Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
The Virtual World: A Challenge for On-Site Action in Ergonomics Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2021 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Single Pilot Operations Along the Human-Centered Design Lifecycle: Reviewing the Dedicated Support Concept

verfasst von : Daniela Schmid

Erschienen in: Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021)

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Single pilot operations (SPO) for airliners represent the evolutionary cockpit crew development for future aviation. The present work replies to the call for a human-centered research agenda by providing a systematic review of the literature for one of the most-widely researched concepts of SPO: the dedicated-support concept, which is also known as harbor pilot concept. Accordingly, a remote-copilot supports a single-piloted aircraft to alleviate high workload that can occur during nominal, off-nominal, and emergency situations. All studies of a recently published systematic literature review on SPO [1] were coded according to the categories of type of article, concept of operation, and method. The studies on the concept under analysis were systematically reviewed further to evaluate their contribution to its current state in human-centered design according to ISO 9241-210. The theoretical foundations of such SPO are elaborated in detail in modeling studies and accident analyses whereas empirical evaluation of design solutions has been started only in a few studies. Nonetheless, workload seems consistently be able to be distributed in a comparable range as in nowadays flight operations. In the end, the dedicated support concept of SPO is at early stages in the human-centered design process.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Estimation of a Pilot’s Workload In-Flight Using External Fluctuation Factors: An Experimental Approach Using a Flight Simulator
Nächstes Kapitel Some Major Human Issues in Aerospace Engineering: Review and Extension
Literatur
1.
Schmid, D., Stanton, N.A.: Progressing toward airliners’ reduced-crew operations: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Aerosp. Psychol. 30(1–2), 1–24 (2020)CrossRef
2.
Boy, G.A.: Requirements for single pilot operations in commercial aviation: a first high-level cognitive function analysis. In: Boulanger, F., Korb, D., Morel, G., Roussel, J.-C. (eds.) Complex Systems Design & Management, pp. 227–234. Springer, Cham (2015)
3.
Schmid, D., Stanton, N.A.: Considering single-piloted airliners for different flight durations: an issue of fatigue management. In: Stanton, N.A. (ed.) Advances in Human Factors of Transportation, pp. 683–694. Springer, Cham (2019)
4.
European Aviation Safety Agency: Certification Specifications and Acceptable Means of Compliance for Large Aeroplanes: CS-25 Amendment 17. EASA, Cologne, Germany (2015)
5.
Federal Aviation Administration: 14 CFR Part 25: Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes. U.S. Department of Transportation (2011)
6.
Airbus: A319/A320/A321 Flight crew operating manual. Airbus, Blagnac Cedex, France (2003)
7.
Harris, D.: A human-centred design agenda for the development of single crew operated commercial aircraft. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Tech. 79(5), 518–526 (2007)CrossRef
8.
Koltz, M.T., Roberts, Z.S., Sweet, J., Battiste, H., Cunningham, J., Battiste, V., Vu, K.-P.L., Strybel, T.Z.: An investigation of the harbor pilot concept for single pilot operations. Proc. Manuf. 3, 2937–2944 (2015)
9.
Lachter, J., Brandt, S.L., Battiste, V., Matessa, M., Johnson, W.W.: Enhanced ground support: lessons from work on reduced crew operations. Cogn. Tech. Work 19(2–3), 279–288 (2017)CrossRef
10.
Bilimoria, K.D., Johnson, W.W., Schutte, P.C.: Conceptual framework for single pilot operations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace. ACM, New York (2014)
11.
Schmid, D., Stanton, N.A.: A future airliner’s reduced-crew: modelling pilot incapacitation and homicide-suicide with systems theory. Hum.-Intell. Syst. Integr. 1(1), 27–42 (2019)CrossRef
12.
Schmid, D., Korn, B., Stanton, N.A.: Evaluating the reduced flight deck crew concept using cognitive work analysis and social network analysis: comparing normal and data-link outage scenarios. Cogn. Tech. Work 22, 109–124 (2020)CrossRef
13.
Driscoll, K., Roy, A., Ponchak, D.S., Downey, A.N.: Cyber safety and security for reduced crew operations (RCO). In: IEEE Conference on Aerospace, pp. 1–15. IEEE, Big Sky (2017)
14.
International Organization for Standardization: Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. ISO Standard, International Organization for Standardization (2019)
15.
Deutsch, S., Pew, R.W.: Single pilot commercial aircraft operation. BBN Report. BBN Technologies, Cambridge, MA, USA (2005)
16.
Norman, M.: Economic opportunities and technological challenges for reduced crew operations. Technical paper prepared for: Crew Vehicle Interface Element, NASA, Seattle, WA, USA (2007)
17.
Schutte, P.C., Goodrich, K.H., Cox, D.E., Jackson, E.B., Palmer, M.T., Pope, A.T., Schlecht, R.W., Tedjojuwono, K.K., Trujillo, A.C., Williams, R.A., Kinney, J.B., Barry, J.S.: The naturalistic flight deck system: an integrated system concept for improved single-pilot operations. p. 63. NASA, Hampton (2007)
18.
Comerford, D., Brandt, S.L., Lachter, J., Wu, S.-C., Mogford, R., Battiste, V., Johnson, W.W.: NASA’s single-pilot operations technical interchange meeting: Proceedings and findings. p. 298. NASA, Moffett Field (2013)
19.
Schutte, P.C.: How to make the most of your human: design considerations for single pilot operations. In: Harris, D. (ed.) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, pp. 480–491. Springer, Cham (2015)CrossRef
20.
Harris, D.: Network re-analysis of Boeing 737 accident at Kegworth using different potential crewing configurations for a single pilot commercial aircraft. In: Harris, D. (ed.) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, pp. 572–582. Springer, Cham (2018)CrossRef
21.
Stanton, N.A., Harris, D., Starr, A.: The future flight deck: modelling dual, single and distributed crewing options. Appl. Ergon. 53, 331–342 (2016)CrossRef
22.
Schmid, D., Korn, B., Wies, M., Stanton, N.A.: Managing a data-link failure of a single-piloted airliner during flight: a system-theoretic process analysis. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 63, pp. 106–110 (2019)
23.
Schmid, D., Korn, B.: The operational issue of an airliner’s reduced-crew caused by data-link break-up to remote support. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 62, pp. 71–75 (2018)
24.
Bailey, R.E., Kramer, L.J., Kennedy, K.D., Stephens, C.L., Etherington, T.J.: An assessment of reduced crew and single pilot operations in commercial transport aircraft operations. In: 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). IEEE (2017)
25.
Huddlestone, J., Sears, R., Harris, D.: The use of operational event sequence diagrams and work domain analysis techniques for the specification of the crewing configuration of a single-pilot commercial aircraft. Cogn. Tech. Work 19(2–3), 289–302 (2017)CrossRef
26.
Harris, D., Stanton, N.A., Starr, A.: Spot the difference: operational event sequence diagrams as a formal method for work allocation in the development of single-pilot operations for commercial aircraft. Ergonomics 58(11), 1773–1791 (2015)CrossRef
27.
Revell, K.M., Stanton, N.A., Kelleher, G.: Exploring changes in pilot behaviour during distributed crewing. In: The Institute of Ergonomics and Human Factors Annual Conference, Daventry, UK (2016)
28.
Leveson, N.G.: Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)
29.
Leveson, N.G.: A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf. Sci. 42(4), 237–270 (2004)CrossRef
30.
Schmid, D., Stanton, N.A.: The training of operators in single pilot operations: an initial system theoretic consideration. In: 20th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Dayton, OH, USA (2019)
31.
Gore, B.F., Wolter, C.A.: A task analytic process to define future concepts in aviation. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) Digital Human Modeling, pp. 236–246. Springer, Cham (2014)
32.
Wolter, C.A., Gore, B.F.: A validated task analysis of the single pilot operations concept. NASA, Moffett Field (2015)
33.
Huddlestone, J., Harris, D., Richards, D., Scott, S., Sears, R.: Dual pilot and single pilot operations – hierarchical task decomposition analysis of doing more with less. In: Harris, D. (ed.) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, pp. 365–376. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2014)
34.
Schutte, P.C.: Task analysis of two crew operations in the flight deck: investigating the feasibility of using single pilot. In: 19th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, pp. 566–571 (2017)
35.
Stanton, N.A., Plant, K.L., Revell, K.M.A., Griffin, T.G.C., Moffat, S., Stanton, M.J.: Distributed cognition in aviation operations: a gate-to-gate study with implications for distributed crewing. Ergonomics 62(2), 138–155 (2019)CrossRef
36.
Schmid, D., Stanton, N.A.: How are laser attacks encountered in commercial aviation? A hazard analysis based on systems theory. Saf. Sci. 110, 178–191 (2018)CrossRef
37.
Schmid, D., Stanton, N.A.: Exploring Bayesian analyses of a small-sample-size factorial design in human systems integration: the effects of pilot incapacitation. Hum.-Intell. Syst. Integr. 1, 71–88 (2019)CrossRef
38.
Lachter, J., Brandt, S.L., Battiste, V., Ligda, S.V., Matessa, M., Johnson, W.W.: Toward single pilot operations: developing a ground station. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace. ACM, New York (2014)
39.
Brandt, S.L., Lachter, J., Battiste, V., Johnson, W.: Pilot situation awareness and its implications for single pilot operations: analysis of a human-in-the-loop study. Proc. Manuf. 3, 3017–3024 (2015)
40.
Ligda, S.V., Fischer, U., Mosier, K., Matessa, M., Battiste, V., Johnson, W.W.: Effectiveness of advanced collaboration tools on crew communication in reduced crew operations. In: Harris, D. (ed.) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, pp. 416–427. Springer, Cham (2015)CrossRef
41.
Revell, K.M., Allison, C., Sears, R., Stanton, N.A.: Modelling distributed crewing in commercial aircraft with STAMP for a rapid decompression hazard. Ergonomics 62(2), 156–170 (2019)CrossRef
42.
Gaultier, D., SAFEE consortium: SAFEE (Security of Aircraft in the Future European Environment): final publishable report. (EC contract AIP3-CT-2003–503521) (2008)
43.
Schmitt, D.-R., Többen, H., Philippens, H.: Passivation of misused aircraft to protect passengers, airports and infrastructure. In: Grant, I. (ed.) 27th Congress of the International Council of Aeronautical Sciences, pp. 1–3. Optimage, Edinburgh (2010)
44.
Bueno, J., Herrería, J.A., Consortium, S.: SOFIA (safe automatic flight back and landing of aircraft): final publishable activity report. EC contract (2010)
Metadaten
Titel
Single Pilot Operations Along the Human-Centered Design Lifecycle: Reviewing the Dedicated Support Concept
verfasst von
Daniela Schmid
Copyright-Jahr
2021
Buch
Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021)

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74607-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-74608-7

Copyright-Jahr: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_21

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise