nach oben

Acta Mechanica

Erschienen in:

02.07.2020 | Original Paper

Robust optimum design of a tuned mass damper inerter

verfasst von: A. Kaveh, M. Fahimi Farzam, H. Hojat Jalali, R. Maroofiazar

Erschienen in: Acta Mechanica | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The current work describes the optimum design of a tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) to control a benchmark 10-story base-excited linear shear building under seismic excitations. Mass and inertance ratios are preselected, and optimum free vibration parameters of the TMDI (i.e., natural frequency and damping ratios) are calculated for single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) and multi degree-of-freedom (MDOF) models with different configurations of single and double inerter TMDIs at different locations using the colliding bodies optimization technique. Four different inherent damping values are considered for each analysis. Minimizing the \(H_{\mathrm{\infty }}\) norm of the roof displacement transfer function is considered as the objective function for robust control of the building. Additionally, the optimum designed damper performance and its robustness is assessed in both the frequency and time domains. Results show that while being robust, the SDOF-based optimized TMDI approach should be used with caution and it is recommended to optimize and employ the TMDI using the MDOF model. Results indicate the superior performance of the proposed well-tuned damper with proper configuration in comparison to a same weight/mass classical TMD.

Vorheriger Artikel A general dynamic model based on Mindlin’s high-frequency theory and the microstructure effect

Nächster Artikel Geometric variational approach to the dynamics of porous medium, filled with incompressible fluid

Soong, T.T.: Active Structural Control Theory and Practice, 1st edn. Wiley, New York (1990)

Sun, J.Q., Jolly, M.R., Norris, M.A.: Passive, adaptive and active tuned vibration absorbers—a survey. J. Vib. Acoust. Trans. ASME 117, 234–242 (1995)CrossRef

Tributsch, A., Adam, C.: Evaluation and analytical approximation of tuned mass damper performance in an earthquake environment. Smart Struct. Syst. 10(2), 155–179 (2012). https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2012.10.2.155CrossRef

Gutierrez Soto, M., Adeli, H.: Tuned mass dampers. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 20(4), 419–431 (2013)CrossRef

Den Hartog, J.P.: Mechanical Vibrations, 4th edn. Dover Publications, New York (1956)MATH

Ruiz, R., Taflanidis, A.A., Giaralis, A., Lopez-Garcia, D.: Risk-informed optimization of the tuned mass-damper–inerter (TMDI) for the seismic protection of multi-storey building structures. Eng. Struct. 177, 836–850 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.074CrossRef

Marian, L., Giaralis, A.: Optimal design of a novel tuned mass-damper–inerter (TMDI) passive vibration control configuration for stochastically support-excited structural systems. Probab. Eng. Mech. 38, 156–164 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.03.007CrossRef

Elias, S., Matsagar, V.: Research developments in vibration control of structures using passive tuned mass dampers. Annu. Rev. Control 44, 129–156 (2017)CrossRef

Bekdaş, G., Nigdeli, S.M., Yang, X.-S.: A novel bat algorithm based optimum tuning of mass dampers for improving the seismic safety of structures. Eng. Struct. 159, 89–98 (2018)CrossRef

10.

Bekdaş, G., Nigdeli, S.M.: Metaheuristic based optimization of tuned mass dampers under earthquake excitation by considering soil–structure interaction. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 92, 443–461 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.10.019CrossRef

11.

Salvi, J., Rizzi, E.: Closed-form optimum tuning formulas for passive tuned mass dampers under benchmark excitations. Smart Struct. Syst. 17(2), 231–256 (2016)CrossRef

12.

Leung, A.Y.T., Zhang, H., Cheng, C.C., Lee, Y.Y.: Particle swarm optimization of TMD by non-stationary base excitation during earthquake. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37(9), 1223–1246 (2008)CrossRef

13.

Matta, E.: Performance of tuned mass dampers against near-field earthquakes. Struct Eng. Mech. 39(5), 621–642 (2011). https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.39.5.621CrossRef

14.

Di Matteo, A., Furtmüller, T., Adam, C., Pirrotta, A.: Optimal design of tuned liquid column dampers for seismic response control of base-isolated structures. Acta Mech. 229(2), 437–454 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-017-1980-7MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

15.

De Angelis, M., Perno, S., Reggio, A.: Dynamic response and optimal design of structures with large mass ratio TMD. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41(1), 41–60 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1117CrossRef

16.

Smith, M.C.: Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter. In: 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, pp. 1657–1662 (2002)

17.

Siami, A., Karimi, H.R., Cigada, A., Zappa, E., Sabbioni, E.: Parameter optimization of an inerter-based isolator for passive vibration control of Michelangelo’s Rondanini Pietà. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 98, 667–683 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.05.030CrossRef

18.

Marian, L., Giaralis, A.: Optimal design of inerter devices combined with TMDs for vibration control of buildings exposed to stochastic seismic excitations. In: 11th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, ICOSSAR 2013, New York, pp. 1025–1032 (2013)

19.

Marian, L., Giaralis, A.: The tuned mass-damper–inerter for harmonic vibrations suppression, attached mass reduction, and energy harvesting. Smart Struct. Syst. 19(6), 665–678 (2017). https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.19.6.665CrossRef

20.

Lazar, I.F., Neild, S.A., Wagg, D.J.: Using an inerter-based device for structural vibration suppression. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43(8), 1129–1147 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2390CrossRef

21.

Ikago, K., Saito, K., Inoue, N.: Seismic control of single-degree-of-freedom structure using tuned viscous mass damper. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 41(3), 453–474 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1138CrossRef

22.

De Domenico, D., Ricciardi, G.: Improving the dynamic performance of base-isolated structures via tuned mass damper and inerter devices: a comparative study. Struct. Control Health Monit. 25(10), e2234 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2234CrossRef

23.

De Domenico, D., Deastra, P., Ricciardi, G., Sims, N.D., Wagg, D.J.: Novel fluid inerter based tuned mass dampers for optimised structural control of base-isolated buildings. J. Frankl. Inst. 356, 7626–7649 (2018) CrossRef

24.

Di Matteo, A., Masnata, C., Pirrotta, A.: Simplified analytical solution for the optimal design of tuned mass damper inerter for base isolated structures. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 134, 106337 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106337CrossRef

25.

Masnata, C., Matteo, A.D., Adam, C., Pirrotta, A.J.M.R.C.: Smart structures through nontraditional design of tuned mass damper inerter for higher control of base isolated systems. Mech. Res. Commun. 105, 103513 (2020) CrossRef

26.

Masri, S.F., Caffrey, J.P., Li, H.: Transient response of MDOF systems with inerters to nonstationary stochastic excitation. J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME (2017). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037551CrossRef

27.

Giaralis, A., Taflanidis, A.A.: Optimal tuned mass-damper–inerter (TMDI) design for seismically excited MDOF structures with model uncertainties based on reliability criteria. Struct. Control Health Monit. 25(2), e2082 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2082CrossRef

28.

Ziegler, F.: Mechanics of Solids and Fluids, Corrected reprint of the 2 edn. Springer, New York (1998)MATH

29.

Debnath, N., Deb, S.K., Dutta, A.: Frequency band-wise passive control of linear time invariant structural systems with \(H_{\infty }\) optimization. J. Sound Vib. 332(23), 6044–6062 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.06.018CrossRef

30.

Asami, T., Nishihara, O., Baz, A.M.: Analytical solutions to \(H_{\infty }\) and \(H_2\) optimization of dynamic vibration absorbers attached to damped linear systems. J. Vib. Acoust. 124(2), 284–295 (2002)CrossRef

31.

Sadek, F., Mohraz, B., Taylor, A.W., Chung, R.M.: A method of estimating the parameters of tuned mass dampers for seismic applications. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26(6), 617–635 (1998)CrossRef

32.

Kaveh, A., Mahdavi, V.R.: Colliding bodies optimization: a novel meta-heuristic method. Comput. Struct. 139, 18–27 (2014)CrossRef

33.

Fahimi Farzam, M., Kaveh, A.: Optimum design of tuned mass dampers using colliding bodies optimization in frequency domain. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-019-00296-6CrossRef

34.

Kaveh, A.: Applications of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms in Civil Engineering. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, Cham (2017)CrossRef

35.

Kaveh, A.: Advances in Metaheuristic Algorithms for Optimal Design of Structures, 2nd edn. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, Cham (2017)CrossRef

36.

Hadi, M.N.S., Arfiadi, Y.: Optimum design of absorber for MDOF structures. J. Struct. Eng. (ASCE) 124(11), 1272–1279 (1998)CrossRef

37.

Bekdaş, G., Nigdeli, S.M.: Estimating optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers using harmony search. Eng. Struct. 33(9), 2716–2723 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.024CrossRef

38.

Nigdeli, S.M., Bekdaş, G.: Optimum tuned mass damper design in frequency domain for structures. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 21(3), 912–922 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0829-2CrossRef

39.

Khatibinia, M., Gholami, H., Kamgar, R.: Optimal design of tuned mass dampers subjected to continuous stationary critical excitation. Intl. J. Dyn. Control 6(3), 1094–1104 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-017-0386-7MathSciNetCrossRef

40.

Spencer Jr, B.F., Christenson, R.E., Dyke, S.J.: Next generation benchmark control problem for seismically excited buildings. In: Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Structural Control 1998, pp. 1135–1360. Kyoto

Titel: Robust optimum design of a tuned mass damper inerter
verfasst von: A. Kaveh
M. Fahimi Farzam
H. Hojat Jalali
R. Maroofiazar
Publikationsdatum: 02.07.2020
Verlag: Springer Vienna
Erschienen in: Acta Mechanica / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0001-5970
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-6937
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02720-9

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

The effect of bend angle on pressure drop and flow behavior in a corrugated duct

Variable separation method for solving boundary value problems of isotropic linearly viscoelastic bodies

In-plane transient analysis of two dissimilar nonhomogeneous half-planes containing several interface cracks

A general dynamic model based on Mindlin’s high-frequency theory and the microstructure effect

Inflation, extension and torsion analysis of compressible functionally graded hyperelastic tubes

Free vibration of partially fluid-filled or fluid-surrounded composite shells using the dynamic stiffness method

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten