Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 1/2012

01.08.2012

Stakeholder Management, Reciprocity and Stakeholder Responsibility

verfasst von: Yves Fassin

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Stakeholder theory advocates that firms bear responsibility for the implications of their actions. However, while a firm affects or can affect stakeholders, stakeholders can also affect the corporation. Previous stakeholder theorising has neglected the reciprocal nature of responsibility. The question can be asked whether—in a spirit of reciprocity, loyalty and fairness—stakeholders should treat the corporation in a fair and responsible way. This study based on different definitions of stakeholders argues that various stakeholder attributes differ for different categories of stakeholders. This analysis presumes that the attribute of stakeholder reciprocity can probably be restricted to real stakeholders, labelled stakeowners: genuine stakeholders with a legitimate stake, the loyal partners who strive for mutual benefits. Stakeowners own and deserve a stake in the firm. Stakeholder reciprocity could be an innovative criterion in the corporate governance debate as to who should be accorded representation on the board. Corporate social responsibility should imply corporate stakeholder responsibility.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adair, A. (1999). Codes for conduct are good for NGOs too. Review—Institute of Public Affairs, 51(1), 26–27. Adair, A. (1999). Codes for conduct are good for NGOs too. Review—Institute of Public Affairs, 51(1), 26–27.
Zurück zum Zitat Adam, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299. Adam, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.
Zurück zum Zitat Alkhafaji, A. (1989). A stakeholder approach to corporate governance. Managing in a dynamic environment. Westport, CT: Quorum. Alkhafaji, A. (1989). A stakeholder approach to corporate governance. Managing in a dynamic environment. Westport, CT: Quorum.
Zurück zum Zitat Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B., & Sutherland Rahman, S. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder thinking. Sheffield: Greenleaf. Andriof, J., Waddock, S., Husted, B., & Sutherland Rahman, S. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder thinking. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Zurück zum Zitat Attarça, M., & Jacquot, T. (2005). La représentation de la Responsabilité Sociale des Entreprises: Une confrontation entre les approches théoriques et les visions managériales. XIViéme Conférence internationale de Management Stratégique, Angers. Attarça, M., & Jacquot, T. (2005). La représentation de la Responsabilité Sociale des Entreprises: Une confrontation entre les approches théoriques et les visions managériales. XIViéme Conférence internationale de Management Stratégique, Angers.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker, L. (1996). The ethics of protest. Vital Speeches of the Day, 62(8), 252–255. Baker, L. (1996). The ethics of protest. Vital Speeches of the Day, 62(8), 252–255.
Zurück zum Zitat Bohlander, G., & Snell, S. (2009). Managing human resources. New York: Cengage Learning. Bohlander, G., & Snell, S. (2009). Managing human resources. New York: Cengage Learning.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosse, D., Phillips, R., & Harrison, J. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 447–456. Bosse, D., Phillips, R., & Harrison, J. (2009). Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 447–456.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowie, N. (1991). New directions in CSR. Business Horizons, 34, 56–65. Bowie, N. (1991). New directions in CSR. Business Horizons, 34, 56–65.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowie, N., & Werhane, P. (2005). Management ethics. Oxford: Blackwell. Bowie, N., & Werhane, P. (2005). Management ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner, S. (1993). In J. Pasquero & D. Collins (Eds.), The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision-making: Some propositions and a model (pp. 205–210). San Diego: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society. Brenner, S. (1993). In J. Pasquero & D. Collins (Eds.), The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision-making: Some propositions and a model (pp. 205–210). San Diego: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell, A. (1997). Stakeholders: The case in favour. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 446–449. Campbell, A. (1997). Stakeholders: The case in favour. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 446–449.
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll, A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. Carroll, A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll, A., & Buchholtz, A. (2006). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management (6th ed.). Mason: Thompson Learning. Carroll, A., & Buchholtz, A. (2006). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management (6th ed.). Mason: Thompson Learning.
Zurück zum Zitat Carson, T. (2003). Self-interest and business ethics: Some lessons of the recent corporate scandals. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 389–394. Carson, T. (2003). Self-interest and business ethics: Some lessons of the recent corporate scandals. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(4), 389–394.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
Zurück zum Zitat Clegg, S., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Clegg, S., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Collier, J., & Roberts, J. (2001). An ethic for corporate governance? Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1), 67–71. Collier, J., & Roberts, J. (2001). An ethic for corporate governance? Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(1), 67–71.
Zurück zum Zitat Cornell, R., & Shapiro, A. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16, 5–14. Cornell, R., & Shapiro, A. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management, 16, 5–14.
Zurück zum Zitat Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics: A European perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics: A European perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). The behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). The behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahan, N. (2005). A contribution to the conceptualization of political resources utilized in corporate political action. Journal of Public Affairs, 5(1), 43–54. Dahan, N. (2005). A contribution to the conceptualization of political resources utilized in corporate political action. Journal of Public Affairs, 5(1), 43–54.
Zurück zum Zitat de Bakker, F., & den Hond, F. (2008). Introducing the politics of stakeholder influence: A review essay. Business & Society, 47, 8–20. de Bakker, F., & den Hond, F. (2008). Introducing the politics of stakeholder influence: A review essay. Business & Society, 47, 8–20.
Zurück zum Zitat den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 901–924. den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 901–924.
Zurück zum Zitat Doh, J., & Guay, T. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47–73. Doh, J., & Guay, T. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47–73.
Zurück zum Zitat Doh, J., & Teegen, H. (2002). Nongovernmental organizations as institutional actors in international business: Theory and implications. International Business Review, 11, 665–684. Doh, J., & Teegen, H. (2002). Nongovernmental organizations as institutional actors in international business: Theory and implications. International Business Review, 11, 665–684.
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
Zurück zum Zitat Elms, H. (2006). Corporate and stakeholder responsibility in Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Emerging Markets., 3, 203–211. Elms, H. (2006). Corporate and stakeholder responsibility in Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Emerging Markets., 3, 203–211.
Zurück zum Zitat Elms, H., & Phillips, R. (2009). Private security companies and institutional legitimacy: Corporate and stakeholder responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 403–432. Elms, H., & Phillips, R. (2009). Private security companies and institutional legitimacy: Corporate and stakeholder responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 403–432.
Zurück zum Zitat Emerson, R. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41. Emerson, R. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.
Zurück zum Zitat Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Evan, W., & Freeman, E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 75–84). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Evan, W., & Freeman, E. (1988). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (pp. 75–84). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Fassin, Y. (2008). Shortcomings and imperfections of the stakeholder model’s graphical representation. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 879–888. Fassin, Y. (2008). Shortcomings and imperfections of the stakeholder model’s graphical representation. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 879–888.
Zurück zum Zitat Fassin, Y. (2009a). Inconsistencies in activist’s behaviour and the ethics of NGOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 503–521. Fassin, Y. (2009a). Inconsistencies in activist’s behaviour and the ethics of NGOs. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 503–521.
Zurück zum Zitat Fassin, Y. (2009b). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 113–135. Fassin, Y. (2009b). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 113–135.
Zurück zum Zitat Fassin, Y. (2010). A dynamic perspective in Freeman’s stakeholder model. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 39–49. Fassin, Y. (2010). A dynamic perspective in Freeman’s stakeholder model. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 39–49.
Zurück zum Zitat Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 159–181. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 159–181.
Zurück zum Zitat Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press. Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Frederick, W. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2. Business and Society, 33(2), 150–164. Frederick, W. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2. Business and Society, 33(2), 150–164.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421. Freeman, E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233–236. Freeman, E. (1999). Divergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 233–236.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, E. (2004). The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 5(3), 220–241. Freeman, E. (2004). The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 5(3), 220–241.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, E., & Evan, W. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. The Journal of Behavioural Economics, 19(4), 337–359. Freeman, E., & Evan, W. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. The Journal of Behavioural Economics, 19(4), 337–359.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, E., & Gilbert, D. (1988). Corporate strategy and the search for ethics. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Freeman, E., & Gilbert, D. (1988). Corporate strategy and the search for ethics. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, E., Harrison, J., & Wicks, A. (2007). Managing for stakeholders. New Haven & London: Yale University Press. Freeman, E., Harrison, J., & Wicks, A. (2007). Managing for stakeholders. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, E., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Freeman, E., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, E., & Reed, D. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106. Freeman, E., & Reed, D. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106.
Zurück zum Zitat French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics. New York: Harper & Row. French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics. New York: Harper & Row.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman, A., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Friedman, A., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.
Zurück zum Zitat Galai, D., & Wiener, Z. (2008). Stakeholders and the composition of the voting rights of the board of directors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(2), 107–117. Galai, D., & Wiener, Z. (2008). Stakeholders and the composition of the voting rights of the board of directors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(2), 107–117.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillan, S., & Starks, L. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2), 275–305. Gillan, S., & Starks, L. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2), 275–305.
Zurück zum Zitat Gond, J.-P., & Mercier, S. (2006). La théorie des parties prenantes: une synthèse critique. In J. Allouche (Ed.), Encyclopédie des Ressources Humaines. Paris: Vuibert. Gond, J.-P., & Mercier, S. (2006). La théorie des parties prenantes: une synthèse critique. In J. Allouche (Ed.), Encyclopédie des Ressources Humaines. Paris: Vuibert.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodstein, J., & Wicks, A. (2007). Corporate and stakeholder responsibility: Making business ethics a two-way conversation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 375–398. Goodstein, J., & Wicks, A. (2007). Corporate and stakeholder responsibility: Making business ethics a two-way conversation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(3), 375–398.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodwin, C., & Ross, I. (1992). Consumer responses to service failures: Influence of procedural and interactional fairness perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 25(2), 149–164. Goodwin, C., & Ross, I. (1992). Consumer responses to service failures: Influence of procedural and interactional fairness perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 25(2), 149–164.
Zurück zum Zitat Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen, U., Bode, M., & Moosmayer, D. (2004). Stakeholder theory between general and contextual approaches: A German view. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 5(3), 312–318. Hansen, U., Bode, M., & Moosmayer, D. (2004). Stakeholder theory between general and contextual approaches: A German view. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 5(3), 312–318.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison, J., & Freeman, E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479–485. Harrison, J., & Freeman, E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479–485.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellsten, S., & Mallin, C. (2006). Are ‘ethical’ or ‘socially responsible’ investments socially responsible? Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 393–406. Hellsten, S., & Mallin, C. (2006). Are ‘ethical’ or ‘socially responsible’ investments socially responsible? Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 393–406.
Zurück zum Zitat Henderson, D. (2001). Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. Wellington: New Business Roundtable. Henderson, D. (2001). Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. Wellington: New Business Roundtable.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendry, J. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: An empirical exploration. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 79–99. Hendry, J. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: An empirical exploration. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 79–99.
Zurück zum Zitat Holzer, B. (2008). Turning stakeseekers into stakeholders. A political coalition perspective on the politics of stakeholder influence. Business & Society, 47(1), 50–67. Holzer, B. (2008). Turning stakeseekers into stakeholders. A political coalition perspective on the politics of stakeholder influence. Business & Society, 47(1), 50–67.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosmer, L. T., & Kiewitz, C. (2005). Organizational justice: A behavioral science concept with critical implications for business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1), 67–91. Hosmer, L. T., & Kiewitz, C. (2005). Organizational justice: A behavioral science concept with critical implications for business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1), 67–91.
Zurück zum Zitat Hutton, W., MacDougall, A., & Zadek, S. (2001). Corporate stakeholding, ethical investment, social accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), 107–117. Hutton, W., MacDougall, A., & Zadek, S. (2001). Corporate stakeholding, ethical investment, social accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), 107–117.
Zurück zum Zitat Jamison, L., & Murdoch, H. (2005). Auditing (and communicating) your way to an ethical supply chain. Corporate Responsibility Management, 1(3), 16–21. Jamison, L., & Murdoch, H. (2005). Auditing (and communicating) your way to an ethical supply chain. Corporate Responsibility Management, 1(3), 16–21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen, M. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256. Jensen, M. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonker, J., & Nijhof, A. (2006). Looking through the eyes of the others: Assessing mutual expectations and experiences in order to shape dialogue and collaboration between business and NGOs with respect to CSR. Corporate Governance an International Review, 14(5), 456–466. Jonker, J., & Nijhof, A. (2006). Looking through the eyes of the others: Assessing mutual expectations and experiences in order to shape dialogue and collaboration between business and NGOs with respect to CSR. Corporate Governance an International Review, 14(5), 456–466.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaler, J. (2002). Morality and strategy in stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 91–99. Kaler, J. (2002). Morality and strategy in stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 91–99.
Zurück zum Zitat Kapstein, E. (2001). The corporate ethics crusade. Foreign Affairs, 80(5), 105–119. Kapstein, E. (2001). The corporate ethics crusade. Foreign Affairs, 80(5), 105–119.
Zurück zum Zitat King, B. (2008). A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Business & Society, 47(1), 21–49. King, B. (2008). A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Business & Society, 47(1), 21–49.
Zurück zum Zitat Kochan, T., & Rubinstein, S. (2000). Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership. Organization Science, 11(4), 367–386. Kochan, T., & Rubinstein, S. (2000). Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership. Organization Science, 11(4), 367–386.
Zurück zum Zitat Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2010). Principles of marketing (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2010). Principles of marketing (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Zurück zum Zitat Langtry, B. (1994). Stakeholders and the moral responsibilities of business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 431–443. Langtry, B. (1994). Stakeholders and the moral responsibilities of business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 431–443.
Zurück zum Zitat Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J. (1999). Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 553–563. Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J. (1999). Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 553–563.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattingly, J., & Greening, D. (2002). Public-interest groups as stakeholders: A ‘stakeholder salience’ explanation of activism. In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted, & S. Sutherland Rahman (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking (pp. 267–289). Greenleaf: Sheffield. Mattingly, J., & Greening, D. (2002). Public-interest groups as stakeholders: A ‘stakeholder salience’ explanation of activism. In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted, & S. Sutherland Rahman (Eds.), Unfolding stakeholder thinking (pp. 267–289). Greenleaf: Sheffield.
Zurück zum Zitat Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
Zurück zum Zitat Orts, E., & Strudler, A. (2002). The ethical and environmental limits of stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 215–234. Orts, E., & Strudler, A. (2002). The ethical and environmental limits of stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 215–234.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips, R. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1), 51–67. Phillips, R. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1), 51–67.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips, R. (2003a). Stakeholder legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 25–41. Phillips, R. (2003a). Stakeholder legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 25–41.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips, R. (2003b). Stakeholder theory and organization ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Phillips, R. (2003b). Stakeholder theory and organization ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips, R., & Caldwell, C. (2005). Value chain responsibility: A farewell to arm’s length. Business and Society Review, 110(4), 345–370. Phillips, R., & Caldwell, C. (2005). Value chain responsibility: A farewell to arm’s length. Business and Society Review, 110(4), 345–370.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips, R., Freeman, E., & Wicks, A. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479–502. Phillips, R., Freeman, E., & Wicks, A. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479–502.
Zurück zum Zitat Post, J., Preston, L., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1), 6–28. Post, J., Preston, L., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1), 6–28.
Zurück zum Zitat Rauyruen, P., & Miller, K. (2007). Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 21–31. Rauyruen, P., & Miller, K. (2007). Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 21–31.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Reichheld, F. (1993). Loyalty-based management. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 64–73. Reichheld, F. (1993). Loyalty-based management. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 64–73.
Zurück zum Zitat Robins, F. (2005). The future of corporate social responsibility. Asian Business And Management, 2005(4), 95–115. Robins, F. (2005). The future of corporate social responsibility. Asian Business And Management, 2005(4), 95–115.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowley, T. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910. Rowley, T. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.
Zurück zum Zitat Savage, G., Nix, T., Whitehead, J., & Blair, J. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 61–75. Savage, G., Nix, T., Whitehead, J., & Blair, J. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 61–75.
Zurück zum Zitat Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjöström, E. (2008). Shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility: What do we know? Sustainable Development, 163, 141. Sjöström, E. (2008). Shareholder activism for corporate social responsibility: What do we know? Sustainable Development, 163, 141.
Zurück zum Zitat Southwood, P. (2003). Shareholder engagement: Prospects for improving corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 5(2, 3), 223–236. Southwood, P. (2003). Shareholder engagement: Prospects for improving corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 5(2, 3), 223–236.
Zurück zum Zitat Spar, D., & La Mure, L. (2003). The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business. California Management Review, 45(3), 78–100. Spar, D., & La Mure, L. (2003). The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business. California Management Review, 45(3), 78–100.
Zurück zum Zitat Starik, M. (1995). Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(3), 207–218. Starik, M. (1995). Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(3), 207–218.
Zurück zum Zitat Ulrich, P. (1995). Business in the nineties: Facing public interest. In P. Ulrich & C. Sarasin (Eds.), Facing public interest. The ethical challenge to business policy and corporate communication (pp. 1–8). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Ulrich, P. (1995). Business in the nineties: Facing public interest. In P. Ulrich & C. Sarasin (Eds.), Facing public interest. The ethical challenge to business policy and corporate communication (pp. 1–8). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Zurück zum Zitat Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2006). Theorising accountability for NGO advocacy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(3), 349–376. Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2006). Theorising accountability for NGO advocacy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(3), 349–376.
Zurück zum Zitat Wheeler, D., & Silampää, M. (1998). Including the stakeholders: The business case. Long Range Planning, 31(2), 201–210. Wheeler, D., & Silampää, M. (1998). Including the stakeholders: The business case. Long Range Planning, 31(2), 201–210.
Zurück zum Zitat Winston, M. (2002). NGO strategies for promoting corporate social responsibility. Ethics & International Affairs, 16(1), 71–87. Winston, M. (2002). NGO strategies for promoting corporate social responsibility. Ethics & International Affairs, 16(1), 71–87.
Zurück zum Zitat Yaziji, M. (2004). Turning gadflies into allies. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 110–115. Yaziji, M. (2004). Turning gadflies into allies. Harvard Business Review, 82(2), 110–115.
Zurück zum Zitat Zietsma, C., & Winn, M. (2008). Building chains and directing flows. Strategies and tactics of mutual influence in stakeholder conflicts. Business and Society, 47(1), 68–101. Zietsma, C., & Winn, M. (2008). Building chains and directing flows. Strategies and tactics of mutual influence in stakeholder conflicts. Business and Society, 47(1), 68–101.
Metadaten
Titel
Stakeholder Management, Reciprocity and Stakeholder Responsibility
verfasst von
Yves Fassin
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2012
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1381-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Journal of Business Ethics 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner