond, Olivier Huber

Erschienen in: Advanced Topics in Nonsmooth Dynamics

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

In this chapter, we review several formulations of the discrete frictional contact problem that arises in space and time discretized mechanical systems with unilateral contact and three-dimensional Coulomb’s friction. Most of these formulations are well–known concepts in the optimization community, or more generally, in the mathematical programming community. To cite a few, the discrete frictional contact problem can be formulated as variational inequalities, generalized or semi–smooth equations, second–order cone complementarity problems, or optimization problems, such as quadratic programming problems over second-order cones. Thanks to these multiple formulations, various numerical methods emerge naturally for solving the problem. We review the main numerical techniques that are well-known in the literature, and we also propose new applications of methods such as the fixed point and extra-gradient methods with self-adaptive step rules for variational inequalities or the proximal point algorithm for generalized equations. All these numerical techniques are compared over a large set of test examples using performance profiles. One of the main conclusions is that there is no universal solver. Nevertheless, we are able to give some hints for choosing a solver with respect to the main characteristics of the set of tests.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel On the Constraints Formulation in the Nonsmooth Generalized- Method

Nächstes Kapitel Erratum to: Nonsmooth Modal Analysis: From the Discrete to the Continuous Settings

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

https://frictionalcontactlibrary.github.io/index.html, which aims to provide many problems to compare algorithms on a fair basis.

http://siconos.gforge.inria.fr.

More information can be found at https://frictionalcontactlibrary.github.io.

The whole collection of problems can be found at https://github.com/FrictionalContactLibrary/fclib-library.

https://git-xen.lmgc.univ-montp2.fr/lmgc90/lmgc90_user/wikis/home.

More information on the software is available at http://siconos.gforge.inria.fr and the software can be downloaded at https://github.com/siconos/siconos.

http://people.sc.fsu.edu/~jburkardt/c_src/csparse/csparse.html.

https://ciment-grid.ujf-grenoble.fr/.

Nevertheless, the reader can have access to the complete list of performance profiles at https://github.com/siconos/faf/blob/master/TeX/Full-test/full-test_current.pdf.

Acary V, Brogliato B (2008) Numerical methods for nonsmooth dynamical systems. Applications in mechanics and electronics. Lecture notes in applied and computational mechanics, vol 35. Springer, Berlin, p xxi, 525 pp

Acary V, Cadoux F (2013) Applications of an existence result for the Coulomb friction problem. In: Stavroulakis GE (ed) Recent advances in contact mechanics. Lecture notes in applied and computational mechanics, vol 56. Springer, Berlin

Acary V, Cadoux F, Lemaréchal C, Malick J (2011) A formulation of the linear discrete coulomb friction problem via convex optimization. ZAMM - J Appl Math Mech/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 91(2):155–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.201000073

Acary V, Brémond M, Koziara T, Pérignon F (2014) FCLIB: a collection of discrete 3D frictional contact problems. Technical Report RT-0444, INRIA. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00945820

Acary V, Brémond M, Huber O, Pérignon F (2015) An introduction to Siconos. Technical Report TR-0340, second version, INRIA. http://hal.inria.fr/inria-00162911/en/

Acary V, Brémond M, Dubois F (2017) Méthodes de Newton non–lisses pour les problèmes de contact frottant dans les systèmes de multi–corps flexibles. In: CSMA 2017 - 13ème Colloque National en Calcul des Structures, Presqu’île de Giens (Var), France, p 8. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01562706

Al-Fahed A, Stavroulakis G, Panagiotopulos P (1991) Hard and soft fingered robot grippers. The linear complementarity approach. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 71:257–265MathSciNetCrossRef

Alart P (1993) Injectivity and surjectivity criteria for certain mappings of \({\rm I\it \!\rm R\it }^{n}\) into itself; application to contact mechanics. (Critères d’injectivité et de surjectivité pour certaines applications de \({\rm I\it \!\rm R\it }^{n}\) dans lui-même; application à la mécanique du contact.). RAIRO, Modélisation Math Anal Numér 27(2):203–222

Alart P (1995) Méthode de newton généralisée en mécanique du contact. Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées

10.

Alart P, Curnier A (1991) A mixed formulation for frictional contact problems prone to Newton like solution method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 92(3):353–375MathSciNetCrossRef

11.

Anitescu M, Potra F (1997) Formulating dynamic multi-rigid-body contact problems with friction as solvable linear complementarity problems. Nonlinear Dyn Trans ASME 14:231–247MathSciNetCrossRef

12.

Anitescu M, Tasora A (2010) An iterative approach for cone complementarity problems for nonsmooth dynamics. Comput Optim Appl 47(2):207–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-008-9223-4

13.

Barbosa H, Feijóo R (1985) A numerical algorithm for signorini problem with Coulomb friction. In: [26]

14.

Barbosa H, Raupp F, Borges C (1997) Numerical experiments with algorithms for bound constrained quadratic programming in mechanics. Comput Struct 64(1–4):579–594CrossRef

15.

Bonnans J, Gilbert J, Lemaréchal C, Sagastizábal C (2003) Numerical optimization: theoretical and practical aspects. Springer, Berlin

16.

Bonnefon O, Daviet G (2011) Quartic formulation of Coulomb 3D frictional contact. Technical Report RT-0400, INRIA. https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00553859

17.

Breitkopf P, Jean M (1999) Modélisation parallèèle des matéériaux granulaires. In: Actes du 4ème Colloque National en Calcul des Structures, Giens(Var), pp 387–392

18.

Cadoux F (2009) Analyse convexe et optimisation pour la dynamique non–regulière. PhD thesis, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble I

19.

Calamai P, More J (1987) Projected gradient methods for linearly constrained problems. Math Program 39(1):93–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02592073

20.

Chabrand P, Dubois F, Raous M (1998) Various numerical methods for solving unilateral contact problems with friction. Math Comput Model 28(4–8):97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(98)00111-3, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895717798001113, Recent advances in contact mechanics

21.

Chaudhary A, Bathe K (1986) A solution method for static and dynamic analysis of three-dimensional contact problems with friction. Comput Struct 24(6):855–873CrossRef

22.

Christensen P, Pang J (1998) Frictional contact algorithms based on semismooth newton methods. In: Qi MFL (ed) Reformulation - nonsmooth, piecewise smooth, semismooth and smoothing methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 81–116CrossRef

23.

Christensen P, Klarbring A, Pang J, Stromberg N (1998) Formulation and comparison of algorithms for frictional contact problems. Int J Numer Meth Eng 42:145–172MathSciNetCrossRef

24.

Curnier A, Alart P (1988) A generalized Newton method for contact problems with friction. Journal de Mécanique Théorique et Appliquée supplément no 1 to 7:67–82

25.

Daviet G, Bertails-Descoubes F, Boissieux L (2011) A hybrid iterative solver for robustly capturing coulomb friction in hair dynamics. ACM Trans Graph 30(6):139:1–139:12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2070781.2024173, https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00647497

26.

De Saxcé G (1992) Une généralisation de l’inégalité de Fenchel et ses applications aux lois constitutives. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences t 314,série II:125–129

27.

De Saxcé G, Feng ZQ (1991) New inequality and functional for contact with friction: the implicit standard material approach. Mech Struct Mach 19(3):301–325MathSciNetCrossRef

28.

De Saxcé G, Feng ZQ (1998) The bipotential method: a constructive approach to design the complete contact law with friction and improved numerical algorithms. Math Comput Model 28(4):225–245MathSciNetCrossRef

29.

Del Piero G, Maceri F (eds) (1983) Unilateral problems in structural analysis. CISM courses and lectures, vol 288. Springer, Ravello

30.

Del Piero G, Maceri F (eds) (1985) Unilateral problems in structural analysis – II. CISM courses and lectures, vol 304. Springer, Prescudin

31.

Dolan E, Moré J (2002) Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Math Program 91(2):201–213MathSciNetCrossRef

32.

Dostál Z (1997) Box constrained quadratic programming with proportioning and projections. SIAM J Optim 7(3):871–887. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623494266250

33.

Dostál Z (2016) Scalable algorithms for contact problems. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6834-3_8

34.

Dostál Z, Kozubek T (2012) An optimal algorithm and superrelaxation for minimization of a quadratic function subject to separable convex constraints with applications. Math Program 135(1-2, Ser. A):195–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-011-0454-2

35.

Dostál Z, Kučera R (2010) An optimal algorithm for minimization of quadratic functions with bounded spectrum subject to separable convex inequality and linear equality constraints. SIAM J Optim 20(6):2913–2938. https://doi.org/10.1137/090751414

36.

Dostál Z, Schöberl J (2005) Minimizing quadratic functions subject to bound constraints with the rate of convergence and finite termination. Comput Optim Appl 30(1):23–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-005-4557-7

37.

Dostál Z, Haslinger J, Kučera R (2002) Implementation of the fixed point method in contact problems with Coulomb friction based on a dual splitting type technique. J Comput Appl Math 140(1–2):245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(01)00405-8

38.

Dostál Z, Kozubek T, Horyl P, Brzobohatý T, Markopoulos A (2010) A scalable tfeti algorithm for two-dimensional multibody contact problems with friction. J Computat Appl Math 235(2):403 – 418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2010.05.042, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377042710003328, special Issue on Advanced Computational Algorithms

39.

Facchinei F, Pang JS (2003) Finite-dimensional variational inequalities and complementarity problems. Springer series in operations research, vol I, II. Springer, Berlin

40.

Fletcher R (1987) Practical methods of optimization. Wiley, ChichesterMATH

41.

Fong DCL, Saunders M (2011) Lsmr: an iterative algorithm for sparse least-squares problems. SIAM J Sci Comput 33(5):2950–2971. https://doi.org/10.1137/10079687X

42.

Fortin M, Glowinski R (1983) Augmented Lagrangian methods. Studies in mathematics and its applications, vol 15. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, applications to the numerical solution of boundary value problems, Translated from the French by Hunt B, Spicer DC

43.

Fukushima M, Luo Z, Tseng P (2001) Smoothing functions for second-order-cone complementarity problems. SIAM J Optim 12(2):436–460. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623400380365

44.

Glowinski R, JL L, Trémoliéres R, (1976) Approximations des Inéquations Variationnelles. Dunod, Paris

45.

Hager WW, Zhang H (2008) Self-adaptive inexact proximal point methods. Comput Optim Appl 39(2):161–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-007-9067-3

46.

Han D, Lo HK (2002) Two new self-adaptive projection methods for variational inequality problems. Comput Math Appl 43(12):1529–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(02)00116-5, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898122102001165

47.

Harker P, Pang JS (1990) Finite-dimensional variational inequality and complementarity problems: a survey of theory, algorithms and applications. Math Program 48:160–220MathSciNetMATH

48.

Haslinger J (1983) Approximation of the signorini problem with friction, obeying the coulomb law. Math Methods Appl Sci 5:422–437MathSciNetCrossRef

49.

Haslinger J (1984) Least square method for solving contact problems with friction obeying coulomb’s law. Appl Math 29(3):212–224. http://dml.cz/dmlcz/104086

50.

Haslinger J, Panagiotopoulos PD (1984) The reciprocal variational approach to the signorini problem with friction. approximation results. Proc R Soc Edinb Section A Math 98:365–383. http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0308210500013536

51.

Haslinger J, Hlaváček I, Nečas J (1996) Numerical methods for unilateral problems in solid mechanics. In: Ciarlet P, Lions J (eds) Handbook of numerical analysis, vol IV, Part 2. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 313–485

52.

Haslinger J, Dostál Z, Kučera R (2002) On a splitting type algorithm for the numerical realization of contact problems with Coulomb friction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 191(21-22):2261–2281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00378-4

53.

Haslinger J, Kučera R, D Z (2004) An algorithm for the numerical realization of 3D contact problems with Coulomb friction. In: Proceedings of the 10th international congress on computational and applied mathematics (ICCAM-2002), vol 164/165, pp 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2003.06.002

54.

Haslinger J, Kučera R, Vlach O, Baniotopoulos C (2012) Approximation and numerical realization of 3d quasistatic contact problems with coulomb friction. Math Comput Simul 82(10):1936 – 1951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2011.01.004, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475411000310, the fourth IMACS conference: Mathematical modelling and computational methods in applied sciences and engineering” Devoted to Owe Axelsson in ocassion of his 75th birthday

55.

Hayashi S, Yamashita N, Fukushima M (2005) A combined smoothing and regularization method for monotone second-order cone complementarity problems. SIAM J Optim 15(2):593–615. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623403421516

56.

He B, Liao L (2002) Improvements of some projection methods for monotone nonlinear variational inequalities. J Optim Theory Appl 112(1):111–128. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013096613105

57.

Hestenes M (1969) Multiplier and gradient methods. J Optim Theory Appl 4:303–320MathSciNetCrossRef

58.

Heyn T (2013) On the modeling, simulation, and visualization of many–body dynamics problems with friction and contact. PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison

59.

Heyn T, Anitescu M, Tasora A, Negrut D (2013) Using Krylov subspace and spectral methods for solving complementarity problems in many-body contact dynamics simulation. Int J Numer Methods Engrg 95(7):541–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4513

60.

Hüeber S, Stadler G, Wohlmuth BI (2008) A primal-dual active set algorithm for three-dimensional contact problems with coulomb friction. SIAM J Sci Comput 30(2):572–596. https://doi.org/10.1137/060671061

61.

Jean M, Moreau J (1987) Dynamics in the presence of unilateral contacts and dry friction: a numerical approach. In: Del Pietro G, Maceri F (eds) Unilateral problems in structural analysis. II, CISM 304. Spinger, pp 151–196

62.

Joli P, Feng ZQ (2008) Uzawa and newton algorithms to solve frictional contact problems within the bi-potential framework. Int J Numer Methods Eng 73(3):317–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2073

63.

Jourdan F, Alart P, Jean M (1998) A Gauss Seidel like algorithm to solve frictional contact problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 155(1):31–47MathSciNetCrossRef

64.

Katona MG (1983) A simple contact–friction interface element with applications to buried culverts. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 7(3):371–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610070308

65.

Khobotov E (1987) Modification of the extra-gradient method for solving variational inequalities and certain optimization problems. USSR Comput Math Math Phys 27(5):120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-5553(87)90058-9, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0041555387900589

66.

Kikuchi N, Oden JT (1988) Contact problems in elasticity: a study of variational inequalities and finite element methods. SIAM studies in applied mathematics, vol 8. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611970845

67.

Klarbring A (1986) A mathematical programming approach to three-dimensional contact problem with friction. Compt Methods Appl Math Engrg 58:175–200MathSciNetCrossRef

68.

Klarbring A, Pang JS (1998) Existence of solutions to discrete semicoercive frictional contact problems. SIAM J Optim 8(2):414–442MathSciNetCrossRef

69.

Kleinert J, Simeon B, Obermayr M (2014) An inexact interior point method for the large-scale simulation of granular material. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 278(0):567–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.06.009, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045782514001959

70.

Korpelevich G (1976) The extragradient method for finding saddle points and other problems. Matecon 12(747–756)

71.

Koziara T, Bićanić N (2008) Semismooth newton method for frictional contact between pseudo-rigid bodies. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(33–40):2763–2777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.01.006, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045782508000194

72.

Koziara T, Bićanić N (2011) A distributed memory parallel multibody contact dynamics code. Int J Numer Methods Eng 87(1–5):437–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.3158

73.

Krabbenhoft K, Lyamin A, Huang J, da Silva MV (2012) Granular contact dynamics using mathematical programming methods. Comput Geotech 43:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.02.006, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X12000262

74.

Kučera R (2007) Minimizing quadratic functions with separable quadratic constraints. Optim Methods Softw 22(3):453–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10556780600609246

75.

Kučera R (2008) Convergence rate of an optimization algorithm for minimizing quadratic functions with separable convex constraints. SIAM J Optim 19(2):846–862. https://doi.org/10.1137/060670456

76.

Laursen T (2003) Computational contact and impact mechanics – fundamentals of modeling interfacial phenomena in nonlinear finite element analysis. Springer, Berlin, 1st ed 2002. Corr 2nd printing

77.

Leung A, Guoqing C, Wanji C (1998) Smoothing Newton method for solving two- and thre-dimensional frictional contact problems. Int J Numer Meth Eng 41:1001–1027CrossRef

78.

Mijar A, Arora J (2000) Review of formulations for elastostatic frictional contact problems. Struct Multidiscip Optim 20(3):167–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001580050147

79.

Mijar A, Arora J (2000) Study of variational inequality and equality formulations for elastostatic frictional contact problems. Arch Comput Methods Eng 7(4):387–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02736213

80.

Mijar A, Arora J (2004) An augmented Lagrangian optimization method for contact analysis problems, 1: formulation and algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 28(2-3):99–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0423-y

81.

Mijar A, Arora J (2004) An augmented Lagrangian optimization method for contact analysis problems, 2: numerical evaluation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 28(2-3):113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0424-x

82.

Mitsopoulou E, Doudoumis I (1987) A contribution to the analysis of unilateral contact problems with friction. Solid Mech Arch 12(3):165–186MATH

83.

Mitsopoulou E, Doudoumis I (1988) On the solution of the unilateral contact frictional problem for general static loading conditions. Comput Struct 30(5):1111–1126CrossRef

84.

Miyamura T, Kanno Y, Ohsaki M (2010) Combined interior-point method and semismooth newton method for frictionless contact problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 81(6):701–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2707

85.

Morales JL, Nocedal J, Smelyanskiy M (2008) An algorithm for the fast solution of symmetric linear complementarity problems. Numerische Mathematik 111(2):251–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-008-0183-5

86.

Moré J, Toraldo G (1991) On the solution of large quadratic convex programming problems with bound constraints. SIAM J Optim 1(1):93–113MathSciNetCrossRef

87.

Moré JJ, Toraldo G (1989) Algorithms for bound constrained quadratic programming problems. Numerische Mathematik 55(4):377–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01396045

88.

Moreau J (1965) Proximité et dualité dans un espace hilbertien. Bulletin de la société mathématique de France 93:273–299

89.

Moreau J (1988) Unilateral contact and dry friction in finite freedom dynamics. In: Moreau J, PD P (eds) Nonsmooth mechanics and applications, no. 302 in CISM, Courses and lectures, CISM 302, Spinger, Wien- New York, pp 1–82, formulation mathematiques tire du livre Contacts mechanics

90.

Mylapilli H, Jain A (2017) Complementarity techniques for minimal coordinates contact dynamics. ASME J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 12(2)

91.

Nečas J, Jarušek J, Haslinger J (1980) On the solution of the variational inequality to the Signorini problem with small friction. Bollettino UMI 5(17-B):796–811

92.

Nocedal J, Wright S (1999) Numerical optimization. Springer, Berlin

93.

Panagiotopoulos P (1975) A nonlinear programming approach to the unilateral contact-, and friction-boundary value problem in the theory of elasticity. Ingenieur-Archiv 44(6):421–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00534623

94.

Pang J, Trinkle J (1996) Complementarity formulations and existence of solutions of dynamic multi-rigid-body contact problems with Coulomb friction. Math Program 73:199–226MathSciNetCrossRef

95.

Parikh N, Boyd S et al (2014) Proximal algorithms. Found Trends\({\textregistered }\) Optim 1(3):127–239

96.

Park J, Kwak B (1994) Three dimensional frictional contact analysis using the homotopy method. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 61:703–709CrossRef

97.

Qi L, Sun J (1993) A nonsmooth version of Newton’s method. Math Program 58:353–367MathSciNetCrossRef

98.

Qi L, Sun D, Ulbrich M (eds) (2018) Semismooth and smoothing Newton methods. Springer, Berlin

99.

Raous M, Chabrand P, Lebon F (1988) Numerical methods for frictional contact problems and applications. J Méc Théor Appl 7(1):111–18MathSciNetMATH

100.

Renouf M, Dubois F, Alart P (2004) A parallel version of the non smooth contact dynamics algorithm applied to the simulation of granular media. J Comput Appl Math 168:375–382MathSciNetCrossRef

101.

Rockafellar R (1974) Augmented Lagrange multiplier functions and duality in nonconvex programming. SIAM J Control 12:268–285MathSciNetCrossRef

102.

Rockafellar R (1993) Lagrange multipliers and optimality. SIAM Rev 35(2):183–238MathSciNetCrossRef

103.

Rockafellar R, Wets R (1997) Variational analysis, vol 317. Springer, New YorkMATH

104.

Rockafellar RT (1976) Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm. SIAM J Control Optim 14(5):877–898MathSciNetCrossRef

105.

Saxcé GD, Feng ZQ (1998) The bipotential method: a constructive approach to design the complete contact law with friction and improved numerical algorithms. Math Comput Model 28(4–8):225–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(98)00119-8, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895717798001198, Recent advances in contact mechanics

106.

Sibony M (1970) Méthodes itératives pour les équations et inéquations aux dérivées partielles non linéaires de type monotone. Calcolo 7:65–183MathSciNetCrossRef

107.

Simo J, Laursen T (1992) An augmented Lagrangian treatment of contact problems involving friction. Comput Struct 42(1):97–116MathSciNetCrossRef

108.

Solodov M, Tseng P (1996) Modified projection-type methods for monotone variational inequalities. SIAM J Control Optim 34(5):1814–1830. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/article/solodov95modified.html

109.

Stadler G (2004) Semismooth Newton and augmented Lagrangian methods for a simplified friction problem. SIAM J Optim 15(1):39–62. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623403420833

110.

Stewart D, Trinkle J (1996) An implicit time-stepping scheme for rigid body dynamics with inelastic collisions and Coulomb friction. Int J Numer Methods Eng 39(15), reference tiree du site WILEY

111.

Sun D, Sun J (2005) Strong semismoothness of the fischer-burmeister sdc and soc complementarity functions. Math Program. 103(3):575–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-005-0577-4

112.

Tasora A, Anitescu M (2009) A fast NCP solver for large rigid-body problems with contacts, friction, and joints. In: Multibody dynamics, computational methods and applications science, vol 12. Springer, Berlin, pp 45–55

113.

Tasora A, Anitescu M (2011) A matrix-free cone complementarity approach for solving large-scale, nonsmooth, rigid body dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 200(5-8):439–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.06.030

114.

Tasora A, Anitescu M (2013) A complementarity-based rolling friction model for rigid contacts. Meccanica 48(7):1643–1659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-013-9694-y

115.

Temizer I, Abdalla M, Gürdal Z (2014) An interior point method for isogeometric contact. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 276(0):589–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.03.018, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045782514001042

116.

Tzaferopoulos M (1993) On an efficient new numerical method for the frictional contact problem of structures with convex energy density. Comput Struct 48(1):87–106MathSciNetCrossRef

117.

Wang X, He B, Liao LZ (2010) Steplengths in the extragradient type methods. J Comput Appl Math 233(11):2925–2939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2009.11.037, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377042709007845

118.

Wohlmuth BI, Krause RH (2003) Monotone multigrid methods on nonmatching grids for nonlinear multibody contact problems. SIAM J Sci Comput 25(1):324–347. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827502405318

119.

Wriggers P (2006) Computational contact mechanics, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin. Originally published by Wiley, 2002

120.

Xuewen L, Soh AK, Wanji C (2000) A new nonsmooth model for three-dimensional frictional contact problems. Comput Mech 26:528–535MathSciNetCrossRef

Titel: On Solving Contact Problems with Coulomb Friction: Formulations and Numerical Comparisons
verfasst von: Vincent Acary
Maurice Brémond
Olivier Huber
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Advanced Topics in Nonsmooth Dynamics
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75971-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-75972-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75972-2_10

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten