nach oben

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

Erschienen in:

14.12.2018 | Original Article

Physicochemical characteristics and FTIR-derived structural parameters of hydrochar produced by hydrothermal carbonisation of pea pod (Pisum sativum Linn.) waste

verfasst von: Xiangyuan Dong, Shuqing Guo, Hongyan Wang, Zhezhe Wang, Xinjie Gao

Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Conversion of pea pod (Pisum sativum Linn.) waste into energy and chemical products is a sustainable waste treatment option. In this work, hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) of pea pod (Pisum sativum Linn.) waste was performed at 210–270 °C for 30–480 min. The effects of reaction severity (temperature and time) on the physicochemical and structural properties of hydrochar, including CHNO content, CHO recovery, higher heating value (HHV), structural parameters determined by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and O/C and N/C atomic ratios determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), were investigated. The relationships among the properties of hydrochar were revealed. The results showed that the maximum variation rate of CHO recovery exhibited the trend O > H > C. The N recovery seemed to be independent on severity. With decrease in hydrochar yield, the O/C atomic ratio determined by elemental analysis decreased linearly and approached that of lignite and sub-bituminous coal at high severity, while the C recovery and HHV increased linearly. The O/C atomic ratio calculated by XPS approached that determined by elemental analysis as severity was equal to or greater than that at 230 °C for 480 min, while the N/C atomic ratio calculated by XPS is lower than that determined by elemental analysis at different severities. The structural parameters determined by FTIR (CH₂/CH₃, ‘C’ factor, C=O/Car and C–O–R/Car) trended down with rise in reaction severity. The results will provide more accurate information on the physicochemical characteristics and structural parameters of pea pod hydrochar to control its properties for use in diverse applications.

Vorheriger Artikel Facile preparation of activated carbon foam via pyrolysis of waste bread under CO2 atmosphere

Nächster Artikel Fuel characteristics of binder free briquettes made at room temperature from blends of oil palm mesocarp fibre and Ceiba pentandra

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, Funke A, Berge ND, Neubauer Y, Titirici MM, Fühner C, Bens O, Kern J, Emmerich KH (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2:71–106. https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.81 CrossRef

Titirici M-M, Thomas A, Antonietti M (2007) Back in the black: hydrothermal carbonization of plant material as an efficient chemical process to treat the CO2 problem? New J Chem 31:787–789. https://doi.org/10.1039/B616045J CrossRef

Funke A, Ziegler F (2010) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: a summary and discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 4:160–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.198 CrossRef

Bach Q-V, Skreiberg Ø (2016) Upgrading biomass fuels via wet torrefaction: a review and comparison with dry torrefaction. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:665–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.014 CrossRef

Nizamuddin S, Baloch HA, Griffin GJ, Mubarak NM, Bhutto AW, Abro R, Mazari SA, Ali BS (2017) An overview of effect of process parameters on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. Renew Sust Energ Rev 73:1289–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.122 CrossRef

Zhu X, Liu Y, Qian F, Zhang S, Chen J (2015) Investigation on the physical and chemical properties of hydrochar and its derived pyrolysis char for their potential application: influence of hydrothermal carbonization conditions. Energy Fuel 29:5222–5230. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00512 CrossRef

Lynam JG, Toufiq Reza M, Vasquez VR, Coronella CJ (2012) Effect of salt addition on hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass. Fuel 99:271–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.035 CrossRef

Gao P, Zhou Y, Meng F, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Zhang W, Xue G (2016) Preparation and characterization of hydrochar from waste eucalyptus bark by hydrothermal carbonization. Energy 97:238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.123 CrossRef

Wu Q, Huang L, Yu S, Liu S, Xie C, Ragauskas AJ (2017) Structural elucidation of hydro-products from hydrothermal carbonization of loblolly pine at different temperatures using NMR techniques. Energy 133:171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.040 CrossRef

10.

Wilk M, Magdziarz A (2017) Hydrothermal carbonization, torrefaction and slow pyrolysis of Miscanthus giganteus. Energy 140:1292–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.031 CrossRef

11.

Basso D, Patuzzi F, Castello D, Baratieri M, Rada EC, Weiss-Hortala E, Fiori L (2016) Agro-industrial waste to solid biofuel through hydrothermal carbonization. Waste Manag 47:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.05.013 CrossRef

12.

Guo S, Dong X, Wu T, Zhu C (2016) Influence of reaction conditions and feedstock on hydrochar properties. Energy Convers Manag 123:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.06.029 CrossRef

13.

Mäkelä M, Kwong CW, Broström M, Yoshikawa K (2017) Hydrothermal treatment of grape marc for solid fuel applications. Energy Convers Manag 145:371–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.015 CrossRef

14.

Reza MT, Wirth B, Lüder U, Werner M (2014) Behavior of selected hydrolyzed and dehydrated products during hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. Bioresour Technol 169:352–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.010 CrossRef

15.

Liu Y, Yao S, Wang Y, Lu H, Brar SK, Yang S (2017) Bio- and hydrochars from rice straw and pig manure: inter-comparison. Bioresour Technol 235:332–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.103 CrossRef

16.

Román S, Nabais JMV, Laginhas C, Ledesma B, González JF (2012) Hydrothermal carbonization as an effective way of densifying the energy content of biomass. Fuel Process Technol 103:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.11.009 CrossRef

17.

Xiao L-P, Shi Z-J, Xu F, Sun R-C (2012) Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 118:619–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.060 CrossRef

18.

Guo S, Dong X, Wu T, Shi F, Zhu C (2015) Characteristic evolution of hydrochar from hydrothermal carbonization of corn stalk. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 116:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.10.015 CrossRef

19.

Donar YO, Çağlar E, Sınağ A (2016) Preparation and characterization of agricultural waste biomass based hydrochars. Fuel 183:366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.108 CrossRef

20.

Nizamuddin S, Mubarak NM, Tiripathi M, Jayakumar NS, Sahu JN, Ganesan P (2016) Chemical, dielectric and structural characterization of optimized hydrochar produced from hydrothermal carbonization of palm shell. Fuel 163:88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.08.057 CrossRef

21.

Gao Y, Wang X, Wang J, Li X, Cheng J, Yang H, Chen H (2013) Effect of residence time on chemical and structural properties of hydrochar obtained by hydrothermal carbonization of water hyacinth. Energy 58:376–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.023 CrossRef

22.

Gai C, Chen M, Liu T, Peng N, Liu Z (2016) Gasification characteristics of hydrochar and pyrochar derived from sewage sludge. Energy 113:957–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.129 CrossRef

23.

Mäkelä M, Benavente V, Fullana A (2015) Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass: effect of process conditions on hydrochar properties. Appl Energy 155:576–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.022 CrossRef

24.

Kazan A, Celiktas MS, Sargin S, Yesil-Celiktas O (2015) Bio-based fractions by hydrothermal treatment of olive pomace: process optimization and evaluation. Energy Convers Manag 103:366–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.06.084 CrossRef

25.

Zhang L, Wang Q, Wang B, Yang G, Lucia LA, Chen J (2015) Hydrothermal carbonization of corncob residues for hydrochar production. Energy Fuel 29:872–876. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef502462p CrossRef

26.

He X, Liu X, Nie B, Song D (2017) FTIR and Raman spectroscopy characterization of functional groups in various rank coals. Fuel 206:555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.101

27.

Mateos-Aparicio I, Redondo-Cuenca A, Villanueva-Suárez M-J, Zapata-Revilla MA, Tenorio-Sanz MD (2010) Pea pod, broad bean pod and okara, potential sources of functional compounds. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:1467–1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2010.05.008 CrossRef

28.

Guo S, Dong X, Zhu C, Han Y, Ma F, Wu T (2017) Pyrolysis behaviors and thermodynamics properties of hydrochar from bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla cv. pubescens) shoot shell. Bioresour Technol 233:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.072 CrossRef

29.

Channiwala SA, Parikh PP (2002) A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel 81:1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00131-4 CrossRef

30.

Overend RP, Chornet E (1987) Fractionation of lignocellulosics by steam-aqueous pretreatments. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 321:523–536. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1987.0029 CrossRef

31.

Guo S, Dong X, Zhu C, Han Y, Wang Z (2017) A simple modeling approach for characteristics analysis of hydrothermal liquefaction products from low-lipid aquatic plants. Appl Therm Eng 125:394–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.042 CrossRef

32.

Chen X, Ma X, Peng X, Lin Y, Yao Z (2018) Conversion of sweet potato waste to solid fuel via hydrothermal carbonization. Bioresour Technol 249:900–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.096 CrossRef

33.

Uzun BB, Apaydin-Varol E, Ateş F, Özbay N, Pütün AE (2010) Synthetic fuel production from tea waste: characterisation of bio-oil and bio-char. Fuel 89:176–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.08.040 CrossRef

34.

Toufiq Reza M, Poulson SR, Román S, Coronella CJ (2018) Behavior of stable carbon and stable nitrogen isotopes during hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 131:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.02.006 CrossRef

35.

Sabio E, Álvarez-Murillo A, Román S, Ledesma B (2016) Conversion of tomato-peel waste into solid fuel by hydrothermal carbonization: influence of the processing variables. Waste Manag 47:122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.016 CrossRef

36.

Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86:1781–1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013 CrossRef

37.

Ibarra J, Muñoz E, Moliner R (1996) FTIR study of the evolution of coal structure during the coalification process. Org Geochem 24:725–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6380(96)00063-0 CrossRef

38.

Li W, Zhu Y (2014) Structural characteristics of coal vitrinite during pyrolysis. Energy Fuel 28:3645–3654. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef500300r CrossRef

39.

Chen Y, Mastalerz M, Schimmelmann A (2012) Characterization of chemical functional groups in macerals across different coal ranks via micro-FTIR spectroscopy. Int J Coal Geol 104:22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2012.09.001 CrossRef

40.

Sevilla M, Fuertes AB (2009) The production of carbon materials by hydrothermal carbonization of cellulose. Carbon 47:2281–2289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.04.026 CrossRef

Titel: Physicochemical characteristics and FTIR-derived structural parameters of hydrochar produced by hydrothermal carbonisation of pea pod (Pisum sativum Linn.) waste
verfasst von: Xiangyuan Dong
Shuqing Guo
Hongyan Wang
Zhezhe Wang
Xinjie Gao
Publikationsdatum: 14.12.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 2190-6815
Elektronische ISSN: 2190-6823
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0363-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Solvent-free synthesis of nano-cancrinite from rice husk ash

Use of waste Japonochytrium sp. biomass after lipid extraction as an efficient adsorbent for triphenylmethane dye applied in aquaculture

Production of D-lactic acid by L. delbrueckii growing on orange peel waste hydrolysates and model monosaccharide solutions: effects of pH and temperature on process kinetics

Catalytic hydrolysis of cellulose to levulinic acid by partly replacing sulfuric acid with Nafion® NR50 catalyst

Fuel characteristics of binder free briquettes made at room temperature from blends of oil palm mesocarp fibre and Ceiba pentandra

Maximization of fermentable sugar production from sweet sorghum bagasse (dry and wet bases) using response surface methodology (RSM)