nach oben

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Erschienen in:

21.06.2022

Systematic Review: Flipped Classrooms in the Performance of Undergraduate Science Students

verfasst von: Natalia Serrano Amarilla, María José Cuetos Revuelta, Ana Isabel Manzanal Martínez

Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The sciences are a complex and especially demanding area of study for undergraduate students, particularly in the earlier years, which are a critical period of adaptation to a new educational stage. The use of new teaching models is encouraged to improve their learning, such as flipped classroom (FC), which pursues more meaningful and effective learning that encourages an active role for students. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of the FC model in learning in the field of experimental and health sciences in higher education during the 2014–2021 period, specifically in students’ performance, determining the influence of students’ motivation and self-regulation during the process. The phases and quality standards for systematic reviews were complied with in the search for and compilation of the articles analysed. Science students generally view FC as satisfactory. The results show increased motivation and self-regulation and, by extension, a general positive impact on academic performance as benefits. Furthermore, motivation and self-regulation are regarded as key requirements for good performance in an FC environment in the sciences. However, to achieve good results, FC must be applied in such a way that students are able to reflect on their own learning process.

Vorheriger Artikel Epidemiology in Middle School Science Curricula: a COVID-19 Pre–post Intervention

Nächster Artikel The Affordances of Minecraft Education as a Game-Based Learning Tool for Atomic Structure in Junior High School Science Education

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Aguilera, C., Manzano, A., Martínez, I., Lozano, M. C., & Casiano, C. (2017). El modelo flipped classroom. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 4(1), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2017.n1.v4.1055

Alebrahim, F., & Ku, H. Y. (2020). Perceptions of student engagement in the flipped classroom: A case study. Educational Media International, 57(2), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1786776CrossRef

Allchin, D. (2013). Contextualizing creationists. American Biology Teacher, 75, 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2013.75.2.16CrossRef

Allchin, D., & Zemplén, G. A. (2020). Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and whole science. Science Education, 104(5), 907–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21589CrossRef

Aznar, I., & Romero, J. M. (2018). Las tecnologías aplicadas en las instituciones educativas: El salto del e-learning al m-learning. In I. del Arco & P. Silva (Eds.), Tendencias nacionales e internacionales en organización educativa: Entre la estabilidad y el cambio (pp. 686–695). Wolters Kluwer.

Bawaneh, A. K., & Moumene, A. B. H. (2020). Flipping the classroom for optimizing undergraduate students’ motivation and understanding of medical physics concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(11), em1899. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8561

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. ISTE.

Bingen, H. M., Steindal, S. A., Krumsvik, R. J., & Tveit, B. (2020). Studying physiology within a flipped classroom: The importance of on-campus activities for nursing students’ experiences of mastery. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 00, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15308CrossRef

Broc, M. A. (2011). Voluntad para estudiar, regulación del esfuerzo, gestión eficaz del tiempo y rendimiento académico en alumnos universitarios. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 29(1), 171–185. https://bit.ly/3h4xc8A

Butzler, K. B. (2016). The synergistic effects of self-regulation tools and the flipped classroom. Computers in the Schools, 33(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2016.1137179CrossRef

Casasola, T., Nguyen, T., Warschauer, M., & Sjdaichenke, K. (2017). Can flipping the classroom work? Evidence from undergraduate chemistry. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(3), 421–435. https://bit.ly/3vDXp1O

Cho, M.-K., & Kim, M. Y. (2019). Outcomes and influential factors applying flipped learning methods in a clinical adult nursing practicum. International Journal of Nursing Practice, e12724. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12724

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40CrossRef

Crimmins, M. T., & Midkiff, B. (2017). High structure active learning pedagogy for the teaching of organic chemistry: Assessing the impact on academic outcomes. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(4), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00663CrossRef

Delozier, S., & Rhodes, M. (2017). Flipped classrooms. A review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9356-9CrossRef

Dong, Y., Yin, H., Du, S., & Wang, A. (2021). The effects of flipped classroom characterized by situational and collaborative learning in a community nursing course: A quasi-experimental design. Nurse Education Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105037CrossRef

Dunkle, K. M., & Yantz, J. L. (2020). Intentional design and implementation of a “flipped” upper division geology course: Improving student learning outcomes, persistence, and attitudes. Journal of Geoscience Education, 69(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1787808CrossRef

Evans, L., Vanden Bosch, M. L., Harrington, S., Schoofs, N., & Coviak, C. (2018). Flipping the classroom in health care higher education. A Systematic Review. Nurse Educ., 44(2), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000000554CrossRef

Fatima, S. S., Hashmi, S., Rehman, R., & Akbar, R. (2019). Teaching “shock pathophysiology” by flipped classroom. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 35(6), 1631–1635. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.6.1211

Flores, O., Arco, I., & Silva, P. (2016). The flipped classroom model at the university: Analysis based on professors’ and students’ assessment in the educational field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(21). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0022-1

García, M. (2012). La autorregulación académica como variable explicativa de los procesos de aprendizaje universitario. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y formación de Profesorado, 16(1), 203–221. https://bit.ly/3h4s8kW

Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.0CrossRef

Gómez, C. J., Gautam, C., Rothermel, M. A., & Olsen, J. D. C. (2020). Students’ perceptions of a token economy in an undergraduate science flipped class-room. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 20(2), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v20i2.25673

González-Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., Airado, D., & Cañada-Cañada, F. (2016). Performance and perception in the flipped learning model: An initial approach to evaluate the effectiveness of a new teaching methodology in a general science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 450–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9605-9CrossRef

Gu, M., & Sok, S. (2020). Effects of simulation practicum using flipped learning for Korean nursing students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186829CrossRef

Gu, M., & Sok, S. (2021). Factors affecting the academic achievement of nursing college students in a flipped learning simulation practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/11/5970

Guillén, J. C. (2017). Neuroeducación en el aula: de la teoría a la práctica. CreateSpace.

Halasa, S., Abusalim, N., Rayyan, M., Constantino, R. E., Nassar, O., Amre, H., Sharab, M., & Qadri, I. (2020). Comparing student achievement in traditional learning with a combination of blended and flipped learning. Nursing Open., 00, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.492CrossRef

Hamdan, N., McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). The flipped learning model: A white paper based on the literature review titled. Flipped Learning Network, 3–20. https://bit.ly/3nUzGYD

Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0CrossRef

He, W., Holton, A. J., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2016). The effects of flipped instruction on out-of-class study time, exam performance, and student perceptions. Learning and Instruction, 45(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.07.001CrossRef

He, W., Holton, A., Gu, H., Warschauer, M., & Farkas, G. (2019). Differentiated impact of flipped instruction: When would flipped instruction work or falter? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(1), 32–49. https://bit.ly/3umDGDz

Hendrie, K. N., & Bastacini, M. C. (2020). Autorregulación en estudiantes universitarios: Estrategias de aprendizaje, motivación y emociones. Revista Educación, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.37713

Hernández, A., & Camargo, A. (2017). Autorregulación del aprendizaje en la educación superior en Iberoamérica: Una revisión sistemática. Revista Latinoamericana De Psicología, 49, 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlp.2017.01.001CrossRef

Hoepner, J., & Hemmerich, A. L. (2018). A cross-sectional, mixed methods examination of a modified “flipped classroom” pedagogy: The sandwich approach. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.34318

Hoyle, R. H. (2013). Handbook of personality and self-regulation. John Wiley & Sons.

Jdaitawi, M. (2020). Does flipped learning promote positive emotions in science education? A comparison between traditional and flipped classroom approaches. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 18(6), 516- 524. https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.18.6.004

Jensen, J., Kummer, T., & Godoy, P. (2015). Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0129CrossRef

Jeong, J. S., González-Gómez, D., Conde-Núñez, M. C., & Gallego-Picó, A. (2019). Examination of students’ engagement with R-SPQ-2F of learning approach in flipped sustainable science course. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6, 880–891. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.880

Jeong, J. S., González-Gómez, D., & Yllana Prieto, F. (2020). Sustainable and flipped STEM education: Formative assessment online interface for observing pre-service teachers’ performance and motivation. Education Sciences, 10(10), 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100283CrossRef

Jiménez-Rodríguez, D., Belmonte García, D., & Arizo Luque, V. (2020). Perception of nursing students about the implementation of GREENSc methodology in nursing studies. Nurse Education Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104495CrossRef

Jovanovic, J., Gasevic, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Mirriahi, N. (2017). Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.001

Kim, M., Roh, S., & Ihm, J. (2018). The relationship between non-cognitive student attributes and academic achievements in a flipped learning classroom of a pre-dental science course. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 30(4), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2018.109CrossRef

Kühl, S. J., Schneider, A., Kestler, H. A., Toberer, M., Kühl, M., & Fischer, M. R. (2019). Investigating the self-study phase of an inverted biochemistry classroom-collaborative dyadic learning makes the difference. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1497-yCrossRef

Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2019). Rethinking the flipped learning pre-class: Its influence on the success of flipped learning and related factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12618CrossRef

Lennon, J. M. (2010). Self-regulated learning. In J. A. Rosen, E. J. Glennie, B. W. Dalton, J. M. Lennon, & R.N. Bozick (Eds.), Noncognitive skills in the classroom: New perspectives on educational research, (pp. 69–90). Sage. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2020.7.2.6570

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700CrossRef

Lo, C. M., Han, J., Wong, E. S. W., & Tang, C. C. (2021). Flexible learning with multicomponent blended learning mode for undergraduate chemistry courses in the pandemic of COVID-19. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2020-0061

Long, T., Logan, J., & Waugh, M. (2016a). Students’ perceptions of the value of using videos as a pre-class learning experience in the flipped classroom. TechTrends: Linking research and practice to improve learning, 60(3), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0045-4

Long, T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2016b). Use of the flipped classroom instructional model in higher education: Instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9119-8CrossRef

Ma, X., Luo, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, J., Liang, Y., Yu, H., Wu, Y., Tan, J., & Cao, M. (2018). A trial and perceptions assessment of APP-based flipped classroom teaching model for medical students in learning immunology in China. Education Sciences, 8(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020045CrossRef

Moraros, J., Islam, A., Yu, S., Banow, R., & Schindelka, B. (2015). Flipping for success: Evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0317-2CrossRef

Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Soler-Costa, R., Marín-Marín, J. A., & López-Belmonte, J. (2021). Flipped learning y buenas prácticas docentes en educación secundaria. Comunicar, Revista Científica De Comunicación y Educación. https://doi.org/10.3916/C68-2021-09CrossRef

Naibert, N., Duck, K. D., Phillips, M. M., & Barbera, J. (2021). Multi-institutional study of self-efficacy within flipped chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(5), 1489–1502. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01361CrossRef

Newman, D. L., Deyoe, M. M., Connor, K. A., & Lamendola, J. M. (2014). Flipping STEM learning: Impact on students’ process of learning and faculty instructional activities. In J. Keengwe, G. Onchwari, & J. N. Oigara (Eds.), Promoting active learning through the flipped classroom model (pp. 113–131). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4987-3.ch006

Noor, K. B. M. (2008). Case study: A strategic research methodology. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(11), 1602–1604. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2008.1602.1604CrossRef

Pence, P. L., Franzen, S. R., & Kim, M. J. (2021). Flipping to motivate: Perceptions among prelicensure nursing students. Nurse Educator, 46(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000814CrossRef

Pozo, J. I., & Monereo, C. (1999). El aprendizaje estratégico. Aula XXI- Santillana.

Pujol, R. M. (2007). Didáctica de las ciencias en la educación primaria. Síntesis.

Rivero-Guerra, A. O. (2018). Práctica de laboratorio de granos de almidón en un curso de botánica general: Una experiencia de clase invertida. Formación Universitaria, 11(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062018000100087CrossRef

Romero-García, C., de Paz-Lugo, P., Buzón-García, O., & Navarro-Asencio, E. (2021). Evaluación de una formación online basada en flipped classroom. Revista De Educación, 391, 65–93. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2021-391-471CrossRef

Rotellar, C., & Cain, J. (2016). Research, perspectives, and recommendations on implementing the flipped classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe80234CrossRef

Sáiz Manzanares, M. C., & Valdivieso-León, L. (2020). Relación entre rendimiento académico y desarrollo de estrategias de autorregulación en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria De Formación Del Profesorado, 23(3), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.385491CrossRef

Salcines-Talledo, I., Cifrián, E., González-Fernández, N., & Vigurini, J. (2020). Análisis de las percepciones de los estudiantes sobre el modelo flipped classroom en asignaturas de ingeniería. Diseño e implementación de un cuestionario. Revista Complutense de Educación, 31(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.61739

Sánchez-Cruzado, C., Sánchez-Compaña, M. T., & Ruiz, J. (2019). Experiencias reales de aula invertida como estrategia Metodológica en la Educación Universitaria española. Publicaciones, 49(2), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v49i2.8270

Sánchez-Meca, J. (2010). Cómo realizar una revisión sistemática y un meta-análisis. Aula Abierta, 38(2), 53–64. https://bit.ly/3h2abTZ

Saunders, A., Green, R., & Cross, M. (2017). Making the most of person-centred education by integrating flipped and simulated teaching: An exploratory study. Nurse Education in Practice, 27, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.014CrossRef

Savery, J. R. (2019). Comparative pedagogical models of problem-based learning. In M. Moallem, W. Hung, & N. Dabbagh (Eds.), The Wiley Handbook of Problem‐Based Learning (pp. 81–104). Wiley online library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119173243.ch4

Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., & González-Romá, V. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326CrossRef

Sezer, B., & Abay, E. (2018). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model in medical education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(6), 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1452292CrossRef

Sherr, G., Akkaraju, S., & Atamturktur, S. (2019). Nudging students to succeed in a flipped format gateway biology course. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 2(2), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.36021/jethe.v2i2.51

Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803CrossRef

Smith, T. R., Rama, P. S., & Helms, J. R. (2018). Teaching critical thinking in a GE class: A flipped model. Think. Skill. Creat., 28, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2018.02.010CrossRef

Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4CrossRef

Sudarmika, P., Santyasa, I. W., & Divayana, D. G. H. (2020). Comparison between group discussion flipped classroom and lecture on student achievement and student characters. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13312a

Thai, N., Weber, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003CrossRef

Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2020). Face-to-face, blended, flipped, or online learning environment? Impact on learning performance and student cognitions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36, 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12423

Tourón, J., & Santiago, R. (2015). El modelo flipped learning y el desarrollo del talento en la escuela. Revista De Educación, 368, 196–231. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-368-288CrossRef

Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1). http://educationnext.org/the-flipped-classroom/

Valero, M., Martínez, M., Pozo, F., & Planas, E. (2019). A successful experience with the flipped classroom in the transport phenomena course. Education for Chemical Engineers, 26, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.08.003CrossRef

Velde, R.v., Blignaut-van Westrhenen, N., Labrie, N.H.M., & Zweekhorst, M.B.M. (2021). ‘The idea is nice… but not for me’: First-year students’ readiness for large-scale ‘flipped lectures’-what (de)motivates them? Higher Education, 81, 1157–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00604-4CrossRef

Wang, F. H. (2019). On prediction of online behaviors and achievement using self-regulated learning awareness in flipped classrooms. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.12.1320

Wang, K., & Zhu, C. (2019). MOOC-based flipped learning in higher education: Students’ participation, experience and learning performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0163-0CrossRef

Weaver, G. C., & Sturtevant, H. G. (2015). Design, implementation, and evaluation of a flipped format general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 92, 1437–1448. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00316CrossRef

White, P. J., Naidu, S., Yuriev, E., Short, J. L., McLaughlin, J. E., & Larson, I. C. (2017). Student engagement with a flipped classroom teaching design affects pharmacology examination performance in a manner dependent on question type. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(9), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe5931CrossRef

Yadav, A., Lundeberg, M., DeSchryver, M., Dirkin, K., Schiller, N, Maier, K., & Herreid, F. (2007). Teaching science with case studies: A national survey of faculty perceptions of the benefits and challenges of using cases. The Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(1), 34–38. https://bit.ly/2SolX0t

Zheng, B., Ward, A., & Stanulis, R. (2020a). Self-regulated learning in a competency-based and flipped learning environment: learning strategies across achievement levels and years. Medical Education Online, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1686949

Zheng, B., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Self-regulated learning: The effect on medical student learning outcomes in a flipped classroom environment. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02023-6CrossRef

Zheng, B., Chang, C., Lin, C. H., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Self-efficacy, academic motivation, and self-regulation: How do they predict academic achievement for medical students? Medical Science Educator, 31, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01143-4CrossRef

Zheng, L., Bhagat, K.K., Zhen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020b). The effectiveness of the flipped classroom on students’ learning achievement and learning motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 1–15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26915403

Zhu, L., Lian, Z., & Engström, M. (2020). Use of a flipped classroom in ophthalmology courses for nursing, dental and medical students: A quasi-experimental study using a mixed-methods approach. Nurse Education Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104262CrossRef

Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676CrossRef

Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–39). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Titel: Systematic Review: Flipped Classrooms in the Performance of Undergraduate Science Students
verfasst von: Natalia Serrano Amarilla
María José Cuetos Revuelta
Ana Isabel Manzanal Martínez
Publikationsdatum: 21.06.2022
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09979-8

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten

Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen.

Zur Marktübersicht

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2022

Interest in Educational Data and Barriers to Data Use Among Massive Open Online Course Instructors

Disrupted Lessons in Engineering Robotics: Pivoting Knowledge Transfer From Physical to Virtual Learning Environments

Exploring the Effectiveness and Moderators of Augmented Reality on Science Learning: a Meta-analysis

The Affordances of Minecraft Education as a Game-Based Learning Tool for Atomic Structure in Junior High School Science Education

Understanding Complex Ecosystems Through an Agent-Based Participatory Watershed Simulation

Addressing Gender Bias in STEM Graduate and Post-graduate Students Using Equity in STEM for All Genders Course

Premium Partner

Marktübersichten