nach oben

Public Organization Review

Erschienen in:

05.04.2022

Public Policy Diffusion: A Scoping Review

verfasst von: Hassan Danaeefard, Fatemeh Mahdizadeh

Erschienen in: Public Organization Review | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The purpose of this scoping review is to describe studies focusing on policy diffusion to elicit an overall picture of the research in this field. Although various journals have published articles on policy diffusion, the top journals in public policy and public administration have been studied in this article. Out of 2900 cited articles, 52 articles that met the criteria were finally selected. Findings indicate learning and imitation mechanisms in the diffusion process compared to other mechanisms are more attractive. Finally, the areas of need for further study in the field of policy diffusion are suggested.

Vorheriger Artikel Police Budgeting: Using Overtime as a Management Tool

Nächster Artikel Theme-Based Book Review: Shifting Views of Public Sector Corruption

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Appuhami, R., Perera, S., & Perera, H. (2011). Coercive policy diffusion in a developing country: The case of Public-Private Partnerships in Sri Lanka. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41(3), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2011.582713CrossRef

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616CrossRef

Balla, S. J. (2001). Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations. American Politics Research, 29(3), 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X01293001CrossRef

Barth, J., & Parry, J. (2009). Political Culture, Public Opinion, and Policy (Non) Diffusion: The Case of Gay-and Lesbian-Related Issues in Arkansas. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00619.xCrossRef

Beland, D., Medrano, A., & Rocco, P. (2018). Federalism and the Politics of Bottom-Up Soeial Policy Diffusion in the United States, Mexico, and Canada. Political Science Quarterly, 133(3), 527–561. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12802CrossRef

Bell, S., & Feng, H. (2019). Policy diffusion as empowerment: Domestic agency and the institutional dynamics of monetary policy diffusion in China. Globalizations, 16(6), 919–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1560190CrossRef

Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395–415. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963526CrossRef

Betz, J., & Neff, D. (2017). Social policy diffusion in South Asia. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 10(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2016.1258520CrossRef

Böhmelt, T., & Bove, V. (2020). How migration policies moderate the diffusion of terrorism. European Journal of Political Research, 59(1), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12339CrossRef

Burge, G. S., & Rogers, C. L. (2016). Leaders, followers, and asymmetric local tax policy diffusion. Journal of Regional Science, 56(2), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12242CrossRef

Butler, D. M., Volden, C., Dynes, A. M., & Shor, B. (2017). Ideology, learning, and policy diffusion: Experimental evidence. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12213CrossRef

Canon, B. C., & Baum, L. (1981). Patterns of adoption of tort law innovations: An application of diffusion theory to judicial doctrines. American Political Science Review, 75(4), 975–987. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962297CrossRef

Carrapatoso, A. (2011). Climate policy diffusion: Interregional dialogue in China–EU relations. Global Change, Peace & Security, 23(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2011.580959CrossRef

Clark, C., Menifield, C. E., & Stewart, L. M. (2018). Policy diffusion and performance-based budgeting. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(7), 528–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1278384CrossRef

Cook-Martín, D., & FitzGerald, D. S. (2019). How Their Laws Affect our Laws: Mechanisms of Immigration Policy Diffusion in the Americas, 1790–2010. Law & Society Review, 53(1), 41–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12394CrossRef

Crow, D. A. (2012). Policy diffusion and innovation: Media and experts in Colorado recreational water rights. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 4(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/19390459.2012.642635CrossRef

Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., & Garrett, G. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.090106.142507CrossRef

Douglas, J. W., Raudla, R., & Hartley, R. E. (2015). Shifting constellations of actors and their influence on policy diffusion: A study of the diffusion of drug courts. Policy Studies Journal, 43(4), 484–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12113CrossRef

Eom, T. H., Bae, H., & Kim, S. (2017). Moving beyond the influence of neighbors on policy diffusion: Local influences on decisions to conduct property tax reassessment in New York. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017706754CrossRef

Eseonu, C. I., & Wyrick, D. A. (2014). A heat transfer model for policy diffusion. Engineering Management Journal, 26(2), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2014.11432009CrossRef

Fay, D. L., & Wenger, J. B. (2016). The political structure of policy diffusion. Policy Studies Journal, 44(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12122CrossRef

Füglister, K. (2012). Where does learning take place? The role of intergovernmental cooperation in policy diffusion. European Journal of Political Research, 51(3), 316–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02000.xCrossRef

Gandara, D., Rippner, J. A., & Ness, E. C. (2017). Exploring the ‘how’in policy diffusion: National intermediary organizations’ roles in facilitating the spread of performance-based funding policies in the states. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 701–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1272089CrossRef

Gilardi, F., & Füglister, K. (2008). Empirical modeling of policy diffusion in federal states: The dyadic approach. Swiss Political Science Review, 14(3), 413–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2008.tb00108.xCrossRef

Gilardi, F., & Wasserfallen, F. (2019). The politics of policy diffusion. European Journal of Political Research, 58(4), 1245–1256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12326CrossRef

Gray, V. (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67(4), 1174–1185. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956539CrossRef

Grupp, F. W., & Richards, A. R. (1975). Variations in elite perceptions of American states as referents for public policy making. American Political Science Review, 69(3), 850–858. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958394CrossRef

Gu, J. (2016). Spatial diffusion of social policy in China: Spatial convergence and neighborhood interaction of vocational education. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 9(4), 503–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-015-9161-3CrossRef

Heilmann, S., & Schulte-Kulkmann, N. (2011). The Limits of Policy Diffusion: Introducing International Norms of Anti-Money Laundering into China’s Legal System. Governance, 24(4), 639–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01543.xCrossRef

Hsu, K.-M., & Tung-Wen Sun, M. (2014). Policy diffusion and public service motivation: An exploratory study of the Bookstart programme in Taiwan. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 7(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2014.894901CrossRef

Johnson, B., & Hagström, B. (2005). The translation perspective as an alternative to the policy diffusion paradigm: The case of the Swedish methadone maintenance treatment. Journal of Social Policy, 34(3), 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279405008822CrossRef

Kammerer, M., & Namhata, C. (2018). What drives the adoption of climate change mitigation policy? A dynamic network approach to policy diffusion. Policy Sciences, 51(4), 477–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9332-6CrossRef

Kim, D.-R. (2013). Local government policy diffusion in a decentralised system: Childbirth support policy in South Korea. Local Government Studies, 39(4), 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2012.726200CrossRef

Kim, H. J., Kim, P. S., & Moon, K. (2014). Policy diffusion and its determinants: The case of the Multicultural Family Support Ordinance in South Korean local governments. Philippine Political Science Journal, 35(2), 158–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2014.964793CrossRef

Kim, J., McDonald, B. D., III., & Lee, J. (2018). The nexus of state and local capacity in vertical policy diffusion. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016675966CrossRef

Koski, C. (2010). Greening America’s skylines: The diffusion of low-salience policies. Policy Studies Journal, 38(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00346.xCrossRef

Kourtelis, C. (2019). (Not) learning from the past? The diffusion of the EU’s rural development policy in its neighbouring countries. Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies, 21(2), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2017.1367586CrossRef

Lacy, T. A., & Tandberg, D. A. (2014). Rethinking policy diffusion: The interstate spread of “finance innovations.” Research in Higher Education, 55(7), 627–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9330-2CrossRef

Lee, S.-J. (2004). Policy Diffusion in Local Governments and Time: A Case Study on Local Acts for Administrative Information Disclosure. Journal of Local Government Studies, 16(1), 5–25.

Levac, D., Wishart, L., Missiuna, C., & Wright, V. (2009). The application of motor learning strategies within functionally based interventions for children with neuromotor conditions. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 21(4), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181beb09dCrossRef

Lindsey, I., & Bitugu, B. B. (2018). Distinctive policy diffusion patterns, processes and actors: Drawing implications from the case of sport in international development. Policy Studies, 39(4), 444–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1479521CrossRef

Lucas, A. (1983). Public policy diffusion research: Integrating analytic paradigms. Knowledge, 4(3), 379–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708300400303CrossRef

Maggetti, M., & Gilardi, F. (2016). Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms. Journal of Public Policy, 36(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X1400035XCrossRef

Marier, P. (2017). The politics of policy adoption: A saga on the difficulties of enacting policy diffusion or transfer across industrialized countries. Policy Sciences, 50(3), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9269-6CrossRef

Marsh, D., & Sharman, J. C. (2009). Policy diffusion and policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870902863851CrossRef

Matisoff, D. C., & Edwards, J. (2014). Kindred spirits or intergovernmental competition? The innovation and diffusion of energy policies in the American states (1990–2008). Environmental Politics, 23(5), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.923639CrossRef

Menifield, C. E., Stewart, L. M., Clark, C., & Stodden, W. P. (2017). Policy diffusion as a means for improving national budget systems. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-29-01-2017-B003

Meseguer, C., & Gilardi, F. (2009). What is new in the study of policy diffusion? Review of International Political Economy, 16(3), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802409236CrossRef

Metz, F., & Fischer, M. (2016). Policy diffusion in the context of international river basin management. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(4), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1716CrossRef

Mitchell, J. L. (2018). Does Policy Diffusion Need Space? Spatializing the Dynamics of Policy Diffusion. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 424–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12226CrossRef

Namkoong, K. (1994). Adoptions of ‘Access to Public Information Act’as Policy Innovations. Koran Political Science Review, 28(1), 101–121.

Phillips, S. W. (2016). Military-Style Weapons in Policing: A limited test of diffusion theory. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 38(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2016.1173943CrossRef

Pogrebnyakov, N., & Maitland, C. F. (2013). Intra‐regional diffusion of spectrum license allocation policies. info. https://doi.org/10.1108/info-06-2012-0028

Popelier, P. (2015). The role of courts in legislative policy diffusion and divergence. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 3(3), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2015.1131058CrossRef

Richter, T., & Wurster, S. (2016). Policy Diffusion among Democracies and Autocracies: A Comparison of Trade Reforms and Nuclear Energy Policy. Global Policy, 7(4), 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12373CrossRef

Risse, T. (2017). De-centring the European union: Policy diffusion among European regional organizations–a comment. European Review of History: Revue Européenne D’histoire, 24(3), 472–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2017.1282434CrossRef

Ruiz-Villaverde, A., Chica-Olmo, J., & González-Gómez, F. (2018). Do small municipalities imitate larger ones? Diffusion of water privatization policies. Urban Water Journal, 15(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2017.1414860CrossRef

Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2014). Theories of the policy process. Westview Press.

Segatto, C. (2018). Policy diffusion in subnational governments: State–local relationships in the Brazilian education policy. Regional & Federal Studies, 28(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1409732CrossRef

Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.xCrossRef

Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2012). Policy diffusion: Seven lessons for scholars and practitioners. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 788–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02610.xCrossRef

Starke, P. (2013). Qualitative methods for the study of policy diffusion: Challenges and available solutions. Policy Studies Journal, 41(4), 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12032CrossRef

Strebel, F., & Widmer, T. (2012). Visibility and facticity in policy diffusion: Going beyond the prevailing binarity. Policy Sciences, 45(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9161-yCrossRef

Suárez, S. L. (2012). Reciprocal policy diffusion: The regulation of executive compensation in the UK and the US. Journal of Public Affairs, 12(4), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1405CrossRef

Suk, H. W. (2010). Study on Regional Festival Diffusion as Policy Innovation Focusing on Kyunggi Province. The Korea Local Administration Review, 24(1), 183–206.

Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880–899. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400258644CrossRef

Titel: Public Policy Diffusion: A Scoping Review
verfasst von: Hassan Danaeefard
Fatemeh Mahdizadeh
Publikationsdatum: 05.04.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Public Organization Review / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1566-7170
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7098
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00618-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Call for Proposals – A Special Issue of Public Organization Review

Scientization Under Pressure—The Problematic Role of Expert Bodies During the Handling of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Paths, Punctuations and Policy Learning—Comparing Patterns of European use of Scientific Expertise during the Covid-19 Crisis

Police Budgeting: Using Overtime as a Management Tool

Special Issue on The Scientization of Public Decision-Making Processes – the Relevance for the Handling of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Responsible Management Education in Time of Crisis: A Conceptual Framework for Public Business Schools in Egypt and Similar Middle Eastern Context

Premium Partner