Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Analogical Problem Evolution in Biologically Inspired Design Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2014 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Shape Interpretation with Design Computing

verfasst von : Iestyn Jowers, Chris Earl

Erschienen in: Design Computing and Cognition '12

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

How information is interpreted has significant impact on how it can be used. This is particularly important in design where information from a wide variety of sources is used in a wide variety of contexts and in a wide variety of ways. This paper is concerned with the information that is created, modified and analysed during design processes, specifically with the information that is represented in shapes. It investigates how design computing seeks to support these processes, and the difficulties that arise when it is necessary to consider alternative interpretations of shape. The aim is to establish the problem of shape interpretation as a general challenge for research in design computing, rather than a difficulty that is to be overcome within specific processes. Shape interpretations are common characteristics of several areas of enquiry in design computing. This paper reviews these, brings an integrated perspective and draws conclusions about how this underlying process can be supported.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel A Generic Shape Grammar for the Palladian Villa, Malagueira House, and Prairie House
Nächstes Kapitel Algebras of Shapes Revisited
Literatur
1.
Sloman A (1984) Why we need many knowledge representation formalisms. In Bramer M (ed) Research and development in expert systems, Cambridge University Press, pp 163–183
2.
Prats M, Lim S, Jowers I, Garner SW, Chase S (2009) Transforming shape in design: observations from studies of sketching. Des Stud 30:503–520CrossRef
3.
Corney J, Hayes C, Sundararajan V, Wright P (2005) The CAD/CAM interface: A 25-year retrospective. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 5:188–197CrossRef
4.
Bruce V, Green PR, Georgeson MA (2003) Visual perception: physiology, psychology and ecology (4th Edition). Psychology Press, UK
5.
Krstic D (2004) Computing with analysed shapes. In: Gero JS (ed) Design computing and cognition ’06. Springer, Netherlands, pp 397–416CrossRef
6.
Wittgenstein L (1991) Remarks on the philosophy of psychology. GEM Anscombe, GH von Wright, H Nyman (eds). Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey
7.
Liu Y-T (1995) Some phenomena of seeing shapes in design. Des Stud 16:367–385CrossRef
8.
Suwa M (2003) Constructive perception: coordinating perception and conception toward acts of problem finding in a creative experience. Jpn Psychol Res 45:221–234CrossRefMathSciNet
9.
Wiegers T, Langeveld L, Vergeest J (2011) Shape language: how people describe shapes and shape operations. Des Stud 32:333–347CrossRef
10.
Goel V (1995) Sketches of thought. MIT Press, Cambridge
11.
Schön DA, Wiggins G (1992) Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Des Stud 13:135–156CrossRef
12.
Suwa M, Tversky B (1997) What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? a protocol analysis. Des Stud 18:385–403CrossRef
13.
Schön DA (1988) Designing: rules, types and worlds. Des Stud 9:181–190CrossRef
14.
Gentner D, Bowdle B, Wolff P, Boronat C (2001) Metaphor is like analogy. In: Gentner D, Holyoak KJ, Kokinov BN (eds) The analogical mind perspectives from cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 199–253
15.
Casakin HP (2007) Factors of metaphors in design problem-solving: implications for design creativity. Int J Des 1:21–33
16.
Stones C, Cassidy T (2010) Seeing and discovering: how do student designers reinterpret sketches and digital marks during graphical design ideation? Des Stud 31:439–460CrossRef
17.
Lawson B, Loke SM (1997) Computers words and pictures. Des Stud 18:171–183CrossRef
18.
Dreyfus HL (1992) What computers still can’t do: a critique of artificial reason. MIT Press, Cambridge
19.
Setchi R, Bouchard C (2010) In search of design inspiration: a semantic-based approach. J Comput Inf Sci Des 10:40–47
20.
Stiny G (2006) Shape: talking about seeing and doing. MIT Press, Cambridge
21.
Mitchell WJ (2001) Vitruvius redux. In: Antonsson EK, Cagan J (eds) Formal engineering design synthesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–19CrossRef
22.
Saund E, Moran T (1994) A perceptually supported sketch editor. In Symposium on user interface software and technology, ACM, pp 175–184
23.
Jowers I, Prats M, McKay A, Garner S (2011) Design exploration with useless rules and eye tracking. In Culley SJ, Hicks BJ, cAloone TC, Howard TJ, Dong A (eds) ICED11—the 18th International conference on engineering design, The design society, pp 443–455
24.
Bucciarelli L (1994) Designing engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge
25.
Ferguson ES (1994) Engineering and the mind’s eye. MIT Press, Cambridge
26.
Henderson K (1999) On line and on paper: visual representations, visual culture and computer graphics in design engineering. MIT Press, Cambridge
27.
van der Lugt R (2005) How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings. Des Stud 26:101–122CrossRef
28.
Nielson I, Lee J (1994) Conversations with graphics: Implications for the design of natural language/graphics interfaces. Int J Hum Comput Stud 40:509–541CrossRef
29.
Maier AM, Kreimeyer M, Lindemann U, Clarkson PJ (2009) Reflecting communication: a key factor for successful collaboration between embodiment design and simulation. J Eng Des 20:265–287CrossRef
30.
Shah JJ (1998) Experimental investigation of progressive idea generation techniques in engineering design. In Proceedings of ASME design engineering technical conference
31.
Stacey M, Eckert C (2003) Against ambiguity. Comput Support Coop Work 12:153–183CrossRef
32.
Tang JC (1991) Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. Int J Man Mach Stud 34:143–160CrossRef
33.
Lang SYT, Dickenson J, Buchal RO (2002) Cognitive factors in distributed design. Comput Ind 48:89–98CrossRef
34.
Gu N, Kim MJ, Maher ML (2011) Technological advancements in synchronous collaboration: the effect of 3D virtual worlds and tangible user interfaces on architectural design. Autom Constr 20:270–278CrossRef
35.
Maher ML, Bilda Z, Gül LF (2006) Impact of collaborative virtual environments on design behaviour. In: Gero JS (ed) Design computing and cognition ’06. Springer, Netherlands, pp 305–321CrossRef
36.
Shapiro V, Tsukanov I, Grishin A (2011) Geometric issues in computer aided design/computer aided engineering integration. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 11(2):021005
37.
Pelechano N, Malkawi A (2008) Evacuation simulation models: Challenges in modeling high rise building evacuation with cellular automata approaches. Autom Constr 17:377–385CrossRef
38.
Li AI-K (2004) Styles, grammars, authors and users. In Gero JS (ed) Design computing and cognition ’04, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 197–215
39.
Mengoni M, Colaiocco B, Peruzzini M, Germani M (2011) Design of a tactile display to support materials perception in virtual environments. IEEE Virtual Reality 2011:227–228
40.
Cagan J, Mitchell WJ (1993) Optimally directed shape generation by shape annealing. Environ Plan 20:5–12CrossRef
41.
Gupta SK, Nau DS, Regli WC (1998) IMACS: a case study in real-world planning. Intell Syst Appl 13:49–60CrossRef
42.
Alink T, Eckert C, Ruckpaul A, Albers A (2010) Different function breakdowns for one existing product: experimental results. In Gero JS (ed) Design computing and cognition ’10, Springer, Berlin pp 405–424
43.
Fischer A (2011) Engineering-oriented geometry methods for modelling and analyzing scanned data. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 11(2):021002–021010CrossRef
44.
45.
Venkataraman S, Shah JJ, Summers JD (2001) An investigation of integrating design by features and feature recognition. In IFIP Conference, FEATS, Valenciences, Frances
46.
Bidarra R, Bronsvoort WF (2000) Semantic feature modelling. Comput Aided Des 32:201–225CrossRef
47.
Shah JJ, Anderson D, Kim YS, Joshi S (2001) A discourse on geometric feature recognition from CAD models. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 1:41–51CrossRef
48.
van den Berg E, Bronsvorrt WF, Vergeest JSM (2002) Freeform feature modelling: concepts and prospects. Comput Ind 49:217–233CrossRef
49.
Bronsvoort WF, Noort A (2004) Multiple-view feature modelling for integral product development. Comput Aided Des 36:929–946CrossRef
50.
Jha K, Gurumoorthy B (2000) Automatic propagation of feature modification across domains. Comput Aided Des 32:691–706CrossRef
51.
da Silveira G, Borenstein D, Fogliatto FS (2001) Mass customization: literature review and research directions. Int J Prod Econ 72:1–13CrossRef
52.
Shea K, Ertelt C, Gmeiner T, Ameri F (2010) Design-to-fabrication automation for the cognitive machine shop. Adv Eng Inform 24:251–268CrossRef
53.
Bourne D, Corney J, Gupta SK (2011) Recent advances and future challenges in automated manufacturing planning. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 11:021006–021016CrossRef
54.
Ahn et al (2001) Cyber cut: an internet-based CAD/CAM system. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 1:52–59CrossRef
55.
Yan X, Gu P (1996) A review of rapid prototyping technologies and systems. Comput Aided Des 28:307–318CrossRef
56.
Paterson G, Earl C (2010) Line and plane to solid: Analyzing their use in design practice through shape rules. In Gero JS (ed) Design computing and cognition ’10, Springer, Berlin pp. 251–267
57.
Searle J (1980) Minds, brains and programs. Behav Brain Sci 3:417–457CrossRef
58.
Salustri FA (2002) Mereotopology for product modelling: a new framework for product modelling based on logic. J Des Res 2(1)
59.
Whitehead AN (1929) Process and reality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
60.
61.
Gerla G (1995) Pointless geometries. In Buekenhout F, Kantor W (eds) Handbook of incidence geometry, North-Holland, pp 1015–1031
62.
Hanna S (2010) Design agents and the need for high-dimensional perception. In Gero JS (ed) Design computing and cognition ’10, Springer, Berlin pp 115–134
63.
Stouffs R, Krishnamurti R (2004) Data views, data recognition, design queries and design rules. In Gero JS (ed) Design computing and cognition ’04, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 219–238
Metadaten
Titel
Shape Interpretation with Design Computing
verfasst von
Iestyn Jowers
Chris Earl
Copyright-Jahr
2014
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Buch
Design Computing and Cognition '12

Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9111-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-94-017-9112-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2014

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_19

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise