Skip to main content

2013 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

5. SoftGIS Development Process as a Trading Zone: Challenges in Implementing a Participatory Planning Support System

verfasst von : Maarit Kahila-Tani

Erschienen in: Urban Planning as a Trading Zone

Verlag: Springer Netherlands

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter studies and evaluates the development processes of the SoftGIS methods through four different case studies during 2005–2011 where nine SoftGIS applications were developed in nine different cities in Finland. The Internet-based SoftGIS applications aim to gather residents’ locality-based experiences of their living environment. SoftGIS aims to achieve new and innovative methods to support research and participative urban planning practices as planning support systems (PSS).
Often the tools as planning support systems (PSS) that aim to foster the collaboration between planners and citizens are developed separately by researchers and industry who also have limited knowledge of the users’, such as urban planners and residents, actual needs. This creates the problem of an implementation gap, which refers to the mismatch of the supply and demand of planning support tools.
To narrow down the implementation gap and to embed these tools more effectively into practice, a more user-sensitive and iterative development process is needed. To open up these multi-actor development processes, the engagements and roles of different actors are studied through the concept of a trading zone that allows describing different forms of cooperation during the development process. The research and development processes of different SoftGIS applications are considered as trading zones where information is shared among the stakeholders.
The findings of this study aim to narrow down the implementation gap of PSSs by indicating the importance of the development phase. The development phase and process of the planning support systems should receive more attention to realise a functional system for all stakeholders. To reach this goal, the main focus should be on the social process instead of technical development work, and on a more continuous learning process, which is needed throughout from the development phase to implementation to reduce the implementation gap.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bäcklund P, Mäntysalo R (2010) Agonism and institutional ambiguity: ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice – the case of Finland. Plann Theor 9(4):333–350CrossRef Bäcklund P, Mäntysalo R (2010) Agonism and institutional ambiguity: ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice – the case of Finland. Plann Theor 9(4):333–350CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey K, Grossardt T (2010) Towards structured public involvement: justice, geography and collaborative geospatial/geovisual decision support systems. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100(1):57–86CrossRef Bailey K, Grossardt T (2010) Towards structured public involvement: justice, geography and collaborative geospatial/geovisual decision support systems. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100(1):57–86CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coburn J (2003) Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making: improving urban planning for communities at risk. J Plann Educ Res 22(4):420–433CrossRef Coburn J (2003) Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making: improving urban planning for communities at risk. J Plann Educ Res 22(4):420–433CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Coleman DJ, Georgiadou Y, Labonte J (2009) Volunteered geographic information: the nature and motivation of producers. Int J Spatial Data Infrastruct Res 4:332–358 Coleman DJ, Georgiadou Y, Labonte J (2009) Volunteered geographic information: the nature and motivation of producers. Int J Spatial Data Infrastruct Res 4:332–358
Zurück zum Zitat Collins H, Evans R (2002) The third wave of science studies. Soc Stud Sci 32(2):235–296CrossRef Collins H, Evans R (2002) The third wave of science studies. Soc Stud Sci 32(2):235–296CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Collins H, Evans R, Gorman M (2007) Trading zones and interactional expertise. Stud Hist Philos Sci 38:657–666CrossRef Collins H, Evans R, Gorman M (2007) Trading zones and interactional expertise. Stud Hist Philos Sci 38:657–666CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Collins H, Evans R, Gorman ME (2010) Trading zones and interactional expertise. In: Gorman ME (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp xx–xx Collins H, Evans R, Gorman ME (2010) Trading zones and interactional expertise. In: Gorman ME (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp xx–xx
Zurück zum Zitat Elzen B, Enserink B (1996) Socio-technical networks: how a technology studies approach may help us solve problems related to technical change. Soc Stud Sci 26(1):96–141CrossRef Elzen B, Enserink B (1996) Socio-technical networks: how a technology studies approach may help us solve problems related to technical change. Soc Stud Sci 26(1):96–141CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Galison P (1997) Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Galison P (1997) Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Zurück zum Zitat Galison P (2010) Trading with the enemy. In: Gorman ME (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp xx–xx Galison P (2010) Trading with the enemy. In: Gorman ME (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp xx–xx
Zurück zum Zitat Geertman S, Stillwell J (2004) Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice. Comput Environ Urban Syst 28(4):291–310CrossRef Geertman S, Stillwell J (2004) Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice. Comput Environ Urban Syst 28(4):291–310CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. Int J Spatial Data Infrastruct Res 2:24–32 Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. Int J Spatial Data Infrastruct Res 2:24–32
Zurück zum Zitat Gorman ME, Spohrer J (2010) A new expertise for managing sociotechnical systems. In: Gorman ME (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp xx–xx Gorman ME, Spohrer J (2010) A new expertise for managing sociotechnical systems. In: Gorman ME (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp xx–xx
Zurück zum Zitat Harvey F, Chrisman N (1998) Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environ Plann A 30:1683–1694CrossRef Harvey F, Chrisman N (1998) Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environ Plann A 30:1683–1694CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies. McMillan Press Limited, Hampshire/London Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies. McMillan Press Limited, Hampshire/London
Zurück zum Zitat Jenkins LD (2010) The evolution of a trading zone. In: Gorman ME (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp xx–xx Jenkins LD (2010) The evolution of a trading zone. In: Gorman ME (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp xx–xx
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson M (1993) Moral imagination. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Johnson M (1993) Moral imagination. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Zurück zum Zitat Kahila M, Kyttä M (2009) SoftGIS as a bridge-builder in collaborative urban planning. In: Planning support systems best practice and new methods, vol 95, The GeoJournal Library. Springer, Dordrecht, NetherlandsCrossRef Kahila M, Kyttä M (2009) SoftGIS as a bridge-builder in collaborative urban planning. In: Planning support systems best practice and new methods, vol 95, The GeoJournal Library. Springer, Dordrecht, NetherlandsCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Klosterman RE (1997) Planning support systems: a new perspective on computer-aided planning. J Plann Educ Res 17:45–54CrossRef Klosterman RE (1997) Planning support systems: a new perspective on computer-aided planning. J Plann Educ Res 17:45–54CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kyttä M (2011) SoftGIS methods in planning evaluation. In: Hull A, Alexander ER, Khakee A, Woltjer J (eds) Evaluation for participatory and sustainable planning. Routledge, London/New York, pp 334–354 Kyttä M (2011) SoftGIS methods in planning evaluation. In: Hull A, Alexander ER, Khakee A, Woltjer J (eds) Evaluation for participatory and sustainable planning. Routledge, London/New York, pp 334–354
Zurück zum Zitat Kyttä M, Broberg A, Kahila M (2011) Urban infill policy and the perceived quality of the environment. Special Issue GIS Technol Appl Urban Des Plan Urban Des Int 16(1):19–35 Kyttä M, Broberg A, Kahila M (2011) Urban infill policy and the perceived quality of the environment. Special Issue GIS Technol Appl Urban Des Plan Urban Des Int 16(1):19–35
Zurück zum Zitat Staffans A (2004) Vaikuttavat asukkaat. Yhdyskuntasuunnittelun tutkimus- ja koulutuskeskuksen julkaisuja, vol A 29. Yliopistopaino, Helsinki Staffans A (2004) Vaikuttavat asukkaat. Yhdyskuntasuunnittelun tutkimus- ja koulutuskeskuksen julkaisuja, vol A 29. Yliopistopaino, Helsinki
Zurück zum Zitat Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, “Translations” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci 19(3):387–420CrossRef Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, “Translations” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci 19(3):387–420CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brömmelstroet M, Schrijnen P (2010) From planning support systems to mediated planning support: a structured dialogue to overcome the implementation gap. Environ Plann B Plann Des 37:3–20CrossRef Brömmelstroet M, Schrijnen P (2010) From planning support systems to mediated planning support: a structured dialogue to overcome the implementation gap. Environ Plann B Plann Des 37:3–20CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vonk G (2006) Improving planning support: the use of planning support systems for spatial planning. Nederlandse Geografische Studies, Utrecht Vonk G (2006) Improving planning support: the use of planning support systems for spatial planning. Nederlandse Geografische Studies, Utrecht
Zurück zum Zitat Vonk G, Geertman S (2008) Improving the adoption and use of planning support systems in practice. Appl Spatial Anal 1:153–173CrossRef Vonk G, Geertman S (2008) Improving the adoption and use of planning support systems in practice. Appl Spatial Anal 1:153–173CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
SoftGIS Development Process as a Trading Zone: Challenges in Implementing a Participatory Planning Support System
verfasst von
Maarit Kahila-Tani
Copyright-Jahr
2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5854-4_5

Premium Partner