Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cluster Computing 3/2019

09.03.2018

Strong conflicting evidences fusion based on belief interval distance measurement

Erschienen in: Cluster Computing | Sonderheft 3/2019

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

To suppress the counterintuitive results which are caused by the combination of strong conflicting bodies of evidence, we proposed a modified evidence combination. First of all, we found out that the belief interval on the evidence theory had shown the disadvantages of uncertainty of the evidence expression. And based on the differences of belief interval of all the elements in the identification frame between two bodies of evidence, we constructed a new distance measure to represent the conflict between bodies, and theoretically proved its rationality. Secondly, based on the measured distance result, we calculated the weight of multiple bodies of evidence participating in the fusion. And finally, the integration of conflicting evidence was resolved through fusion of the weighted average evidence. Numerical experiments show that when the conflict is weak, the new method is as same as the other existing advanced calculations, or similar with them. And when the conflict is strong, it can overcome the interference of strong conflicting evidences effectively and conform the results of intuitive cognition. Besides, its convergence speed is much faster.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multiplicated mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38(2), 325–339 (1967)CrossRef Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multiplicated mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38(2), 325–339 (1967)CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (1976)MATH Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (1976)MATH
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zadeh, L.A.: Review of Shafer’s a mathematical theory of evidence. AI Mag. 5(3), 81–83 (1984) Zadeh, L.A.: Review of Shafer’s a mathematical theory of evidence. AI Mag. 5(3), 81–83 (1984)
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zadeh, L.A.: A simple view of the Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination. AI Mag. 2(7), 85–90 (1986) Zadeh, L.A.: A simple view of the Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination. AI Mag. 2(7), 85–90 (1986)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Smarandache, F., Dezert, J.: Applications and advances of DSmT for information fusion. American Research Press, Rehoboth (2009)MATH Smarandache, F., Dezert, J.: Applications and advances of DSmT for information fusion. American Research Press, Rehoboth (2009)MATH
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lefevre, E., Colot, O., Vannoorenberghe, P.: Belief functions combination and conflict management. Inf. Fusion 3(2), 149–162 (2002)CrossRef Lefevre, E., Colot, O., Vannoorenberghe, P.: Belief functions combination and conflict management. Inf. Fusion 3(2), 149–162 (2002)CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lefevre, E., Elouedi, Z.: How to preserve the conflict as an alarm in the combination of belief function. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 326–333 (2013)CrossRef Lefevre, E., Elouedi, Z.: How to preserve the conflict as an alarm in the combination of belief function. Decis. Support Syst. 56, 326–333 (2013)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Smets, P.: Data fusion in the transferable belief model. In: Proceedings of of the 3rd International Conference on Information Fusion. Sunny vale, CA, USA: ISIF, pp. 21–33 (2000) Smets, P.: Data fusion in the transferable belief model. In: Proceedings of of the 3rd International Conference on Information Fusion. Sunny vale, CA, USA: ISIF, pp. 21–33 (2000)
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy, C.K.: Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decis. Support Syst. 29(1), 1–9 (2000)CrossRef Murphy, C.K.: Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decis. Support Syst. 29(1), 1–9 (2000)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yager, R.R.: Comparing approximate reasoning and probabilistic reasoning using the Dempster–Shafer framework. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 50(5), 812–821 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRef Yager, R.R.: Comparing approximate reasoning and probabilistic reasoning using the Dempster–Shafer framework. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 50(5), 812–821 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Yager, R.R., Alajlan, N.: Dempster–Shafer belief structures for decision making under uncertainty. Knowl. Based Syst. 80, 58–66 (2015)CrossRef Yager, R.R., Alajlan, N.: Dempster–Shafer belief structures for decision making under uncertainty. Knowl. Based Syst. 80, 58–66 (2015)CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jousselme, A.L., Grenier, D., Bosse, E.: A new distance between two bodies of evidence. Inf. Fusion 2(2), 91–101 (2001)CrossRef Jousselme, A.L., Grenier, D., Bosse, E.: A new distance between two bodies of evidence. Inf. Fusion 2(2), 91–101 (2001)CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tessem, B.: Approximations for efficient computation in the theory of evidence. Artif. Intell. 61, 315–329 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRef Tessem, B.: Approximations for efficient computation in the theory of evidence. Artif. Intell. 61, 315–329 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu, Z., Luo, X., Mei, L., Hu, C.: Measuring the semantic discrimination capability of association relations. Concurr. Comput. 26(2), 380–395 (2014)CrossRef Xu, Z., Luo, X., Mei, L., Hu, C.: Measuring the semantic discrimination capability of association relations. Concurr. Comput. 26(2), 380–395 (2014)CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu, C., Yang, J.H., Yang, D.B., et al.: An improved conflicting evidence combination approach based on a new supporting probability distance. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(12), 5139–5149 (2015)CrossRef Yu, C., Yang, J.H., Yang, D.B., et al.: An improved conflicting evidence combination approach based on a new supporting probability distance. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(12), 5139–5149 (2015)CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Han, D., Dezert, J., Yang Y.: New distance measures of evidence based on belief intervals. In: International Conference on Belief Functions, pp. 432–441 (2014)CrossRef Han, D., Dezert, J., Yang Y.: New distance measures of evidence based on belief intervals. In: International Conference on Belief Functions, pp. 432–441 (2014)CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jousselme, A., Maupin, P.: Distances in evidence theory: comprehensive survey and generalizations. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 53(2), 118–145 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRef Jousselme, A., Maupin, P.: Distances in evidence theory: comprehensive survey and generalizations. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 53(2), 118–145 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu, Z.-G., Pan, Q., Dezert, J.: Evidential classifier for imprecise data based on belief functions. Knowl. Based Syst. 52, 246–257 (2013)CrossRef Liu, Z.-G., Pan, Q., Dezert, J.: Evidential classifier for imprecise data based on belief functions. Knowl. Based Syst. 52, 246–257 (2013)CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chebbah, M., Martin, A., Yaghlane, B.B.: Combining partially independent belief function. Decis. Support Syst. 73, 37–46 (2015)CrossRef Chebbah, M., Martin, A., Yaghlane, B.B.: Combining partially independent belief function. Decis. Support Syst. 73, 37–46 (2015)CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yager, R.R.: Fuzzy relations between Dempster-Shafer belief structures. Knowl.-Based Syst. 105, 60–67 (2016)CrossRef Yager, R.R.: Fuzzy relations between Dempster-Shafer belief structures. Knowl.-Based Syst. 105, 60–67 (2016)CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Irpino, A., Verde, R.: Dynamic clustering of interval data using a Wasserstein-based distance. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 29(11), 1648–1658 (2008)CrossRef Irpino, A., Verde, R.: Dynamic clustering of interval data using a Wasserstein-based distance. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 29(11), 1648–1658 (2008)CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran, L., Duckstein, L.: Comparison of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure. Fuzzy 130(3), 331–341 (2002)MathSciNetMATH Tran, L., Duckstein, L.: Comparison of fuzzy numbers using a fuzzy distance measure. Fuzzy 130(3), 331–341 (2002)MathSciNetMATH
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang, Y., Han, D.Q.: A new distance-based total uncertainty measure in the theory of belief functions. Knowl.-Based Syst. 94, 114–123 (2016)CrossRef Yang, Y., Han, D.Q.: A new distance-based total uncertainty measure in the theory of belief functions. Knowl.-Based Syst. 94, 114–123 (2016)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Strong conflicting evidences fusion based on belief interval distance measurement
Publikationsdatum
09.03.2018
Erschienen in
Cluster Computing / Ausgabe Sonderheft 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1386-7857
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7543
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2345-2

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 3/2019

Cluster Computing 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner