nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

03.08.2023

Patient quality of life and caregiver experiences in ovarian cancer: How are they related?

verfasst von: Elisa Stragapede, Danielle Petricone-Westwood, Sarah Hales, Jacqueline Galica, Sophie Lebel

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 12/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with ovarian cancer and their spousal caregivers report similarities in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and experiences throughout the cancer process. Previous research has reflected these shared experiences, demonstrating caregivers’ capacity to accurately rate their patient-partner’s HRQoL as a proxy. In response, this study examines associations between caregivers’ perceptions of their patient-partner’s HRQoL and their own caregiving responsibilities, consequences to well-being, and desired assistance from the healthcare system. This study will be beneficial when developing supports to assist caregivers throughout the cancer journey.

Methods

Using a cross-sectional survey design, spousal caregivers (N = 82) of patients with ovarian cancer completed measures on perceived patient HRQoL and caregiver experiences. Correlation analyses determined medical and sociodemographic covariates. A multivariate multiple regression was conducted using four proxy HRQoL functioning subscales and three factors of reported experiences as caregivers in cancer. Post-hoc univariate regression analyses were run on significant factors to assess the associations that exist.

Results

Caregiver-perceived patient physical functioning was significantly associated with more caregiving tasks after controlling for education, age, and stage of ovarian cancer, but no other HRQoL functioning scale (i.e., role, emotional, social) was associated with caregiver experiences.

Conclusion

The study provides a unique perspective into the caregiver experience by attending to interpersonal factors in relation to caregiver experiences. Results may be able to guide interventions aimed at supporting caregivers through the cancer process by offering more assistance with tasks as their partner’s physical condition worsens.

Vorheriger Artikel Living well while providing support: validation of LTCQ-Carer for assessing informal carers’ quality of life

Nächster Artikel Supportive care needs in Australian melanoma patients and caregivers: results from a quantitative cross-sectional survey

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

The present study uses the original three factors (i.e., tasks, needs, and consequences) to provide stronger, more comprehensive interpretations to explain caregiver experiences. The main researcher, E. S., contacted Dr. Line Lund (CaTCoN [24]) who indicated this method would be suitable.

Preisler, M., Heuse, S., Riemer, M., Kendel, F., & Letsch, A. (2018). Early integration of palliative cancer care: Patients’ and caregivers’ challenges, treatment preferences, and knowledge of illness and treatment throughout the cancer trajectory. Supportive Care in Cancer, 26(3), 921–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3911-5CrossRefPubMed

Tan, J. H., Sharpe, L., & Russell, H. (2021). The impact of ovarian cancer on individuals and their caregivers: A qualitative analysis. Psycho-Oncology, 30(2), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5551CrossRefPubMed

Haraldstad, K., Wahl, A., Andenæs, R., et al. (2019). A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences. Quality of Life Research, 28, 2641–2650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02214-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mayo, N. (2015). Dictionary of quality of life and health outcomes measurement. International Society for Quality of Life Research.

Kornblith, A. B., Thaler, H. T., Wong, G., Vlamis, V., Mccarthylepore, J., Loseth, D. B., Hakes, T., Hoskins, W. J., & Portenoy, R. K. (1995). Quality of life of women with ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology, 59(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1995.0014CrossRefPubMed

Butow, P. N., Price, M. A., Bell, M. L., Webb, P. M., deFazio, A., The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Quality of Life Study Investigators, & Friedlander, M. (2014). Caring for women with ovarian cancer in the last year of life: A longitudinal study of caregiver quality of life, distress and unmet needs. Gynecologic Oncology, 132(3), 690–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.01.002CrossRefPubMed

Cancer Care Ontario. (2019). Oncology caregiver support framework. Cancer Care Ontario.

National Alliance for Caregiving. (2016). Cancer caregiving in the U.S: An intense, episodic, and challenging care experience. National Alliance for Caregiving.

Revenson, T. A., Konstadina, G., Luszczynska, A., Morrison, V., Panagopoulou, E., Vilchinsky, N., & Hagedoorn, M. (2016). Caregiving in the illness context. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

10.

Kassir, Z. M., Li, J., Harrison, C., Johnson, J. T., & Nilsen, M. L. (2021). Disparity of perception of quality of life between head and neck cancer patients and caregivers. BMC Cancer, 21, 1127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08865-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Wilson, K. A., Dowling, A. J., Abdolell, M., & Tannock, I. F. (2000). Perception of quality of life by patients, partners and treating physicians. Quality of Life Research, 9, 1041–1052.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Milne, D. J., Mulder, L. L., Beelen, H. C. M., Schofield, P., Kempen, G. I. J. M., & Aranda, S. (2006). Patients’ self-report and family caregivers’ perception of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: How do they compare? European Journal of Cancer Care, 15, 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00639.xCrossRefPubMed

13.

Ponto, J. A., & Barton, D. (2008). Husbands’ perspective of living with wives’ ovarian cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 17(12), 1225–1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1351CrossRefPubMed

14.

Navaie-Waliser, M., Feldman, P. H., Gould, D. A., Levine, C., Kuerbis, A. N., & Donelan, K. (2002). When the caregiver needs care: The plight of vulnerable caregivers. American Journal of Public Health, 92(3), 409–413. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.92.3.409CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Kim, Y., & Carver, C. S. (2019). Unmet needs of family cancer caregivers predict quality of life in long-term cancer survivorship. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 13(5), 749–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00794-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Petricone-Westwood, D., Galica, J., Hales, S., Stragapede, E., & Lebel, S. (2021). An investigation of the effect of attachment on distress among partners of patients with ovarian cancer and their relationship with the cancer care providers. Current Oncology, 28, 2950–2960. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28040258CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Price, M. A., Butow, P. N., Costa, D. S. J., King, M. T., Aldridge, L. J., Fardell, J. E., DeFazio, A., Webb, P. M., The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Quality of Life Study Investigators. (2010). Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression in women with invasive ovarian cancer and their caregivers. Medical Journal of Australia, 193, S52–S57. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03929.xCrossRefPubMed

18.

Kim, H. H., Kim, S. Y., Kim, J. M., Kim, S. W., Shin, I. S., Shim, H. J., Hwang, J. E., Chung, I. J., & Yoon, J. S. (2016). Influence of caregiver personality on the burden of family caregivers of terminally ill cancer patients. Palliative and Supportive Care, 14(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951515000073CrossRefPubMed

19.

Petricone-Westwood, D., Hales, S., Galica, J., Stragapede, E., & Lebel, S. (2021). What do partners of patients with ovarian cancer need from the healthcare system? An examination of caregiving experiences in the healthcare setting and reported distress. Supportive Care in Cancer, 29(3), 1213–1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05599-3CrossRefPubMed

20.

Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., & de Haes, J. C. (1993). The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.5.365CrossRefPubMed

21.

Sneeuw, K. C., Aaronson, N. K., Sprangers, M. A., Detmar, S. B., Wever, L. D., & Schornagel, J. H. (1998). Comparison of patient and proxy EORTC QLQ-C30 ratings in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(7), 617–631.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Fayers, P., Aaronson, N. K., Bjordal, K., Groenvold, M., Curran, D., & Bottomley, A. (2001). EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual (3rd ed.). European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

23.

Greimel, E., Bottomley, A., Cull, A., Waldenstrom, A. C., Arraras, J., Chauvenet, L., Holzner, B., Kuljanic, K., Lebrec, J., D'haese, S., & EORTC Quality of Life Group and the Quality of Life Unit. (2003). An international field study of the reliability and validity of a disease-specific questionnaire module (the QLQ-OV28) in assessing the quality of life of patients with ovarian cancer. European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990), 39(10), 1402–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00307-1.

24.

Lund, L., Ross, L., & Groenvold, M. (2012). The initial development of the “Cancer Caregiving Tasks, Consequences and Needs Questionnaire” (CaTCoN). Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 51(8), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2012.681697CrossRefPubMed

25.

Lund, L., Ross, L., Petersen, M. A., & Groenvold, M. (2014). The validity and reliability of the ‘Cancer Caregiving Tasks, Consequences and Needs Questionnaire’ (CaTCoN). Acta Oncologica, 53(7), 966–974. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.888496CrossRefPubMed

26.

Anderson, T. W. (2003). An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis (3rd ed). Wiley-Interscience.

27.

Elliott, A. C., & Woodward, W. A. (2007). Correlation and regression. In Statistical analysis quick reference guidebook (pp. 77–112). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985949.n4

28.

Frigon, J.-Y., & Laurencelle, L. (1993). Analysis of covariance: A proposed algorithm. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053001001CrossRef

29.

Spatuzzi, R., Giulietti, M. V., Ricciuti, M., Merico, F., Romito, F., Reggiardo, G., Birgolotti, L., Fabbietti, P., Raucci, L., Rosati, G., Bilancia, D., & Vespa, A. (2020). Does family caregiver burden differ between elderly and younger caregivers in supporting dying patients with cancer? An Italian Study. The American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care, 37(8), 576–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909119890840CrossRef

30.

Daly, B. J., Douglas, S., Lipson, A., & Foley, H. (2009). Needs of older caregivers of patients with advanced cancer. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 57(Suppl 2), S293–S295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02516.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Stenberg, U., Ruland, C. M., & Miaskowski, C. (2010). Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 19(10), 1013–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1670CrossRefPubMed

32.

Leow, M. Q. H., & Chan, S. W. C. (2017). The challenges, emotions, coping, and gains of family caregivers caring for patients with advanced cancer in Singapore: A qualitative study. Cancer Nursing, 40(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000354CrossRefPubMed

33.

Dang, S., Looijmans, A., Ferraris, G., Lamura, G., & Hagedoorn, M. (2022). Exploring the needs of spousal, adult child, and adult sibling informal caregivers: A mixed-method systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 832974. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.832974CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Li, Q. P., Mak, Y. W., & Loke, A. Y. (2013). Spouses’ experience of caregiving for cancer patients: A literature review. International Nursing Review, 60(2), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12000CrossRefPubMed

35.

Hartnett, J., Thom, B., & Kline, N. (2016). Caregiver burden in end-stage ovarian cancer. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 20(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1188/16.CJON.169-173CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Patient quality of life and caregiver experiences in ovarian cancer: How are they related?
verfasst von: Elisa Stragapede
Danielle Petricone-Westwood
Sarah Hales
Jacqueline Galica
Sophie Lebel
Publikationsdatum: 03.08.2023
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 12/2023
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03481-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2023

A scoping review of the use of visual tools and adapted easy-read approaches in Quality-of-Life instruments for adults

Translation and validation of a Chinese version of the pancreatitis quality of life instrument (PANQOLI) in patients with chronic pancreatitis

The Patient Generated Index (PGI) as an early-warning system for predicting brain health challenges: a prospective cohort study for people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)

Estimating meaningful change for The Impact of Weight on Self-Perception (IW-SP) questionnaire among people with type 2 diabetes

Estimating the disutility of relapse in relapsing–remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis using the EQ-5D-5L, AQoL-8D, EQ-5D-5L-psychosocial, and SF-6D: implications for health economic evaluation models

Change in health-related quality of life and functional disability over time post-concussion in youth

Premium Partner