Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Shape Memory and Superelasticity
Erschienen in: Shape Memory and Superelasticity 3/2020

24.06.2020 | Special Issue: A Tribute to Prof. Dr. Gunther Eggeler, Invited Paper

Pseudoelastic NiTiNOL in Orthopaedic Applications

verfasst von: David Safranski, Kenneth Dupont, Ken Gall

Erschienen in: Shape Memory and Superelasticity | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Pseudoelastic NiTiNOL presents an attractive material option for devices used in clinical orthopaedic applications. The capacity of the material to exert sustained compression during shape recovery aligns well with the mechanobiological factors associated with bone healing, particularly in applications such as fracture healing and joint fusion. Orthopaedic medical devices which have incorporated NiTiNOL are increasing in number, with two noted examples including staples and intramedullary nails. Early NiTiNOL devices utilized shape memory NiTiNOL, but the logistical difficulties with maintaining a cold state in the clinic or limited force-generation for materials warmed from room temperature to body temperature have led to pseudoelastic NiTiNOL devices dominating clinical usage. Both pre-clinical biomechanical and clinical studies have shown that these devices do exert sustained compression beyond the abilities of competing static devices, and largely have resulted in superior clinical outcomes, such as higher fusion rates and faster times to fusion. Given these results, continued adoption of existing NiTiNOL devices and future development of new orthopaedic devices utilizing the material should continue.
Vorheriger Artikel Fatigue Crack Initiation in the Iron-Based Shape Memory Alloy FeMnAlNiTi
Nächster Artikel Selective Laser Melting of NiTi Shape Memory Alloy: Processability, Microstructure, and Superelasticity
Literatur
1.
Hughes JL (1976) Evaluation of nitinol for use as a material in the construction of orthopaedic implants. US Army Medical Research and Development, Fredrick
2.
Simon M et al (1977) A vena cava filter using thermal shape memory alloy. Exp Aspects Radiol 125(1):87–94
3.
Carter DR et al (1998) Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:S41–55CrossRef
4.
Allori AC et al (2008) Biological basis of bone formation, remodeling, and repair-part III: biomechanical forces. Tissue Eng Part B 14(3):285–293CrossRef
5.
Robling AG, Castillo AB, Turner CH (2006) Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 8:455–498CrossRef
6.
Rosa N et al (2015) From mechanical stimulus to bone formation: a review. Med Eng Phys 37(8):719–728CrossRef
7.
Liu C et al (2018) Effects of mechanical loading on cortical defect repair using a novel mechanobiological model of bone healing. Bone 108:145–155CrossRef
8.
Charnley J (1951) Compression arthrodesis of the ankle and shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 33B(2):180–191CrossRef
9.
Muckley T et al (2007) Biomechanical evaluation of primary stiffness of tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with intramedullary nails. Foot Ankle Int 28(2):224–231CrossRef
10.
Parker L, Singh D (2009) The principles of foot and ankle arthrodesis. Orthop Trauma 23(6):385–394CrossRef
11.
Evers J et al (2017) 3D optical investigation of 2 nail systems used in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int 38(5):571–579CrossRef
12.
Claes L, Eckert-Hubner K, Augat P (2003) The fracture gap size influences the local vascularization and tissue differentiation in callus healing. Langenbecks Arch Surg 388(5):316–322CrossRef
13.
Jagodzinski M, Krettek C (2007) Effect of mechanical stability on fracture healing–an update. Injury 38(Suppl 1):S3–10CrossRef
14.
Yamaji T et al (2001) The effect of micromovement on callus formation. J Orthop Sci 6(6):571–575CrossRef
15.
Wehner T et al (2011) Improvement of the shear fixation stability of intramedullary nailing. Clin Biomech 26(2):147–151CrossRef
16.
Knothe U, Tate ML, Perren SM (2000) 300 Years of Intramedullary Fixation – from Aztec Practice to Standard Treatment Modality. European Journal of Trauma 26:217–225CrossRef
17.
Rosa N et al (2017) Recent developments on intramedullary nailing: a biomechanical perspective. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1408(1):20–31CrossRef
18.
Yakacki CM et al (2010) Compression forces of internal and external ankle fixation devices with simulated bone resorption. Foot Ankle Int 31(1):76–85CrossRef
19.
Yakacki CM et al (2011) Pseudoelastic intramedullary nailing for tibio-talo-calcaneal arthrodesis. Exp Rev Med Dev 8(2):159–166CrossRef
20.
Taylor J et al (2016) Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis nails: a comparison of nails with and without internal compression. Foot Ankle Int 37(3):294–299CrossRef
21.
Griffin MJ, Coughlin MJ (2018) Evaluation of midterm results of the panta nail: an active compression tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis device. J Foot Ankle Surg 57(1):74–80CrossRef
22.
Anderson R et al (2016) Finite element analysis of a pseudoelastic compression-generating intramedullary ankle arthrodesis nail. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 62:83–92CrossRef
23.
Karakasli A, Satoglu IS, Havitcioglu H (2015) A new intramedullary sustained dynamic compression nail for the treatment of long bone fractures: a biomechanical study. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 26(2):64–71CrossRef
24.
Mueckley TM et al (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of primary stiffness of tibiotalar arthrodesis with an intramedullary compression nail and four other fixation devices. Foot Ankle Int 27(10):814–820CrossRef
25.
Morgan NB (2004) Medical shape memory alloy applications - the market and its products. Mater Sci Eng, A 378:16–23CrossRef
26.
Machado LG, Savi MA (2003) Medical applications of shape memory alloys. Braz J Med Biol Res 36(6):683–691CrossRef
27.
Gabarre S et al (2017) Influence of gap size, screw configuration, and nail materials in the stability of anterograde reamed intramedullary nail in femoral transverse fractures. Injury 48(Suppl 6):S40–S46CrossRef
28.
Yakacki CM et al (2017) Patient-specific finite-element analysis of three intramedullary nails for tibiotalocalcaneal fusion. In: AOFAS annual meeting. 2017: Seattle, WA
29.
Kujala S et al (2002) Bone modeling controlled by a nickel-titanium shape memory alloy intramedullary nail. Biomaterials 23(12):2535–2543CrossRef
30.
Firoozbakhsh K et al (2004) Smart intramedullary rod for correction of pediatric bone deformity: a preliminary study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 424:194–201CrossRef
31.
Assad M et al (2003) Porous titanium-nickel for intervertebral fusion in a sheep model: part 2. Surface analysis and nickel release assessment. J Biomed Mater Res B 64(2):121–129CrossRef
32.
Assad M et al (2003) (2003) Porous titanium-nickel for intervertebral fusion in a sheep model: part 1. Histomorphometric and radiological analysis. J Biomed Mater Res B 64(2):107–120CrossRef
33.
Russell SM (2009) Design considerations for nitinol bone staples. J Mater Eng Perform 18(5–6):831–835CrossRef
34.
Knight A et al (2013) Method and apparatus for an orthopedic fixation system. BioMedical Enterprises: USPTO 8584853B2.
35.
Cheney D (2018) Elastic orthopedic implant and method of manufacturing thereof. BioMedical Enterprises: USPTO 10117647B2
36.
Cheney D (2014) Bonestaples and methods of use therefor and manufacturing thereof. BioMedical Enterprises: USPTO US2014/0276830
37.
Mereau TM, Ford TC (2006) Nitinol compression staples for bone fixation in foot surgery. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 96(2):102–106CrossRef
38.
Neufeld SK, Parks BG, Naseef GS, Melamed EA, Schon LC (2002) Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: a biomechanical study comparing memory compression staples, cannulated screws, and a dorsal plate. Foot Ankle Int 23(2):97–101CrossRef
39.
Shibuya N et al (2007) A compression force comparison study among three staple fixation systems. J Foot Ankle Surg 46(1):7–15CrossRef
40.
Farr D et al (2010) A biomechanical comparison of shape memory compression staples and mechanical compression staples: compression or distraction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(2):212–217CrossRef
41.
Chang TJ, Overley BD, Pancratz D (2008) An in vitro comparative study of screw and nitinol staple compression: a model showing active dynamic compression. The Podiatry Institute Update Textbooks, Decatur
42.
Russell NA et al (2015) Evaluation of nitinol staples for the lapidus arthrodesis in a reproducible biomechanical model. Front Surg 2:65CrossRef
43.
Aiyer A et al (2016) The impact of nitinol staples on the compressive forces, contact area, and mechanical properties in comparison to a claw plate and crossed screws for the first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Spec 9(3):232–240CrossRef
44.
Hoon QJ et al (2016) Biomechanical evaluation of shape-memory alloy staples for internal fixation-an in vitro study. J Exp Orthop 3(1):19CrossRef
45.
McKnight RR, Lee SK (2019) Biomechanical properties of nitinol staples: effects of troughing, effective leg length, and 2-staple constructs. J Hand Surg Am 44(6):520CrossRef
46.
Zhou PY et al (2019) Nickel-titanium arched shape-memory alloy connector combined with bone grafting in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion. Eur J Med Res 24(1):27CrossRef
47.
Malal JJ, Hegde G, Ferdinand RD (2006) Tarsal joint fusion using memory compression staples–a study of 10 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg 45(2):113–117CrossRef
48.
Fernandez-de-Retana P, Poggio D, Ortega JP (2008) Technical tip: first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis with 20-mm memory compression staples. Foot Ankle Int 29(6):613–615CrossRef
49.
Choudhary RK, Theruvil B, Taylor GR (2004) First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: a new technique of internal fixation by using memory compression staples. J Foot Ankle Surg 43(5):312–317CrossRef
50.
Mallette JP, Glenn CL, Glod DJ (2014) The incidence of nonunion after lapidus arthrodesis using staple fixation. J Foot Ankle Surg 53(3):303–306CrossRef
51.
Schipper ON et al (2018) Radiographic results of nitinol compression staples for hindfoot and midfoot arthrodeses. Foot Ankle Int 39(2):172–179CrossRef
52.
Schipper ON, Ellington JK (2019) Nitinol compression staples in foot and ankle surgery. Orthop Clin N Am 50(3):391–399CrossRef
53.
Wu JC et al (2019) Fracture fixation using shape-memory (ninitol) staples. Orthop Clin N Am 50(3):367–374CrossRef
54.
Bennett GL et al (2005) Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a biomechanical assessment of stability. Foot Ankle Int 26(7):530–536CrossRef
55.
Jehan S et al (2011) The success of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing–a systematic review of the literature. Acta Orthop Belg 77(5):644–651
56.
Dupont KM, Shibuya N, Bariteau JT (2019) Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nails—mechanobiological background and evolution of compressive technology. Glob J Ortho Res 1(5):873–884
57.
Jeng CL et al (2013) Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with bulk femoral head allograft for salvage of large defects in the ankle. Foot Ankle Int 34(9):1256–1266CrossRef
58.
Bussewitz B et al (2014) Retrograde intramedullary nail with femoral head allograft for large deficit tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 35(7):706–711CrossRef
59.
Ford SE, Kwon JY, Ellington JK (2019) Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis utilizing a titanium intramedullary nail with an internal pseudoelastic nitinol compression element: a retrospective case series of 33 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 58(2):266–272CrossRef
60.
Steele JR et al (2019) Comparison of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodeses using a sustained dynamic compression nail versus nondynamized nails. Foot Ankle Spec 13:193–200CrossRef
61.
Berson L, McGarvey WC, Clanton TO (2002) Evaluation of compression in intramedullary hindfoot arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 23(11):992–995CrossRef
62.
Hsu AR, Ellington JK, Adams SB Jr (2015) Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a nitinol intramedullary hindfoot nail. Foot Ankle Spec 8(5):389–396CrossRef
63.
Kinmon K et al (2013) Benchtop comparison of a novel dynamic compression screw to a standard cortical screw: compression integrity and gap size over time during simulated resorption. Foot Ankle Spec 6(3):222–225CrossRef
64.
Conklin MJ et al (2019) Total ankle replacement conversion to tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with bulk femoral head allograft and pseudoelastic intramedullary nail providing sustained joint compression. Foot Ankle Orthopaedics 3(4):1–7
65.
Dekker TJ et al (2018) Use of patient-specific 3D-printed titanium implants for complex foot and ankle limb salvage, deformity correction, and arthrodesis procedures. Foot Ankle Int 39(8):916–921CrossRef
66.
Kildow BJ et al (2016) Measurement of nitinol recovery distance using pseudoelastic intramedullary nails for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Spec 9(6):494–499CrossRef
67.
Kreulen C, Lian E, Giza E (2017) Technique for use of trabecular metal spacers in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with large bony defects. Foot Ankle Int 38(1):96–106CrossRef
68.
Lachman JR, Adams SB (2019) Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for severe talar avascular necrosis. Foot Ankle Clin 24(1):143–161CrossRef
69.
Latt LD, Smith KE, Dupont KM (2017) Revision tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a pseudoelastic intramedullary nail: a case study. Foot Ankle Spec 10(1):75–81CrossRef
70.
Zhao X et al (2012) Nickel-titanium shape-memory sawtooth-arm embracing fixator for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop 36(3):619–626CrossRef
71.
Chen X et al (2013) Design and application of nickel-titanium olecranon memory connector in treatment of olecranon fractures: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop 37(6):1099–1105CrossRef
72.
Chan WY et al (2018) Mechanical and clinical evaluation of a shape memory alloy and conventional struts in a flexible scoliotic brace. Ann Biomed Eng 46(8):1194–1205CrossRef
73.
Abduljabbar FH et al (2017) Factors associated with clinical outcomes after lumbar interbody fusion with a porous nitinol implant. Glob Spine J 7(8):780–786CrossRef
74.
Ferrier M et al (2019) Radiographic and clinical comparison of proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis between a static and dynamic implant. J Foot Ankle Surg 58(4):657–662CrossRef
75.
Payo-Ollero J et al (2019) The efficacy of an intramedullary nitinol implant in the correction of claw toe or hammertoe deformities. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(12):1681–1690CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Pseudoelastic NiTiNOL in Orthopaedic Applications
verfasst von
David Safranski
Kenneth Dupont
Ken Gall
Publikationsdatum
24.06.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Shape Memory and Superelasticity / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 2199-384X
Elektronische ISSN: 2199-3858
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40830-020-00294-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Shape Memory and Superelasticity 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Announcement

SMST Members Named 2020 ASM Fellows

Special Issue: A Tribute to Prof. Dr. Gunther Eggeler, Invited Paper

Development of Nickel-Rich Nickel–Titanium–Hafnium Alloys for Tribological Applications

Special Issue: A Tribute to Prof. Dr. Gunther Eggeler, Invited Paper

Selective Laser Melting of NiTi Shape Memory Alloy: Processability, Microstructure, and Superelasticity

Correction

Correction to: Announcing the Shape Memory and Superelasticity 2019 Editor’s Choice Selections

Special Issue: A Tribute to Prof. Dr. Gunther Eggeler, Invited Paper

Load–Displacement Behavior of Helical Shape Memory Alloy Spring Actuators with Small Spring Diameter to Wire Diameter Ratios

Special Issue: A Tribute to Prof. Dr. Gunther Eggeler, Invited Paper

Recent Developments in Small-Scale Shape Memory Oxides

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise