Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
An Introduction to Mental Modeling Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. Science of Mental Modeling

verfasst von : Matthew D. Wood, Ph.D., Igor Linkov, Ph.D.

Erschienen in: Mental Modeling Approach

Verlag: Springer New York

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Accommodating social and human dimensions in risk management and other domains is gaining recognition as a key component of successful process improvement outcomes. However, tools that integrate the knowledge, interests, and values of stakeholders with those of expert groups and risk management agencies are not used to the extent they could be and are underdeveloped (Linkov and Moberg, Multi-criteria decision analysis: Environmental applications and case studies. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2011). Mental Modeling is a useful framework for better understanding and addressing values and beliefs that can enhance stakeholder engagement and involvement in decision making. Mental Modeling is a toolkit that is increasingly used to inform management processes, improve organizational processes, encourage stakeholder engagement, and a host of other applications. This chapter elaborates on the roots of the Mental Modeling approach and its relation to other methods of visually representing stakeholder beliefs.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Mental Modeling Research Technical Approach
Nächstes Kapitel Flood Risk Management
Literatur
Atman, C. J., Bostrom, A., Fischhoff, B., & Morgan, M. G. (1994). Designing risk communications—completing and correcting mental models of hazardous processes. 1. Risk Analysis, 14(5), 779–788.CrossRef
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). A theory of remembering remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology (pp. 197–214). London: Cambridge University Press.
Bostrom, A., Atman, C. J., Fischhoff, B., & Morgan, M. G. (1994a). Evaluating risk communications—completing and correcting mental models of hazardous processes. 2. Risk Analysis, 14(5), 789–798.CrossRef
Bostrom, A., Fischbeck, P., Kucklick, J. H., & Hayward Walker, A. (1995). A mental models approach to the preparation of summary reports on ecological issues related to dispersant use. Washington, DC: Marine Spill Response Corporation.
Bostrom, A., Fischhoff, B., & Morgan, M. G. (1992). Characterizing mental models of hazardous processes: A methodology and an application to radon. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 85–100.CrossRef
Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., & Read, D. (1994b). What do people know about global climate change?: 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 959–970.CrossRef
Byram, S. (1998). Breast cancer and mammogram screening: Mental models and quantitative assessments of beliefs. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
Carley, K. M. (1997). Extracting team mental models through textual analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(Special Issue), 533–558.CrossRef
Carley, K. M., & Palmquist, M. (1992). Extracting, representing, and analyzing mental models. Social Forces, 70(3), 601–636.CrossRef
Clemen, R. T., & Reilly, T. (Eds.). (2001). Making hard decisions with decision tools. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
Craik, K. J. W. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
Daniels, K., de Chernatony, L., & Johnson, G. (1995). Validating a method for mapping managers’ mental models of competetive industry structures. Human Relations, 48(9), 975–991.CrossRef
Darisi, T., Thorne, S., & Iacobelli, C. (2005). Influences on decision-making for undergoing plastic surgery: A mental models and quantitative assessment. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 116(3), 907–916.CrossRef
Downs, J. S., Bruine de Bruin, W., & Fischhoff, B. (2008). Parents’ vaccination comprehension and decisions. Vaccine, 26, 1595–1607.CrossRef
Downs, J. S., & Fischhoff, B. (2011). Qualitative information. In B. Fischhoff, N. T. Brewer, & J. S. Downs (Eds.), Communicating risks and benefits: An evidence-based user’s guide. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration.
Doyle, J. K., & Ford, D. N. (1999). Mental models concepts revisited: Some clarifications and a reply to Lane. System Dynamics Review, 15(4), 411–415.CrossRef
Fischhoff, B. (1995). Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 15(2), 137–145.CrossRef
Fischhoff, B., de Bruin, W. B., Guvenc, U., Caruso, D., & Brilliant, L. (2006). Analyzing disaster risks and plans: An avian flu example. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 33(1-2), 131–149.CrossRef
Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. New York: The MIT Press and John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Forrester, J. W. (1993). System dynamics and the lessons of 35 years. Unpublished manuscript.
Freeman, L. A., & Jessup, L. M. (2004). The power and benefits of concept mapping: Measuring use, usefulness, ease of use, and satisfaction. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 151–169.CrossRef
Galvin, P. F. (1989). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation of a Big Brother/Big Sister program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 53–57.CrossRef
Gentner, D. (1983). A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.CrossRef
Gregory, R., Fischhoff, B., Thorne, S., & Butte, G. (2003). A multi-channel stakeholder consultation process for transmission deregulation. Energy Policy, 31(12), 1291–1299.CrossRef
Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2005). Logical argument mapping: A method for overcoming cognitive problems of conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16(4), 304–334.
Ifenthaler, D. (2010). Relational, structural, and semantic analysis of graphical representations and concept maps. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(1), 81–97.CrossRef
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006). Models and heterogeneous reasoning. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 18(2), 121–148.CrossRef
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Bryne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: An interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 46.CrossRef
Karkkainen, H., & Hallikas, J. (2006). Decision making in inter-organisational relationships: Implications from systems thinking. International Journal of Technology Management, 33(2-3), 144–159.CrossRef
Kearney, A. R., & Kaplan, S. (1997). Toward a methodology for the measurement of knowledge structures of ordinary people—the conceptual content cognitive map (3CM). Environment and Behavior, 29(5), 579–617.CrossRef
Kiker, G. A., Bridges, T. S., Varghese, A., Seager, T. P., & Linkov, I. (2005). Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1(2), 95–108.CrossRef
Kolkman, M. J., Kok, M., & van der Veen, A. (2005). Mental model mapping as a new tool to analyse the use of information in decision-making in integrated water management. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 30(4-5), 317–332.CrossRef
Lane, D. C. (2000). Should system dynamics be described as a “hard” or “deterministic” systems approach? Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 17(1), 3–22.CrossRef
Linkov, I., Cormier, S., Gold, J., Satterstrom, F. K., & Bridges, T. (2012). Using our brains to develop better policy. Risk Analysis, 32(3), 374–380.
Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Atman, C. (2002). Risk communication: A mental models approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moxnes, E. (2004). Misperceptions of basic dynamics: The case of renewable resource management. System Dynamics Review, 20(2), 139–162.CrossRef
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 7–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Novak, J. D., & Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Review Journal, 28(1), 117–153.CrossRef
Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (Eds.). (1996). Mental models in cognitive science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pirnay-Dummer, P. (2007, April). Model inspection trace of concepts and relations: A heuristic approach to language-oriented model assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Pirnay-Dummer, P., Ifenthaler, D., Johnson, T., & Al-Diban, S. (2008, March). Reading with the guide of automated graphical representations: How model based text visualizations facilitate learning in reading comprehension tasks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
Read, D., Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., & Smuts, T. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 2. Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 971–982.CrossRef
Scholz, D. K., Kucklick, J. H., Pond, R., Walker, A. H., Bostrom, A., & Fischbeck, P. (1999). Fate of spilled oil in marine waters: Where does it go, what does it do, and how do dispersants affect it? Cape Charles, VA: Scientific and Environmental Associates, Inc.
Sterman, J. D. (2001). System dynamics modeling: Tools for learning in a complex world. California Management Review, 43(4), 8–25.CrossRef
Sterman, J. D. (2008). Economics—risk communication on climate: Mental models and mass balance. Science, 322(5901), 532–533.CrossRef
Sterman, J. D., & Sweeney, L. B. (2007). Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climatic Change, 80(3-4), 213–238.CrossRef
Stevens, A. L., & Gentner, D. (1983). Introduction. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 1–6). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Trochim, W. M. K. (1989a). Concept mapping: Soft science or hard art? Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 87–110.CrossRef
Trochim, W. M. K. (1989b). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 1–16.CrossRef
Valentine, K. (1989). Contributions to the theory of care. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 17–23.CrossRef
Vislosky, D. M., & Fischbeck, P. S. (2000). A mental model approach applied to R&D decisionmaking. International Journal of Technology Management, 19(3-5), 453–471.CrossRef
Westbrook, L. (2006). Mental models: A theoretical overview and preliminary study. Journal of Information Science, 32(6), 563–579.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Science of Mental Modeling
verfasst von
Matthew D. Wood, Ph.D.
Igor Linkov, Ph.D.
Copyright-Jahr
2017
Verlag
Springer New York
Buch
Mental Modeling Approach

Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6614-1

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4939-6616-5

Copyright-Jahr: 2017

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6616-5_3