nach oben

Erschienen in:

24.07.2015 | Theme Section Paper

Statistical prioritization for software product line testing: an experience report

verfasst von: Xavier Devroey, Gilles Perrouin, Maxime Cordy, Hamza Samih, Axel Legay, Pierre-Yves Schobbens, Patrick Heymans

Erschienen in: Software and Systems Modeling | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Software product lines (SPLs) are families of software systems sharing common assets and exhibiting variabilities specific to each product member of the family. Commonalities and variabilities are often represented as features organized in a feature model. Due to combinatorial explosion of the number of products induced by possible features combinations, exhaustive testing of SPLs is intractable. Therefore, sampling and prioritization techniques have been proposed to generate sorted lists of products based on coverage criteria or weights assigned to features. Solely based on the feature model, these techniques do not take into account behavioural usage of such products as a source of prioritization. In this paper, we assess the feasibility of integrating usage models into the testing process to derive statistical testing approaches for SPLs. Usage models are given as Markov chains, enabling prioritization of probable/rare behaviours. We used featured transition systems, compactly modelling variability and behaviour for SPLs, to determine which products are realizing prioritized behaviours. Statistical prioritization can achieve a significant reduction in the state space, and modelling efforts can be rewarded by better automation. In particular, we used MaTeLo, a statistical test cases generation suite developed at ALL4TEC. We assess feasibility criteria on two systems: Claroline, a configurable course management system, and Sferion™, an embedded system providing helicopter landing assistance.

Vorheriger Artikel Specification and automated validation of staged reconfiguration processes for dynamic software product lines

Nächster Artikel Variability testing in the wild: the Drupal case study

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Complete models are downloadable at https://projects.info.unamur.be/vibes/

http://webcampus.unamur.be

Tool implementation may be downloaded at https://projects.info.unamur.be/yami/

Airbus defence & space - sferion: http://www.defenceandsecurity-airbusds.com/fr/sferion

ALL4TEC - MaTeLo: http://all4tec.net/index.php/en/model-based-testing/20-markov-test-logic-matelo

Asirelli, P., ter Beek, M., Gnesi, S., Fantechi, A.: Formal description of variability in product families. In: Software product line conference (SPLC), 15th International, pp. 130–139 (2011). doi:10.1109/SPLC.2011.34

Asirelli, P., ter Beek, M.H., Fantechi, A., Gnesi, S., Mazzanti, F.: Design and validation of variability in product lines. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Product Line Approaches in Software Engineering, PLEASE ’11, ACM, New York, 25–30. (2011). doi:10.1145/1985484.1985492

Baier, C., Katoen, J.P.: Principles of Model Checking. MIT Press, Massachusetts (2008)MATH

Burch, J.R., Clarke, E.M., McMillan, K.L., Dill, D.L., Hwang, L.J.: Symbolic model checking: 1020 states and beyond. Inf. Comput. 98(2), 142–170 (1992). doi:10.1016/0890-5401(92)90017-A CrossRefMATH

Cichos, H., Oster, S., Lochau, M., Schürr, A.: Model-based coverage-driven test suite generation for software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, MODELS’11, Springer, Heidelberg, pp.425–439. (2011). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2050655.2050698

Claroline: http://www.claroline.net/

Classen, A., Boucher, Q., Heymans, P.: A text-based approach to feature modelling: syntax and semantics of TVL. Science of computer programming 76(12), 1130–1143 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.scico.2010.10.005. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167642310001899

10.

Classen, A., Cordy, M., Schobbens, P.Y., Heymans, P., Legay, A., Raskin, J.F.: Featured transition systems: foundations for verifying variability-intensive systems and their application to LTL model checking. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 39(8), 1069–1089 (2013). doi:10.1109/TSE.2012.86 CrossRef

11.

Classen, A., Heymans, P., Schobbens, P.Y.: What’s in a Feature: A requirements engineering perspective. In: Fiadeiro, J.L., Inverardi, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering (FASE’08), Held as Part of the Joint European Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software (ETAPS’08), LNCS, vol. 4961, pp. 16–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). http://www.cs.le.ac.uk/events/fase2008/

12.

Classen, A., Heymans, P., Schobbens, P.Y., Legay, A.: Symbolic model checking of software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’11, pp. 321–330. ACM, New York (2011). doi:10.1145/1985793.1985838

13.

Classen, A., Heymans, P., Schobbens, P.Y., Legay, A., Raskin, J.F.: Model checking lots of systems: efficient verification of temporal properties in software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 32Nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Vol 1, ICSE ’10, pp. 335–344. ACM, New York (2010). doi:10.1145/1806799.1806850

14.

Cohen, M., Dwyer, M., Shi, J.: Constructing interaction test suites for highly-configurable systems in the presence of constraints: a greedy approach. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 34(5), 633–650 (2008). doi:10.1109/TSE.2008.50. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4564473

15.

Cohen, M.B., Dwyer, M.B., Shi, J.: Coverage and adequacy in software product line testing. In: Proceedings of the ISSTA 2006 Workshop on Role of Software Architecture for Testing and Analysis, ROSATEA ’06, pp. 53–63. ACM, New York (2006). doi:10.1145/1147249.1147257

16.

Cohen, M.B., Dwyer, M.B., Shi, J.: Interaction testing of highly-configurable systems in the presence of constraints. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, ISSTA ’07, pp. 129–139. ACM, New York (2007). doi:10.1145/1273463.1273482

17.

Cordy, M., Classen, A., Heymans, P., Schobbens, P.Y., Legay, A.: Provelines: a product line of verifiers for software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Software Product Line Conference Co-located Workshops, SPLC ’13 Workshops, pp. 141–146. ACM, New York (2013). doi:10.1145/2499777.2499781

18.

Cordy, M., Heymans, P., Schobbens, P.Y., Sharifloo, A.M., Ghezzi, C., Legay, A.: Verification for reliable product lines. arXiv:1311.1343 (2013)

19.

Czarnecki, K., Wasowski, A.: Feature diagrams and logics: there and back again. In: SPLC ’07, pp. 23–34. IEEE (2007). doi:10.1109/SPLINE.2007.24

20.

Devroey, X., Cordy, M., Perrouin, G., Kang, E.Y., Schobbens, P.Y., Heymans, P., Legay, A., Baudry, B.: A vision for behavioural model-driven validation of software product lines. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Technologies for Mastering Change, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7609, pp. 208–222. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34026-0_16 CrossRef

21.

Devroey, X., Perrouin, G.: Variability intensive system behavioural testing framework (VIBeS) (2014). https://projects.info.unamur.be/vibes/

22.

Devroey, X., Perrouin, G., Cordy, M., Schobbens, P., Legay, A., Heymans, P.: Towards statistical prioritization for software product lines testing. In: Collet, P., Wasowski, A., Weyer, T. (eds.) The Eighth International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-intensive Systems, VaMoS ’14, Sophia Antipolis, France, January 22–24, 2014, p. 10. ACM (2014). doi:10.1145/2556624.2556635

23.

Devroey, X., Perrouin, G., Legay, A., Cordy, M., Schobbens, P., Heymans, P.: Coverage criteria for behavioural testing of software product lines. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Technologies for Mastering Change - 6th International Symposium, ISoLA 2014, Imperial, Corfu, Greece, October 8–11, 2014, Proceedings, Part I, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8802, pp. 336–350. Springer (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45234-9_24

24.

Devroey, X., Perrouin, G., Schobbens, P.: Abstract test case generation for behavioural testing of software product lines. In: Gnesi, S., Fantechi, A., ter Beek, M.H., Botterweck, G., Becker, M. (eds.) 18th International Software Product Lines Conference - Companion Volume for Workshop, Tools and Demo papers, SPLC ’14, Florence, Italy, September 15–19, 2014, pp. 86–93. ACM (2014). doi:10.1145/2647908.2655971

25.

Feliachi, A., Le Guen, H.: Generating transition probabilities for automatic model-based test generation. In: Software testing, verification and validation (ICST), third international conference, pp. 99–102 (2010). doi:10.1109/ICST.2010.26

26.

Fischbein, D., Uchitel, S., Braberman, V.: A foundation for behavioural conformance in software product line architectures. In: Proceedings of the ISSTA 2006 Workshop on Role of Software Architecture for Testing and Analysis, ROSATEA ’06, pp. 39–48. ACM, New York (2006). doi:10.1145/1147249.1147254

27.

Garca-Teodoro, P., Daz-Verdejo, J., Maci-Fernndez, G., Vzquez, E.: Anomaly-based network intrusion detection: techniques, systems and challenges. Comput. Secur. 28(12), 18–28 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.cose.2008.08.003. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404808000692

28.

Ghezzi, C., Pezzè, M., Sama, M., Tamburrelli, G.: Mining behavior models from user-intensive web applications categories and subject descriptors. In: 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’14. ACM, Hyderabad (2014)

29.

Gouraud, S.D., Denise, A., Gaudel, M.C., Marre, B.: A new way of automating statistical testing methods. In: Automated software engineering, 2001. (ASE 2001). In: Proceedings 16th Annual International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 5–12 (2001). doi:10.1109/ASE.2001.989785

30.

Henard, C., Papadakis, M., Perrouin, G., Klein, J., Heymans, P., Le Traon, Y.: Bypassing the combinatorial explosion: using similarity to generate and prioritize T-wise test configurations for software product lines. IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng. 40(7), 650–670 (2014). doi:10.1109/TSE.2014.2327020. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6823132

31.

Henard, C., Papadakis, M., Perrouin, G., Klein, J., Traon, Y.L.: Multi-objective test generation for software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Software Product Line Conference, SPLC ’13, pp. 62–71. ACM, New York (2013). doi:10.1145/2491627.2491635

32.

Johansen, M., Haugen, O., Fleurey, F., Eldegard, A., Syversen, T.: Generating better partial covering arrays by modeling weights on sub-product lines. In: France, R., Kazmeier, J., Breu, R., Atkinson, C. (eds.) Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7590, pp. 269–284. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33666-9_18 CrossRef

33.

Kang, K.C., Cohen, S.G., Hess, J.A., Novak, W.E., Spencer Peterson, A.: Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Tech. rep., Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (1990)

34.

Kim, C., Khurshid, S., Batory, D.: Shared execution for efficiently testing product lines. In: Software reliability engineering (ISSRE), IEEE 23rd International Symposium on, pp. 221–230 (2012). doi:10.1109/ISSRE.2012.23

35.

Lauenroth, K., Pohl, K., Toehning, S.: Model checking of domain artifacts in product line engineering. In: Automated software engineering, ASE ’09. 24th IEEE/ACM international conference, pp. 269–280 (2009). doi:10.1109/ASE.2009.16

36.

Lochau, M., Oster, S., Goltz, U., Schürr, A.: Model-based pairwise testing for feature interaction coverage in software product line engineering. Softw. Qual. J. 20(3–4), 567–604 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11219-011-9165-4 CrossRef

37.

Mathur, A.P.: Foundations of Software Testing. Pearson Education, New York (2008)

38.

Metzger, A., Pohl, K.: Software product line engineering and variability management: achievements and challenges. In: Proceedings of the on Future of Software Engineering, FOSE, pp. 70–84. ACM, New York (2014). doi:10.1145/2593882.2593888

39.

Michel, R., Classen, A., Hubaux, A., Boucher, Q.: A formal semantics for feature cardinalities in feature diagrams. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Variability Modeling of Software-Intensive Systems, VaMoS, pp. 82–89. ACM, New York (2011). doi:10.1145/1944892.1944902

40.

Musa, J.D., Fuoco, G., Irving, N., Kropfl, D., Juhlin, B.: The operational profile. NATO ASI Ser. Comput. Syst. Sci. 154, 333–344 (1996)

41.

Nguyen, H.V., Kästner, C., Nguyen, T.N.: Exploring variability-aware execution for testing plugin-based web applications. In: Jalote, P., Briand, L.C., van der Hoek, A. (eds.) 36th international conference on software engineering, ICSE ’14, Hyderabad, India - May 31 - June 07, 2014, pp. 907–918. ACM (2014). doi:10.1145/2568225.2568300

42.

Oster, S., Wöbbeke, A., Engels, G., Schürr, A.: Model-based software product lines testing survey. In: Model-Based Testing for Embedded Systems, pp. 339–382. CRC Press (2011)

43.

Perrouin, G., Oster, S., Sen, S., Klein, J., Baudry, B., le Traon, Y.: Pairwise testing for software product lines: comparison of two approaches. Softw. Qual. J. 20(3–4), 605–643 (2012). doi:10.1007/s11219-011-9160-9 CrossRef

44.

Pohl, K., Böckle, G., Van Der Linden, F.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques. Springer, New York (2005)CrossRefMATH

45.

Prowell, S.J.: JUMBL: a tool for model-based statistical testing. In: System sciences. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference, p. 9 (2003). doi:10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174916

46.

von Rhein, A., Apel, S., Kästner, C., Thüm, T., Schaefer, I.: The PLA model: on the combination of product-line analyses. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-intensive Systems (VaMoS). pp. 14:1–14:8. ACM, New York (2013). doi:10.1145/2430502.2430522

47.

Samih, H., Acher, M., Bogusch, R., Le Guen, H., Baudry, B.: Deriving usage model variants for model-based testing: an industrial case study. In: IEEE (ed.) 19th international conference on engineering of complex computer systems (ICECCS). Tianjin, Chine (2014). http://hal.inria.fr/hal-01002099

48.

Samih, H., Bogusch, R.: MPLM - MaTeLo Product line manager. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Software Product Line Conference: Companion Volume for Workshops, Demonstrations and Tools - Vol 2, SPLC , pp. 138–142. ACM, New York (2014). doi:10.1145/2647908.2655980

49.

Samih, H., Le Guen, H., Bogusch, R., Acher, M., Baudry, B.: An Approach to Derive Usage Models Variants for Model-based Testing. In: The 26th IFIP International Conference on Testing Software and Systems (2014). Springer, Madrid, Espagne (2014). http://hal.inria.fr/hal-01025124

50.

Sampath, S., Bryce, R.C., Viswanath, G., Kandimalla, V., Koru, a.G.: Prioritizing user-session-based test cases for web applications testing. In: 1st international conference on Software testing, verification, and validation, pp. 141–150. IEEE (2008). doi:10.1109/ICST.2008.42. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4539541

51.

Schobbens, P.Y., Heymans, P., Trigaux, J.C., Bontemps, Y.: Generic semantics of feature diagrams. Comput. Netw. 51(2), 456–479 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2006.08.008. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128606002179. Feature Interaction

52.

Scrapy: http://scrapy.org/

53.

Segura, S., Sánchez, A.B., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Automated variability analysis and testing of an e-commerce site.: an experience report. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE ’14, pp. 139–150. ACM, New York (2014). doi:10.1145/2642937.2642939

54.

Sprenkle, S.E., Pollock, L.L., Simko, L.M.: Configuring effective navigation models and abstract test cases for web applications by analysing user behaviour. Softw. Test. Verif. Reliab. 23(6), 439–464 (2013). doi:10.1002/stvr.1496 CrossRef

55.

Thévenod-Fosse, P., Waeselynck, H.: An investigation of statistical software testing. Softw. Test. Verif. Reliab. 1(2), 5–25 (1991)CrossRef

56.

Tretmans, J.: Model based testing with labelled transition systems. In: Hierons, R., Bowen, J., Harman, M. (eds.) Formal Methods and Testing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4949, pp. 1–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78917-8_1

57.

Utting, M., Legeard, B.: Practical Model-Based Testing: A Tools Approach. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2007)

58.

Utting, M., Pretschner, A., Legeard, B.: A taxonomy of model-based testing approaches (April 2011), 297–312 (2012). doi:10.1002/stvr

59.

Verwer, S., Eyraud, R., De La Higuera, C.: PAutomaC: a probabilistic automata and hidden Markov models learning competition. Mach. Learn. pp. 1–26 (2013). doi:10.1007/s10994-013-5409-9. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00873981

60.

Viterbi, A.J.: Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 13(2), 260–269 (1967)CrossRefMATH

61.

Weißleder, S., Sokenou, D., Schlingloff, B.: Reusing state machines for automatic test generation in product lines. In: 1st workshop on model-based testing in practice (MoTiP), p. 19. Citeseer, Berlin (2008). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.169.5699&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=21

62.

Whittaker, J., Thomason Michael, G.: A Markov chain model for statistical software testing. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 20(10), 812–824 (1994). doi:10.1109/32.328991 CrossRef

Titel: Statistical prioritization for software product line testing: an experience report
verfasst von: Xavier Devroey
Gilles Perrouin
Maxime Cordy
Hamza Samih
Axel Legay
Pierre-Yves Schobbens
Patrick Heymans
Publikationsdatum: 24.07.2015
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Software and Systems Modeling / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1619-1366
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-1374
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-015-0479-8

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Constraint-based test generation for automotive operating systems

Introduction to the theme issue on variability modeling of software-intensive systems

The shape of feature code: an analysis of twenty C-preprocessor-based systems

Variability testing in the wild: the Drupal case study

Inferring physical units in formal models

An empirical approach toward the resolution of conflicts in goal-oriented models

Premium Partner