Skip to main content
Erschienen in:
Buchtitelbild

2024 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Project Idea Selection in an Automotive R&D Center

verfasst von : Ulviye Savaş, Serkan Altuntaş

Erschienen in: Advances in Intelligent Manufacturing and Service System Informatics

Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

R&D project selection is one of the most important issues for an R&D center. Evaluating more than one project in terms of different criteria, selecting and implementing the most appropriate project is very critical for both the company’s profit and the sustainability of the project. The project selection process is handled by different processes in companies. Due to the importance of this issue, companies adopt a selection process in line with their own strategies. In this study, an application was carried out with the fuzzy TOPSIS method to evaluate alternative project ideas that will be an R&D project in the R&D center of an automotive company. 4 different criteria were evaluated by experts for 6 different project ideas. With the implementation realized as a result of expert evaluations, a priority order was obtained for 6 project ideas. In practice, as a result of the evaluation, the alternative project P5 with the highest value in the ranking is selected as the next R&D project to be started.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohanty, R.P., Agarwal, R., Choudhury, A.K., Tiwari, M.K.: A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: a case study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 43(24), 5199–5216 (2005)CrossRefMATH Mohanty, R.P., Agarwal, R., Choudhury, A.K., Tiwari, M.K.: A fuzzy ANP-based approach to R&D project selection: a case study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 43(24), 5199–5216 (2005)CrossRefMATH
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Meade, L.M., Presley, A.: R&D project selection using the analytic network process. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 49(1), 59–66 (2022)CrossRef Meade, L.M., Presley, A.: R&D project selection using the analytic network process. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 49(1), 59–66 (2022)CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghasemzadeh, F., Archer, N.P.: Project portfolio selection through decision support. Decis. Supp. Syst. 29, 73–88 (2000)CrossRef Ghasemzadeh, F., Archer, N.P.: Project portfolio selection through decision support. Decis. Supp. Syst. 29, 73–88 (2000)CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Henriksen, A.D., Traynor, A.J.: A practical R&D project-selection scoring tool. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 46, 158–170 (1999)CrossRef Henriksen, A.D., Traynor, A.J.: A practical R&D project-selection scoring tool. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 46, 158–170 (1999)CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ringuest, J.L., Graves, S.B., Case, R.H.: Mean-Gini analysis in R&D portfolio selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 154, 157–169 (2004)CrossRefMATH Ringuest, J.L., Graves, S.B., Case, R.H.: Mean-Gini analysis in R&D portfolio selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 154, 157–169 (2004)CrossRefMATH
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawson, C.P., Longhurst, P.J., Ivey, P.C.: The application of a new research and development project selection model in SMEs. Technovation 25, 1–9 (2004) Lawson, C.P., Longhurst, P.J., Ivey, P.C.: The application of a new research and development project selection model in SMEs. Technovation 25, 1–9 (2004)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Golabi, K.: Selecting a group of dissimilar projects for funding. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 34, 138–145 (1987)CrossRef Golabi, K.: Selecting a group of dissimilar projects for funding. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 34, 138–145 (1987)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bard, J.F., et al.: An interactive approach to R&D project selection and termination. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 35, 135–146 (1988)CrossRef Bard, J.F., et al.: An interactive approach to R&D project selection and termination. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 35, 135–146 (1988)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart, T.J.: A multi criteria decision support system for R&D project selection. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 42, 17–26 (1991)CrossRef Stewart, T.J.: A multi criteria decision support system for R&D project selection. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 42, 17–26 (1991)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Iyigun, M.G.: A decision support system for R&D project selection and resource allocation under uncertainty. Proj. Manag. J. 24, 5–13 (1993) Iyigun, M.G.: A decision support system for R&D project selection and resource allocation under uncertainty. Proj. Manag. J. 24, 5–13 (1993)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner, J.R., Cochrane, R.A.: Goals and methods matrix: coping with projects with ill-defined goals and/or methods of achieving them. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 11, 93–102 (1993)CrossRef Turner, J.R., Cochrane, R.A.: Goals and methods matrix: coping with projects with ill-defined goals and/or methods of achieving them. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 11, 93–102 (1993)CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chui, Y.C., Chan, S.P.: Fuzzy cash flow analysis using present worth criterion. Eng. Econ. 39, 113–138 (1994)CrossRef Chui, Y.C., Chan, S.P.: Fuzzy cash flow analysis using present worth criterion. Eng. Econ. 39, 113–138 (1994)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980) Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberatore, M.J.: An expert system for R&D project selection. Math. Comput. Model. 11, 260–265 (1988)CrossRef Liberatore, M.J.: An expert system for R&D project selection. Math. Comput. Model. 11, 260–265 (1988)CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner, M.S.: Practical R&D project prioritization. Res. Technol. Manag. 28, 38–42 (1994)CrossRef Brenner, M.S.: Practical R&D project prioritization. Res. Technol. Manag. 28, 38–42 (1994)CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yıldırım, B.F., Yıldırım, S.K.: A new integrated intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making approach for R&D project selection process. J. Eng. Sci. Des. 10(2), 643–653 (2022) Yıldırım, B.F., Yıldırım, S.K.: A new integrated intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making approach for R&D project selection process. J. Eng. Sci. Des. 10(2), 643–653 (2022)
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, C.T.: Extensions of the topsis for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114, 1–9 (2000)CrossRefMATH Chen, C.T.: Extensions of the topsis for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114, 1–9 (2000)CrossRefMATH
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun, C.C.: A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 7745–7754 (2010)CrossRef Sun, C.C.: A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 7745–7754 (2010)CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Şen, Z.: Bulanık Mantık İlkeleri ve Modelleme. Su Vakfı Yayınları (2009) Şen, Z.: Bulanık Mantık İlkeleri ve Modelleme. Su Vakfı Yayınları (2009)
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pervez, A.K.M.K., Maniruzzaman, M., Shah, A.A., Nabi, N., Ado, A.M.: The meagerness of simple Likert scale in assessing risk: how appropriate the fuzzy Likert is? Nust J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 6(2), 138–150 (2020) Pervez, A.K.M.K., Maniruzzaman, M., Shah, A.A., Nabi, N., Ado, A.M.: The meagerness of simple Likert scale in assessing risk: how appropriate the fuzzy Likert is? Nust J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 6(2), 138–150 (2020)
Metadaten
Titel
Project Idea Selection in an Automotive R&D Center
verfasst von
Ulviye Savaş
Serkan Altuntaş
Copyright-Jahr
2024
Verlag
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6062-0_1

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.