Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Argumentation 3/2013

01.08.2013

Peter A. Cramer: Controversy as News Discourse

Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2011, Viii + 203 pp

verfasst von: Andrea Rocci, Marta Zampa

Erschienen in: Argumentation | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

Peter Cramer’s1 book on controversy as news discourse sets to explain how journalism shapes public controversy in the modern industrial society and how it influences the experience of it by the mass mediated public. …

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Fußnoten
1
Peter Cramer is assistant professor at the Department of English of Simon Fraser University (CAN).
 
2
On journalists as participants see also p. 29.
 
3
Consider for instance the following Italian headlines, extracted via Google: Il Festival di Bayreuth apre tra le polemiche ‘Bayreuth festival opens amid controversy’, Caos post-incidente, infuria la polemica ‘Post-accident chaos, controversy rages’. In both cases the Italian noun controversia would have been infelicitous, suggesting a somewhat learned context and a high level of argumentative quality, which are clearly off-color in the examples.
 
4
Cf. for instance Lewiński’s (2011) account of argumentative asynchronous “polylogue” in Internet based forums.
 
5
This holds, at least, in the Pragma-Dialectical view of resolution whose first ideal step is the confrontation stage where standpoints over the issue are made clear (cf. van Eemeren 2010: 8–11).
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bergler, S. 2006. Conveying attitude with reported speech. In Computing attitude and affect in text: Theory and applications, 11–22. Dordrecht: Springer. Bergler, S. 2006. Conveying attitude with reported speech. In Computing attitude and affect in text: Theory and applications, 11–22. Dordrecht: Springer.
Zurück zum Zitat Dascal, M. 2003. Understanding controversies. In Interpretation and understanding, ed. M. Dascal. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Dascal, M. 2003. Understanding controversies. In Interpretation and understanding, ed. M. Dascal. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Zurück zum Zitat van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Zurück zum Zitat Greco Morasso, S. 2011. Argumentation in dispute mediation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Greco Morasso, S. 2011. Argumentation in dispute mediation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewiński, M. 2011. The collective antagonist: Multiple criticism in informal online deliberation. In The seventh conference of the international society for the study of argumentation (ISSA), ed. F.H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, and G. Mitchell, 1089–1101. Amsterdam: SicSat. Lewiński, M. 2011. The collective antagonist: Multiple criticism in informal online deliberation. In The seventh conference of the international society for the study of argumentation (ISSA), ed. F.H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, and G. Mitchell, 1089–1101. Amsterdam: SicSat.
Zurück zum Zitat Rigotti, E., and A. Rocci. 2006. Towards a definition of communication context. Studies in Communication Sciences 6(2): 155–180. Rigotti, E., and A. Rocci. 2006. Towards a definition of communication context. Studies in Communication Sciences 6(2): 155–180.
Zurück zum Zitat Rocci, A. 2009. Manoeuvring with voices: The polyphonic framing of arguments in an institutional advertisement. In Examining argumentation in context, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, 257–284. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Rocci, A. 2009. Manoeuvring with voices: The polyphonic framing of arguments in an institutional advertisement. In Examining argumentation in context, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, 257–284. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Zurück zum Zitat Smirnova, A.V. (2009). Reported speech as an element of argumentative newspaper discourse. Discourse & Communication 3(1): 79–103. Smirnova, A.V. (2009). Reported speech as an element of argumentative newspaper discourse. Discourse & Communication 3(1): 79–103.
Zurück zum Zitat Walton, D. 2004. Relevance in argumentation. Mahwah: Erlbaum. Walton, D. 2004. Relevance in argumentation. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Zurück zum Zitat Zlatkova, G. 2012. Reported argumentation in economic-financial news. In Exploring argumentative contexts, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 377–391. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Zlatkova, G. 2012. Reported argumentation in economic-financial news. In Exploring argumentative contexts, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 377–391. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Metadaten
Titel
Peter A. Cramer: Controversy as News Discourse
Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2011, Viii + 203 pp
verfasst von
Andrea Rocci
Marta Zampa
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Argumentation / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0920-427X
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-8374
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-012-9283-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Argumentation 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner