nach oben

Erschienen in:

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Performance Management Systems as Driver of Public Administration Improvement: A Dream?

verfasst von : Debora Tomasi, Stefano Scravaglieri, Maurizio Decastri

Erschienen in: Designing Organizational Systems

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Recently the Italian Government required public administrations to manage organizational and individual performance and to implement pay for performance systems. Actually each Italian public administration has to adopt Performance Management Systems (PMS). The Reform recalls the New Public Management framework in several points even if there’s a great controversy in the literature concerning the effective implementation of PMS in public administrations: for some authors PMS would run well while for others they need an adaptation to the public context. In this scenario, we assess the design of PMS on the basis of the empirical evidence collected in an Italian public administration and we indentify which parts of the literature are consistent with the empirical results. Our aim is to contribute to knowledge base on performance management in public administrations through an action design research approach based on the empirical evidence collected in the design of a PMS in Italy.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Designing Innovative Learning Spaces in Higher Education at a Turning Point: Institutional Identities, Pervasive Smart Technologies and Organizational Learning

Nächstes Kapitel Design on a Societal Scale: The Case of e-Government Strategic Planning

ISPRA is the Italian acronym of “Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale”.

CAD Codice dell’Amministrazione Digitale, Decreto legislativo 7 marzo 2005, n. 82, art. 69 (2005).

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all season. Public Administration, 69, 3–19.CrossRef

Pollit, C., & Bouckaret, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University press.

Emery, Y. (2004). Rewarding civil service performance through team bonuses: findings, analysis and recommendations. International Review of Administrative Science, 70, 157–168.CrossRef

Kettl, D. (2000). The global public management revolution. Washington: The Brookings Institution.

Varone, F., & Giauque, D. (2001). Policy management and performance related pay: comparative analysis of service contracts in Switzerland. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 67(3), 543–565.CrossRef

Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15, 80–116.CrossRef

Emery, Y., & Giauque, D. (2005). Employment in the public and private sectors: toward a confusing hybridization process. International Review of Administrative Science, 71, 636–657.CrossRef

Gualmini, E. (2008). Restructuring Weberian bureaucracy: Comparing managerial reforms in Europe and the United States. Public Administration, 86, 75–94.CrossRef

Kickert, M. (1993). Complexity governance and dynamics: Conceptual explorations of public network management. In J. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern governance. London: Sage.

10.

Ingraham, P., James, R., & Elliot, F. (1995). Political management strategies and political/career relationships: Where are we now in the federal government? Public Administration Review, 55, 263–272.CrossRef

11.

Thompson, J. (2006). The federal civil service: The demise of an institution. Public Administration Review, 66, 496–503.CrossRef

12.

Grey, C., & Garsten, C. (2001). Trust. Control and Post-Bureaucracy. Organization Studies, 2, 229–250.

13.

Hodgson, D. (2004). Project work: The legacy of bureaucratic control in the post-bureaucratic organization. Organization, 1, 81–100.CrossRef

14.

Kallinikos, J. (2004). The social foundations of the bureaucratic order. Organization, 1, 13–36.CrossRef

15.

March, S., & Smith, G. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251–266.CrossRef

16.

Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28, 75–105.

17.

Simon, H. (1996). The sciences of artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.

18.

Hevner, A. (2007). A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems Information Systems, 19(2), 87–92.

19.

van Aken, J. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: The quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219–246.CrossRef

20.

Sein, M., Henfridsoon, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56.

21.

Walls, J., Widmeyer, G., & El Sawy, O. (1992). Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 36–59.CrossRef

22.

Walls, J., & Widmeyer, G. (2004). Assessing information system design theory in perspective: How useful was our 1992 initial rendition. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 6(2), 43–58.

23.

Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10, 363–382.CrossRef

24.

Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing performance. International comparisons. Oxon: Routledge.

25.

OECD. (2004). Public sector modernisation: Governing for performance. Paris: OECD Publishing.

26.

Plant, R. (2003). A public service ethic and political accountability. Parliamentary Affairs, 56, 560–579.CrossRef

27.

Flamholtz, G. (1995). Il sistema di controllo come strumento di direzione. In F. Amigoni, Misurazioni d'azienda. Milano: Giuffrè.

28.

Boivard, T. (1996). The political economy of performance measurement. In A. Halachmi & G. Bouckaert (Eds.), Organizational performance and measurement in the public sector: Toward service, efforts and accomplishment reporting. Westport: Quorum Books.

29.

Hinna, L., & Monteduro, F. (2003). Trust in local authorities : The role of social reporting to citizens. European group of public administration, Oeires.

30.

Mussari, R. (2000). La valutazione dei programmi nelle aziende pubbliche. Giappichelli, Torino.

31.

Ford, J., & Schellenberg, D. (1982). Conceptual Issues of linkage in the assessment of organizational performance. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 49–58.

32.

Bannister, B., & Balkin, D. (1990). Performance evaluation and compensation feedback messages: An integrated model. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 97–111.

33.

Heeks, R. (2000). The approach of senior public officials to information technology-related reform: Lessons from India. Public Administration and Development, 20, 197–205.CrossRef

34.

von Waldenberg, W. (2004). Electronic government and development. European Journal of Development Research, 16, 417–432.CrossRef

35.

Madon, S. (2006). IT-based government reform initiatives in the indian state of Gujarat. Journal of International Development, 18, 877–888.CrossRef

36.

Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The new public management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

37.

Hood, C. (1995). Emerging issues in public administration. Public administration, 73(1), 165–183.

38.

Pollit, C. (1990). Managerialism and the public services: The Anglo-American experience. Mass. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

39.

Daley, D. (1992). Performance appraisal in the public sector—Techniques and applications. CT: Quorum, Westport.

40.

Pynes, J. (1997). Human resources management for public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

41.

Kellough, J., & Selden, S. (1997). Pay-for-performance systems in state government: Perceptions of state agency personnel managers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 17(1), 5–21.CrossRef

42.

Guion, R. (1997). Criterion measures and the criterion dilemma. In N. Andreson & P. Herriot (Eds.), International handbook of selection and assessment (pp. 287–302). Chichester: Wiley.

43.

Fletcher, C. (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research agenda. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 473–487.CrossRef

44.

Kessler, I., & Purcell, J. (1992). Performance related pay: Objectives and application. Human Resource Management Journal, 2(3), 13–33.CrossRef

45.

Campbell, D., Campbell, K., & Chia, H. (1998). Merit pay, performance appraisal, and individual motivation: An analysis and alternative. Human Resource Management, 37(2), 131–146.CrossRef

46.

Beer, M., Cannon, M. (2004). Promise and peril in implementing pay for performance. Human resource management, 43(1), 3–20.

47.

Kim, J. (2010). Strategic human resource practices: Introducing alternatives for organizational performance improvement in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 38–49.CrossRef

48.

Latham, G., Almost, J., Mann, S., & Moore, C. (2005). New developments in performance management. Organizational Dynamics, 34(1), 77–87.CrossRef

49.

Daley, D. (1993). Performance appraisal as an aid in personnel decisions. American Review of Public Administration, 23(3), 201–213.CrossRef

50.

Li, L. (2000). An analysis of sources of competitiveness and performance of Chinese manufacturers. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 20(3), 299–315.CrossRef

51.

Roback, T. (1989). Personnel research perspectives on human resource management and development. Public Personnel Management, 18(2), 138–162.

52.

Baron, A., & Armstrong, M. (1998). Out of the box. People Management, 23, 38–41.

53.

DeNisi, A. (2000). Performance appraisal and performance management: A multilevel analysis. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowki (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations (pp. 121–156). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .

54.

Mondy, R., Noe, R., & Premeaux, S. (2002). Human resource management. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

55.

Roberts, G. (2002). Employee performance appraisal system participation: A technique that works. Public Personnel Management, 31(3), 333–342.

56.

Locke, E., & Latham, G. (1990).Work motivation: The high performance cycle. In U. Kleinbeck & et al. (Eds.), Work motivation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

57.

Guest, D. (1997). Human resource management and performance: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8, 263–276.CrossRef

58.

Murphy, K., & Cleveland, J. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

59.

Brown, M., & Heywood, J. (2005). Performance appraisal systems: Determinants and change. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(4), 659–679.CrossRef

60.

Soltani, E. (2005). Conflict between theory and practice: TQM and performance appraisal. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 22(8), 796–818.CrossRef

61.

Hodgetts, R. (1993). Modern human relations at work. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

62.

Reinhardt, C. (1985). The state of performance appraisal: A literature review. Human Resource Planning, 8(2), 105–110.

63.

Spagnoletti, P., & Federici, T. (2011). Exploring the interplay between FLOSS adoption and organizational innovation. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29(15), 279–298.

64.

Winter, R., & Strauch, B. (2003). A method for demand-driven information requirements analysis in data warehousing projects. Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Titel: Performance Management Systems as Driver of Public Administration Improvement: A Dream?
verfasst von: Debora Tomasi
Stefano Scravaglieri
Maurizio Decastri
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Designing Organizational Systems
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33370-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-33371-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33371-2_13

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"