Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Cultural Studies of Science Education
Erschienen in: Cultural Studies of Science Education 2/2014

01.06.2014 | forum

Opening the discussion through challenging companion meanings and pedagogical approaches that de-center

verfasst von: Sue V. Rosser

Erschienen in: Cultural Studies of Science Education | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Many aspects of the paper “What if we were in a test tube?: students’ gendered meaning making during a biology lesson about the basic facts of the human genitals” intrigue and warrant further exploration. This forum will focus on two particular areas: (1) An expansion of the companion meanings by examining how they resonate with themes forwarded by other feminist scholars who critiqued biology and reproduction. (2) A proposal of some pedagogical approaches that might provide solutions to de-center the prioritization of heterosexual male genitals and of facts over complexities in science.
Vorheriger Artikel “What if we were in a test tube?” Students’ gendered meaning making during a biology lesson about the basic facts of the human genitals
Nächster Artikel Who is the competent physics student? A study of students’ positions and social interaction in small-group discussions

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Aeschylus. (1975). The Oresteia (R. Fagles, Trans.). New York: Viking Press.
Biology and Gender Study Group. (1989). The importance of feminist critique of contemporary cell biology. In N. Tuana (Ed.), Feminism and science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.CrossRef
Darwin, C. (1967). On the origin of species: A facsimile of the first edition. New York Atheneum (original work published 1859).
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.
Greer, G. (1984). Sex and destiny. New York: Harper & Row.
Haraway, D. (1989). Monkeys, aliens, and women: Love, science, and politics at the intersection of feminist theory and colonial discourse. Women’s Studies International Forum, 12, 295–312.CrossRef
Herschberger, R. (1970). Adam’s rib. New York: Harper & Row (original work published 1948).
Keeton, W. C. (1976). Biological science (3rd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.
Martin, E. (1991). The egg and the sperm: How science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male–female roles. Signs, 16, 485–501.CrossRef
Merchant, C. (1979). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper & Row.
Rose, H., & Rose, S. (1980). The myth of the neutrality of science. In R. Arditti, P. Brennan, & S. Carak (Eds.), Science and liberation. Boston: South End Press.
Ruse, M. (1979). The Darwinian revolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Schatten, G., & Schatten, H. (1983). The energetic egg. The Sciences, 23(5), 28–34.CrossRef
Tuana, N. (1989). The weaker seed: The sexist bias of reproductive theory. In N. Tuana (Ed.), Feminism and science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Opening the discussion through challenging companion meanings and pedagogical approaches that de-center
verfasst von
Sue V. Rosser
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Cultural Studies of Science Education / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1871-1502
Elektronische ISSN: 1871-1510
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9422-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Cultural Studies of Science Education 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Inviting queer ideas into the science classroom: studying sexuality education from a queer perspective

Forum

Perspectives on positioning, interaction, and learning in small-group discussion: possibilities for extending the analytic lens

OriginalPaper

Gendered education in a gendered world: looking beyond cosmetic solutions to the gender gap in science

OriginalPaper

Persistent discourses in physics education: gender neutrality and the gendering of competence

OriginalPaper

“Physics and the girly girl—there is a contradiction somewhere”: doctoral students’ positioning around discourses of gender and competence in physics

Forum

[Re]considering queer theories and science education

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise