Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wireless Networks
Erschienen in: Wireless Networks 1/2020

09.08.2018

Optimized and load balanced clustering for wireless sensor networks to increase the lifetime of WSN using MADM approaches

verfasst von: Prince Rajpoot, Pragya Dwivedi

Erschienen in: Wireless Networks | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The power utilization has verified as a major problem in wireless sensor networks (WSNs). Many researchers have provided efficient solutions for power utilization. Clustering is one of them that helps in topology control and ensures efficient power utilization. However, the clustering method should be effective that could obtain the best clusters. Comprehensive evolution of clustering protocols for the lifetime of sensor nodes is a unique approach to the total enhancement of the lifetime of WSNs. There are many conflicting factors that affect the efficiency of clustering, i.e. distance between CH and the base station, distance form node to cluster head (CH), maximum residual energy of CHs, etc. The coordination among these factors has a capability to insure the optimal power utilization by reducing power consumption and load balancing among the nodes and CHs. In this paper, we have considered total sixteen such factors and made coordination among them to select the best CHs. Multiple attribute decision-making methods are used to choose best set of CHs from the available alternatives that can fulfill the condition of coordination efficiently. The experimental results validate that the coordination among these sixteen factors put up one of the best demonstration for choosing best CHs.
Vorheriger Artikel An improved method for TOA analysis in MMW systems
Nächster Artikel Energy-spectral efficient resource allocation and power control in heterogeneous networks with D2D communication

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Zhao, F., Guibas, L. J., & Guibas, L. (2004). Wireless sensor networks: An information processing approach. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.
2.
Raghavendra, C. S., Sivalingam, K. M., & Znati, T. (Eds.). (2006). Wireless sensor networks. Berlin: Springer.
3.
Akyildiz, I. F., & Kasimoglu, I. H. (2004). Wireless sensor and actor networks: Research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 2(4), 351–67.
4.
Chilamkurti, N., Zeadally, S., Vasilakos, A., & Sharma, V. (2009). Cross-layer support for energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Sensors, 2009, 1–9.
5.
Meng, T., Wu, F., Yang, Z., Chen, G., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2016). Spatial reusability-aware routing in multi-hop wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 65(1), 244–55.MathSciNetMATH
6.
Busch, C., Kannan, R., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2012). Approximating congestion+ dilation in networks via “quality of routing games”. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 61(9), 1270–83.MathSciNetMATH
7.
Dvir, A., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2010). Backpressure-based routing protocol for DTNs. In InACM SIGCOMM computer communication ACM (Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 405–406).
8.
Yao, Y., Cao, Q., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2013). EDAL: An energy-efficient, delay-aware, and lifetime-balancing data collection protocol for wireless sensor networks. In 10th international conference IEEE mobile ad-hoc and sensor systems (MASS) (pp. 182–190).
9.
Sheng, Z., Yang, S., Yu, Y., Vasilakos, A., Mccann, J., & Leung, K. (2013). A survey on the IETF protocol suite for the internet of things: Standards, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Wireless Communications, 20(6), 91–8.
10.
Zeng, Y., Xiang, K., Li, D., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2013). Directional routing and scheduling for green vehicular delay tolerant networks. Wireless Networks, 19(2), 161–73.
11.
Luo, X., Hu, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2014). Topology evolution model for wireless multi-hop network based on socially inspired mechanism. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 416, 639–50.
12.
Li, M., Li, Z., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2013). A survey on topology control in wireless sensor networks: Taxonomy, comparative study, and open issues. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(12), 2538–57.
13.
Hu, X., Li, Y., & Xu, H. (2017). Multi-mode clustering model for hierarchical wireless sensor networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 469, 665–75.
14.
Zhang, X. M., Zhang, Y., Yan, F., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015). Interference-based topology control algorithm for delay-constrained mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 14(4), 742–54.
15.
Jing, Q., Vasilakos, A. V., Wan, J., Lu, J., & Qiu, D. (2014). Security of the internet of things: Perspectives and challenges. Wireless Networks, 20(8), 2481–501.
16.
Yan, Z., Zhang, P., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2014). A survey on trust management for Internet of Things. Journal of Network and Computer Application, 42, 120–34.
17.
Han, K., Luo, J., Liu, Y., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2013). Algorithm design for data communications in duty-cycled wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(7), 107–13.
18.
Chen, F., Deng, P., Wan, J., Zhang, D., Vasilakos, A. V., & Rong, X. (2015). Data mining for the internet of things: Literature review and challenges. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 11(8), 431047.
19.
Vasilakos, A. V., Li, Z., Simon, G., & You, W. (2015). Information centric network: Research challenges and opportunities. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 52, 1.
20.
Sengupta, S., Das, S., Nasir, M., Vasilakos, A. V., & Pedrycz, W. (2012). An evolutionary multiobjective sleep-scheduling scheme for differentiated coverage in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 42(6), 1093–1102.
21.
Xiang, L., Luo, J., & Vasilakos, A. (2011). Compressed data aggregation for energy efficient wireless sensor networks. In 2011 8th annual IEEE communications society conference sensor, mesh and ad hoc communications and networks (SECON) (pp. 46–54).
22.
Yao, Y., Cao, Q., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015). EDAL: An energy-efficient, delay-aware, and lifetime-balancing data collection protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 23(3), 810–23.
23.
Xiao, Y., Peng, M., Gibson, J., Xie, G. G., Du, D. Z., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2012). Tight performance bounds of multihop fair access for MAC protocols in wireless sensor networks and underwater sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 10, 1538–54.
24.
Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–70.
25.
Younis, O., & Fahmy, S. (2004). HEED: A hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3(4), 366–79.
26.
Kuila, P., & Jana, P. K. (2014). Energy efficient clustering and routing algorithms for wireless sensor networks: Particle swarm optimization approach. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 33, 127–40.
27.
Wei, G., Ling, Y., Guo, B., Xiao, B., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2011). Prediction-based data aggregation in wireless sensor networks: Combining grey model and Kalman Filter. Computer Communications, 34(6), 793–802.
28.
Liu, X. Y., Zhu, Y., Kong, L., Liu, C., Gu, Y., Vasilakos, A. V., et al. (2015). CDC: Compressive data collection for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 26(8), 2188–97.
29.
Zhou, L., Naixue, X., Shu, L., Vasilakos, A., & Yeo, S. S. (2010). Context-aware middleware for multimedia services in heterogeneous networks. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 25(2), 40–47.
30.
Xu, X., Ansari, R., Khokhar, A., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015). Hierarchical data aggregation using compressive sensing (HDACS) in WSNs. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), 11(3), 45.
31.
Fei, Z., Li, B., Yang, S., Xing, C., Chen, H., & Hanzo, L. (2017). A survey of multi-objective optimization in wireless sensor networks: Metrics, algorithms, and open problems. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 1, 550–86.
32.
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods. In E. Triantaphyllou (Ed.), InMulti-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study (pp. 5–21). Boston, MA: Springer.
33.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems (vol. 186). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
34.
Baker, D., Ephremides, A., & Flynn, J. (1984). The design and simulation of a mobile radio network with distributed control. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2(1), 226–37.
35.
Basagni, S. (1999). Distributed clustering for ad hoc networks. Proceedings, 4th International Symposium Parallel Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks, (I-SPAN’99) (pp. 310-315). IEEE.
36.
Amis, A. D., Prakash, R., Vuong, T. H., & Huynh, D. T. (2000). Max-min d-cluster formation in wireless ad hoc networks. In INFOCOM 2000. Nineteenth annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 32–41).
37.
Demirbas, M., Arora, A., & Mittal, V. (2004). FLOC: A fast local clustering service for wireless sensor networks. Workshop on dependability issues in wireless ad hoc networks and sensor networks (DIWANS/DSN) (pp. 1–6).
38.
Chan, H., & Perrig, A. (2004). ACE: An emergent algorithm for highly uniform cluster formation. European workshop on wireless sensor networks (pp. 154–171). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
39.
Ding, P., Holliday, J., & Celik, A. (2005). Distributed energy-efficient hierarchical clustering for wireless sensor networks. In International conference on distributed computing in sensor systems (pp. 322–339). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
40.
Bandyopadhyay, S., & Coyle, E. J. (2003). An energy efficient hierarchical clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In INFOCOM 2003. 22nd annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications (Vol. 3, pp. 1713–1723). IEEE Societies.
41.
Ye, M., Li, C., Chen, G., & Wu, J. (2005). EECS: An energy efficient clustering scheme in wireless sensor networks. In 24th IEEE international performance, computing, and communications conference, IPCCC 2005 (pp. 535–540).
42.
Youssef, A., Agrawala, A., & Younis, M. (2005). Accurate anchor-free node localization in wireless sensor networks. In 24th IEEE international performance, computing, and communications conference, IPCCC 2005 (pp. 465–470).
43.
Yuan, H. Y., Yang, S. Q., & Yi, Y. Q. (2011). An energy-efficient unequal clustering method for wireless sensor networks. In International conference on computer and management (CAMAN) (pp. 1–4).
44.
Comeau, F., Sivakumar, S. C., Robertson, W., & Phillips, W. J. (2006). Energy conserving architectures and algorithms for wireless sensor networks. In System Sciences, HICSS’06. Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference (Vol. 9, p. 236c). IEEE.
45.
Yi, S., Heo, J., Cho, Y., & Hong, J. (2007). PEACH: Power-efficient and adaptive clustering hierarchy protocol for wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 30(14–15), 2842–52.
46.
Kim, D.S., & Chung, Y.J. (2006). Self-organization routing protocol supporting mobile nodes for wireless sensor network. In 1st International Multi-symposiums Computer and Computational Sciences. IMSCCS’06 (pp. 622–626). IEEE.
47.
Renugadevi, G., & Sumithra, M. G. (2013). An analysis on LEACH-mobile protocol for mobile wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Computer Applications, 65(21), 38–42.
48.
Kumar, G. S., Vinu, P. M., & Jacob, K. P. (2008). Mobility metric based leach-mobile protocol. In 16th International conference advanced computing and communications. ADCOM 2008 (pp. 248–253). IEEE.
49.
Corn, J., & Bruce, J. W. (2017). Clustering algorithm for improved network lifetime of mobile wireless sensor networks. In International conference on computing, networking and communications (ICNC) (pp. 1063–1067). IEEE.
50.
Xiangning, F., & Yulin, S. (2007). Improvement on LEACH protocol of wireless sensor network. In International conference on sensor technologies and applications (SensorComm 2007) (pp. 260–264). Valenica: Spain.
51.
Yu-quan, Z., & Lei, W. (2010). Improving the LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks. In IET Conference Proceedings (pp. 355–359).
52.
Li, Y. Z., Zhang, A. L., & Liang, Y. Z. (2013). Improvement of leach protocol for wireless sensor networks. In 3rd international conference instrumentation, measurement, computer, communication and control (IMCCC) (pp. 322–326). IEEE
53.
Ma, X. W., & Yu, X. (2013). Improvement on LEACH protocol of wireless sensor network. In Applied mechanics and materials (pp. 1738–1742). Trans Tech Publications.
54.
Koucheryavy, A., Salim, A., & Osamy, W. (2009). Enhanced LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks. Saint Petersburg: St. Petersburg University of Telecommunication.
55.
Kumar, D., Aseri, T. C., & Patel, R. B. (2009). EEHC: Energy efficient heterogeneous clustered scheme for wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 32(4), 662–667.
56.
Qureshi, T. N., Javaid, N., Khan, A. H., Iqbal, A., Akhtar, E., & Ishfaq, M. (2013). BEENISH: Balanced energy efficient network integrated super heterogeneous protocol for wireless sensor networks. Procedia Computer Science, 19, 920–925.
57.
Javaid, N., Qureshi, T. N., Khan, A. H., Iqbal, A., Akhtar, E., & Ishfaq, M. (2013). EDDEEC: Enhanced developed distributed energy-efficient clustering for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Procedia Computer Science, 19, 914–919.
58.
Jin, S., Zhou, M., & Wu, A.S. (2003). Sensor network optimization using a genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 7th world multi-conference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics (pp. 109–116).
59.
Ferentinos, K. P., Tsiligiridis, T. A., & Arvanitis, K. G. (2005). Energy optimization of wireless sensor networks for environmental measurements. In Proceedings of the international conference on computational intelligence for measurement systems and applications (CIMSA) (Vol. 51, pp. 1031–1051).
60.
Lee, D., Lee, W., & Kim, J. (2007). Genetic algorithmic topology control for two-tiered wireless sensor networks. In International conference on computational science (pp. 385–392). Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer.
61.
Nitesh, K., Azharuddin, M., & Jana, P. K. (2015). Energy efficient fault-tolerant clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In International conference on Green computing and internet of things (ICGCIoT) (pp. 234–239). IEEE.
62.
Kuila, P., Gupta, S. K., & Jana, P. K. (2013). A novel evolutionary approach for load balanced clustering problem for wireless sensor networks. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 12, 48–56.
63.
Kuila, P., & Jana, P. K. (2014). A novel differential evolution based clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Applied Soft Computing, 25, 414–25.
64.
Saaty, T. L. (2013). Analytic network process. In Encyclopedia of operations research and management science (pp. 64–72).
65.
Yin, Y., Shi, J., Li, Y., & Zhang, P. (2006). Cluster head selection using analytical hierarchy process for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE 17th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (pp. 1–5).
66.
Durn, O., & Aguilo, J. (2008). Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 1787–94.
67.
Azadeh, A., Ghaderi, S. F., & Izadbakhsh, H. (2008). Integration of DEA and AHP with computer simulation for railway system improvement and optimization. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 195(2), 775–85.MathSciNetMATH
68.
Wei, C. C., Chien, C. F., & Wang, M. J. (2005). An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 96(1), 47–62.
69.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). Decision making for leaders: The analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world. Pittsburgh: RWS publications.
70.
Hwang, C. L., Lai, Y. J., & Liu, T. Y. (1993). A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Computers and Operations Research, 20(8), 889–99.MATH
71.
Hamzeloei, F., & Dermany, M. K. (2016). A TOPSIS based cluster head selection for wireless sensor network. Procedia Computer Science, 98, 8–15.
72.
Azad, P., & Sharma, V. (2013). Clusterhead selection using multiple attribute decision making (MADM) approach in wireless sensor networks. In International conference on heterogeneous networking for quality, reliability, security and robustness (pp. 141–154). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
73.
Yildiz, H. U., Temiz, M., & Tavli, B. (2015). Impact of limiting hop count on the lifetime of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 19(4), 569–72.
74.
Pantazis, N. A., Nikolidakis, S. A., & Vergados, D. D. (2013). Energy-efficient routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 15(2), 551–91.
75.
Akhtar, F., & Rehmani, M. H. (2015). Energy replenishment using renewable and traditional energy resources for sustainable wireless sensor networks: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 769–84.
76.
Amjad, M., Sharif, M., Afzal, M. K., & Kim, S. W. (2016). TinyOS-new trends, comparative views, and supported sensing applications: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 16(9), 2865–89.
77.
Venkatraman, S., & Sarvepalli, S. K. (2018). Load balance technique with adaptive position updates (LAPU) for geographic routing in MANETs. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 18(1), 73.
78.
Collotta, M. (2015). FLBA: A fuzzy algorithm for load balancing in IEEE 802.11 networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 53, 183–92.
79.
Zhang, H., Song, L., & Jun, Y. (2018). Load balancing for 5G ultra-dense networks using device-to-device communications. arXiv preprint arXiv:​1803.​06082.
80.
Ma, Y. W., Chen, J. L., & Lin, C. J. (2018). Automated network load balancing and capacity enhancing mechanism in future network. IEEE Access (vol. 6, pp. 19407–19418).
81.
Rajpoot, P., & Dwivedi, P. Multiple parameter based energy balanced and optimized clustering for WSN to enhance the Lifetime using MADM Approaches, Wireless Personal Communications (Communicated).
82.
Wang, C. L., & Yoon, K. S. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making. Berlin: Springer.
83.
Yoon, K. (1987). A reconciliation among discrete compromise solutions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 38(3), 277–86.MATH
84.
Assari, A., Mahesh, T. M., & Assari, E. (2012). Role of public participation in sustainability of historical city: Usage of TOPSIS method. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(3), 2289–94.
85.
Brans, J. P. (1982). The engineering of decision: Elaboration instruments of decision support method PROMETHEE. Quebec: Laval University.
86.
Brans, J. P., & Vincke, P. (1985). Note: A preference ranking organisation method: (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Management Science, 31(6), 647–56.MathSciNetMATH
87.
88.
Instruments, T. (2003). MSP430x13x, MSP430x14x Mixed signal microcontroller datasheet, SLAS272D.
89.
90.
91.
Metadaten
Titel
Optimized and load balanced clustering for wireless sensor networks to increase the lifetime of WSN using MADM approaches
verfasst von
Prince Rajpoot
Pragya Dwivedi
Publikationsdatum
09.08.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Wireless Networks / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1812-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Wireless Networks 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

FTR: features tree based routing in mobile social networks

OriginalPaper

A peer-to-peer communication based content distribution protocol for incentive-aware delay tolerant networks

OriginalPaper

Design and evaluation of an LQI-based beaconless routing protocol for a heterogeneous MSN

OriginalPaper

Variable Global Optimization min-sum (VGOMS) algorithm of decode-and-forward protocol for the relay node in the cooperative channel

OriginalPaper

WOA-NN: a decision algorithm for vertical handover in heterogeneous networks

OriginalPaper

A Bayesian game model and network availability model for small cells under denial of service (DoS) attack in 5G wireless communication network

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise