nach oben

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

07.05.2024 | Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science

Real-Time Stress Detection from Raw Noisy PPG Signals Using LSTM Model Leveraging TinyML

verfasst von: Amin Rostami, Bahram Tarvirdizadeh, Khalil Alipour, Mohammad Ghamari

Erschienen in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The negative effects of stress on well-being demonstrate the need for real-time detection. The increasing prevalence of wearables with AI capabilities to continually monitor vital signs like heart rate and blood pressure highlights their growing value in promptly identifying stress. This paper presents a new approach for real-time stress detection employing an LSTM-based deep learning model, a technique with promising outcomes for time-series data analysis. Our model is trained on raw PPG signals from the WESAD dataset covering diverse stress scenarios. By learning patterns and fluctuations over time, it can effectively distinguish stressed and non-stressed states. The training uses only the raw PPG signals, segments them into windows, and creates labeled data for supervised learning. To enable real-time detection, we explore deploying our trained model on STM32H7xx microcontrollers equipped with a Cortex-M7 core offering low-power and hardware acceleration. We implement the LSTM model leveraging their capabilities for efficient inference. This implementation process involves optimizing the model and converting it into a format compatible with the microcontrollers. Within this study, we employ key TensorFlow toolkit optimization methods, including quantization-aware training (QAT), pruning, prune-preserving quantization-aware training (PQAT), and post-training quantization (PTQ), along with the TensorFlow Lite (TFL) toolkit, to evaluate and compare the outcomes obtained from applying these methods to the baseline model. Our goal is to select the most effective approach for the processor, enabling real-time detection. Through the utilization of these techniques, our objective is to reduce the size of the model and the necessary processing resources, such as RAM size, while ensuring that a high level of accuracy is maintained. Our results show the capability of the optimized LSTM model to accurately detect stress from raw PPG data on resource-constrained, low-power STM32H7xx MCUs. The final optimized model requires only 170 Kbytes of RAM, a nearly 12 times reduction in size, while still achieving a high accuracy of 87.76% when performing inference on the microcontroller.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Cohen, S.; Janicki-Deverts, D.; Miller, G.E.: Psychological stress and disease. JAMA 298(14), 1685 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.14.1685CrossRef

McEwen, B.S.: Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain. Physiol. Rev. 87(3), 873–904 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00041.2006CrossRef

Vildjiounaite, E.; Huotari; V., Kallio; J., Kyllönen; V., Mäkelä; SM., Gimel’farb G.: “Detection of prolonged stress in smart office,” 1253–1261 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01177-2_90.

Derevenco, P.; Popescu, G.; Deliu, N.: Stress assessment by means of questionnaires. Rom J Physiol Physiol Sci 37(1–4), 39–49 (2000)

Aristizabal, S., et al.: The feasibility of wearable and self-report stress detection measures in a semi-controlled lab environment. IEEE Access 9, 102053–102068 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097038CrossRef

Attar, E.T.; Balasubramanian, V.; Subasi, E.; Kaya, M.: Stress analysis based on simultaneous heart rate variability and EEG monitoring. IEEE J. Transl. Eng. Heal. Med. 9, 1–7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2021.3106803CrossRef

Praveena, G.; Mathana, J.M.: “Review on stress detection and management techniques using nano EEG sensors,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Nanoelectronics, Nanophotonics, Nanomaterials, Nanobioscience & Nanotechnology (5NANO), IEEE, Apr 1–7 (2022). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/5NANO53044.2022.9828889.

Massaro, S.; Pecchia, L.: Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis: a methodology for organizational neuroscience. Organ. Res. Methods 22(1), 354–393 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116681072CrossRef

Ishaque, S.; Khan, N.; Krishnan, S.: Physiological signal analysis and stress classification from VR simulations using decision tree methods. Bioengineering 10(7), 766 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070766CrossRef

10.

Pavel et al., A.M.: “Heart rate variability analysis for the prediction of EEG grade in infants with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy within the first 12 h of birth,” Front. Pediatr. (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1016211.

11.

Alugubelli, N.; Abuissa, H.; Roka, A.: Wearable devices for remote monitoring of heart rate and heart rate variability—what we know and what is coming. Sensors 22(22), 8903 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228903CrossRef

12.

Hasanpoor, Y.; Motaman, K.; Tarvirdizadeh, B.; Alipour, K.; Ghamari, M.: “Stress detection using ppg signal and combined deep CNN-MLP network,” in 2022 29th National and 7th International Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering, ICBME 2022, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 223–228 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBME57741.2022.10052957.

13.

Hasanpoor, Y.; Tarvirdizadeh, B.; Alipour, K.; Ghamari, M.: “Stress assessment with convolutional neural network using PPG signals,” in 2022 10th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM), IEEE, Nov 472–477 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRoM57054.2022.10025071.

14.

Gedam, S.; Paul, S.: A review on mental stress detection using wearable sensors and machine learning techniques. IEEE Access 9, 84045–84066 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3085502CrossRef

15.

E. Smets et al.,: “Comparison of machine learning techniques for psychophysiological stress detection,” 13–22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32270-4_2.

16.

Awasthi, K.; Nanda, P.; Suma, K.V.: “Performance analysis of machine learning techniques for classification of stress levels using PPG signals,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT), IEEE, Jul. 1–6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/CONECCT50063.2020.9198481.

17.

Golgouneh, A.; Tarvirdizadeh, B.: Fabrication of a portable device for stress monitoring using wearable sensors and soft computing algorithms. Neural Comput. Appl. 32(11), 7515–7537 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-019-04278-7CrossRef

18.

Keshan, N.; Parimi, P.V.; Bichindaritz, I.: “Machine learning for stress detection from ECG signals in automobile drivers,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), IEEE, Oct 2661–2669 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2015.7364066.

19.

Saeed, S.M.U.; Anwar, S.M.; Khalid, H.; Majid, M.; Bagci, U.: EEG based classification of long-term stress using psychological labeling. Sensors 20(7), 1886 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20071886CrossRef

20.

Castaldo, R.; Xu, W.; Melillo, P.; Pecchia, L.; Santamaria, L.; James, C.: “Detection of mental stress due to oral academic examination via ultra-short-term HRV analysis,” in 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), IEEE, Aug, 3805–3808 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591557.

21.

Rodríguez-Arce, J.; Lara-Flores, L.; Portillo-Rodríguez, O.; Martínez-Méndez, R.: Towards an anxiety and stress recognition system for academic environments based on physiological features. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 190, 105408 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105408CrossRef

22.

Setiawan, R.; Budiman, F.; Basori, W.I.: “Stress diagnostic system and digital medical record based on internet of things,” in 2019 International Seminar on Intelligent Technology and Its Applications (ISITIA), IEEE, Aug. 348–353 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISITIA.2019.8937273.

23.

Bobade P.; Vani, M.: “Stress detection with machine learning and deep learning using multimodal physiological data,” in 2020 Second International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA), IEEE, Jul. 51–57 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIRCA48905.2020.9183244.

24.

Zagajewski, B.; Kluczek, M.; Raczko, E.; Njegovec, A.; Dabija, A.; Kycko, M.: Comparison of random forest, support vector machines, and neural networks for post-disaster forest species mapping of the Krkonoše/Karkonosze transboundary biosphere reserve. Remote Sens. 13(13), 2581 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132581CrossRef

25.

Ursutiu, D.; Nascov, V.; Samoila, C.; Moga, M.: “Microcontroller technologies in low power applications,” in 2012 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), IEEE, Sep 1–5 (2012). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL.2012.6402096.

26.

Mou, L., et al.: Driver stress detection via multimodal fusion using attention-based CNN-LSTM. Expert Syst. Appl. 173, 114693 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114693CrossRef

27.

Han, H.; Byun, K; Kang, H.G.: “A deep learning-based stress detection algorithm with speech signal,” in Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Audio-Visual Scene Understanding for Immersive Multimedia, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Oct, 11–15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3264869.3264875.

28.

Motaman, K.; Alipour, K.; Tarvirdizadeh, B.; Ghamari, M.: “A stress detection model based on LSTM network using solely raw PPG signals,” in 2022 10th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM), IEEE, Nov 485–490 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRoM57054.2022.10025256.

29.

Schmidt, P.; Reiss, A.; Duerichen, R.; Marberger, C.; Van Laerhoven, K.: “Introducing WESAD, a multimodal dataset for wearable stress and affect detection,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Oct. 400–408 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3242969.3242985.

30.

“WESAD: Multimodal dataset for wearable stress and affect Detection|Ubiquitous Computing.” https://www.eti.uni-siegen.de/ubicomp/home/datasets/icmi18/index.html.en?lang=en (accessed 03 Mar 2024).

31.

Maqsood, S.; Xu, S.; Springer, M.; Mohawesh, R.: A benchmark study of machine learning for analysis of signal feature extraction techniques for blood pressure estimation using photoplethysmography (PPG). IEEE Access 9, 138817–138833 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3117969CrossRef

32.

Jacob et al., B.: “Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inference,” Dec. (2017). [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.05877

33.

Han, T.; Li, D.; Liu, J.; Tian, L.; Shan, Y.: “Improving low-precision network quantization via bin regularization,” in 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), IEEE, Oct. 5241–5250 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00521.

34.

Li, L.; Zhu, J.; Sun, M-T.: “Deep learning based method for pruning deep neural networks,” in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW), IEEE, Jul 312–317 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMEW.2019.00-68.

35.

Zhu M. Gupta, S.: “To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compression,” Oct. (2017). [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.01878

36.

Yu, F.; Cui, L.; Wang, P.; Han, C.; Huang, R.; Huang, X.: EasiEdge: a novel global deep neural networks pruning method for efficient edge computing. IEEE Internet Things J. 8(3), 1259–1271 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.3034925CrossRef

37.

Predić, B.; Vukić, U.; Saračević, M.; Karabašević, D.; Stanujkić, D.: The possibility of combining and implementing deep neural network compression methods. Axioms 11(5), 229 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11050229CrossRef

38.

Bai, H.; Hou, L.; Shang, L.; Jiang, X.; King, I.; Lyu M.R.: “Towards efficient post-training quantization of pre-trained language models,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, S. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, and A. Oh, Eds., Curran Associates, Inc.,1405–1418. (2022). [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/096347b4efc264ae7f07742fea34af1f-Paper-Conference.pdf

39.

Kamruzzaman, J.; Begg, R.; Sarker, R.: “Overview of Artificial Neural Networks and their Applications in Healthcare,” in Neural Networks in Healthcare, IGI Global, 1–19. (2006). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-848-2.ch001.

40.

Immonen, R.; Hämäläinen, T.: Tiny machine learning for resource-constrained microcontrollers. J. Sensors 2022, 1–11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7437023CrossRef

41.

Ingolfsson, T.M.; Wang, X.; Hersche, M; Burrello, A.; Cavigelli, L.; Benini, L.: “ECG-TCN: wearable cardiac arrhythmia detection with a temporal convolutional network,” in 2021 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Circuits and Systems (AICAS), IEEE, Jun 1–4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/AICAS51828.2021.9458520.

42.

Faraone A.; Delgado-Gonzalo, R.: “Convolutional-recurrent neural networks on low-power wearable platforms for cardiac arrhythmia detection,” (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/AICAS48895.2020.9073950.

43.

Zhu, T.; Kuang, L.; Li, K.; Zeng, J.; Herrero, P.; Georgiou, P.: “Blood glucose prediction in type 1 diabetes using deep learning on the edge,” in 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), IEEE, May 1–5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS51556.2021.9401083.

44.

Zanetti, R.; Aminifar, A.; Atienza, D.: “Robust epileptic seizure detection on wearable systems with reduced false-alarm rate,” in 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), IEEE, Jul 4248–4251 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175339.

45.

Risso et al., M.: “Robust and Energy-Efficient PPG-Based Heart-Rate Monitoring,” in 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), IEEE, May 1–5 (2021). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS51556.2021.9401282.

46.

Gokul, H.; Suresh, P.; Hari Vignesh, B.; Pravin Kumaar, R.; Vijayaraghavan, V.: “Gait recovery system for parkinson’s disease using machine learning on embedded platforms,” in 2020 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon), IEEE, Aug. 1–8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/SysCon47679.2020.9275930.

47.

Oden L.; Witt, T.: “Fall-detection on a wearable micro controller using machine learning algorithms,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP), IEEE, Sep 296–301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/SMARTCOMP50058.2020.00067.

48.

Sucerquia, A.; López, J.; Vargas-Bonilla, J.: SisFall: a fall and movement dataset. Sensors 17(12), 198 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010198CrossRef

49.

Merenda, M.; Astrologo, M.; Laurendi, D.; Romeo, V.; Della Corte, F.G.: “A novel fitness tracker using edge machine learning,” in 2020 IEEE 20th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference ( MELECON), IEEE, Jun 212–215 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MELECON48756.2020.9140602.

50.

Casadei, B.C.; Gumiero, A.; Tantillo, G.; Della Torre, L.; Olmo, G.: “Systolic blood pressure estimation from PPG signal using ANN,” Electronics, 11, 18, 2909, (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11182909.

51.

Kwiatkowski, K.K.; Pau, D.P.; Leung, T.; Di Marco, O.: “Phonocardiogram segmentation with tiny computing,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), IEEE, Jan 1–4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE56470.2023.10043562.

52.

Whang, S.E.; Lee, J.-G.: Data collection and quality challenges for deep learning. Proc. VLDB Endow. 13(12), 3429–3432 (2020). https://doi.org/10.14778/3415478.3415562CrossRef

53.

Jmal, A.; Barioul, R.; Meddeb Makhlouf, A.; Fakhfakh, A.; Kanoun, O.: “An embedded ANN raspberry PI for inertial sensor based human activity recognition,” in Springer, 375–385 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51517-1_34.

54.

Gao, H.; Wu, X.; Shi, C.; Gao, Q.; Geng, J.: “A LSTM-based realtime signal quality assessment for photoplethysmogram and remote photoplethysmogram,” in 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), IEEE, Jun 3826–3835 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW53098.2021.00424.

55.

Smagulova K.; James, A.P.: “Overview of long short-term memory neural networks,” in Modeling and Optimization in Science and Technologies, Springer Verlag, 139–153 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14524-8_11.

56.

Li, S.; Walls, R.J; Guo, T.: “Characterizing and modeling distributed training with transient cloud GPU servers,” in 2020 IEEE 40th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), IEEE, Nov 943–953 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS47774.2020.00097.

57.

Wang, Y.E.; Wei, G.-Y.; Brooks, D.: “Benchmarking TPU, GPU, and CPU Platforms for Deep Learning,” Jul. (2019). [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10701

58.

Varghese, B.; Wang, N.; Barbhuiya, S.; Kilpatrick, P.; Nikolopoulos, D.S.: “Challenges and Opportunities in Edge Computing,” 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. Smart Cloud, 20–26 (2016). [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:17046469

59.

Ren, J.; Pan, Y.; Goscinski, A.M.; Beyah, R.A.: “Edge Computing for the Internet of Things,” IEEE Netw, vol. 32, pp. 6–7, (2018). [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:38206525

60.

Zhang, Y.; Wijerathne, D.; Li, Z.; Mitra, T.: “Power-performance characterization of TinyML systems,” in 2022 IEEE 40th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD), IEEE, Oct 644–651 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD56317.2022.00099.

61.

Mukherjee, N.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Gupta, R.: Real-time mental stress detection technique using neural networks towards a wearable health monitor. Meas. Sci. Technol. 33(4), 044003 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ac3aaeCrossRef

62.

Urosevic V.; Dimitrijevic, S.: “Optimum input sequence size for a sliding window-based LSTM neural network used in short-term electrical load forecasting,” in 2021 29th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), IEEE, Nov. 1–4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TELFOR52709.2021.9653206.

63.

S. A and S. K.: “Drug Analyser Using Neural Networks with the Use of Transfer Learning Techniques,” Int. Res. J. Adv. Sci. Hub, vol. 3, no. Special Issue ICIES-2021 4S, 22–25, Apr (2021). https://doi.org/10.47392/irjash.2021.105.

64.

M.S.M.P. Mrs. A. Pavithra,: “TensorFlow in Deep learning,” (2019). [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:150864082

65.

van den Dool, W.; Blankevoort, T.; Welling, M.; Asano, Y.: “Efficient Neural PDE-Solvers Using Quantization Aware Training,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) Workshops, Oct. 1423–1432 (2023).

66.

Narang, S.; Elsen, E.; Diamos, G.; Sengupta, S.: “Exploring sparsity in recurrent neural networks,” Apr (2017). [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.05119

67.

Hawks, B.; Duarte, J.; Fraser, N.J.; Pappalardo, A.; Tran, N.; Umuroglu, Y.: Ps and Qs: quantization-aware pruning for efficient low latency neural network inference. Front Artif. Intell. (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.676564CrossRef

68.

Krishnamoorthi, R.: “Quantizing deep convolutional networks for efficient inference: A whitepaper,” ArXiv, vol. abs/1806.0, (2018). [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:49356451

69.

Orășan, I.L.; Seiculescu, C.; Căleanu, C.D.: “Benchmarking TensorFlow Lite Quantization Algorithms for Deep Neural Networks,” 2022 IEEE 16th Int. Symp. Appl. Comput. Intell. Informatics, pp. 221–226, (2022). [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:253123929

70.

Li J.; Álvarez, R.: “On the quantization of recurrent neural networks,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2101.0, (2021). [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:231602957

71.

“STM32H743IIT6-eStore-STMicroelectronics.” https://estore.st.com/en/stm32h743iit6-cpn.html (accessed 26 Feb. 2024).

72.

“Buy STM32H750VBT6-ST Online Store.” https://estore.st.com/en/stm32h750vbt6-cpn.html (accessed 26 Feb. 2024).

73.

“Winbond W25Q16JV Serial NOR Flash.” https://www.techdesign.com/market/categories/flash/code-storage-flash-memory/serial-nor-flash?search=W25Q16JV&utm_source=winbond&utm_medium=product&utm_campaign=winbond_product (accessed 26 Feb 2024).

Titel: Real-Time Stress Detection from Raw Noisy PPG Signals Using LSTM Model Leveraging TinyML
verfasst von: Amin Rostami
Bahram Tarvirdizadeh
Khalil Alipour
Mohammad Ghamari
Publikationsdatum: 07.05.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Print ISSN: 2193-567X
Elektronische ISSN: 2191-4281
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09095-2

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht