Sätze und Texte verstehen und produzieren

Adams, B. C., Clifton, C., & Mitchell, D. C. (1998). Lexical guidance in sentence processing? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 265–270.CrossRef

Akinnaso, F. N. (1982). On the differences between spoken and written language. Language and Speech, 25, 97–125.

Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1061–1070.

Alibali, M. W., Kita, S., & Young, A. J. (2000). Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 593–613.CrossRef

Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106, 748–765.PubMedCrossRef

Altmann, G., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247–264.PubMedCrossRef

Altmann, G., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191–238.PubMedCrossRef

Altmann, G., Garnham, A., & Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 685–712.CrossRef

Anderson, A., Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1983). The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 427–440.CrossRef

Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 76, B13–B26.PubMedCrossRef

Asher, N. (1993). Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef

Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Austin, J. L. (1962). Philosophical Papers. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baars, B. J., Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status in artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382–391.CrossRef

Badecker, W., & Straub, K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 748–769.PubMed

Baker, L., & Wagner, J. L. (1987). Evaluating information for truthfulness: The effects of logical subordination. Memory & Cognition, 15, 247–255.CrossRef

Baroni, M., Bernardi, R., & Zamparelli, R. (2014). Frege in space: A program for compositional distributional semantics. Linguistic Issues in Language Technologies, 9, 5–110.

Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2006). Perspective taking and the coordination of meaning in language use. In M. Traxler, & M. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2. Aufl. S. 901–938). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.CrossRef

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and brain sciences, 22, 637–660.CrossRef

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.PubMedCrossRef

Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher, & R. A. Zwaan (Hrsg.), Grounding Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barsalou, L. W. (2014). Cognitive Psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. New York: Psychology Press.

Barton, S. B., & Sanford, A. J. (1993). A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory & Cognition, 21, 477–487.CrossRef

Bates, E., Masling, M., & Kintsch, W. (1978). Recognition memory for aspects of dialogue. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 187–197.

Beck, S., & Gergel, R. (2014). Contrasting English and German Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRef

Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112, 150–158.PubMedCrossRef

Berkum, J. J. A. van, Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2003). Event related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40, 235–248.PubMedCrossRef

Berkum, J. J. van, Van Den Brink, D., Tesink, C. M., Kos, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 580–591.PubMedCrossRef

Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Hrsg.), Cognition and the development of language (S. 279–362). New York: Wiley.

Bierwisch, M. (1982). Formal and lexical semantics. Linguistische Berichte, 80/82, 3–17.

Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 527–536.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2767–2796.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1–47.CrossRef

Bock, J. K. (1986a). Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 575–586.

Bock, J. K. (1986b). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.CrossRef

Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177–192.CrossRef

Bock, K. J., & Irwin, D. E. (1980). Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 467–484.CrossRef

Bock, J. K., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (S. 945–984). San Diego: Academic Press.

Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. H. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104, 437–458.PubMedCrossRef

Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1990). Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 413–432.CrossRef

Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2009). Processing syntax and morphology: A neurocognitive perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185–189.PubMedCrossRef

Bott, O. (in press). The processing domain of aspectual interpretation. In B. Arsenijevic, B. Gehrke & R. Marín (Eds.): Subatomic Semantics of Event Predicates. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Springer: Dordrecht.

Bott, O., & Schlotterbeck, F. (2015). The processing domain of scope interaction. Journal of Semantics, 39, 39–92.CrossRef

Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Liversedge, S. P., Stewart, A. J., & Urbach, T. P. (1995). Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 489–506.CrossRef

Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331–350.CrossRef

Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11, 717–726.CrossRef

Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193–209.CrossRef

Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In G. Miller, J. Bresnan, & M. Halle (Hrsg.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality (S. 1–59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bresnan, J., & Kaplan, R. M. (1982). Introduction: Grammars as mental representations of language. In J. Bresnan (Hrsg.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Broca, P. (1861). Perte de la parole, ramollissement chronique et destruction partielle du lobe antérieur gauche du cerveau. Bulletin de la Société Anthropologique, 2, 235–238.

Bröder, A., & Bredenkamp, J. (1996). SLIP-Technik, Prozeßdissoziationsmodell und multinomiale Modellierung: neue Werkzeuge zum experimentellen Nachweis „Freudscher Versprecher?“. Zeitschrift für experimentelle Psychologie, 43, 175–202.PubMed

Broek, P. van den, Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2005). Integrating memory-based and constructionist processes in accounts of reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 299–316.CrossRef

Brysbaert, M., & Mitchell, D. C. (1996). Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 49, 664–695.CrossRef

Burkhardt, P. (2006). Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 98, 159–168.PubMedCrossRef

Burton, M., Small, S., & Blumstein, S. (2000). The role of segmentation in phonological processing: an fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 679–690.PubMedCrossRef

Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 671–681.CrossRef

Carlson, K. (2009). How prosody influences sentence comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 1188–1200.CrossRef

Carroll, D. (1994). Psychology of language. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Chafe, W., & Tannen, D. (1987). The relation between written and spoken language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 16, 383–407.CrossRef

Cherubim, D. (Hrsg.). (1980). Fehlerlinguistik. Beiträge zum Problem der sprachlichen Abweichung. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 1–15.CrossRef

Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (1999). Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance. Cognitive Science, 23, 157–205.CrossRef

Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489–509.PubMed

Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 368–407.PubMedCrossRef

Cirilo, R. K., & Foss, D. J. (1980). Text structure and reading time for sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 96–109.CrossRef

Clark, H. H. (1975). Bridging. Proceedings of the 1975 workshop on Theoretical issues in natural language processing. (S. 169–174). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.

Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 430–477.CrossRef

Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in Communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Hrsg.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (S. 127–149). Washington: APA Books.CrossRef

Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the given – new contract. In R. O. Freedle (Hrsg.), DiscourseProduction and Comprehension (S. 1–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294.CrossRef

Clark, H. H., & Sengul, C. M. J. (1979). In search of referents for nouns and pronouns. Memory & Cognition, 7, 35–41.CrossRef

Claus, B. (2015). Verb gapping: an action-gap compatibility study. Acta Psychologica, 156, 104–113.PubMedCrossRef

Claus, B., & Kelter, S. (2006). Comprehending narratives containing flashbacks: evidence for temporally organized representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1031–1044.PubMed

Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. (2006). Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations? Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 185–198.CrossRef

Clifton Jr, C., & Odom, P. (1966). Similarity relations among certain English sentence constructions. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–35.CrossRef

Corbett, A. T., & Chang, F. R. (1983). Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents. Memory & Cognition, 11, 283–294.CrossRef

Crain, S., & Steedman, M. (1985). On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser. Natural Language Parsing, 320–358.

Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. C. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73–105.PubMedCrossRef

Davidson, D. (1967). The logical form of action sentences. In N. Resher (Hrsg.), The logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391–407.CrossRef

Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321.PubMedCrossRef

Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611–629.CrossRef

Dijk, T. A. van, & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

Dove, G. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110, 412–431.PubMedCrossRef

Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547–619.CrossRef

Drieman, G. H. (1962). Differences between written and spoken language: An exploratory study. Acta Psychologica, 20, 78–100.CrossRef

Dudschig, C., Maienborn, C., & Kaup, B. (2016). Is there a difference between stripy journeys and stripy ladybirds? The N400 response to semantic and world-knowledge violations during sentence comprehension. Brain and Cognition, 103, 38–49.

Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179–211.CrossRef

Elman, J. L. (1991). Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7, 195–225.

Elman, J. L. (2009). On the meaning of words and dinosaur bones: Lexical knowledge without a lexicon. Cognitive Science, 33, 547–582.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813.PubMedCrossRef

Erickson, T. D., & Mattson, M. E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 540–551.CrossRef

Farmer, T. A., Misyak, J. B., & Christinsen, M. H. (2012). In M. Spivey, M. Joanisse, & K. McRae (Hrsg.), In (S. 353–364). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ferreira, F. (1993). Creation of prosody during sentence production. Psychological Review, 100, 233–253.PubMedCrossRef

Ferreira, F. (1994). Choice of passive voice is affected by verb type and animacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 715–736.CrossRef

Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203.PubMedCrossRef

Ferreira, F., & Clifton Jr, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348–368.CrossRef

Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 555–568.PubMed

Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 57–84.CrossRef

Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11–15.CrossRef

Ferreira, V. S. (1996). Is it better to give than to donate? Syntactic flexibility in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 724–755.CrossRef

Ferreira, V. S., & Dell, G. S. (2000). Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 296–340.PubMedCrossRef

Filik, R., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Processing local pragmatic anomalies in fictional contexts: Evidence from the N400. Psychophysiology, 45, 554–558.PubMedCrossRef

Filik, R., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). Processing doubly quantified sentences: Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 953–959.CrossRef

Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach, & R. T. Harms (Hrsg.), Universals in linguistic theory (S. 1–88). New York: Holt, Rinehart und Winston.

Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. Studies in Linguistic Analysis, Philological Society (Great Britain), 1–32.

Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Grounding Cognition in Perception and Action. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825–850.CrossRef

Flores d’Arcais, G. B. (1987). Syntactic processing during reading for comprehension. Attention and Performance, Bd. XII, S. 619–633). The Psychology of Reading

Fodor, J. D. (1998). Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 285–319.CrossRef

Fodor, J. A., & Bever, T. G. (1965). The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 414–420.CrossRef

Fodor, J. A., & Garrett, M. (1967). Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 289–296.CrossRef

Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G., & Garrett, M. F. (1974). The psychology of langauge. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Foltz, P. W., Gilliam, S., & Kendall, S. (2000). Supporting content-based feedback in on-line writing evaluation with LSA. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 111–127.CrossRef

Forrest, L. B. (1996). Discourse goals and attentional processes in sentence production: The dynamic construal of events. In A. E. Goldberg (Hrsg.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language (S. 149–162). Stanford, CA: The Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications.

Frazier, L. (1999). On sentence interpretation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef

Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291–325.CrossRef

Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178–210.CrossRef

Frege, G. (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik, N.F, 100, 25–50.. Neuabdruck in Frege (1962)

Freud, S. (1901). Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens. Über Vergessen, Versprechen, Vergreifen, Aberglaube und Irrtum. In: Project Gutenberg eBook.

Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91, 1357–1392.PubMedCrossRef

Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27–52.CrossRef

Gamut, L. T. F. (1991). Intensional Logic and Logical Grammar. Logic, Language, and Meaning, Bd. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Garnham, A., Shillcock, R. C., Brown, G. D., Mill, A. I., & Cutler, A. (1981). Slips of the tongue in the London-Lund corpus of spontaneous conversation. Linguistics, 19, 805–818.CrossRef

Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower (Hrsg.), The psychology of learning and motivation Bd. 9 New York: Academic Press.

Garrett, M. F. (1992). Disorder of lexical selection. Cognition, 42, 143–180.PubMedCrossRef

Garrett, M. F., Bever, T., & Fodor, J. (1966). The active use of grammar in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 30–32.CrossRef

Garrod, S., & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27, 181–218.PubMedCrossRef

Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 8–11.PubMedCrossRef

Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 292–304.PubMedCrossRef

Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1994). Resolving sentences in a discourse context: How discourse representation affects language understanding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (S. 675–698). San Diego: Academic Press.

Garvey, C., & Caramazza, A. (1974). Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 459–464.

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 265–304.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Gernsbacher, M. A., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1988). Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 699–717.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2006). Figurative language. In M. Traxler, & M. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2. Aufl. S. 835–862). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.CrossRef

Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76.PubMedCrossRef

Giora, R. (2002). Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 487–506.CrossRef

Gleitman, H., Gross, J., & Reisberg, D. (2010). Psychology. New York, NJ: Norton.

Glenberg, A. M. (2011). How reading comprehension is embodied and why that matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 5–18.

Glenberg, A. M. (2014). How acting out in school boosts learning. Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-acting-out-in-school-boosts-learning/

Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565.CrossRef

Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and language, 26, 69–83.CrossRef

Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children’s Reading Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 424–436.CrossRef

Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., & Cattaneo, L. (2008). Use-induced motor plasticity affects the processing of abstract and concrete language. Current Biology, 18, R290–R291.PubMedCrossRef

Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 419–429.PubMedCrossRef

Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Gesture’s role in speaking, learning, and creating language. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 257–283.PubMedCrossRef

Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12, 516–522.PubMedCrossRef

Gompel, R. P. van, & Pickering, M. J. (2001). Lexical guidance in sentence processing: A note on Adams, Clifton, and Mitchell (1998). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 851–857.CrossRef

Gompel, R. P. van, & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Syntactic parsing. The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, Gareth Gaskell. Oxford University Press, NY, 289–307.

Gompel, R. P. van, Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2001). Reanalysis in sentence processing: Evidence against current constraint-based and two-stage models. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 225–258.CrossRef

Gompel, R. P. van, Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 284–307.CrossRef

Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17, 311–347.CrossRef

Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.PubMedCrossRef

Grewendorf, G. (2006). Noam Chomsky. München: CH Beck.

Grewendorf, G., Hamm, F., & Sternefeld, W. (1989). Sprachliches Wissen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Hrsg.), Speech acts Syntax and semantics, (Bd. 3, S. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

Griffin, Z. M. (2001). Gaze duration during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82, B1–B14.PubMedCrossRef

Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274–279.PubMedCrossRef

Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Grober, E. H., Beardsley, W., & Caramazza, A. (1978). Parallel function strategy in pronoun assignment. Cognition, 6, 117–133.PubMedCrossRef

Grodner, D. J., Klein, N. M., Carbary, K. M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2010). „Some,“ and possibly all, scalar inferences are not delayed: Evidence for immediate pragmatic enrichment. Cognition, 116, 42–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12, 175–204.

Grosz, B. J., Weinstein, S., & Joshi, A. K. (1995). Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21, 203–225.

Gullberg, M., De Bot, K., & Volterra, V. (2008). Gestures and some key issues in the study of language development. Gesture, 8, 149–179.CrossRef

Habel, C. (1986). Prinzipien der Referentialität. Untersuchungen zur propositionalen Repräsentation von Wissen. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef

Hagoort, P., & Berkum, J. van (2007). Beyond the sentence given. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 801–811.CrossRef

Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438–441.PubMedCrossRef

Hakes, D. T. (1972). Effects of reducing complement constructions on sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 278–286.CrossRef

Hare, M., Jones, M., Thomson, C., Kelly, S., & McRae, K. (2009). Activating event knowledge. Cognition, 111, 151–167.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Harley, T. A. (1984). A Critique of Top-down Independent Levels Models of Speech Production: Evidence from Non-plan-Internal Speech Errors. Cognitive Science, 8, 191–219.CrossRef

Harley, T. A. (2013). The psychology of language: From data to theory. New York: Psychology Press.

Hartshorne, J. K. (2013). What is implicit causality? Language and Cognitive Processes, 29, 1–21.

Hartsuiker, R. J., & Westenberg, C. (2000). Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition, 75, B27–B39.PubMedCrossRef

Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15, 409–414.PubMedCrossRef

Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.PubMedCrossRef

Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512–521.CrossRef

Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts).

Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Bd. 13. Oxford: Blackwell.

Herbert, C., Deutsch, R., Sütterlin, S., Kübler, A., & Pauli, P. (2011). Negation as a means for emotion regulation? Startle reflex modulation during processing of negated emotional words. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 199–206.CrossRef

Herrmann, T. (2003). Theorien und Modelle der Sprachproduktion. In G. Rickheit, T. Herrmann, & W. Deutsch (Hrsg.), Psycholinguistik. Ein internationals Handbuch (S. 213–228). Berlin, New York: DeGruyter.

Hess, D. J., Foss, D. J., & Carroll, P. (1995). Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 62–82.CrossRef

Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2000). Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 131–138.PubMedCrossRef

Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2004). Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition, 92, 67–99.PubMedCrossRef

Holmes, V. M., & Forster, K. I. (1970). Detection of extraneous signals during sentence recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 7, 297–301.CrossRef

Holsinger, E. (2013). Representing Idioms: Syntactic and contextual effects on idiom processing. Language and Speech, 56, 373–394.PubMedCrossRef

Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500.PubMedCrossRef

Hörnig, R., Oberauer, K., & Weidenfeld, A. (2005). Two principles of premise integration in spatial reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 33, 131–139.CrossRef

Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 495–514.CrossRef

Huang, Y. T., & Gordon, P. C. (2011). Distinguishing the time course of lexical and discourse processes through context, coreference, and quantified expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 966–978.PubMedPubMedCentral

Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2011). Logic and conversation revisited: Evidence for a division between semantic and pragmatic content in real-time language comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1161–1172.CrossRef

Hughes, D. C., Keeling, B., & Tuck, B. F. (1983). The effects of instructions to scorers intended to reduce context effects in essay scoring. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 1047–1050.CrossRef

Isberner, M. B., & Richter, T. (2014). Does validation during language comprehension depend on an evaluative mindset? Discourse Processes, 51, 7–25.CrossRef

Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). What’s communication got to do with it? Gesture in children blind from birth. Developmental Psychology, 33, 453–467.PubMedCrossRef

Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science, 16, 367–371.PubMedCrossRef

Jacobson, P. (2014). Compositional semantics: An introduction to the syntax/semantics interface. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Bd. 6. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Jones, M. N., Willits, J. A. & Dennis, S. (im Druck). Models of semantic memory. In J. R. Busemeyer & J. T. Townsend (Eds.) Oxford Handbook of Mathematical and Computational Psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.PubMedCrossRef

Kamide, Y., & Mitchell, D. C. (1999). Incremental pre-head attachment in Japanese parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 631–662.CrossRef

Kamide, Y., Altmann, G., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133–156.CrossRef

Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Katz, A. N., & Ferretti, T. R. (2001). Moment-by-moment reading of proverbs in literal and nonliteral contexts. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 193–221.CrossRef

Katz, J. J., & Postal, P. M. (1964). An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Kaup, B. (2001). Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information. Memory & Cognition, 20, 960–967.CrossRef

Kaup, B. & Ulrich, R. (im Druck). Die Beziehung zwischen sprachlicher und nicht-sprachlicher Kognition: Die Bedeutung von Repräsentationsformaten. Psychologische Rundschau.

Kaup, B., de la Vega, I., Strozyk, J., & Dudschig, C. (im Druck). The role of sensorimotor processes in meaning composition. In M. H. Fischer & Y. Coello (Eds.), Foundations of Embodied Cognition: Conceptual and Interactive Embodiment. London: Psychology Press.

Kellogg, R. T. (1999). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kelly, M. H., Bock, J. K., & Keil, F. C. (1986). Prototypicality in a linguistic context: Effects on sentence structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 59–74.CrossRef

Kelter, S. (2003). Mentale Modelle. In G. Rickheit, T. Herrmann, & W. Deutsch (Hrsg.), Psycholinguistik-Psycholinguistics (S. 505–517). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.

Kelter, S., Kaup, B., & Claus, B. (2004). Representing a described sequence of events: a dynamic view of narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 451–464.PubMed

Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258.CrossRef

Kendon, A. (1997). Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 109–128.CrossRef

Kennedy, A., Murray, W. S., Jennings, F., & Reid, C. (1989). Parsing complements: Comments on the generality of the principle of minimal attachment. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, SI51–SI76.CrossRef

Kimball, J. (1973). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition, 2, 15–47.CrossRef

Kintsch, W. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological review, 95, 163.PubMedCrossRef

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive Science, 25, 173–202.CrossRef

Kintsch, W., & Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257–274.CrossRef

Kintsch, W., & Dijk, T. A. van (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.CrossRef

Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Hrsg.), Language and Gesture (S. 162–185). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32.CrossRef

Knoeferle, P., Crocker, M. W., Scheepers, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). The influence of the immediate visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: Evidence from eye-movements in depicted events. Cognition, 95, 95–127.PubMedCrossRef

Konieczny, L. (2000). Locality and parsing complexity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 627–645.PubMedCrossRef

Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B., & Strube, G. (1991). Psychologisch fundierte Prinzipien der Satzverarbeitung jenseits von Minimal Attachment. Kognitionswissenschaft, 1, 58–70.

Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B., Scheepers, C., & Strube, G. (1997). The role of lexical heads in parsing: Evidence from German. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 307–348.CrossRef

Konopka, A. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2014). Priming sentence planning. Cognitive Psychology, 73, 1–40.PubMedCrossRef

Krauss, R. M., Dushay, R. A., Chen, Y., & Rauscher, F. (1995). The communicative value of conversational hand gesture. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 533–552.CrossRef

Krifka, M. (1989). Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Bd. 10. Paderborn: W. Fink.

Krifka, M. (2004). Argumentstruktur und Verbsemantik. Skript zum Grundkurs C WS 2004/5. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

Lakoff, G. (1970). Global rules. Language, 46(3), 627–639.CrossRef

Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.CrossRef

Lang, E., & Maienborn, C. (2011). Two-level semantics: Semantic form and conceptual structure. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Hrsg.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (Bd. I, S. 709–740). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Lee, E. K., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Watson, D. G. (2013). Ways of looking ahead: Hierarchical planning in language production. Cognition, 129, 544–562.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Lenhard, W., Baier, H., Hoffmann, J., & Schneider, W. (2007). Automatische Bewertung offener Antworten mittels Latenter Semantischer Analyse. Diagnostica, 53, 155–165.CrossRef

Leuninger, H. (1999). Reden ist Schweigen, Silber ist Gold: gesammelte Versprecher. München: DTV.

Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41–104.PubMedCrossRef

Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.

Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106, 1126–1177.PubMedCrossRef

Lichtheim, L. (1885). On aphasia. Brain, 7, 433–484.CrossRef

MacDonald, M. C. (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 157–201.CrossRef

MacDonald, M. C., & Just, M. A. (1989). Changes in activation levels with negation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 633.PubMed

MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676.PubMedCrossRef

Macedonia, M. (2014). Bringing back the body into the mind: gestures enhance word learning in foreign language. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1467.PubMedPubMedCentral

Maienborn, C. (2003). Die logische Form von Kopula-Sätzen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRef

Maienborn, C. (2011). Event semantics. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger, & P. Portner (Hrsg.), Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning (Bd. 1, S. 802–829). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.. HSK 33.1

Mani, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions. Memory & Cognition, 10, 181–187.CrossRef

Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1–71.PubMedCrossRef

Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Warren, P., Grenier, P., & Lee, C. S. (1992). Prosodic effects in minimal attachment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 73–87.CrossRef

Marx, E. (2000). Versprecher und Genusverarbeitung. Analyse spontaner und experimentell erzeugter Sprechfehler. Wiesbaden: DUV.CrossRef

McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287–330.CrossRef

McCelland, J., & Rumelhart, D. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.CrossRef

McDonald, J. L., Bock, K., & Kelly, M. H. (1993). Word and world order: Semantic, phonological, and metrical determinants of serial position. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 188–230.PubMedCrossRef

McElree, B., Traxler, M. J., Pickering, M. J., Seely, R. E., & Jackendoff, R. (2001). Reading time evidence for enriched composition. Cognition, 78, B17–B25.PubMedCrossRef

McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466.PubMedCrossRef

McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1998). Memory-based language processing: Psycholinguistic research in the 1990s. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 25–42.PubMedCrossRef

McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 283–312.CrossRef

Meringer, R., & Mayer, C. (1895). Versprechen und Verlesen: eine philologisch-linguistische Studie. Stuttgart: Göschen.

Meyer, A. S. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 477–496.CrossRef

Miller, G. A., & McKean, K. O. (1964). A chronometric study of some relations between sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 297–308.CrossRef

Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action, 27, Oxford Psychology Series 27. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, K. A. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 414–417.CrossRef

Mitchell, D. C. (1987). Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. In M. Coltheart (Hrsg.), Attention and performance XII (S. 601–618). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Mitchell, D. C., Cuetos, F., Corley, M. M., & Brysbaert, M. (1995). Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 469–488.CrossRef

Mitchell, D. C., & Holmes, V. M. (1985). The role of specific information about the verb in parsing sentences with local structural ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 542–559.CrossRef

Mitchell, J., & Lapata, M. (2010). Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cognitive Science, 34, 1388–1429.PubMedCrossRef

Montague, R. (1973). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In K. J. J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik, & P. Suppes (Hrsg.), Approaches to Natural Language (S. 221–242). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRef

Morgan, J. L., Meier, R. P., & Newport, E. L. (1987). Structural packaging in the input to language learning: Contributions of prosodic and morphological marking of phrases to the acquisition of language. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 498–550.PubMedCrossRef

Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 165–187.CrossRef

Murray, J. D., Klin, C. M., & Myers, J. L. (1993). Forward inferences in narrative text. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 464–473.CrossRef

Ni, W., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1996). Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 283–334.CrossRef

Nickerson, R. S. (1999). How we know – and sometimes misjudge – what others know: Imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 737–759.CrossRef

Nieuwland, M. S., & Berkum, J. J. van (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1098–1111.PubMedCrossRef

O’Brien, E. J. (1987). Antecedent search processes and the structure of text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 278–290.PubMed

O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing víew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learníng, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1200–1210.PubMed

O’Donnell, R. C. (1974). Syntactic differences between speech and writing. American Speech, 49, 102–110.CrossRef

Özyürek, A., Willems, R., Kita, S., & Hagoort, P. (2007). On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: Insights from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 605–616.PubMedCrossRef

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

Partee, B. (1984). Compositionality. Varieties of Formal Semantics, 3, 281–311.

Pfau, R., Steinbach, M., & Woll, B. (Hrsg.). (2012). Sign language: An international handbook. Bd. 37. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–190.PubMed

Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 105–110.PubMedCrossRef

Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRef

Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73–193.PubMedCrossRef

Poeppel, D., & Hickok, G. (2004). Towards a new functional anatomy of language. Cognition, 92, 1–12.PubMedCrossRef

Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97–132.PubMedCrossRef

Price, C. J. (2010). The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 62–88.PubMedCrossRef

Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582.PubMedCrossRef

Pylkkänen, L., & McElree, B. (2006). The syntax-semantics interface: On-line composition of sentence meaning. In M. Traxler, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (S. 537–577). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Raaijmakers, J. G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93–134.CrossRef

Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1978). Priming in item recognition: Evidence for the propositional structure of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 403–417.CrossRef

Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7, 226–231.CrossRef

Rayner, K., & Frazier, L. (1987). Parsing temporarily ambiguous complements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 657–673.CrossRef

Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358–374.CrossRef

Rayner, K., Kambe, G., & Duffy, S. A. (2000). The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 53, 1061–1080.CrossRef

Reber, A. S., & Anderson, J. R. (1970). The perception of clicks in linguistic and nonlinguistic messages. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 81–89.CrossRef

Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445–476.PubMedCrossRef

Richter, T., Schroeder, S., & Wöhrmann, B. (2009). You don’t have to believe everything you read: background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 538–558.PubMedCrossRef

Rinck, M., & Bower, G. H. (1995). Anaphora resolution and the focus of attention in situation models. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 110–131.CrossRef

Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. G. Bobrow, & M. A. Collins (Hrsg.), Representation and understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science (S. 211–236). New York: Academic Press.CrossRef

Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland, & D. E. Rumelhart (Hrsg.), Parallel Distributed Processing (Bd. II, S. 216–271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back propagating errors. Nature, 323, 533–536.CrossRef

Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14, 479–493.CrossRef

Sachs, J. S. (1967). Recopition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 437–442.CrossRef

Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1981). Understanding written language: Explorations of comprehension beyond the sentence. New York: Wiley.

Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1998). The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 26, 159–190.CrossRef

Sanford, A. J., Moar, K., & Garrod, S. C. (1988). Proper names as controllers of discourse focus. Language and Speech, 31, 43–56.

Sanford, A. J., & Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 382–386.PubMedCrossRef

Sauerland, U. (2011). Traces. In P. C. Hogan (Hrsg.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences (S. 866–867). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Savin, H. B., & Perchonock, E. (1965). Grammatical structure and the immediate recall of English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 348–353.CrossRef

Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schlotterbeck, F., & Bott, O. (2013). Easy Solutions for a Hard Problem? The Computational Complexity of Reciprocals with Quantificational Antecedents. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 22, 363–390.CrossRef

Schwarz, F. (2007). Processing presupposed content. Journal of Semantics, 24, 373–416.CrossRef

Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, K. M., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71, 109–147.PubMedCrossRef

Shapiro, A., & Murphy, G. (1993). Can you answer a question for me? Evidence for a salience-based theory of indirect speech act. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 211–229.CrossRef

Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 272–281.CrossRef

Slevc, L. R. (2011). Saying what’s on your mind: Working memory effects on sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1503–1514.PubMedPubMedCentral

Slobin, D. I. (1966). Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 5, 219–227.CrossRef

Singer, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (S. 479–515). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. (1999). High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition, 73, 205–246.PubMedCrossRef

Smyth, R. (1994). Grammatical determinants of ambiguous pronoun resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 197–229.CrossRef

Speer, S., & Blodgett, A. (2006). Prosody. In M. Traxler, & M. A. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (S. 505–537). Amsterdam: Academic Press.CrossRef

Sperber, & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Backwell.

Spivey, M. J., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 447–481.PubMedCrossRef

Sprenger, S. A., Levelt, W. J. M., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 161–184.CrossRef

Stallings, L. M., MacDonald, M. C., & O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1998). Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: Phrase length and verb disposition in heavy-NP shift. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 392–417.CrossRef

Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: The closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 267–295.PubMedCrossRef

Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and progressing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 18, 523–534.CrossRef

Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G., & Trueswell, J. C. (1989). The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, SI211–SI234.CrossRef

Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.PubMedCrossRef

Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influences of content-based expectations. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 597–632.CrossRef

Taylor, L., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Motor resonance and linguistic focus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 896–904.CrossRef

Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77–110.CrossRef

Tiemann, S. (2014). The Processing of ’wieder’ (’again’) and Other Presupposition Triggers (Doctoral dissertation, Universität Tübingen).

Till, R. E., Mross, E. F., & Kintsch, W. (1988). Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context. Memory & Cognition, 16, 283–298.CrossRef

Tomasello, M. (1995). Language is not an instinct. Cognitive Development, 10, 131–156.CrossRef

Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Hrsg.), Perspectives in Sentence Processing (S. 155–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 528–553.PubMed

Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285–318.CrossRef

Tunstall, S. L. (1998). The interpretation of quantifiers: semantics & processing (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst).

Ulrich, R., & Maienborn, C. (2010). Left-right coding of past and future in language: The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition, 117, 126–138.PubMedCrossRef

Von Stutterheim, C., & Nüse, R. (2003). Processes of conceptualization in language production: language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics, 41, 851–882.CrossRef

Velde, F. van der, Van der Voort van der Kleij, G. T., & Kamps, M. de (2004). Lack of combinatorial productivity in language processing with simple recurrent networks. Connection Science, 16, 21–46.CrossRef

Velde, M. van de, Meyer, A. S., & Konopka, A. E. (2014). Message formulation and structural assembly: Describing „easy“ and „hard“ events with preferred and dispreferred syntactic structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 71, 124–144.CrossRef

Vosse, T., & Kempen, G. (2000). Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar. Cognition, 75, 105–143.PubMedCrossRef

Vosse, T., & Kempen, G. (2009). The Unification Space implemented as a localist neural net: predictions and error-tolerance in a constraint-based parser. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 3, 331–346.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Wagner, V., Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2010). On the flexibility of grammatical advance planning during sentence production: Effects of cognitive load on multiple lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 423–440.PubMed

Wason, P. C. (1965). The contexts of plausible denial. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 4, 7–11.CrossRef

Wason, P. C., & Reich, S. S. (1979). A verbal illusion. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 591–597.PubMedCrossRef

Weber, A., Grice, M., & Crocker, M. W. (2006). The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural ambiguities: A study of anticipatory eye movements. Cognition, 99, B63–B72.PubMedCrossRef

Welke, K. (1988). Einführung in die Valenz- und Kasustheorie. Leipzig: VEB Bibliographisches Institut.

Wernicke, C. (1874/1974). Der aphasische Symptomenkomplex (pp. 1–70). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

Wheeldon, L. (2000). Generating prosodic structures. In L. R. Wheeldon (Hrsg.), Aspects of language production (S. 249–274). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Wheeldon, L. (2012). Producing spoken sentences: The scope of incremental planning. In S. Fuchs, M. Weirich, D. Pape, & P. Perrier (Hrsg.), Speech planning and dynamics Speech production and perception, (Bd. 1, S. 97–118). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Land.

Wheeldon, L., & Lahiri, A. (1997). Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 356–381.CrossRef

Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt, W. J. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 311–334.CrossRef

William, M., & Thompson, S. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8, 243–281.

Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 460–473.PubMedCrossRef

Yamamoto, Y. (2014). Multidimensional vocabulary acquisition through deliberate vocabulary list learning. System, 42, 232–243.CrossRef

Yeari, M., & Broek, P. W. van den (2011). A cognitive account of discourse understanding and discourse interpretation: The landscape model of reading. Discourse Studies, 13, 635–643.CrossRef

Yekovich, F. R., Walker, C. H., & Blackman, H. S. (1979). The role of presupposed and focal information in integrating sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 535–548.CrossRef

Zagar, D., Pynte, J., & Rativeau, S. (1997). Evidence for early closure attachment on first pass reading times in French. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 50, 421–438.CrossRef

Zimmermann, T. E., & Sternefeld, W. (2013). Introduction to semantics: an essential guide to the composition of meaning. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRef

Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Hrsg.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Bd. 43, S. 35–62). New York: Academic Press.

Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 229–234.PubMedCrossRef

Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In D. Pecher, & R. A. Zwaan (Hrsg.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (S. 224–245). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.PubMedCrossRef

Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Discourse comprehension. In M. Traxler, & M. Gernsbacher (Hrsg.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2. Aufl. S. 725–764). Oxford, U.K: Elsevier.CrossRef

Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1–11.CrossRef

Zwitserlood, P., & Bölte, J. (2015). Psycholinguistik 1: Worterkennung und Wortproduktion. In J. M. Müsseler, & M. Rieger (Hrsg.), Allgemeine Psychologie. Berlin: Springer.

Springer Professional

14. Sätze und Texte verstehen und produzieren

Zusammenfassung

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner