Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quality of Life Research
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 8/2009

01.10.2009

Responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score and the SF-36: five years after total hip arthroplasty

verfasst von: Hon-Yi Shi, Lih-Wen Mau, Je-Ken Chang, Jun-Wen Wang, Herng-Chia Chiu

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 8/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Comparing the responsiveness over time of the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the SF-36 in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and assessing variation in the responsiveness of these measures by the number of co-morbidities.

Methods

This prospective study analyzed 335 THA patients treated at two southern Taiwan hospitals from 1997 to 2000. Magnitude of change in HRQoL was compared by generalized estimating equation. Bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrapping was used to measure magnitude of change in HHS and SF-36 subscale scores for five different time intervals spanning a 5-year period.

Results

The analytical results indicated that the pain and physical function subscales of the HHS are more responsive than those of the SF-36 for short-term (within 1 year post-surgery) measurements but are less responsive for long-term measurements. At various follow-up intervals, the HHS and the SF-36 significantly differed in ES of changes in pain and physical function subscale scores for patients with one co-morbidity and for patients with two or more co-morbidities.

Conclusion

For long-term evaluation of THA patients, clinicians and health researchers should weight both measures equally and should also consider co-morbidities.
Vorheriger Artikel How sharp is the short QuickDASH? A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions
Nächster Artikel Prostate cancer-specific anxiety in Dutch patients on active surveillance: validation of the memorial anxiety scale for prostate cancer

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Rampersaud, Y. R., Ravi, B., Lewis, S. J., Stas, V., Barron, R., Davey, R., et al. (2008). Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. The Spine Journal : Official Journal of the North American Spine Society, 8, 296–304.
2.
Shi, H. Y., Chiu, H. C., Chang, J. K., Wang, J. W., Culbertson, R., & Khan, M. M. (2008). Evaluation and prediction of health-related quality of life for total hip replacement among Chinese in Taiwan. International Orthopaedics, 32, 27–32.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Hagell, P., Tornqvist, A. L., & Hobart, J. (2008). Testing the SF-36 in Parkinson’s disease. Implications for reporting rating scale data. Journal of Neurology, 255, 246–254.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Hobart, J. C., Williams, L. S., Moran, K., & Thompson, A. J. (2002). Quality of life measurement after stroke: Uses and abuses of the SF-36. Stroke, 33, 1348–1356.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Wiebe, S., Guyatt, G., Weaver, B., Matijevic, S., & Sidwell, C. (2003). Comparative responsiveness of generic and specific quality-of-life instruments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56, 52–60.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Quintana, J. M., Escobar, A., Bilbao, A., Arostegui, I., Lafuente, I., & Vidaurreta, I. (2005). Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 13, 1076–1083.PubMedCrossRef
7.
van der Waal, J. M., Terwee, C. B., van der Windt, D. A., Bouter, L. M., & Dekker, J. (2005). Health-related and overall quality of life of patients with chronic hip and knee complaints in general practice. Quality of Life Research, 14, 795–803.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Davis, K. E., Ritter, M. A., Berend, M. E., & Meding, J. B. (2007). The importance of range of motion after total hip arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 465, 180–184.PubMed
9.
Haywood, K. L., Garratt, A. M., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2005). Quality of life in older people: A structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1651–1668.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Yu, J., Coons, S. J., Draugalis, J. R., Ren, X. S., & Hays, R. D. (2003). Equivalence of Chinese and US-English versions of the SF-36 health survey. Quality of Life Research, 12, 449–457.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Ethgen, O., Bruyere, O., Richy, F., Dardennes, D., & Reginster, J. Y. (2004). Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty: A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 86, 963–974.
12.
de Pablo, P., Losina, E., Mahomed, N., Wright, J., Fossel, A. H., Barrett, J. A., et al. (2006). Extent of followup care after elective total hip replacement. Journal of Rheumatology, 33, 1159–1166.PubMed
13.
Ostendorf, M., van Stel, H. F., Buskens, E., Schrijvers, A. J., Marting, L. N., Verbout, A. J., et al. (2004). Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement: A comparison of five instruments of health status. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 86, 801–808.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Jones, C. A., Beaupre, L. A., Johnston, D. W., & Suarez-Almazor, M. E. (2005). Total joint arthroplasties: Current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 21, 527–541.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Fitzgerald, J. D., Orav, E. J., Lee, T. H., Marcantonio, E. R., Poss, R., Goldman, L., et al. (2004). Patient quality of life during the 12 months following joint replacement surgery. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 51, 100–109.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M. K., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A user’s manual. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
17.
Tseng, H. M., Lu, J. F. R., & Tsai, Y. J. (2003). Assessment of health-related quality of life in Taiwan (II): Norming and validation of SF-36 Taiwan version. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 22, 512–518.
18.
van der Waal, J. M., Terwee, C. B., van der Windt, D. A., Bouter, L. M., & Dekker, J. (2005). The impact of non-traumatic hip and knee disorders on health-related quality of life as measured with the SF-36 or SF-12. A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1141–1155.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Hardin, J. W., & Hilbe, J. M. (2003). Generalized estimating equations (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
20.
Fairclough, D. L., Thijs, H., Huang, I. C., Finnern, H. W., & Wu, A. W. (2008). Handling missing quality of life data in HIV clinical trials: What is practical? Quality of Life Research, 17, 61–73.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Twisk, J. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989). Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Medical Care, 27, 178–189.CrossRef
23.
Chang, E., Abrahamowicz, M., Ferland, D., Fortin, P. R., & CaNIOS Investigators. (2002). Comparison of the responsiveness of lupus disease activity measures to changes in systemic lupus erythematosus activity relevant to patients and physicians. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55, 488–497.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide (pp. 7–11). Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
25.
Garbuz, D. S., Min, Xu, & Sayre, E. C. (2006). Patients’ outcome after total hip arthroplasty: A comparison between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index and the Oxford 12-item Hip Score. Journal of Arthroplasty, 21, 998–1004.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Mahomed, N. N., Liang, M. H., Cook, E. F., Daltroy, L. H., Fortin, P. R., Fossel, A. H., et al. (2002). The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. Journal of Rheumatology, 29, 1273–1279.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score and the SF-36: five years after total hip arthroplasty
verfasst von
Hon-Yi Shi
Lih-Wen Mau
Je-Ken Chang
Jun-Wen Wang
Herng-Chia Chiu
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2009
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9512-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2009

Quality of Life Research 8/2009 Zur Ausgabe

OriginalPaper

Somatization is associated with physical health-related quality of life independent of anxiety and depression in cancer, glaucoma and rheumatological disorders

OriginalPaper

Concordance of cancer patients’ function, symptoms, and supportive care needs

OriginalPaper

Differential item functioning was negligible in an adaptive test of functional status for patients with knee impairments who spoke English or Hebrew

OriginalPaper

Impact of demographic factors, medication and symptoms on disease-specific quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease

OriginalPaper

Negative and positive affect are independently associated with patient-reported health status following percutaneous coronary intervention

OriginalPaper

Health utility scores of colorectal cancer based on societal preference in Japan

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise