Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Electrical Engineering
Erschienen in: Electrical Engineering 4/2019

08.11.2019 | Original Paper

Optimal allocation of unified power quality conditioner in the smart distribution grids

verfasst von: Ehsan Dehnavi, Saeed Afsharnia, Khalil Gholami

Erschienen in: Electrical Engineering | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The optimal operation of current distribution networks has a great importance due to growing electrical demand and significant power losses. In this paper, the optimal allocation of unified power quality conditioner (UPQC) in smart grid with responsive loads is investigated as an appropriate solution to reduce power losses. Also, in order to consider different consumption patterns and to predict the demand with the lowest error, different linear and nonlinear models of responsive loads are taken into account. New pricing method in demand response programs (DRPs) is another concept which is developed in the paper by which optimal electricity prices in DRP during peak, off-peak, and valley periods are determined. Moreover, DRPs are prioritized by the Topsis method based on the different Utility’s policies. The final proposed model has been applied on the IEEE 12-bus, IEEE 33-bus, and the practical 94-bus Portuguese RDS distribution system. The results show that the UPQC allocation in the presence of DRPs is a win–win game both for the Utility and for customers.
Vorheriger Artikel Framework for optimal grounding system design concerning IEEE standard
Nächster Artikel Eliminating the effect of hot spots on underground power cables using cool pavements

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Biscaro AAP, Pereira RAF, Kezunovic M, Mantovani JRS (2016) Integrated fault location and power-quality analysis in electric power distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 31:428–436CrossRef
2.
Fergany EI, Attia A (2013) Optimal capacitor allocations using evolutionary algorithms. IET Gener Transm Distrib 7:593–601CrossRef
3.
Taher SA, Afsari SA (2014) Optimal location and sizing of DSTATCOM in distribution systems by immune algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 60:34–44CrossRef
4.
Jazebi S, Hosseinian SH, Vahidi B (2011) DSTATCOM allocation in distribution networks considering reconfiguration using differential evolution algorithm. Energy Convers Manag 52:2777–2783CrossRef
5.
Vinod K (2012) Enhancing electric power quality using UPQC: a comprehensive overview. IEEE Trans Power Electron 27:2284–2297CrossRef
6.
Josep M, Guerrero M (2017) Guest editorial special issue on power quality in smart grids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 8:379–381CrossRef
7.
Bahrami S, Wong V, Huang J (2018) Data center demand response in deregulated electricity markets. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10(3):2820–2832CrossRef
8.
Amini MH (2019) demand response in future power networks: panorama and state-of-the-art. In: sustainable interdependent networks, Springer, Berlin, pp 167–191
9.
Aalami HA, Moghaddam MP, Yousefi GR (2010) Modeling and prioritizing demand response programs in power markets. Electr Power Syst Res 80:426–435CrossRef
10.
Aalami HA, Moghaddam MP, Yousefi GR (2015) Evaluation of nonlinear models for time-based rates demand response programs. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 65:282–290CrossRef
11.
Jordehi AR (2015) Particle swarm optimization (PSO) for allocation of FACTS devices in electric transmission systems: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:1260–1267CrossRef
12.
Jordehi AR (2016) Optimal allocation of FACTS devices for static security enhancement in power systems via imperialistic competitive algorithm (ICA). Appl Soft Comput 48:317–328CrossRef
13.
Devi S, Geethanjali M (2014) Optimal location and sizing determination of distributed generation and DSTATCOM using particle swarm optimization algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 62:562–570CrossRef
14.
Hajar Bagheri T, Hasan Ali M, Rizwan M (2015) Simultaneous reconfiguration, optimal placement of DSTATCOM, and photovoltaic array in a distribution system based on fuzzy-ACO approach. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 6:210–218CrossRef
15.
Kumar D, Samantaray SR (2016) Implementation of multi-objective seeker-optimization-algorithm for optimal planning of primary distribution systems including DSTATCOM. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 77:439–449CrossRef
16.
Sirjani R, Rezaee Jordehi A (2017) Optimal placement and sizing of distribution static compensator (D-STATCOM) in electric distribution networks: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 77:688–694CrossRef
17.
Jayanti S, Goswami SK (2016) Optimal location of unified power quality conditioner in distribution system for power quality improvement. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 83:309–324CrossRef
18.
Ganguly S (2014) Impact of unified power-quality conditioner allocation on line loading, losses, and voltage stability of radial distribution systems. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 29:1859–1867CrossRef
19.
Ganguly S (2014) Multi-objective planning for reactive power compensation of radial distribution networks with unified power quality conditioner allocation using particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29:1801–1810CrossRef
20.
Ganguly S (2014) Unified power quality conditioner allocation for reactive power compensation of radial distribution networks. IET Gener Transm Distrib 8:1418–1429CrossRef
21.
Li N, Chen L, Low SH (2011) Optimal demand response based on utility maximization in power networks. In: Power and energy society general meeting, IEEE. San Diego, CA, pp 24–29
22.
Aghaei J, Alizadeh MI (2013) Demand response in smart electricity grids equipped with renewable energy sources: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 18:64–72CrossRef
23.
Yousefi A, Nguyen TT, Zareipour H, Malik OP (2012) Congestion management using demand response and FACTS devices. Electr Power Energy Syst 37:78–85CrossRef
24.
25.
Dehnavi E, Abdi H (2016) Optimal pricing in time of use demand response by integrating with dynamic economic dispatch problem. Energy 109:1086–1094CrossRef
26.
Abdel-Akher M (2013) Voltage stability analysis of unbalanced distribution systems using backward/forward sweep load-flow analysis method with secant predictor. IET Gener Transm Distrib 7:309–317CrossRef
27.
Kayal P, Chanda CK (2015) Optimal mix of solar and wind distributed generations considering performance improvement of electrical distribution network. Renew Energy 75:173–186CrossRef
28.
Varadarajan M, Swarup KS (2008) Differential evolutionary algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch. Electr Power Syst Res 30:435–441CrossRef
29.
Acharjee P (2016) Optimal power flow with UPFC using security constrained self-adaptive differential evolutionary algorithm for restructured power system”. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 76:69–81CrossRef
30.
Jazebi S, Vahidi B (2012) Reconfiguration of distribution networks to mitigate utilities power quality disturbances. Electr Power Syst Res 91:9–17CrossRef
31.
Vardakas JS, Zorba N, Verikoukis CV (2015) A survey on demand response programs in smart grids: pricing methods and optimization algorithms. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 17:152–178CrossRef
32.
Dehanvi E, Abdi H (2016) Determining the optimal buses for implementing demand response as an effective congestion management method. IEEE Trans Power Syst 99:1537–1544
33.
Abdi H, Dehnavi E, Mohammadi F (2015) Dynamic economic dispatch problem integrated with demand response (DEDDR) considering non-linear responsive load models. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 99:2586–2595
34.
Ghasemi-Falavarjani S, Nematbakhsh MA, Shahgholi Ghahfarokhi B (2015) Context-aware multi-objective resource allocation in mobile cloud. Comput Electr Eng 44:218–240CrossRef
35.
Sengul U, Eren M, Eslamian Shiraz SH, Gezder V, Bilal Sengul A (2015) Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey. Renew Energy 75:617–625CrossRef
36.
Baran ME, Wu FF (1989) Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 4:1401–1409CrossRef
37.
Das D, Nagi HS, Kothari DP (1994) Novel method for solving radial distribution networks. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 141:291–298CrossRef
38.
Zeinalzadeh A, Mohammadi Y, Moradi MH (2015) Optimal multi objective placement and sizing of multiple DGs and shunt capacitor banks simultaneously considering load uncertainty via MOPSO approach. Electr Power Energy Syst 67:336–349CrossRef
39.
Esmaeilian HR, Fadaeinedjad R (2013) Optimal reconfiguration and capacitor allocation in unbalanced distribution network considering power quality issues. In: 22nd International conference and exhibition on electricity distribution (CIRED 2013), Stockholm, Sweden, IET
Metadaten
Titel
Optimal allocation of unified power quality conditioner in the smart distribution grids
verfasst von
Ehsan Dehnavi
Saeed Afsharnia
Khalil Gholami
Publikationsdatum
08.11.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Electrical Engineering / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0948-7921
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0487
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-019-00861-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Electrical Engineering 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Eliminating the effect of hot spots on underground power cables using cool pavements

Original Paper

LCC-HVDC auxiliary emergency power coordinated control strategy considering the effect of electrical connection of the sending-end power grid

Original Paper

New approach in partial discharge diagnosis and maintenance of 22.9 kV XLPE power cables in service

Original Paper

Functioning ability of multilevel Vienna converter as new parallel active filtering configuration: simulation and experimental evaluation

Original Paper

Effect of oil impregnated paper thickness and impulse waveshapes on voltage–number characteristics

Original Paper

Transient analysis with coupled field-circuit model and experimental assessment of a PMSG used in small-scale wind turbine for water heating purpose

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise