nach oben

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

Erschienen in:

20.10.2021 | Original Paper

Psychrophilic biomethanation for enhanced bioenergy production in cold regions

verfasst von: Vivek Manyapu, Aman Kumar, Rakshak Kumar

Erschienen in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Biomethanation is a temperature-dependent process, and in the cold regions where temperature mostly remains below 20 °C, it acts as a crucial limiting factor. The biomethanation process with efficient cold-tolerant anaerobes and other advanced techniques, including reliable digester designs, cost-effective insulation strategies, and additives, can help increase methane production efficiency under low ambient temperature. In cold regions, traditional fuel sources like forest wood, charcoal, agricultural residues, or cow dung cakes are used for cooking and heating, leading to increased greenhouse gas emissions. Thus, biogas is a promising fuel to replace traditional fuels and helps reduce the greenhouse effect to a great extent. The current review article has highlighted the role of cold-tolerant methanogens, different digester designs with a special focus on insulation techniques, co-digestion, and additives. The review also discusses different upgradation techniques to generate pure methane as a substitute for natural gas. Additionally, life cycle assessment analysis is also carried out focusing on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to show higher biogas production over traditional biogas systems. Overall, the importance of improved biomethanation in cold regions has been discussed in this review article.

Graphic abstract

Vorheriger Artikel Evaluation of long-term performance of plant microbial fuel cells using agricultural plants under the controlled environment

Nächster Artikel Valorization of waste vegetable oil-based blend fuels as sustainable diesel replacement: comparison between blending with diesel versus kerosene

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Adghim M, Abdallah M, Saad S, Shanableh A, Sartaj M, El Mansouri AE (2020) Comparative life cycle assessment of anaerobic co-digestion for dairy waste management in large-scale farms. J Clean Prod 256:120320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120320CrossRef

Akila G, Chandra TS (2010) Stimulation of biomethanation by Clostridium sp. PXYL1 in coculture with a Methanosarcina strain PMET1 at psychrophilic temperatures. J Appl Microbiol 108:204–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04412.xCrossRef

Alvarez R, Lidén G (2009) Low temperature anaerobic digestion of mixtures of llama, cow and sheep manure for improved methane production. Biomass Bioenerg 33:527–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.08.012CrossRef

Angenent LT, Banik GC, Sung S (2001) Anaerobic migrating blanket reactor treatment of low‐strength wastewater at low temperatures. Water Environ Res 73(5):567–574. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143001X139632

Aoki K, Umetsu K, Nishizaki K, Takahashi J, Kishimoto T, Tani M, Hamamoto O, Misaki T (2006) Thermophilic biogas plant for dairy manure treatment as combined power and heat system in cold regions. International Congress Series, greenhouse gases and animal agriculture: an update. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on greenhouse gases and animal agriculture, held in Zurich, Switzerland between 20 and 24 September 2005 1293, 238–241. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2006.03.014

Asadi M, Guo H, McPhedran K (2020) Biogas production estimation using data-driven approaches for cold region municipal wastewater anaerobic digestion. J Environ Manage 253:109708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109708CrossRef

Bajpai P (2017) Basics of anaerobic digestion process. In: Bajpai P (ed) Anaerobic technology in pulp and paper industry, springer briefs in applied sciences and technology. Springer, Singapore, pp 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4130-3_2CrossRef

Battini F, Agostini A, Boulamanti AK, Giuntoli J, Amaducci S (2014) Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po valley. Sci Total Environ 481:196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.038CrossRef

Bialek K, Kumar A, Mahony T, Lens PNL, Flaherty VO (2012) Microbial community structure and dynamics in anaerobic fluidized-bed and granular sludge-bed reactors: influence of operational temperature and reactor configuration. Microb Biotechnol 5:738–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7915.2012.00364.xCrossRef

Bohn I, Björnsson L, Mattiasson B (2007) The energy balance in farm scale anaerobic digestion of crop residues at 11–37°C. Process Biochem 42:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2006.07.013CrossRef

Bond T, Templeton MR (2011) History and future of domestic biogas plants in the developing world. Energy Sustain Dev 15:347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2011.09.003CrossRef

Borker SS, Thakur A, Kumar S, Kumari S, Kumar R, Kumar S (2021) Comparative genomics and physiological investigation supported safety, cold adaptation, efficient hydrolytic and plant growth-promoting potential of psychrotrophic Glutamicibacter arilaitensis LJH19, isolated from night-soil compost. BMC Genom 22:307. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-021-07632-zCrossRef

Choudhary A, Kumar A, Govil T, Sani RK, Gorky N, Kumar S (2020) Sustainable production of biogas in large bioreactor under psychrophilic and mesophilic conditions. J Environ Eng 146:04019117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001645CrossRef

Chowdhury TR, Herndon EM, Phelps TJ, Elias DA, Gu B, Liang L, Wullschleger SD, Graham DE (2015) Stoichiometry and temperature sensitivity of methanogenesis and CO₂ production from saturated polygonal tundra in Barrow, Alaska. Glob Change Biol 21:722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12762CrossRef

Crone BC, Garland JL, Sorial GA, Vane LM (2016) Significance of dissolved methane in effluents of anaerobically treated low strength wastewater and potential for recovery as an energy product: a review. Water Res 104:520–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.019CrossRef

Curry N, Pillay P (2015) Integrating solar energy into an urban small-scale anaerobic digester for improved performance. Renewable Energy 83:280–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.03.073CrossRef

Daniel-Gromke J, Rensberg N, Denysenko V, Stinner W, Schmalfuß T, Scheftelowitz M, Nelles M, Liebetrau J (2018) Current developments in production and utilization of biogas and biomethane in Germany. Chem Ing Tec 90:17–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201700077CrossRef

De Maayer P, Anderson D, Cary C, Cowan DA (2014) Some like it cold: understanding the survival strategies of psychrophiles. EMBO Rep 15:508–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/embr.201338170CrossRef

Dev S, Saha S, Kurade MB, Salama E-S, El-Dalatony MM, Ha G-S, Chang SW, Jeon B-H (2019) Perspective on anaerobic digestion for biomethanation in cold environments. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 103:85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.034CrossRef

Dhaked RK, Singh P, Singh L (2010) Biomethanation under psychrophilic conditions. Waste Manage 30:2490–2496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.07.015CrossRef

Dziewit L, Bartosik D (2014) Plasmids of psychrophilic and psychrotolerant bacteria and their role in adaptation to cold environments. Front Microbiol 5:596. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00596CrossRef

Elmitwalli TA, van Lier J, Zeeman G, Lettinga G (2003) Treatment of domestic sewage at low temperature in a two-anaerobic step system followed by a trickling filter. Water Sci Technol 48:199–206CrossRef

Fenchel T, King GM, Blackburn TH (2012) Chapter 1–bacterial metabolism. In: Fenchel T, King GM, Blackburn TH (eds) Bacterial biogeochemistry, 3rd edn. Academic Press, Boston, pp 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-415836-8.00001-3CrossRef

Fjørtoft K, Morken J, Hanssen JF, Briseid T (2014) Methane production and energy evaluation of a farm scaled biogas plant in cold climate area. Biores Technol 169:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.077CrossRef

Garfí M, Ferrer-Martí L, Villegas V, Ferrer I (2011) Psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of guinea pig manure in low-cost tubular digesters at high altitude. Biores Technol 102:6356–6359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.004CrossRef

Gashaw A (2016) Co-digestion of municipal organic wastes with night soil and cow dung for biogas production: a review. Afr J Biotech 15:32–44. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajb.v15i2CrossRef

Gillis C, Agnew J, Pratt D (2014) Solid-state, pilot-scale anaerobic digestion of culled potatoes and manure, in: American society of agricultural and biological engineers annual international meeting 2014, ASABE 2014. Presented at the ASABE annual international meeting, the American society of agricultural and biological engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan, Montreal, p. 9

Gouveia J, Plaza F, Garralon G, Fdz-Polanco F, Peña M (2015a) A novel configuration for an anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactor (AnSMBR). Long-term treatment of municipal wastewater under psychrophilic conditions. Biores Technol 198:510–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.039CrossRef

Gouveia J, Plaza F, Garralon G, Fdz-Polanco F, Peña M (2015b) Long-term operation of a pilot scale anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for the treatment of municipal wastewater under psychrophilic conditions. Biores Technol 185:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.002CrossRef

Guenther-Lübbers W, Bergmann H, Theuvsen L (2016) Potential analysis of the biogas production–as measured by effects of added value and employment. J Clean Prod 129:556–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.157CrossRef

Guo H, Yu Z, Thompson IP, Zhang H (2014) A contribution of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis to the biogenic coal bed methane reserves of Southern Qinshui Basin, China. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:9083–9093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5908-zCrossRef

Im S, Petersen SO, Lee D, Kim D-H (2020) Effects of storage temperature on CH₄ emissions from cattle manure and subsequent biogas production potential. Waste Manage 101:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.09.036CrossRef

Jaimes-Estévez J, Zafra G, Martí-Herrero J, Pelaz G, Morán A, Puentes A, Gomez C, del CastroL. P, Escalante Hernández H (2021) Psychrophilic full scale tubular digester operating over eight years: complete performance evaluation and microbiological population. Energies 14:151. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010151CrossRef

Jang HM, Choi Y-K, Kan E (2018) Effects of dairy manure-derived biochar on psychrophilic, mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestions of dairy manure. Biores Technol 250:927–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.074CrossRef

Kalyuzhnaya MG, Beck DAC, Vorobev A, Smalley N, Kunkel DD, Lidstrom ME, Chistoserdova L (2012) Novel methylotrophic isolates from lake sediment, description of Methylotenera versatilis sp. nov. and emended description of the genus Methylotenera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:106–111. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.029165-0CrossRef

Kapoor R, Ghosh P, Kumar M, Vijay VK (2019) Evaluation of biogas upgrading technologies and future perspectives: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:11631–11661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04767-1CrossRef

Keating C, Hughes D, Mahony T, Cysneiros D, Ijaz UZ, Smith CJ, O’Flaherty V (2018) Cold adaptation and replicable microbial community development during long-term low-temperature anaerobic digestion treatment of synthetic sewage. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy095CrossRef

Khan IU, Othman MHD, Hashim H, Matsuura T, Ismail AF, Rezaei-DashtArzhandi M, Azelee IW (2017) Biogas as a renewable energy fuel–A review of biogas upgrading, utilisation and storage. Energy Convers Manag 150:277–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.035CrossRef

Korzeniewska E, Zieliński M, Filipkowska Z, Dębowski M, Kwiatkowski R (2014) Methanogenic archaeon as biogas producer in psychrophilic conditions. J Clean Prod 76:190–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.063CrossRef

Kumar R, Acharya V, Mukhia S, Singh D, Kumar S (2019) Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas frederiksbergensis ERDD5:01 revealed genetic bases for survivability at high altitude ecosystem and bioprospection potential. Genomics 111:492–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2018.03.008CrossRef

Li K, Liu R, Sun C (2016) A review of methane production from agricultural residues in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:857–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.103CrossRef

Lukitawesa, Safarudin A, Millati R, Taherzadeh MJ, Niklasson C (2018) Inhibition of patchouli oil for anaerobic digestion and enhancement in methane production using reverse membrane bioreactors. Renewable Energy, 1st International Conference on Bioresource Technology for Bioenergy, Bioproducts & Environmental Sustainability 129, 748–753. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.068

Manyapu V, Mandpe A, Kumar S (2018) Synergistic effect of fly ash in in-vessel composting of biomass and kitchen waste. Biores Technol 251:114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.039CrossRef

Mao C, Feng Y, Wang X, Ren G (2015) Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:540–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032CrossRef

Martí-Herrero J (2011) Reduced hydraulic retention times in low-cost tubular digesters: two issues. Biomass Bioenerg 35:4481–4484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.07.020CrossRef

Martí-Herrero J, Alvarez R, Rojas MR, Aliaga L, Céspedes R, Carbonell J (2014) Improvement through low cost biofilm carrier in anaerobic tubular digestion in cold climate regions. Biores Technol 167:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.115CrossRef

Martí-Herrero J, Alvarez R, Cespedes R, Rojas MR, Conde V, Aliaga L, Balboa M, Danov S (2015) Cow, sheep and llama manure at psychrophilic anaerobic co-digestion with low cost tubular digesters in cold climate and high altitude. Biores Technol 181:238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.063CrossRef

McKeown RM, Hughes D, Collins G, Mahony T, O’Flaherty V (2012) Low-temperature anaerobic digestion for wastewater treatment. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:444–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.11.025

Mehta P, Deshmukh K, Dagar SS, Dhakephalkar PK, Lanjekar VB (2021) Genome sequencing and analysis of a psychrotrophic methanogen Methanosarcina sp nov MSH10X1 cultured from methane hydrate deposits of Krishna Godavari basin of India. Marine Genom. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margen.2021.100864CrossRef

Mukhia S, Khatri A, Acharya V, Kumar R (2021) Comparative genomics and molecular adaptational analysis of Arthrobacter from Sikkim Himalaya provided insights into its survivability under multiple high-altitude stress. Genomics 113:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.12.001CrossRef

Mwene-Mbeja TM, Dufour A, Lecka J, Kaur BS, Vaneeckhaute C (2020) Enzymatic reactions in the production of biomethane from organic waste. Enzyme Microb Technol 132:1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2019.109410CrossRef

Nadimi R, Tokimatsu K (2017) Analyzing of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption via Bayesian inference. Energy procedia, proceedings of the 9th international conference on applied energy 142, 2773–2778. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.224

Nasir IM, Ghazi TIM, Omar R, Idris A (2014) Bioreactor performance in the anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: a review. Energy Sour Part A Recovery Utilization Environ Eff 36:1476–1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2010.542439CrossRef

Nizami AS, Rehan M, Waqas M, Naqvi M, Ouda OKM, Shahzad K, Miandad R, Khan MZ, Syamsiro M, Ismail IMI, Pant D (2017) Waste biorefineries: enabling circular economies in developing countries. Biores Technol 241:1101–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.097CrossRef

Nkemka VN, Hao X (2018) Start-up of a sequential dry anaerobic digestion of paunch under psychrophilic and mesophilic temperatures. Waste Manage 74:144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.06.022CrossRef

Parshina SN, Ermakova AV, Bomberg M, Detkova EN (2014) Methanospirillum stamsii sp. nov., a psychrotolerant, hydrogenotrophic, methanogenic archaeon isolated from an anaerobic expanded granular sludge bed bioreactor operated at low temperature. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:180–186. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.056218-0CrossRef

Perrigault T, Weatherford V, Martí-Herrero J, Poggio D (2012) Towards thermal design optimization of tubular digesters in cold climates: a heat transfer model. Biores Technol 124:259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.019CrossRef

Pilarski G, Kyncl M, Stegenta S, Piechota G (2020) Emission of biogas from sewage sludge in psychrophilic conditions. Waste Biomass Valor 11:3579–3592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00707-9CrossRef

Pizarro-Loaiza CA, Antón A, Torrellas M, Torres-Lozada P, Palatsi J, Bonmatí A (2021) Environmental, social and health benefits of alternative renewable energy sources. Case study for household biogas digesters in rural areas. J Clean Prod 297:126722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126722CrossRef

Rajagopal R, Bellavance D, Rahaman MdS (2017) Psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of semi-dry mixed municipal food waste: for North American context. Process Saf Environ Prot 105:101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.10.014CrossRef

Rusín J, Chamrádová K, Basinas P (2020) Two-stage psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste: comparison to conventional single-stage mesophilic process. Waste Manage 119:172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.039CrossRef

Saady NMC, Massé DI (2015) Impact of organic loading rate on the performance of psychrophilic dry anaerobic digestion of dairy manure and wheat straw: long-term operation. Bioresour Technol 182:50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.065CrossRef

Saha S, Badhe N, De Vrieze J, Biswas R, Nandy T (2015) Methanol induces low temperature resilient methanogens and improves methane generation from domestic wastewater at low to moderate temperatures. Biores Technol 189:370–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.056CrossRef

Shi X-S, Dong J-J, Yu J-H, Yin H, Hu S-M, Huang S-X, Yuan X-Z (2017) Effect of hydraulic retention time on anaerobic digestion of wheat straw in the semicontinuous continuous stirred-tank reactors. Biomed Res Int 2017:e2457805. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2457805CrossRef

Smith AL, Skerlos SJ, Raskin L (2013) Psychrophilic anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater. Water Res 47:1655–1665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.12.028CrossRef

Smith AL, Skerlos SJ, Raskin L (2015) Anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater at psychrophilic temperatures ranging from 15 °C to 3 °C. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 1:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EW00070FCrossRef

Sun Q, Li H, Yan J, Liu L, Yu Z, Yu X (2015) Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:521–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.029CrossRef

Tauseef SM, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2013) Energy recovery from wastewaters with high-rate anaerobic digesters. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 19:704–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.056CrossRef

Thakur A, Kumari S, Sinai Borker S, Prashant SP, Kumar A, Kumar R (2021) Solid waste management in Indian Himalayan region: current scenario, resource recovery, and way forward for sustainable development. Front Energy Res. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.609229CrossRef

Wandera SM, Westerholm M, Qiao W, Yin D, Jiang M, Dong R (2019) The correlation of methanogenic communities’ dynamics and process performance of anaerobic digestion of thermal hydrolyzed sludge at short hydraulic retention times. Biores Technol 272:180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.023CrossRef

Wei S, Zhang H, Cai X, Xu J, Fang J, Liu H (2014) Psychrophilic anaerobic co-digestion of highland barley straw with two animal manures at high altitude for enhancing biogas production. Energy Convers Manage 88:40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.08.018CrossRef

Yao Y, Huang G, An C, Chen X, Zhang P, Xin X, Shen J, Agnew J (2020) Anaerobic digestion of livestock manure in cold regions: Technological advancements and global impacts. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 119:109494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109494CrossRef

Yuan M, Zhang H, Hu G (2010) Biological characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of a strain of Methanocorpusculum parvum. Chin J App Environ Biol 16:705–709. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1145.2010.00705CrossRef

Zhang G, Jiang N, Liu X, Dong X (2008) Methanogenesis from methanol at low temperatures by a novel psychrophilic methanogen, “Methanolobus psychrophilus” sp. nov., prevalent in Zoige wetland of the Tibetan plateau. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6114–6120. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01146-08CrossRef

Zhang L, Hendrickx TLG, Kampman C, Temmink H, Zeeman G (2013) Co-digestion to support low temperature anaerobic pretreatment of municipal sewage in a UASB–digester. Biores Technol 148:560–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.013CrossRef

Zhang G, Li Y, Dai YJ, Wang RZ (2016) Design and analysis of a biogas production system utilizing residual energy for a hybrid CSP and biogas power plant. Appl Therm Eng 109:423–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.092CrossRef

Zhang Y, Guo B, Zhang L, Zhang H, Liu Y (2021) Microbial community dynamics in granular activated carbon enhanced up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) treating municipal sewage under sulfate reducing and psychrophilic conditions. Chem Eng J 405:126957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126957CrossRef

Titel: Psychrophilic biomethanation for enhanced bioenergy production in cold regions
verfasst von: Vivek Manyapu
Aman Kumar
Rakshak Kumar
Publikationsdatum: 20.10.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1618-954X
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-9558
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02223-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphic abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Co-substrate facilitated charge transfer for bioelectricity evolution in a toxic blue-green alga-fed microbial fuel cell technology

Recycled pangasius pond sediments as organic fertilizer for vegetables cultivation: strategies for sustainable food production

Guar gum-stabilized soil: a clean, sustainable and economic alternative liner material for landfills

Environmental assessment coupled with machine learning for circular economy

Air emissions in waste to energy (W2E) plants

Evaluation of long-term performance of plant microbial fuel cells using agricultural plants under the controlled environment