Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering
Erschienen in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 5/2021

31.10.2020 | Research Article-Civil Engineering

Sustainability Evaluation of Conductive Concrete for Pavement Deicing: The Case Study of Parkway Bridge, Tehran, Iran

verfasst von: Aydin Shishegaran, Mohammad Ali Naghsh, Hamed Taghavizade, Mohammad Hossein Afsharmovahed, Arshia Shishegaran, Mohammadreza Babaei Lavasani

Erschienen in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The main target of this study is to evaluate the sustainability of existing mix proportions of the concrete to find the best option for pavement deicing in bridge in Tehran. Based on data availability, the meteorological condition in Tehran, and interviews with experts, 12 conductive concrete mixes, which were evaluated in previous studies, were proposed in this study. Sustainable indicators were selected based on data availability, proposed life cycle assessment indicators by CEN TC350, and experts’ opinions. Weights and effect values of the indicators were determined based on interviews with experts. Values of two indicators, including compressive strength and resistivity, were extracted from the previous studies. Existing numerical models were used to determine the values of other indicators. A composite sustainability index and an applied effect of changes intensity in each indicator (AECIEI) methods were used to sort the mix proportions. Results show that the AECIEI method is more accurate for megacities, where several critical environmental and social problems exist because it can apply the effect of critical indicators and the intensity of the changes on sustainability. Mix proportion 1, in which steel wastes were used as the conductive material, is selected as the best option with compressive strength of 37.77 MPa, resistivity of 5.69 Ω m. This mix proportion can increase the temperature by 18.8 °C and can increase the temperature from − 10 to 3 °C during 103.723 min.
Vorheriger Artikel Mesoscopic Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of Beishan Granite Based on the Equivalent Crystal Model
Nächster Artikel Studies on Biocementation of Mortar and Identification of Causative Bacteria

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Shi, X.; Fu, L.: Sustainable Winter Road Operations. Wiley, Hoboken (2018)
2.
Yehia, S.; Tuan, C.Y.; Ferdon, D.; Chen, B.: Conductive concrete overlay for bridge deck deicing: mixture proportioning, optimization, and properties. Mater. J. 97(2), 172–181 (2000)
3.
Shishegaran, A.; Daneshpajoh, F.; Taghavizade, H.; Mirvalad, S.: Developing conductive concrete containing wire rope and steel powder wastes for route deicing. Constr. Build. Mater. 232, 117184 (2020)
4.
Wu, J.; Liu, J.; Yang, F.: Three-phase composite conductive concrete for pavement deicing. Constr. Build. Mater. 75, 129–135 (2015)
5.
Chen, W.; Gao, P.: Performances of electrically conductive concrete with layered stainless steel fibers. Sustain. Constr. Mater. 2012, 164–172 (2013)
6.
Cordon, H.; Tadini, F.; Akiyama, G.; de Andrade, V.; da Silva, R.: Development of electrically conductive concrete. Cerâmica 66(377), 88–92 (2020)
7.
Fulham-Lebrasseur, R.: Développement d’un système automatisé de fonte de neige et de glace avec du béton électriquement conducteur. Master thesis, Université Lava in Québec, Canada (2018)
8.
Ren, M.; Liu, Y.; Gao, X.: Incorporation of phase change material and carbon nanofibers into lightweight aggregate concrete for thermal energy regulation in buildings. Energy 197, 117262 (2020)
9.
Zhao, R.; Tuan, C.Y.; Fan, D.; Xu, A.; Luo, B.: Ionically conductive mortar for electrical heating. ACI Mater. J. 114, 923–933 (2017)
10.
Liu, K.; Huang, S.; Xie, H.; Wang, F.: Multi-objective optimization of the design and operation for snow-melting pavement with electric heating pipes. Appl. Therm. Eng. 122, 359–367 (2017)
11.
Sassani, A.; Arabzadeh, A.; Ceylan, H.; Kim, S.; Sadati, S.S.; Gopalakrishnan, K.; Taylor, P.C.; Abdualla, H.: Carbon fiber-based electrically conductive concrete for salt-free deicing of pavements. J. Clean. Prod. 203, 799–809 (2018)
12.
Environment, W.C.O.: El desarrollo sostenible, una guía sobre nuestro futuro común: El informe de la Comisión Mundial sobre el Medio Ambiente y el Desarrollo. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987)
13.
Litman, T.: Reinventing transportation: exploring the paradigm shift needed to reconcile transportation and sustainability objectives (2003)
14.
Litman, T.; Burwell, D.: Issues in sustainable transportation. Int. J. Glob. Environ. Issues 6(4), 331–347 (2006)
15.
Bueno, P.C.; Vassallo, J.M.; Cheung, K.: Sustainability assessment of transport infrastructure projects: a review of existing tools and methods. Transp. Rev. 35(5), 622–649 (2015)
16.
Marsden, G.; Snell, C.: The role of indicators, targets and monitoring in decision-support for transport. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 9(3), 219–236 (2009)
17.
Imperatives, S.: Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. Accessed Feb 10 (1987)
18.
Quaddus, M.A.; Siddique, M.: Modelling sustainable development planning: a multicriteria decision conferencing approach. Environ. Int. 27(2–3), 89–95 (2001)
19.
Gilbert, R.; Irwin, N.; Hollingworth, B.; Blais, P.: Sustainable transportation performance indicators (STPI). In: Transportation Research Board (TRB), CD ROM (2003)
20.
Zegras, C.: Sustainable transport indicators and assessment methodologies. In: Biannual Conference and Exhibit of the Clean Air Initiative for Latin American Cities, pp. 25–27 (2006)
21.
Zegras, P.C.: Sustainable urban mobility: exploring the role of the built environment. Ph.D. thesis at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA (2005)
22.
Castillo, H.; Pitfield, D.E.: ELASTIC–A methodological framework for identifying and selecting sustainable transport indicators. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 15(4), 179–188 (2010)
23.
Mansourianfar, M.H.; Haghshenas, H.: Micro-scale sustainability assessment of infrastructure projects on urban transportation systems: case study of Azadi district, Isfahan, Iran. Cities 72, 149–159 (2018)
24.
Thompson, U.-C.; Marsan, J.-F.; Fournier-Peyresblanques, B.; Forgues, C.; Ogaa, A.; Jaeger, J.A.: Using compliance analysis for PPP to bridge the gap between SEA and EIA: lessons from the Turcot interchange reconstruction in Montréal, Québec. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 42, 74–78 (2013)
25.
Convertino, M.; Baker, K.; Vogel, J.; Lu, C.; Suedel, B.; Linkov, I.: Multi-criteria decision analysis to select metrics for design and monitoring of sustainable ecosystem restorations. Ecol. Ind. 26, 76–86 (2013)
26.
Khalili, N.R.; Duecker, S.: Application of multi-criteria decision analysis in design of sustainable environmental management system framework. J. Clean. Prod. 47, 188–198 (2013)
27.
Awasthi, A.; Chauhan, S.S.; Omrani, H.: Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(10), 12270–12280 (2011)
28.
Stanković, M.; Gladović, P.; Popović, V.: Determining the importance of the criteria of traffic accessibility using fuzzy AHP and rough AHP method. Decis. Making Appl. Manag. Eng. 2(1), 86–104 (2019)
29.
Shishegaran, A.; Shishegaran, A.; Mazzulla, G.; Forciniti, C.: A novel approach for a sustainability evaluation of developing system interchange: the case study of the Sheikhfazolah-Yadegar interchange, Tehran, Iran. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17(2), 435 (2020)
30.
Shishegaran, A.; Saeedi, M.; Kumar, A.; Ghiasinejad, H.: Prediction of air quality in Tehran by developing the nonlinear ensemble model. J. Clean. Prod. 259, 120825 (2020)
31.
Agency, E.E.: EEA core set of indicators: Guide. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen (2005)
32.
Litman, T.: Well Measured: Developing Indicators for Sustainable and Livable Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria (2012)
33.
OECD, Assessment, D.P.f.I.S., PISA, élèves, P.i.p.l.s.d.a.d., Cooperation, O.f.E., Development, Assessment, P.f.I.S., 2005. PISA PISA 2003 Data Analysis Manual: SPSS. OECD.
34.
Mihyeon Jeon, C.; Amekudzi, A.: Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: definitions, indicators, and metrics. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 11(1), 31–50 (2005)
35.
Litman, T.: Sustainable transportation indicators: a recommended program to define a standard set of indicators for sustainable transportation planning. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting in 2009 (2008)
36.
Haghshenas, H.; Vaziri, M.: Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison. Ecol. Ind. 15(1), 115–121 (2012)
37.
Standardisation, C.E.C.F.: EN 16309:2014 + A1, Sustainability of construction works: assessment of social performance of buildings—calculation methodology. Brussels (2014)
38.
Das, S.: Life cycle assessment of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16(3), 268–282 (2011)
39.
Heravi, G.; Nafisi, T.; Mousavi, R.: Evaluation of energy consumption during production and construction of concrete and steel frames of residential buildings. Energy Build. 130, 244–252 (2016)
40.
Marceau, M.; Nisbet, M.A.; Van Geem, M.G.: Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Manufacture. Portland Cement Association, Skokie (2006)
41.
Institute, A.S.M.: Cement and Structural Concrete Products: Life Cycle Inventory Update# 2. Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, Ottawa (2005)
42.
Zapata, P.; Gambatese, J.A.: Energy consumption of asphalt and reinforced concrete pavement materials and construction. Journal of infrastructure systems 11(1), 9–20 (2005)
43.
Technology, I.U.O.: Evaluation of First Phase Activities in Comprehensive Transport Studies in Isfahan (2006) (in Persian)
44.
Technology, S.U.O.: Traffic Allocation Model and Performance of the Metropolitan Transportation System of Isfahan in 2000. Sharif University of Technology, Transportation Research Center (2004)
45.
Andrew, R.M.: Global CO2 emissions from cement production. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10(1), 195 (2018)
46.
Poon, C.-S.; Yu, A.T.; Jaillon, L.: Reducing building waste at construction sites in Hong Kong. Construct. Manag. Econ. 22(5), 461–470 (2004)
47.
Katz, A.; Baum, H.: A novel methodology to estimate the evolution of construction waste in construction sites. Waste Manag 31(2), 353–358 (2011)
48.
Nisbet, M.A.; VanGeem, M.G.; Gajda, J.; Marceau, M.: Environmental life cycle inventory of portland cement concrete. PCA R&D Serial (2137a) (2000)
49.
American Concrete Pavement Association. Design of concrete pavement for city streets (1992)
50.
Deo, S.V.: Mix design approach for high 28 days’ strength, high-volume, low-lime fly ash concrete. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 16(3), 707–715 (2015)
51.
Setyawan, A.: Asessing the compressive strength properties of semi-flexible pavements. Proc. Eng. 54, 863–874 (2013)
52.
García, Á.; Schlangen, E.; van de Ven, M.; Liu, Q.: Electrical conductivity of asphalt mortar containing conductive fibers and fillers. Constr. Build. Mater. 23(10), 3175–3181 (2009)
53.
Pan, P.; Wu, S.; Xiao, F.; Pang, L.; Xiao, Y.: Conductive asphalt concrete: a review on structure design, performance, and practical applications. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 26(7), 755–769 (2015)
54.
Dehghanpour, H.; Yilmaz, K.: Investigation of specimen size, geometry and temperature effects on resistivity of electrically conductive concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 250, 118864 (2020)
55.
Shahbazi, H.; Taghvaee, S.; Hosseini, V.; Afshin, H.: A GIS based emission inventory development for Tehran. Urban Clim. 17, 216–229 (2016)
56.
Smith, S.H.; Durham, S.A.: A cradle to gate LCA framework for emissions and energy reduction in concrete pavement mixture design. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 5(1), 23–33 (2016)
57.
Yehia, S.; Tuan, C.Y.: Conductive concrete overlay for bridge deck deicing. Mater. J. 96(3), 382–390 (1999)
58.
Heggie, I.G.; Vickers, P.: Commercial Management and Financing of Roads. The World Bank, Washington, DC (1998)
59.
Jeon, C.M.; Amekudzi, A.A.; Guensler, R.L.: Sustainability assessment at the transportation planning level: performance measures and indexes. Transp. Policy 25, 10–21 (2013)
60.
Reisi, M.; Aye, L.; Rajabifard, A.; Ngo, T.: Transport sustainability index: melbourne case study. Ecol. Ind. 43, 288–296 (2014)
61.
62.
Yoon, K.P.; Hwang, C.-L.: Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1995)
Metadaten
Titel
Sustainability Evaluation of Conductive Concrete for Pavement Deicing: The Case Study of Parkway Bridge, Tehran, Iran
verfasst von
Aydin Shishegaran
Mohammad Ali Naghsh
Hamed Taghavizade
Mohammad Hossein Afsharmovahed
Arshia Shishegaran
Mohammadreza Babaei Lavasani
Publikationsdatum
31.10.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 2193-567X
Elektronische ISSN: 2191-4281
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05057-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Research Article-Civil Engineering

An Improved Creep Model for Granite Based on the Deviatoric Stress-to-Peak Strength Ratio

Review-Civil Engineering

Groundwater Contamination by Hazardous Wastes

Research Article-Civil Engineering

Flow Dynamics Around Permeable Spur Dike in a Rectangular Channel

Research Article-Civil Engineering

Influence of Critical Parameters of Mix Proportions on Properties of MK-Based Geopolymer Concrete

Research Article-Civil Engineering

Lateral Bearing Behaviors of Slightly Inclined Single Pile with Different Pile Head Restraint Under Combined Loads

Correction

Correction to: Investigation of the Impact of Deicer Materials on Thermodynamic Parameters and Its Relationship with Moisture Susceptibility in Modified Asphalt Mixtures by Carbon Nanotube

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise