Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Knowledge and Information Systems
Erschienen in: Knowledge and Information Systems 3/2012

01.12.2012 | Regular Paper

Structuring persistent chat conversations: experimental results of the chatsistance tool

verfasst von: Mohsen Rahimifar, Siti Salwah Salim

Erschienen in: Knowledge and Information Systems | Ausgabe 3/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This research targets persistency by introducing new features in ‘Chatsistance’, a persistent chat tool that employs speech act theory and an explicit referencing technique to structure the chat log, and by providing further options for retrieving information. Earlier theory is related to the linguistics and characteristics of user statements. The later technique shows the relation of artefacts in an interconnected context named ‘explicit referencing’. Although speech acts were previously used in the field of chat, it is the first time that this theory has been used for the purpose of enhancing persistency combined with an explicit referencing technique, which together provide a well-established structure that provides greater flexibility for the analysis of content. In this paper, we show how this structuring approach could be useful, by evaluating the results of previous experiments that have used Chatsistance.
Vorheriger Artikel Mining frequent conjunctive queries in relational databases through dependency discovery
Nächster Artikel Novel approaches to crawling important pages early

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Allen J, Core M (1997) DAMSL: dialogue act markup in several layers. Draft contribution for the discourse resource initiative
2.
Austin John L (1962) How to do things with words. Clarendon Press, Oxford
3.
Bach K (1998) Speech acts. In: Craig E (ed) Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge, London
4.
Clark H, Brennan S (1991) Grounding in communication. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 13:127–149
5.
Erickson TD (1999) Persistent conversation: discourse as document, minitrack introduction. In: Nunamaker JF Jr , Sprague RH Jr (eds) Proceedings of the thirty-second Hawaii international conference on systems science. Also republished as “Persistent conversation: an introduction”. J Comput Med Commun 4(4)
6.
Fono D, Baecker R (2006) Structuring and supporting persistent chat conversations. In: Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 455–458
7.
Gergle D, Millen D, Kraut R, Fussell S (2004) Persistence matters: making the most of chat in tightly-coupled work. ACM, New York
8.
Gomez J, Boiy E, Moens M-F (2012) Highly discriminative statistical features for email classification. Knowl Inf Syst 31:23–53
9.
Halverson CA (2004) The value of persistence: a study of the creation, ordering and use of conversation archives by a knowledge worker. System sciences. In: Proceedings of the 37th annual Hawaii international conference on 2004
10.
Herring S (1999) Interaction coherence in CMC. J Comput Med Commun 4:13
11.
Hinckley K, Baudisch P, Ramos G, Guimbretiere F (2005) Design and analysis of delimiters for selection-action pen gesture phrases in scriboli. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, Portland
12.
Holmer T (2008) Discourse structure analysis of chat communication. Language@Internet, 5, article 10
13.
Holmer T, Kienle A, Wessner M (2006) Explicit referencing in learning chats: needs and acceptance (Lecture notes in computer science) vol 4227, p 170
14.
Morelli R, Bronzino J, Goethe J (1991) A computational speech-act model of human-computer conversations. IEEE 263–264
15.
Muhlpfordt M, Wessner M (2005) Explicit referencing in chat supports collaborative learning. In: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years! International society of the learning sciences, Taipei, Taiwan
16.
O’neill J, Martin D (2003) Text chat in action. ACM, New York
17.
Oztemel E, Arslankaya S (2006) Enterprise knowledge management model: a knowledge tower. Knowl Inf Syst 31:1–22
18.
19.
Popolov D, Callaghan M, Luker P (2000) Conversation space: visualising multi-threaded conversation. ACM, New York
20.
Rahimifar M, Salim S (2011) Features to support persistent chat conversation. Online Commun Soc Comput 6778/2011:261–266
21.
Searle J (1969) Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
22.
Searle JR (1976) A classification of illocutionary acts. Lang Soc 5:1–23CrossRef
23.
Douglas PT, Mark A, Jay FN, Judee KB, Twitchell DP, Adkins MRJFN, Burgoon JK (2008) Using speech act theory to model conversations for automated classification and retrieval
24.
Douglas PT, Nunamaker JF Jr (2004) Speech act profiling: a probabilistic method for analyzing persistent conversations and their participants
Metadaten
Titel
Structuring persistent chat conversations: experimental results of the chatsistance tool
verfasst von
Mohsen Rahimifar
Siti Salwah Salim
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Knowledge and Information Systems / Ausgabe 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0219-1377
Elektronische ISSN: 0219-3116
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-012-0536-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2012

Knowledge and Information Systems 3/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Regular Paper

Algorithms for mining the evolution of conserved relational states in dynamic networks

Regular Paper

Threshold conditions for arbitrary cascade models on arbitrary networks

Regular Paper

Novel approaches to crawling important pages early

Regular Paper

Analyzing collective behavior from blogs using swarm intelligence

Regular Paper

Efficient algorithms for influence maximization in social networks

Regular Paper

Wrapper positive Bayesian network classifiers

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise