nach oben

Erschienen in:

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. State Responsibility

verfasst von : Silke Marie Christiansen

Erschienen in: Climate Conflicts - A Case of International Environmental and Humanitarian Law

Verlag: Springer International Publishing

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The second chapter introduces the system of ‘state responsibility.’ Since this chapter covers legal responsibility for climate change, the concept of state responsibility is analyzed with regard to the legal consequences of state conduct for climate change. Thus, the chapter draws on the work of the International Law Commission (ILC). Establishing international responsibility serves as a ground for the discourse in how far international responsibility reaches. The legal consequences deriving from state responsibility will be analyzed later in Chap. 5.

The concept of state responsibility, in which most of the analysis is embedded, requires examining the legal regulations deductively. This means that an internationally wrongful act has to be committed, i.e. a violation of an international obligation. From thereon, the particular primary norm of international law is then scrutinized as to whether the conduct in question qualifies as a violation of the norm. However, the issue of climate conflicts requires an inductive approach, which means the facts are not clearly determined yet. This impediment would actually require to establish the facts and to then analyze whether or not the situation is included in a particular regulation of international law. The same challenge occurred with the drafting of a definition of climate conflicts, mentioned above. Having state responsibility on the one side, which requires working deductively, and the scenario of climate conflicts on the other side, which is alien to international law to date and thus requires to be established inductively, bears methodological difficulties. For reasons of clarity, state responsibility is thus introduced in a separate chapter and not embedded in the analysis of a violation of a primary norm. This would have led to an excessive complexity of Chap. 4. Instead, the analysis of international environmental law is now ‘framed’ by state responsibility, with the preconditions of state responsibility in the introduction of state responsibility and the legal consequences of state responsibility following the analysis of international environmental law.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Vorheriges Kapitel Climate Conflicts: The Pathways

Nächstes Kapitel Climate Conflicts and International Environmental Law

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/responsibility.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Liability.

Customary international law refers to the unwritten legal regulations in the international context. In the international context, contrary to domestic legal systems, customary law plays a major role; it is referred to as ‘[…] a dynamic source of law in the light of nature of the international system and its lack of centralized government.’ See: Shaw (2008), p. 73; regarding the controversies evolving around customary law, see: D’Amato (1971).

Stein and Buttlar (2009), p. 400.

Brownlie (2008), p. 434.

Herdegen (2009), p. 395.

Amerasinghe (2005), p. 5.

Crawford (2002), p. 1.

Shaw (2008), p. 119.

http://www.un.org/law/ilc/.

Statute of the International Law Commission, 1947-11-21 [GA Resolution 174 (II)].

The procedure was followed in drafting the Convention on the Law of the Sea in 1958, the Convention on Diplomatic Relations in 1961, the Convention on Consular Relations in 1963, the Convention on Special Missions in 1969, and the Convention on the Law of Treaties in 1969. See: Shaw (2008), p. 120.

Zemanek (2000), p. 221.

Hereinafter, the Draft Articles on State Responsibility by the International Law Commission will be referred to as the ‘ILC-DASR.’

Hiller (1998), p. 321.

Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, UN-Resolution GA Res. 56/83 12.12.2001.

Yarwood (2011), p. 78.

Parry and Grant (2004), p. 482.

Stein and Buttlar (2009), p. 400.

Cassese (2005), p. 244.

Fitzmaurice (2007), p. 1016.

Brownlie (2008), p. 435.

Fitzmaurice (2007), p. 1016. ‘[…] Rules of international law can be divided into two: the one is the rules which, one sector of international relations or another, impose particular obligations on states, and which may be termed ‘primary’ rules, and the other is concerned with determining consequences of failure to fulfill obligations established by the primary rules, and which may hence be termed ‘secondary’ rules, the field of responsibility being covered by the latter.’ See: Matsui (2002), pp. 3–4.

Crawford (2002), p. 16.

Yearbook ILC Volume II Part 2 2001, p. 31.

Yearbook ILC Volume II Part 1 1963, p. 228.

Crawford (2002), p. 76.

Fitzmaurice (2007), p. 1012.

Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage, Vienna 21 May 1963, in force 12 November 1977 [1063 UNTS 265; 2 ILM 727 (1963)].

Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects, 1972-03-29, in force 1972-09-01 [961 UNTS 187; 24 UST 2389; 10 ILM 965 (1971)].

The Convention on the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities, Wellington 2 June 1988.

International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea (HNS Convention), 1996-05-03 [35 ILM 1415 (1996)].

Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Paris Convention), 1960-07-29, in force 1968-04-01 [956 UNTS 251; 55 AJIL 1082 (1960)].

Convention on Civil Liability for Damage resulting from Activities Dangerous to the Environment (Lugano Convention), Lugano 21/6/1993 [ETS No. 150]. The Lugano Convention on Civil Liability for Damages Resulting from the Exercise of Activities Dangerous for the Environment from 1993 is a European convention. However, the convention is open for signing and ratification through other states as well.

The condition to enter into force is three ratifications. To date, no state ratified the Lugano Convention; see: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=150&CM=3&DF=&CL=ENG.

Trail Smelter Arbitration (United States v. Canada), 1938, 1941, 3 RIAA 1907 (1941), p. 4.

Corfu Channel Case (U.K. v. Albania), Judgment, ICJ Reports 1949, p. 4.

United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Teheran, Judgment, ICJ Reports 1980, p. 3.

Cassese (2005), p. 245.

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), Montego Bay 10 December 1982, in force 16 November 1994, [1833 UNTS 3/[1994] ATS 31/21 ILM 1261 (1982)].

Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Paris Convention), 1960-07-29, in force 1968-04-01 [956 UNTS 251; 55 AJIL 1082 (1960)].

Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, Basel 22 Mar 1989, in force 5 May 1992 [1673 UNTS 57; [1992] ATS 7; 28 ILM 657 (1989)].

Bamako Convention on the ban on the Import into Africa and the Control of Transboundary Movement and Management of Hazardous Wastes within Africa, Bamako 30 January 1991, in force 22 April 1998.

Lusaka Agreement on Cooperative Enforcement Operations Directed at Illegal Trade in Wild Fauna and Flora, 1994, in force 10 December 1996.

Convention on the Protection of the Environment through Criminal Law, Strasbourg 4 November 1998 [ETS No. 172].

The PCIJ is the predecessor of the ICJ and worked from 1922 until 1946.

Crawford (2002), p. 77.

Cassese (2005), p. 251.

Crawford (2002), p. 81.

Interpretation of Peace Treaties with Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania, Second Phase, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1950, p. 221.

Yearbook ILC Volume II Part 2 2001, p. 33.

Yearbook ILC Volume II Part 2 2001, p. 34.

Brownlie (2008), p. 443.

Crawford (2002), p. 76.

Louka (2006), p. 468.

Crawford (2002), p. 124.

Crawford (2002), p. 125.

Rainbow Warrior Case (New Zealand v. France), 1990, 82 ILR, 499, p. 251.

Fitzmaurice (2007), p. 1014.

In the following, the Draft Articles on the Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities are referred to as ‘ILC-DAPTH.’

This notion is held by, e.g., Goldie (1965), pp. 1189 ff.; Handl (1975), p. 156 at pp. 167–170; Springer (1983), pp. 133–134.

Crawford (2002), p. 135.

Shaw (2008), p. 124.

Crawford (2002), pp. 246, 247.

Ibid., p. 246.

Zwanenburg (2005), p. 220.

Yarwood (2011), p. 79.

On the debate regarding international crime and peremptory norms, see: Shaw (2008), pp. 807, 808.

Yarwood (2011), p. 79.

Ibid., p. 84.

Shaw (2008), p. 124.

Tams (2005), pp. 118, 119.

Birnie et al. (2009), pp. 99–100; Kiss and Shelton (2004), pp. 24, 25.

Tams (2005), p. 120.

Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain), Judgment, ICJ Reports 1970, p. 3 at p. 32, para. 34.

Ibid.

See: Case Concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia), Judgment, ICJ Reports 1997, p. 39, para. 14.

Kiss and Shelton (2007), p. 15.

Tams (2005), p. 310.

Amerasinghe CF (2005) The essence of the structure of international responsibility. In: Ragazzi M (ed) International responsibility today: essays in memory of Oscar Schachter. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, Boston

Birnie P, Boyle A, Redgewell C (2009) International law and the environment, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Brownlie I (2008) Principles of public international law, 7th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York

Cassese A (2005) International law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York

Crawford J (2002) The international law commission’s articles on state responsibility: introduction, text and commentaries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne

D’Amato AA (1971) The concept of custom in international law (1971). Cornell University Press, London

Fitzmaurice M (2007) International responsibility and liability. In: Bodansky D, Brunnée J, Hey E (eds) The Oxford handbook on international environmental law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York

Goldie LFE (1965) Liability for damage and the progressive development of international law. Int Comp Law Q 14(4), Cambridge University Press

Handl G (1975) Balancing of interests and international liability for the pollution of international watercourses: customary principles of law revisited. Can Yearb Int Law 13, University of British Columbia Press, Toronto

Herdegen M (2009) Völkerrecht, 8th edn. Verlag C.H. Beck, München

Hiller T (1998) Sourcebook on public international law – (sourcebook series). Cavendish Publishing Limited, London

Kiss A, Shelton D (2004) International environmental law, 3rd edn. Transnational Publishers, Inc. Ardsley, New York

Kiss A, Shelton D (2007) Guide to international environmental law. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, BostonCrossRef

Louka E (2006) International environmental law – fairness, effectiveness, and world order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New YorkCrossRef

Matsui Y (2002) The transformation of the law of state responsibility. In: Provost R (ed) State responsibility in international law. Ashgate Dartmouth, Surrey, London

Parry C, Grant JP (2004) Margin of appreciation. In: Grant JP, Craig Barker J (eds) Encyclopedic dictionary of international law, 2nd edn. Oceana Publications, Inc. Dobbs Ferry, New York

Shaw MN (2008) International law, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, MadridCrossRef

Springer AL (1983) The international law of pollution. Quorum Books, New York

Stein T, von Buttlar C (2009) Völkerrecht, 12th edn. Carl Heymanns Verlag, Köln

Tams CJ (2005) Enforcing obligations Erga Omnes in international law. Cambridge University Press, New York, MelbourneCrossRef

Yarwood L (2011) State accountability under international law – holding states accountable for a breach of ius cogens norms. Routledge, London, New York

Zemanek K (2000) Responsibility of states: general principles. In: Encyclopedia of Public International law, Published under the auspices of the Max Planck Institute for comparative public law and international law under the direction of Rudolf Bernhardt, vol 4. North-Holland Elsevier Amsterdam, London, New York

Zwanenburg MC (2005) Accountability of peace support operations. International Humanitarian Law Series, Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, Leiden

Titel: State Responsibility
verfasst von: Silke Marie Christiansen
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Buch: Climate Conflicts - A Case of International Environmental and Humanitarian Law
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27943-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-27945-9

Copyright-Jahr: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27945-9_3