nach oben

Erschienen in:

2015 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

16. Nachhaltiges Konsumentenverhalten

verfasst von : Matthias Spörrle, Prof. Dr., Magdalena Bekk

Erschienen in: Wirtschaftspsychologie

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Zusammenfassung

Das Thema Nachhaltigkeit ist für den Bereich der Wirtschaftspsychologie von hoher Relevanz. Nachhaltigkeit ist untrennbar mit Konsum, heutiger und zukünftiger Generationen, verbunden. Hierbei gilt es, umweltbewusste, soziale und ökonomische Perspektiven zu vereinen. Die Psychologie liefert dabei für alle drei Perspektiven Erklärungsansätze, warum die Umsetzung nachhaltiger Prinzipien für den Menschen und für Organisationen eine Herausforderung ist und gibt Hinweise, welche Faktoren die erfolgreiche Umsetzung nachhaltiger Prinzipien fördern könnten. In diesem Kapitel werden zunächst einige zentrale theoretische Ansätze der Psychologie beleuchtet, die hinsichtlich nachhaltigen Konsums ein erklärendes Potenzial aufweisen. Anschließend werden spezifischere stabile menschliche Merkmale sowie situative Faktoren in ihrem Einfluss auf nachhaltiges Konsumverhalten betrachtet. Hierdurch soll einerseits das Verständnis des Menschen als (nicht-)nachhaltig handelndes Wesen vertieft und andererseits dargestellt werden, wie Veränderungen hin zum nachhaltigen Verhalten angestoßen werden können.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Arbeitslosigkeit

Nächstes Kapitel Bürgersinn

Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291.CrossRef

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRef

Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., & Blöbaum, A. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 190–203.CrossRef

Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25.CrossRef

Bauer, H. H., Heinrich, D., & Schäfer, D. B. (2013). The effects of organic labels on global, local, and private brands: More hype than substance? Journal of Business Research, 66, 1035–1043.CrossRef

Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Do conscious thoughts cause behavior? Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 331–361.CrossRefPubMed

Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885–908.CrossRefPubMed

Biel, A., Dahlstrand, U., & Grankvist, G. (2005). Habitual and value-guided purchase behavior. AMBIO. A Journal of the Human Environment, 34, 360–365.

Black, J. S., Stern, P. C., & Elworth, J. T. (1985). Personal and contextual influences on househould energy adaptations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 3–21.CrossRef

Brothers, K. J., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1994). Office paper recycling: A function of container proximity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 153–160.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Burn, S. M. (1991). Social psychology and the stimulation of recycling behaviors: The block leader approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 611–629.CrossRef

Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105–109.CrossRef

Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.CrossRef

Corral-Verdugo, V., Carrus, G., Bonnes, M., Moser, G., & Sinha, J. B. P. (2008). Environmental beliefs and endorsement of sustainable development principles in water conservation: Toward a new human interdependence paradigm scale. Environment and Behavior, 40, 703–725.CrossRef

Davis, J. L., Green, J. D., & Reed, A. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 173–180.CrossRef

de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2010). Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 368–378.CrossRef

Di Giulio, A., Defila, R., & Kaufmann-Hayoz, R. (2010). Gutes Leben, Bedürfnisse und nachhaltiger Konsum. Umweltpsychologie, 14, 10–29.

Dialego – Bioprodukte (2011). Kaufintensität von Bioprodukten von 2008 bis 2011 in Deutschland. http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/172716/umfrage/kaufintensitaet-von-bioprodukten-seit-2008/

Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56, 465–480.CrossRef

Dietz, T., Kalof, L., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Gender, values, and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 353–364.CrossRef

Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.CrossRef

Eagly, A. H., Diekman, A. B., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Koenig, A. M. (2004). Gender gaps in sociopolitical attitudes: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 796–816.CrossRefPubMed

Egger, G., Swinburn, B., & Amirul Islam, F. M. (2012). Economic growth and obesity: An interesting relationship with world-wide implications. Economics and Human Biology, 10, 147–153.CrossRefPubMed

Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd.

Fornara, F., Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2011). Distinguishing the sources of normative influence on proenvironmental behaviors: The role of local norms in household waste recycling. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 623–635.CrossRef

Gadenne, D., Sharma, B., Kerr, D., & Smith, T. (2011). The influence of consumers’ environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours. Energy Policy, 39, 7684–7694.CrossRef

Garvare, R., & Johansson, P. (2010). Management for sustainability – A stakeholder theory. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 21, 737–744.CrossRef

Gifford, R. (1982). Children and the commons dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 269–280.CrossRef

Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66, 290–302.CrossRefPubMed

Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 541–579.CrossRefPubMed

Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, online first

Glavič, P., & Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1875–1885.CrossRef

Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Reseach, 35, 472–482.CrossRef

Goryakin, Y., & Suhrcke, M. (2014). Economic development, urbanization, technological change and overweight: What do we learn from 244 demographic and health surveys? Economics and Human Biology. 14, 109–127

Grankvist, G., Dahlstrand, U., & Biel, A. L. (2004). The impact of environmental labelling on consumer preference: Negative vs. positive labels. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27, 213–230.CrossRef

Griskevicius, V., Cantú, S. M., & van Vugt, M. (2012). The evolutionary bases for sustainable behavior: Implications for marketing, policy, and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 31, 115–128.CrossRef

Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 392–404.CrossRefPubMed

Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699–718.CrossRef

Halvorsen, B. (2008). Effects of norms and opportunity cost of time on household recycling. Land Economics, 84, 501–516.

Hayes, S. C., & Cone, J. D. (1981). Reduction of residential consumption of electricity through simple monthly feedback. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 81–88.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1–8.CrossRef

Hirsh, J. B. (2010). Personality and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 245–248.CrossRef

Houten, R. V., Nau, P. A., & Merrigan, M. (1981). Reducing elevator energy use: A comparison of posted feedback and reduced elevator convenience. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 377–387.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2010). Green consumer behavior: Determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27, 358–370.CrossRef

Kaiser, F. G., Ranney, M., Hartig, T., & Bowler, P. A. (1999). Ecological behavior, environmental attitude, and feelings of responsibility for the environment. European Psychologist, 4, 59–74.CrossRef

Kalafatis, S. P., Pollard, M., East, R., & Tsogas, M. H. (1999). Green marketing and Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior: A cross-market examination. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16, 441–460.CrossRef

Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002–1012.CrossRef

Kazdin, A. E. (2009). Psychological science’s contributions to a sustainable environment: Extending our reach to a grand challenge of society. American Psychologist, 64, 339–356.CrossRefPubMed

Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., Griskevicius, V., Becker, D. V., & Schaller, M. (2010). Goal-driven cognition and functional behavior: The fundamental-motives framework. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 63–67.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Ketelaar, T., & Ellis, B. J. (2000). Are evolutionary explanations unfalsifiable? Evolutionary psychology and the Lakatosian philosophy of science. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 1–21.CrossRef

Kidwell, B., Farmer, A., & Hardesty, D. M. (2013). Getting Liberals and Conservatives to go green: Political ideology and congruent appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 350–367.CrossRef

Kotler, P. (2011). Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. Journal of Marketing, 75, 132–135.CrossRef

Labao, R., Francisco, H., Harder, D., & Santos, F. (2008). Do colored photographs affect willingness to pay responses for endangered species conservation? Environmental and Resource Economics, 40, 251–264.CrossRef

Leonidou, C. N., Katsikeas, C. S., & Morgan, N. A. (2013). “Greening” the marketing mix: Do firms do it and does it pay off? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, 151–170.CrossRef

Longoni, C., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2014). A green paradox: Validating green choices has ironic effects on behavior, cognition, and perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 158–165.CrossRef

Luchs, M. G., & Mooradian, T. A. (2012). Sex, personality, and sustainable consumer behaviour: Elucidating the gender effect. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35, 127–144.CrossRef

Markowitz, E. M., Goldberg, L. R., Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2012). Profiling the “pro-environmental individual”: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality, 80, 81–111.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Mazar, N., & Zhong, C.-B. (2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21, 494–498.CrossRefPubMed

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the Five-Factor Model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.CrossRefPubMed

McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000). Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. American Psychologist, 55, 531–537.CrossRefPubMed

McMichael, A. J., Powles, J. W., Butler, C. D., & Uauy, R. (2007). Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. The Lancet, 370(9594), 1253–1263.CrossRef

Milfont, T. L., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 80–94.CrossRef

Milfont, T. L., & Gouveia, V. V. (2006). Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 72–82.CrossRef

Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 339–347.CrossRef

Ornish, D. (2012). Holy cow! What’s good for you is good for our planet: Comment on “red meat consumption and mortality”. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172, 563–564.CrossRefPubMed

Osbaldiston, R., & Schott, J. P. (2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44, 257–299.CrossRef

Pan, A., Sun, Q., Bernstein, A. M., Schulze, M. B., Manson, J. E., Stampfer, M. J., Willett, W. C., & Hu, F. B. (2012). Red meat consumption and mortality: Results from 2 prospective cohort studies. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172, 555–563.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36, 70–93.CrossRef

Roberts, J. A. (1996). Green consumers in the 1990 s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36, 217–231.CrossRef

Salazar, H. A., Oerlemans, L., & van Stroe-Biezen, S. (2013). Social influence on sustainable consumption: Evidence from a behavioural experiment. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37, 172–180.CrossRef

Schmidt, P., Bamberg, S., Davidov, E., Herrmann, J., & Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Die Messung von Werten mit dem “Portraits Value Questionnaire“. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38, 261–275.CrossRef

Schmitt, D. P., Jonason, P. K., Byerley, G. J., Flores, S. D., Illbeck, B. E., O’Leary, K. N., & Qudrat, A. (2012). A reexamination of sex differences in sexuality: New studies reveal old truths. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 135–139.CrossRef

Scholl, G., Rubik, F., Kalimo, H., Biedenkopf, K., & Söebech, Ó. (2010). Policies to promote sustainable consumption: Innovative approaches in Europe. Natural Resources Forum, 34, 39–50.CrossRef

Schrader, U., & Hansen, U. (2001). Nachhaltiger Konsum: Forschung und Praxis im Dialog Bd. 831. Frankfurt: Campus.

Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429–434.CrossRefPubMed

Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255–265.CrossRef

Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influence on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Bd. 10, S. 221–279). New York: Academic Press.

Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.CrossRef

Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–424.CrossRef

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322–348.CrossRef

Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Snelgar, R., & Furnham, A. (2011). Personality, individual differences, and demographic antecedents of self-reported household waste management behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 21–26.CrossRef

Szagun, G., & Mesenholl, E. (1993). Environmental ethics: An empirical study of West German adolescents. The Journal of Environmental Education, 25, 37–44.CrossRef

Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

The Home Depot (2011). Third annual Canadian green home index – Canadian influences by social circles and economy when it comes to environmental efforts at home. http://cnw.ca/B1qXh

Tiefenbeck, V., Staake, T., Roth, K., & Sachs, O. (2013). For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy, 57, 160–171.CrossRef

Tybur, J. M., & Griskevicius, V. (2013). Evolutionary psychology: A fresh perspective for understanding and changing problematic behavior. Public Administration Review, 73, 12–22.CrossRef

Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum, 42, 342–348.CrossRef

Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64, 542–553.CrossRef

Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434–447.CrossRefPubMed

Vess, M., & Arndt, J. (2008). The nature of death and the death of nature: The impact of mortality salience on environmental concern. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1376–1380.CrossRef

Viscusi, W. K., Huber, J., & Bell, J. (2011). Promoting recycling: Private values, social norms, and economic incentives. American Economic Review, 101, 65–70.CrossRef

Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997). Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325), 494–499.CrossRef

Weber, C. (2001). Nachhaltiger Konsum - Versuch einer Einordnung und Operationalisierung. In U. Schrader, & U. Hansen (Hrsg.), Nachhaltiger Konsum: Forschung und Praxis im Dialog (Bd. 831, S. 63–76). Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

White, M. A. (2013). Sustainability: I know it when I see it. Ecological Economics, 86, 213–217.CrossRef

World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wu, D. W.-L., DiGiacomo, A., & Kingstone, A. (2013). A sustainable building promotes pro-environmental behavior: An observational study on food disposal. PLoS ONE, 8, e53856.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Xiao, C., & Hong, D. (2010). Gender differences in environmental behaviors in China. Population and Environment, 32, 88–104.CrossRef

Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainable Development, 18, 20–31.

Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P.-P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 443–457.CrossRef

Zhong, C.-B., & DeVoe, S. E. (2010). You are how you eat: Fast food and impatience. Psychological Science, 21, 619–622.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Nachhaltiges Konsumentenverhalten
verfasst von: Matthias Spörrle, Prof. Dr.
Magdalena Bekk
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Wirtschaftspsychologie
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43575-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-43576-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43576-2_16

Springer Professional

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Premium Partner