Skip to main content

2016 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

Strömungen der US-amerikanischen politischen Theorie

verfasst von : Hans-Jörg Sigwart

Erschienen in: Handbuch Politik USA

Verlag: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Der Aufsatz gibt einen Überblick über wichtige Strömungen und Themen in der politischen Theorie der USA und skizziert ihre Stellung in der US-amerikanischen Politikwissenschaft und Gesellschaft. Die politische Theorie ist eng mit dem demokratischen Selbstverständnis der USA verbunden. Zugleich bewegt sie sich in einem internationalen Kommunikations- und Wirkungshorizont. Thematisch steht die Begründung und kritische Reflexion einer demokratischen Idee des politischen Liberalismus im Zentrum der US-amerikanischen politischen Theorie. Zu den wichtigsten Entwicklungstendenzen der aktuellen Debatte gehört der Versuch einer Globalisierung der politisch-theoretischen Perspektive.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Archibugi, Daniele, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, und Raffael Marchetti Hrsg. 2012. Global democracy: Normative and empirical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Archibugi, Daniele, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, und Raffael Marchetti Hrsg. 2012. Global democracy: Normative and empirical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Archibugi, Daniele, und David Held. 2011. Cosmopolitan democracy: Paths and agents. Ethics and international affairs 25(4): 433–461. Archibugi, Daniele, und David Held. 2011. Cosmopolitan democracy: Paths and agents. Ethics and international affairs 25(4): 433–461.
Zurück zum Zitat Arendt, Hannah. 1986. Über die Revolution. München/Zürich: Piper Verlag. Arendt, Hannah. 1986. Über die Revolution. München/Zürich: Piper Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong democracy. Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press. Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong democracy. Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Beitz, Charles. 1979a. Political theory and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Beitz, Charles. 1979a. Political theory and international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Beitz, Charles. 1979b. Bounded morality: Justice and the state in world politics. International Organisation 33: 405–424. Beitz, Charles. 1979b. Bounded morality: Justice and the state in world politics. International Organisation 33: 405–424.
Zurück zum Zitat Bellah, Robert. 1967. Civil religion in America. Daedalus 96(1): 1–21. Bellah, Robert. 1967. Civil religion in America. Daedalus 96(1): 1–21.
Zurück zum Zitat Benhabib, Seyla. 2009. Claiming rights across borders: International human rights and democratic sovereignty. American Political Science Review 103(4): 691–704. Benhabib, Seyla. 2009. Claiming rights across borders: International human rights and democratic sovereignty. American Political Science Review 103(4): 691–704.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett, Stephen Earl. 2003. „Perestroika“ lost: Why the latest „Reform“ movement in political science should fail. Political Science and Politics 35(2): 177–179. Bennett, Stephen Earl. 2003. „Perestroika“ lost: Why the latest „Reform“ movement in political science should fail. Political Science and Politics 35(2): 177–179.
Zurück zum Zitat Bercovitch, Savran. 1975. The puritan origins of the American self. New Haven/London: Yale University Press. Bercovitch, Savran. 1975. The puritan origins of the American self. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Boesche, Roger. 2006. Why could tocqueville predict so well? In Tocqueville’s road map. methodology, liberalism, revolution, and despotism, 1–25. Lanham: Lexington Books. Boesche, Roger. 2006. Why could tocqueville predict so well? In Tocqueville’s road map. methodology, liberalism, revolution, and despotism, 1–25. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Brettschneider, Corey. 2010. A transformative theory of religious freedom: Promoting the reasons for rights. Political Theory 38(2): 187–213. Brettschneider, Corey. 2010. A transformative theory of religious freedom: Promoting the reasons for rights. Political Theory 38(2): 187–213.
Zurück zum Zitat Caney, Simon. 2002. Cosmopolitanism and the law of peoples. The Journal of Political Philosophy 16(3): 245–271. Caney, Simon. 2002. Cosmopolitanism and the law of peoples. The Journal of Political Philosophy 16(3): 245–271.
Zurück zum Zitat Carens, Joseph H. 2010. Immigrants and the right to stay. Cambridge: The Mit Press. Carens, Joseph H. 2010. Immigrants and the right to stay. Cambridge: The Mit Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Chatterjee, Deen K. Hrsg. 2011. Encyclopedia of global justice. 2. Bde. New York: Springer Science. Chatterjee, Deen K. Hrsg. 2011. Encyclopedia of global justice. 2. Bde. New York: Springer Science.
Zurück zum Zitat Cline, Erin M. 2013. Confucius, Rawls, and the sense of justice. New York: Fordham University Press. Cline, Erin M. 2013. Confucius, Rawls, and the sense of justice. New York: Fordham University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, Joshua. 2002. Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In Philosophy and democracy, Hrsg. Christiano Thomas, 17–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cohen, Joshua. 2002. Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In Philosophy and democracy, Hrsg. Christiano Thomas, 17–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, Jean L. 2008. Rethinking human rights, democracy, and sovereignty in the age of globalization. Political Theory 36(4): 578–606. Cohen, Jean L. 2008. Rethinking human rights, democracy, and sovereignty in the age of globalization. Political Theory 36(4): 578–606.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen Charles Sabel, Joshua, und Charles Sabel. 2009. Extram republicam nulla justitia? Philosophy and Public Affairs 34(2): 147–175. Cohen Charles Sabel, Joshua, und Charles Sabel. 2009. Extram republicam nulla justitia? Philosophy and Public Affairs 34(2): 147–175.
Zurück zum Zitat Connolly, William. 2008. Capitalism and christianity, American style. Durham: Duke University Press. Connolly, William. 2008. Capitalism and christianity, American style. Durham: Duke University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Corley, Pamela, Robert Howard, und David Nixon. 2005. The supreme court and opinion content: The use of the federalist papers. Political Science Quarterly 58: 329–340. Corley, Pamela, Robert Howard, und David Nixon. 2005. The supreme court and opinion content: The use of the federalist papers. Political Science Quarterly 58: 329–340.
Zurück zum Zitat Dagger, Richard. 2009. Individualism and the claims of community. In Contemporary debates in political philosophy, Hrsg. Christiano Thomas und Christman John, 303–321. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. Dagger, Richard. 2009. Individualism and the claims of community. In Contemporary debates in political philosophy, Hrsg. Christiano Thomas und Christman John, 303–321. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Dallmayr, Fred. 2004. Beyond monologue: For a comparative political theory. Perspectives on Politics 2(2): 249–257. Dallmayr, Fred. 2004. Beyond monologue: For a comparative political theory. Perspectives on Politics 2(2): 249–257.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz, Mary G. 2012. Between polis and empire: Aristotle’s politics. American Political Science Review 106(2): 275–293. Dietz, Mary G. 2012. Between polis and empire: Aristotle’s politics. American Political Science Review 106(2): 275–293.
Zurück zum Zitat Dryzek, John S. 2006. Revolutions without enemies: Key transformations in political science. American Political Science Review 100(4): 487–492. Dryzek, John S. 2006. Revolutions without enemies: Key transformations in political science. American Political Science Review 100(4): 487–492.
Zurück zum Zitat Dryzek, John S., Bonnie Honig, und Anne Phillips. 2009. Overview of political theory. In The Oxford handbook of political science, Hrsg. John Goodin, 61–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dryzek, John S., Bonnie Honig, und Anne Phillips. 2009. Overview of political theory. In The Oxford handbook of political science, Hrsg. John Goodin, 61–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Euben, Roxanne L. 1999. Enemy in the mirror. Islamic fundamentalism and the limits of modern rationalism: A work of comparative political theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Euben, Roxanne L. 1999. Enemy in the mirror. Islamic fundamentalism and the limits of modern rationalism: A work of comparative political theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabre, Cecile. 2008. Cosmopolitanism, just war theory and legitimate authority. International Affairs 84(5): 963–976. Fabre, Cecile. 2008. Cosmopolitanism, just war theory and legitimate authority. International Affairs 84(5): 963–976.
Zurück zum Zitat Fishkin, James S. 2009. When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fishkin, James S. 2009. When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Floyd Marc Stears, Jonathan, und Marc Stears, Hrsg. 2011. Political philosophy versus history? contextualism and real politics in contemporary political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Floyd Marc Stears, Jonathan, und Marc Stears, Hrsg. 2011. Political philosophy versus history? contextualism and real politics in contemporary political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraser, Nancy. 2013. A triple movement? Parsing the politics of crisis after polanyi. New Left Review 81: 119–132. Fraser, Nancy. 2013. A triple movement? Parsing the politics of crisis after polanyi. New Left Review 81: 119–132.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraser Axel Honneth, Nancy, und Axel Honneth. 2003. Redistribution or recognition? a political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso. Fraser Axel Honneth, Nancy, und Axel Honneth. 2003. Redistribution or recognition? a political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeden, Michael, und Andrew Vincent. 2013. Introduction: The study of comparative political thought. In Comparative political thought. Theorizing practices, 1–23. London/New York: Routledge. Freeden, Michael, und Andrew Vincent. 2013. Introduction: The study of comparative political thought. In Comparative political thought. Theorizing practices, 1–23. London/New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, Samuel. 2006. The law of peoples, social cooperation, human rights, and distributive justice. Social Philosophy and Polity 23(1): 29–68. Freeman, Samuel. 2006. The law of peoples, social cooperation, human rights, and distributive justice. Social Philosophy and Polity 23(1): 29–68.
Zurück zum Zitat Fung, Archon. 2007. Democratic theory and political science: A pragmatic method of constructive engagement. American Political Science Review 101(3): 443–458. Fung, Archon. 2007. Democratic theory and political science: A pragmatic method of constructive engagement. American Political Science Review 101(3): 443–458.
Zurück zum Zitat Galston, William. 2010. Realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory 9(4): 385–411. Galston, William. 2010. Realism in political theory. European Journal of Political Theory 9(4): 385–411.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaus, Gerald. 2012. The order of public reason. A theory of freedom and morality in a diverse and bounded world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gaus, Gerald. 2012. The order of public reason. A theory of freedom and morality in a diverse and bounded world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gebhardt, Jürgen. 1993. Americanism. Revolutionary order and societal self-interpretation in the american republic. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press. Gebhardt, Jürgen. 1993. Americanism. Revolutionary order and societal self-interpretation in the american republic. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gehardt, Jürgen. 2008. Political thought in an intercivilizational perspective: A critical reflection. The Review of Politics 70(1): 5–22. Gehardt, Jürgen. 2008. Political thought in an intercivilizational perspective: A critical reflection. The Review of Politics 70(1): 5–22.
Zurück zum Zitat Geuss, Raymond. 2008. Philosophy and real politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Geuss, Raymond. 2008. Philosophy and real politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibbons, Michael T. 2006. Hermeneutics, political inquiry, and practical reason: An evolving challenge to political science. American Political Science Review 100(4): 563–571. Gibbons, Michael T. 2006. Hermeneutics, political inquiry, and practical reason: An evolving challenge to political science. American Political Science Review 100(4): 563–571.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillespie, Michael. 2008. The theological origins of modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Gillespie, Michael. 2008. The theological origins of modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Godrej, Farah. 2009. Towards a cosmopolitan political thought: The hermeneutics of interpreting the other. Polity 41(2): 135–165. Godrej, Farah. 2009. Towards a cosmopolitan political thought: The hermeneutics of interpreting the other. Polity 41(2): 135–165.
Zurück zum Zitat Green, Jeffrey E. 2013. Rawls and the forgotten figure of the most advantaged: In Defense of reasonable envy toward the superrich. American Political Science Review 107(1): 123–138. Green, Jeffrey E. 2013. Rawls and the forgotten figure of the most advantaged: In Defense of reasonable envy toward the superrich. American Political Science Review 107(1): 123–138.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunnell, John G. 1988. American political science, liberalism, and the invention of political theory. American Political Science Review 82(1): 71–87. Gunnell, John G. 1988. American political science, liberalism, and the invention of political theory. American Political Science Review 82(1): 71–87.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunnell, John G. 2010. Professing political theory. Political Science Quarterly 63(3): 674–679. Gunnell, John G. 2010. Professing political theory. Political Science Quarterly 63(3): 674–679.
Zurück zum Zitat Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Drei normative Modelle der Demokratie. In Die Einbeziehung des Anderen, 277–292. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Drei normative Modelle der Demokratie. In Die Einbeziehung des Anderen, 277–292. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.
Zurück zum Zitat Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. The divided west. Cambridge: Polity Press. Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. The divided west. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. The postnational constellation. Übers. M. Pensky, Hrsg. Cambridge: The Mit Press. Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. The postnational constellation. Übers. M. Pensky, Hrsg. Cambridge: The Mit Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton, Alexander, James/Madison und John Jay. 2007. Die Federalist Papers. Übers, Hrsg. Barbara Zehnpfennig, Hrsg. München: Verlag C.H. Beck. Hamilton, Alexander, James/Madison und John Jay. 2007. Die Federalist Papers. Übers, Hrsg. Barbara Zehnpfennig, Hrsg. München: Verlag C.H. Beck.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartz, Louis. 1955. The liberal tradition in America. An interpretation of american political thought since the revolution. New York: Hartcourt, Brace & World. Hartz, Louis. 1955. The liberal tradition in America. An interpretation of american political thought since the revolution. New York: Hartcourt, Brace & World.
Zurück zum Zitat Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the global order: From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Cambridge: Polity Press. Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the global order: From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Held, Virginia. 2008. How terrorism is wrong: Morality and political violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Held, Virginia. 2008. How terrorism is wrong: Morality and political violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Jaggar, Alison. 2005. ‚Saving Amina: Global justice for women and intercultural Dialogue. Ethics and International Affairs 19(3): 55–75. Jaggar, Alison. 2005. ‚Saving Amina: Global justice for women and intercultural Dialogue. Ethics and International Affairs 19(3): 55–75.
Zurück zum Zitat James, Aaron. 2012. Fairness in practice: A social contract for a global economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. James, Aaron. 2012. Fairness in practice: A social contract for a global economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Jordan, Sara R., und Gary J. Nederman. 2012. The logic of the history of ideas and the study of comparative political theory. Journal of the History of Ideas 73(4): 627–641. Jordan, Sara R., und Gary J. Nederman. 2012. The logic of the history of ideas and the study of comparative political theory. Journal of the History of Ideas 73(4): 627–641.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasza, Gregory. 2001. Perestroika: For an ecumenical science of politics. Political Science and Politics 34(3): 597–599. Kasza, Gregory. 2001. Perestroika: For an ecumenical science of politics. Political Science and Politics 34(3): 597–599.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaufman-Osborn, Timothy V. 2010. Political theory as profession and as subfield? Political Research Quarterly 63(3): 655–673. Kaufman-Osborn, Timothy V. 2010. Political theory as profession and as subfield? Political Research Quarterly 63(3): 655–673.
Zurück zum Zitat Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Laitin, David D. 2003. The perestroikan challenge to social science. Politics & Society 31(1): 163–184. Laitin, David D. 2003. The perestroikan challenge to social science. Politics & Society 31(1): 163–184.
Zurück zum Zitat Luke, Timothy W., und Patrick J. McGovern. 2010. The rebels' Yell: Mr. Perestroika and the causes of this rebellion in context. Political Science and Politics 43(4): 729–731. Luke, Timothy W., und Patrick J. McGovern. 2010. The rebels' Yell: Mr. Perestroika and the causes of this rebellion in context. Political Science and Politics 43(4): 729–731.
Zurück zum Zitat March, Andrew F. 2009a. Islam and liberal citizenship: The search for an overlapping consensus. New York: Oxford University Press. March, Andrew F. 2009a. Islam and liberal citizenship: The search for an overlapping consensus. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat March, Andrew F. 2009b. What is comparative political theory? The Review of Politics 71(3): 531–565. March, Andrew F. 2009b. What is comparative political theory? The Review of Politics 71(3): 531–565.
Zurück zum Zitat Meckled-Garcia, Saladin. 2008. On the very idea of cosmopolitan justice: Constructivism and international agency. The Journal of Political Philosophy 16(3): 245–271. Meckled-Garcia, Saladin. 2008. On the very idea of cosmopolitan justice: Constructivism and international agency. The Journal of Political Philosophy 16(3): 245–271.
Zurück zum Zitat Meckstroth, Christopher. 2012. Socratic method and political science. American Political Science Review 106(3): 644–660. Meckstroth, Christopher. 2012. Socratic method and political science. American Political Science Review 106(3): 644–660.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, David. 2007. National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Miller, David. 2007. National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitzen, Jennifer. 2005. Reading Habermas in anarchy: Multicultural diplomacy and global public spheres. American Political Science Review 99(3): 401–417. Mitzen, Jennifer. 2005. Reading Habermas in anarchy: Multicultural diplomacy and global public spheres. American Political Science Review 99(3): 401–417.
Zurück zum Zitat Monroe, Kristen Renwick, Hrsg. 2005. Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science. New Haven: Vail-Ballou Press. Monroe, Kristen Renwick, Hrsg. 2005. Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science. New Haven: Vail-Ballou Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy, Andrew R. 2009. Prodigal nation: Moral decline and divine punishment from new England to 9/11. New York: Oxford University Press. Murphy, Andrew R. 2009. Prodigal nation: Moral decline and divine punishment from new England to 9/11. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagel, Thomas. 2005. The problem of global justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33(2): 113–147. Nagel, Thomas. 2005. The problem of global justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33(2): 113–147.
Zurück zum Zitat Nardin, Terry. 2006. International political theory and the question of justice. International Affairs 82(3): 449–465. Nardin, Terry. 2006. International political theory and the question of justice. International Affairs 82(3): 449–465.
Zurück zum Zitat Nili, Shmuel. 2013. Rawlzickian global politics. The Journal of Political Philosophy 21(4): 473–495. Nili, Shmuel. 2013. Rawlzickian global politics. The Journal of Political Philosophy 21(4): 473–495.
Zurück zum Zitat Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. Oxford: Basic Books. Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. Oxford: Basic Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Okin, Susan Moller. 2004. Gender, justice and gender: An unfinished debate. Fordham Law Review 72(5): 1537–1567. Okin, Susan Moller. 2004. Gender, justice and gender: An unfinished debate. Fordham Law Review 72(5): 1537–1567.
Zurück zum Zitat Owen, J.J. 2007. The struggle between ‘Religion and Nonreligion’: Jefferson, Backus, and the dissonance of America's founding principles. American Political Science Review 101(3): 493–503. Owen, J.J. 2007. The struggle between ‘Religion and Nonreligion’: Jefferson, Backus, and the dissonance of America's founding principles. American Political Science Review 101(3): 493–503.
Zurück zum Zitat Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Pettit, Philip. 2012. On the people’s terms: A republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pettit, Philip. 2012. On the people’s terms: A republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Pogge, Thomas. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Pogge, Thomas. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Pogge, Thomas. 2002. World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity Press. Pogge, Thomas. 2002. World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Putnam, Robert. 2003. APSA Presidential address: The public role of political science. Perspectives on Politics 1(2): 249–255. Putnam, Robert. 2003. APSA Presidential address: The public role of political science. Perspectives on Politics 1(2): 249–255.
Zurück zum Zitat Rabinow, Paul, und William M. Sullivan. 1987. The interpretive turn: A second look. In Interpretive social science: A second look, 1–30. Berkeley: University of California Press. Rabinow, Paul, und William M. Sullivan. 1987. The interpretive turn: A second look. In Interpretive social science: A second look, 1–30. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawls, John. 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Rawls, John. 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawls, John. 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Rawls, John. 1999. The law of peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Rehfeld, Andrew. 2010. Offensive political theory. Perspectives on Politics 8(2): 465–486. Rehfeld, Andrew. 2010. Offensive political theory. Perspectives on Politics 8(2): 465–486.
Zurück zum Zitat Rigger, Shelley. 2013. The Perestroika movement in American political science and its lessons for Chinese political studies. In Political science and Chinese political studies. The state of the field, Hrsg. Sujian Guo, 163–176. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Rigger, Shelley. 2013. The Perestroika movement in American political science and its lessons for Chinese political studies. In Political science and Chinese political studies. The state of the field, Hrsg. Sujian Guo, 163–176. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Rorty, Richard. 1988. Solidarität oder Objektivität? Drei philosophische Essays, Stuttgart. Rorty, Richard. 1988. Solidarität oder Objektivität? Drei philosophische Essays, Stuttgart.
Zurück zum Zitat Rorty, Richard. 1994. Hoffnung statt Erkenntnis. Eine Einführung in die pragmatistische Philosophie. Wien: Passagen Verlag. Rorty, Richard. 1994. Hoffnung statt Erkenntnis. Eine Einführung in die pragmatistische Philosophie. Wien: Passagen Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabia, Dan. 2010. Defending immanent critique. Political Theory 38(5): 684–711. Sabia, Dan. 2010. Defending immanent critique. Political Theory 38(5): 684–711.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandel, Michael. 1982. Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sandel, Michael. 1982. Liberalism and the limits of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2008. Justice and the priority of politics to morality. The Journal of Political Philosophy 16(2): 161–163. Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2008. Justice and the priority of politics to morality. The Journal of Political Philosophy 16(2): 161–163.
Zurück zum Zitat Sass, Jensen, und John S. Dryzek. 2014. Deliberative cultures. Political Theory 42(1): 3–25. Sass, Jensen, und John S. Dryzek. 2014. Deliberative cultures. Political Theory 42(1): 3–25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sen, Amartya. 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Sen, Amartya. 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro, Ian. 2005. The flight from reality in the human sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shapiro, Ian. 2005. The flight from reality in the human sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Sigwart, Hans-Jörg. 2013a. Tradition and the experience of citizenship: Political Hermeneutics in Hans-Georg Gadamer, John Dewey and Hannah Arendt. Anamnesis 3(1): 7–40. Sigwart, Hans-Jörg. 2013a. Tradition and the experience of citizenship: Political Hermeneutics in Hans-Georg Gadamer, John Dewey and Hannah Arendt. Anamnesis 3(1): 7–40.
Zurück zum Zitat Sigwart, Hans-Jörg. 2013b. The logic of legitimacy: Ethics in political realism. The Review of Politics 75(3): 407–432. Sigwart, Hans-Jörg. 2013b. The logic of legitimacy: Ethics in political realism. The Review of Politics 75(3): 407–432.
Zurück zum Zitat Simmons, A. John. 2010. Ideal and nonideal theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs 38(1): 5–36. Simmons, A. John. 2010. Ideal and nonideal theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs 38(1): 5–36.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, Nicholas H. 2004. Taylor and the Hermeneutic tradition, Hrsg. Ruth Abbey und Charles Taylor, 29–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Smith, Nicholas H. 2004. Taylor and the Hermeneutic tradition, Hrsg. Ruth Abbey und Charles Taylor, 29–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor, Charles. 1985. Interpretation and the sciences of man. In Philosophy and the human sciences. Philosophical Papers 2, 15–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Taylor, Charles. 1985. Interpretation and the sciences of man. In Philosophy and the human sciences. Philosophical Papers 2, 15–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor, Charles. 1992. Negative Freiheit? Zur Kritik des neuzeitlichen Individualismus. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt a. M. Taylor, Charles. 1992. Negative Freiheit? Zur Kritik des neuzeitlichen Individualismus. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt a. M.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor, Charles. 2007. A secular age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Taylor, Charles. 2007. A secular age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1984. Über die Demokratie in Amerika. Vollständige Ausgabe, Hrsg. von J. P. Mayer. 2. Auflage, München: DTV. Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1984. Über die Demokratie in Amerika. Vollständige Ausgabe, Hrsg. von J. P. Mayer. 2. Auflage, München: DTV.
Zurück zum Zitat Valentini, Laua. 2011. Global justice and practice-dependence: Conventionalism, institutionalism, functionalism. The Journal of Political Philosophy 19(4): 399–418. Valentini, Laua. 2011. Global justice and practice-dependence: Conventionalism, institutionalism, functionalism. The Journal of Political Philosophy 19(4): 399–418.
Zurück zum Zitat Villa, Dana. 2008. Tocqueville: Life and legacy. Political Theory 36(3): 466–472. Villa, Dana. 2008. Tocqueville: Life and legacy. Political Theory 36(3): 466–472.
Zurück zum Zitat Vorländer, Hans. 1997. Hegemonialer Liberalismus. Politisches Denken und politische Kultur in den USA 1776–1920. Frankfurt a. M: Campus Verlag. Vorländer, Hans. 1997. Hegemonialer Liberalismus. Politisches Denken und politische Kultur in den USA 1776–1920. Frankfurt a. M: Campus Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books. Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Wellman Philip Cole, Christopher, und Philip Cole. 2011. Debating the ethics of immigration: Is there a right to exclude? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wellman Philip Cole, Christopher, und Philip Cole. 2011. Debating the ethics of immigration: Is there a right to exclude? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Wenar, Leif. 2008. Property rights and the resource curse. Philosophy and public affairs 36(1): 2–32. Wenar, Leif. 2008. Property rights and the resource curse. Philosophy and public affairs 36(1): 2–32.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, Bernard. 2005. In the beginning was the deed. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Williams, Bernard. 2005. In the beginning was the deed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams, Melissa S., und Mark E. Warren. 2014. A democratic case for comparative political theory. Political Theory 42(1): 26–57. Williams, Melissa S., und Mark E. Warren. 2014. A democratic case for comparative political theory. Political Theory 42(1): 26–57.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolin, Sheldon S. 2001. Tocqueville between two worlds: The making of a political and theoretical life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Wolin, Sheldon S. 2001. Tocqueville between two worlds: The making of a political and theoretical life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Metadaten
Titel
Strömungen der US-amerikanischen politischen Theorie
verfasst von
Hans-Jörg Sigwart
Copyright-Jahr
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02642-4_6