Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Fundamentals of Sustainability Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2019 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Risk Methodology to Assess and Control Aircraft Noise Impact in Vicinity of the Airports

verfasst von : Oleksandr Zaporozhets, Boris Blyukher

Erschienen in: Sustainable Aviation

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Analytical modelling of system safety and risk methodology is used to describe the relationships between the causes, dangers and effects of aircraft noise impact in various scenarios of aviation system development. Risk is assessed according to the hazard identification, associated with the probability of adverse events and their consequences, but the main emphasize is done on noise annoyance. The approach uses two types of risk in principle: individual and societal. A number of events must occur if a main stressor should take place with conditional probability of their realization. Dose-response function is applied to estimate the damage in an exposed receptor, and mathematically it gives a relationship between the intensity of the stressor and the effects in the exposed receptor. Framework for risk assessment and reduction concerning the control of a number of annoyed people by noise is proposed also. Hazard, vulnerability and coping capacity are interpreted in accordance with new requirements of the standard ISO 31000:2018.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Energy Management at the Airports
Nächstes Kapitel Biodiversity Management
Literatur
1.
Last J (1987) Public Health and Human Ecology. Appleton and Lange, East Norwalk
2.
Weltgesundheitsorganisation. Regionalbüro für Europa (2018) Environmental noise guidelines for European region. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen
3.
Zaporozhets O, et al (2014) Interdependency analysis of current and future criteria and their limits for aircraft noise control in urban areas. Acoustic climate inside and outside buildings, international conference, 23–26 Sept 2014, Vilnius, Lithuania, abstract number: Acoustic 14
4.
Kazhan К, Tokarev V (2009) The optimal noise modelling in the airport vicinity. 9th international conference on theoretical and computational acoustics, 7–9 Sept 2009 proceedings, Dresden. pp 41–50
5.
Zaporozhets O, Tokarev V, Attenborough K (2011) Aircraft noise: assessment, prediction and control. Glyph International, Taylor & Francis; CRC Press, 2017, ISBN 9781138073029, CAT# K33865
6.
7.
8.
ICAO Resolution A39-1 (2016) Consolidated statement of continuing ICAO policies and practices related to environmental protection – general provisions, noise and local air quality ICAO resolutions adopted by the assembly, Provisional edition, Oct 2016, 138 p
9.
UNISDR (2016) Exposure and vulnerability short concept note: work stream 2, working group 2. UNISDR science and technology conference on the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. 27–29 Jan 2016, Geneva International Conference Centre
10.
United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (2009) UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. UNISDR, Geneva, p 35
11.
ISO 31000:2018. Risk management – guidelines. 2018-02, 18 p
12.
Birkmann J (ed) (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations, University Press, Tokyo, New York, Paris, 524 pp
13.
van Westen CJ, Greiving S (2017) Multi-hazard risk assessment and decision making. In: Dalezios NR (ed) Environmental hazards methodologies for risk assessment and management. IWA Publishing, London, pp 31–94CrossRef
14.
15.
Flindell I et al (2013) Understanding UK community annoyance with aircraft noise. ANASE update study report for 2M Group, Ian Flindell & Associates
16.
Zaporozhets OI, Khaidar HA (2001) Instruments and procedures for management of aviation safety provision. Visnyk of the National Aviation University, Kyiv, 6(1): 186–189
17.
Morselt T, Evenhuis E (2006) Review standaardmethode schade en slachtoff ers, Rebel Group in opdracht Rijkswaterstaat, Dienst Weg en Waterbouwkunde, Rotterdam, 2006
18.
Basner M (2014) Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet 383(9925):1325–1332CrossRef
19.
Griefahn B, Scheuch K (2004) Protection goals for residents in the vicinity of civil airports. Noise Health 6(24):51–62
20.
21.
EPA (1973) Public health and welfare criteria for noise. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Noise Abatement and Control (ONAC), report EPA550/9-73-002, Washington, DC
22.
Miedema HME, Vos H (1998) Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise. J Acoust Soc Am 104:3432–3445CrossRef
23.
ISO 1996-1 (2016) Acoustics—description, measurement and assessment of environmental sound—part 1: basic quantities and assessment procedures, International Standard ISO 1996-1. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
24.
Shaw EAG (1996) Noise environments outdoors and the effects of community noise exposure. Noise Control Eng 44(3):109CrossRef
25.
Guski R (1999) Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance. Noise & Health 1(3):45–56
26.
27.
Aircraft Noise and Annoyance (2018) Recent findings CAP 1588. Civil Aviation Authority
28.
Fidell S (2003) The Schultz curve 25 years later: a research perspective. J Acoust Soc Am 114(6):3007–3015CrossRef
29.
WHO (2009) Night noise guidelines for Europe. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen
30.
31.
Schultz TJ (1979) Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. J Acoust Soc Am 65:849CrossRef
32.
Miedema HM, Oudshoorn CG (2001) Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environ Health Perspect 109(4):409–416CrossRef
33.
Gjestland T, Gelderblom FB (2017) Prevalence of noise induced annoyance and its dependency on number of aircraft movements. Acta Acustica United Acustica 103:28–33CrossRef
34.
ICAO white paper on noise (2018) CAEP/11-WP/xx, draft. 41 p
35.
Jagnatinskas A, Fiks B, Zaporozhets O, Kartyshev O (2011) Aircraft noise assessment in the vicinity of airports with different descriptors. Inter-noise-2011, Osaka, Japan, 4–7 Sept 2011
36.
Scheuch K, Griefahn B, Jansen G, Spreng M (2003) Evaluation criteria for aircraft noise. Rev Environ Health 18(3):185–201CrossRef
37.
Job RFS (1988) Community response to noise: a review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction. J Acoust Soc Am 83:991–1001CrossRef
38.
Taylor SM (1984) A path model of aircraft noise annoyance? J Sound Vib 96:243–260CrossRef
39.
Alexandre A (1976) An assessment of certain causal models used in surveys on aircraft noise annoyance. J Sound Vib 44:119–125CrossRef
40.
Flindell IH, Stallen PJM (1999) Non-acoustical factors in environmental noise. Noise Health 1(3):11–16
41.
42.
Fidell S, Piersons KS (1997) Community response to environmental noise. In: Crocker MJ (ed) Encyclopaedia of acoustics. Wiley, New York
43.
Stallen PJM (1999) A theoretical framework for environmental noise annoyance. Noise Health 1
44.
Zaporozhets O (2014) Criteria for aircraft noise control around airports and their role in reaching the strategic goals in environmental protection from aviation impact. Acoustic climate inside and outside buildings, international conference, 23–26 Sept 2014, Vilnius, Lithuania, abstract number: Acoustic 09
45.
Kroesen M, Molin EJE, van Wee B (2008) Testing a theory of aircraft noise annoyance: a structural equation analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 123(6): 4250–4260
46.
Schomer PD (2005) Criteria for assessment of noise annoyance. Noise Control Eng J 53(4):132–144CrossRef
47.
Guski R (2017) The increase of aircraft noise annoyance in communities. Causes and consequences, ISBEN-2017, Keynote lecture, Zurich, 12 p
48.
Vader R (2007) D/R&D 07/026 Noise annoyance mitigation at airports by non-acoustic measures
49.
ICAO (2004) Guidance on the balanced approach to aircraft noise management. ICAO Doc 9829, AN/451, Montreal
50.
Woodward JM, Lassman Briscoe L, Dunholter P (2009) Aircraft noise: a toolkit for managing community expectations. ACRP report 15, Washington, DC
51.
52.
Review of noise abatement procedure research & development and implementation results. Discussion of survey results ICAO preliminary edition – 2007, 29 p
53.
Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise, OJ L 189, 18.7.2002
54.
Fleming GG, Ziegler URF (2013) Environmental trends in aviation to 2050. ICAO 2013 Environmental Report
55.
Janssen SA, Vos H, van Kempen EE, Breugelmans OR, Miedema HM (2011) Trends in aircraft noise annoyance: the role of study and sample characteristics. J Acoust Soc Am 129(4)
Metadaten
Titel
Risk Methodology to Assess and Control Aircraft Noise Impact in Vicinity of the Airports
verfasst von
Oleksandr Zaporozhets
Boris Blyukher
Copyright-Jahr
2019
Buch
Sustainable Aviation

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14194-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-14195-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14195-0_3

    Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise