nach oben

Sexuality Research and Social Policy

Erschienen in:

13.08.2020

Systematized Review and Meta-synthesis of the Sterilization of Women with Disabilities in the Field of Social Science: from Macroeugenics to Microeugenics

verfasst von: Mª de las Mercedes Serrato Calero, Ángel M. Delgado-Vázquez, Rosa M. Díaz Jiménez

Erschienen in: Sexuality Research and Social Policy | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Background

The forced sterilization of women with disabilities has been a common practice throughout the world, hindering the sexual and reproductive freedom of a significant part of the female population.

Methods

In this paper, carried out between 2018 and 2019, we will perform a systematized review of this phenomenon in order to find out the scientific contributions on this matter in the field of Social Science, explore whether this practice is linked to one or more forms of violence, and analyze whether it is identified with specific disability typologies. For that purpose, we performed searches on three different bibliographic databases: Social Work Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts, and Social Services Abstracts, focusing on the disciplinary origin of the analysis. The research focusing on the forced sterilization of women with disabilities was selected, while those pertaining to other groups subjected to involuntary sterilization were ignored. After an evaluation phase, we obtained 98 research papers that were then subjected to the synthesis and analysis phases, following the SALSA Framework review methodology.

Results

The main findings indicate that on how the macroeugenics carried out during the nineteenth century has continued up until today as microeugenics, setting up the required situation for the continuation of forced sterilization.

Conclusions

This and other results provided significant data about the state of the matter in the field of Social Sciences, establishing the basis to organize further research about a phenomenon that has still not been sufficiently studied.

Vorheriger Artikel Heteronormativity in Italy: Psychometric Characteristics of the Italian Version of the Heteronormative Attitudes and Beliefs Scale

Nächster Artikel Integrating Pre- and Post-exposure Prophylaxes Programs for HIV Prevention Guidelines in Manila, Philippines

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Despite the fact that nowadays, certain trends of theoretical activism are starting to use the term “Functional Diversity”, we opted not to use it in this work, due to its academic rebuttal not being properly established, and also due to the lack of general use of the term, which limits the identification of the analysis units.

For additional information, we recommend looking up the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, Istanbul Convention of 2011, article 39, Council of Europe Treaty Series – No. 210.

The list is annexed to this document (see Annex 1)

The idea of microeugenics was already introduced by Barbara K. Rothman in 1998, in a publication called “Genetic Maps and Human Imaginations: The limits of science in understanding who we are”, edited by W. W. Norton & Company.

Adler, R. R. (1996). Estate of C.W.: A pragmatic approach to the involuntary sterilization of the mentally disabled. Nova Law Journal, 20(3), 1323–1368. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0030088601&origin=inward&txGid=1672797050078a54949c5bb155b9b230 (Last checked on September 14th, 2019).

Alouf, B. (2007). Care of the adolescent female with cerebral palsy. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 6(1), 3–10.CrossRef

Applebaum, G. M., & La Puma, J. (1994). Sterilization and a mentally handicapped minor: providing consent for one who cannot. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 3(02), 209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096318010000493X.CrossRefPubMed

Ashraf, S., Haider, G., & Ashraf, M. (2017). Violence against women with disabilities: a qualitative investigation. Annals of KEMU (King Edward Medical University) Lahore Pakistan, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v23i4.2234.

Atherton, H. L., & Steels, S. L. (2016). A hidden history: A survey of the teaching of eugenics in health, social care and pedagogical education and training courses in Europe. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 20(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629515619253.CrossRefPubMed

Aubert-Marson, D. (2011). Eugenics: A political and scientific ideology. Ethique et Sante, 8(3), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etiqe.2010.12.002.CrossRef

Baker, J. D. (1975). Sexual sterilization-constitutional validity of involuntary sterilization and consent determinative of voluntariness. Missouri Law Review, 40(3), 509–526. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0016518054&partnerID=40&md5=ff5f7dabd2077b4fbc556805186906a3 (Last checked on September 14th, 2019).

Barton, L. (Comp). (1998). Discapacidad y Sociedad [disability and society]. Madrid: Morata.

Barjot, P., & Hervé, C. (2001). Tubular sterilization for mentally handicapped women. Presse Medicale, 30(26), 1284–1287. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-16744364836&partnerID=40&md5=a7975e32da86b63935d84cb35840ba3d (Last checked on September 15th, 2019).

Berger, E., & Michel, B. (1997). Coercive sterilization and mental handicap. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 109(23), 925–931. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0031566062&partnerID=40&md5=1eb543530eed7d065198afc570bdecc7 (Last checked on September 15th, 2019).

Birnbaum, M. (1961). Eugenic Sterilization. JAMA, 175(11), 951. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1961.03040110015004.CrossRefPubMed

Blank, R. H. (1984). Human sterilization: emerging technologies and reemerging social issues. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 9(3), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224398400900302.CrossRef

Block, P. (2002). Sexuality, parenthood, and cognitive disability in Brazil. Sexuality and Disability, 20(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015230303621.

Block, P., Balcazar, F. E., & Keys, C. B. (2002). Race, poverty and disability: three strikes and you’re out! or are you? Social Policy, 33(1), 34–38. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260899063_Race_Poverty_and_Disability_Three_Strikes_and_You're_Out_Or_Are_You (Last checked on July 7th, 2019).

Bourdieu, P. (1986). Notas provisionales sobre la percepción social del cuerpo [provisional notes about the social perception of the body]. In F. Álvarez- Uría & J. Varela (Eds.), Materiales de sociología crítica [Critical sociology resources] (pp. 183–194). Madrid: La Piqueta.

Brady, S. M. (2001). Sterilization of girls and women with intellectual disabilities: Past and present justifications. Violence Against Women, 7(4), 432–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010122182541.CrossRef

Brogna, P. (2006). El nuevo paradigma de la discapacidad y el rol de los profesionales de la rehabilitación. [The new paradigm of disability and the role of professionals in rehabilitation]. Revista Electrónica Cuadernos Esp. Retrieved from https://cadernos.esp.ce.gov.br/index.php/cadernos/article/view/21/19 (Last checked on April 15th, 2019).

Brown, S. (2009). Hitler’s bible: an analysis of the relationship between American and German eugenics in pre-war Nazi Germany. Vesalius : Acta Internationales Historiae Medicinae, 15(1), 26–31. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-76549117765&partnerID=40&md5=de93746f22a6714bfed3e9dd6a531283 (Last checked on June 20th, 2019).

Burgdorf, R. L., & Burgdorf, M. P. (1977). The wicked witch is almost dead: Buck v. Bell and the sterilization of handicapped persons. Temple Law Quarterly (Philadelphia, Pa. : 1946), 50(4), 995–1034. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0017716064&partnerID=40&md5=ae0c3ace60ee0252bc1f2b4fa1d0ce9c (Last checked on September 15th, 2019).

Burleigh, M. (1994). Between enthusiasm, compliance and protest: the churches, eugenics and the nazi ‘euthanasia’ programme. Contemporary European History, 3(3), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960777300000886.CrossRefPubMed

Burnett, B. A. (1981). Voluntary sterilization for persons with mental disabilities: the need for legislation. Syracuse Law Review, 32(4), 913–955.PubMed

Butler, F. O., & Gamble, C. J. (1947). Sterilization in a California school for the mentally deficient. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 51(4), 745–747. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84887777718&partnerID=40&md5=4b3dc1c7085aaa151cddbddd8872621f (Last checked on September 15th, 2019).

Cappotto, C., & Rinaldi, C. (2016). Intersectionalities, dis/abilities and Subjectification in deaf LGBT people: an exploratory study in Sicily. InterAlia: A Journal of QueerStudies, (11a), 68–87 Retrieved from http://www.interalia.org.pl/media/11A_2016/capotto_rinaldi.pdf (Last checked on April 6th, 2019).

Carey, A. (2009). On the margins of citizenship intellectual disability and civil rights in twentieth-century America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Cepko, R. (1993). Involuntary sterilization of mentally disabled women. Berkeley Women’s Law Journal, 8(1), 122–165 Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0027868202&partnerID=40&md5=9d98cfa3ae3158713e18202b26604e23 (Last checked on September 1st, 2019).

Chernus, R. O. (1977). Substantive due process--compulsory sterilization of the mentally deficient. New York Law School Law Review. New York Law School, 23(1), 151–158. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0017711442&partnerID=40&md5=336bf927884293e7e3b1da4dbc0418a5 (Last checked on June 19th, 2019).

Cica, N. (1993). Sterilising the intellectually disabled: The approach of the high court of Australia in department of health V. J.W.B. and S.M.B. Medical Law Review, 1(2), 186–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/1.2.186.CrossRefPubMed

Codina, L. (2018). Revisiones bibliográficas sistematizadas: Procedimientos generales y Framework para Ciencias Humanas y Sociales [Systematized reference reviews: General procedures and framework for human and social sciences]. (Tesis de maestría). Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona. Retrieved from https://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/handle/10230/34497/Codina_revisiones.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

Corona Aguilar, A. & Díaz Jiménez, R. M. (2016). La participación de las mujeres con diversidad funcional física en el Sur de Europa. Un análisis desde la interseccionalidad [Participation of women with physical functional diversity in Southern Europe. An intersectional analysis]. In M.C. La Barbera y M. Cruells (Coords). Igualdad de género y no discriminación en España: evolución, problemas y perspectivas [Gender equality and non-discrimination in Spain: evolution, problems and perspectives] (pp. 591–623). Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.

Coleman, S. S. (1980). Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden? South Dakota Law Review, 25(1), 55–68. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0019107693&partnerID=40&md5=cfe4de723113369d377e8d605dc39097 (Last checked on June 19th, 2019).

Comer, D. (1975). Sterilization of mental defectives: compulsion and consent. Baylor Law Review, 27(1), 174–198. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0016672995&partnerID=40&md5=dfb8e26dd603d724733210bd7090cc29 (Last checked on June 20th, 2019).

Dahl, M. (2001). Selection and killing - The treatment of children “not worth living” during the period of National Socialism and the role of child and adolescent psychiatry. Praxis Der Kinderpsychologie Und Kinderpsychiatrie, 50(3), 170–191. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0348169815&partnerID=40&md5=43f82a4fbae956c7e185c10485d3187c (Last checked on April 15th, 2019).

David, H. P., Fleischacker, J., & Hohn, C. (1988). Abortion and eugenics in Nazi Germany. Population and Development Review, 14(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/1972501.

Denkin, J. F. (1982). In re Grady--voluntary sterilization and the retarded. Rutgers Law Review, 34(3), 567–590 Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0020097291&partnerID=40&md5=eb8be4ee0f6c9c6f1843ffe01544f294 (Last checked on April 6th, 2020).PubMed

de Souza, M. L., & Boarini, M. L. (2008). Mental disability in the conception of Brazilian league of mental hygiene. Revista Brasileira de Educacao Especial, 14(2), 273–292. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-55649113084&partnerID=40&md5=ae7c9287b1d67b790af3cd07ca46e561 (Last checked on October 14th, 2019).

Díaz Jiménez, R. M. (2003). Personas con discapacidad. Una aproximación desde el trabajo social [People with disabilities. A social work approach]. Sevilla: Aconcagua Libros.

Dodge, G. A. (1978). Sterilization, retardation, and parental authority. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1978(2), 380–407. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0018214050&partnerID=40&md5=3e0a95782b7664491e5c48daa5ef629c (Last checked on February 2nd, 2020).

Dowben, C., & Heartwell, S. F. (1979). Legal Implications of Sterilization of the Mentally Retarded. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 133(7), 697–699. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1979.02130070033006.CrossRefPubMed

Drouard, A. (1996). A case of “democratic” eugenics: forty-five years of “Genetic Hygiene” in Denmark. La Recherche, 287, 78–81.

Dugan, J. C. (1993). The conflict between “disabling” and “enabling” paradigms in law: sterilization, the developmentally disabled, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Cornell Law Review, 78(3), 507–542. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0027565562&partnerID=40&md5=1f06e22f5ae12341269693dc70323c68 (Last checked on June 20th, 2019).

Dunn, R. (1975). Eugenic sterilization statutes: a constitutional re-evaluation. Journal of Family Law / University of Louisville School of Law, 14(2), 280–308. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0016672868&partnerID=40&md5=ecf708e9f09b37807ee8baa6f50b43e5 (Last checked on July 7th, 2019).

Dyck, E. (2013). Facing eugenics: Reproduction, sterilization, and the politics of choice (Facing Eugenics: Reproduction, Sterilization, and the Politics of Choice). Canada: University of Toronto Press.

Ernst, E. (1996). 50 years ago: the nuremberg doctors’ tribunal part 1: the descent towards medicalised murder. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, 146(21–22), 574–576. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0030447776&partnerID=40&md5=eb6d34cd73152ce4965c12a3952c0bb0 (Last checked on July 6th, 2019).

FCM & EDF. (2018). Poner fin a la Esterilización Forzosa de Mujeres y Niñas con Discapacidad [Ending forced sterilization of women and girls with disabilities]. Cinca: Colección Generosidad. Madrid.

Ferreira, M. A. V. (2008). Una aproximación sociológica a la discapacidad desde el modelo social: apuntes caracteriológicos [A sociological approach to disability based on the social model: some characteriological sketches]. Reis: Revista española de investigaciones sociológicas, (124), 141–176 Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=2712849 (Last checked on February 2nd, 2019).

Gauvey, S. K., & Shuger, N. B. (1976). The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In Re sterilization of moore. The University of Maryland Law Forum, 6(3), 109–128. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0017210861&partnerID=40&md5=9d17ad705d8bc80a05f94da22069dd80 (Last checked on February 2nd, 2019).

Gewirtz, D. S. (1994). Toward a quality population: China’s eugenic sterilization of the mentally retarded. New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law, 15(1), 139–162. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0028680140&partnerID=40&md5=c8c146df26baf7d7bffdb1a10c9363a4 (Last checked on June 20th, 2019).

Gibbon, T. C., Scheckler, E. R., Taylor, N., Stagmer, M., & Bateman, D. F. (2016). Sexual assault and students with disabilities: How to respond. In Sexual misconduct in the education and human services sector. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0657-7.ch001.

Gill, E. (1983). Horst Biesold: helping the survivors. Deaf American, 35(8), 7–8.

Goldhar, J. (1991). The sterilization of women with an intellectual disability: a lawyer looks at the medical aspects. University of Tasmania Law Review, 10(2), 157–196.PubMed

Gomiz Pascual, M. P. (2016). La sexualidad y la maternidad como factores adicionales de discriminación (y violencia) en las mujeres con discapacidad [Sexuality and maternity as additional factors in the discrimination (and violence) of women with disabilities]. Revista Española de Discapacidad, 4(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.5569/2340-5104.04.02.07.CrossRef

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.CrossRefPubMed

Gressel, M. (1977). Compulsory sterilization: equal protection and the quality of life. University of Dayton law review. University of Dayton. Law School, 2(2), 327–339. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0017500335&partnerID=40&md5=f99ebddf35e8656cd6d601637ce86f0e (Last checked on June 20th, 2019).

Guirao-Goris, J. A., Olmedo Salas, A., & Ferrer Ferrandis, E. (2008). El artículo de revisión [The review article]. Revista Iberoamericana de Enfermería Comunitaria, 1(1), 1–6 Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268518751_El_articulo_de_revision (Last checked on April 14th, 2019).

Güvercin, C. H., & Arda, B. (2008). Eugenics Concept: From Plato to Present. Human Reproduction & Genetic Ethics, 14(2), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1558/hrge.v14i2.20.

Habgood, J. S. (1979). Sterilisation of the mentally handicapped. Lancet, 11(8144), 685–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(79)92078-6.CrossRefPubMed

Harding, S. (1996). Ciencia y Feminismo [Science and Feminism]. Madrid: Morata.

Hassenfeld, I. N. (2002). Doctor-patient relations in Nazi Germany and the fate of psychiatric patients. Psychiatric Quarterly, 73(3), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016084620453.CrossRef

Hyatt, S. (1998). A shared history of shame: Sweden’s four-decade policy of forced sterilization and the eugenics movement in the United States. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 8(2), 475–503. https://doi.org/10.18060/17816.CrossRef

Insogna, I., & Fiester, A. (2015). Sterilization as last resort in women with intellectual disabilities: protection or disservice? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 212(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.016.

Irvine, A. C. (1988). Balancing the right of the mentally retarded to obtain a therapeutic sterilization against the potential for abuse. Law and Psychology Review, 12, 95–122. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0023984889&partnerID=40&md5=d99e6c84f97adb2dd602d1dfc6aa1880 (Last checked on February 2nd, 2019).

Jaegers, E. M. (1992). Modern judicial treatment of procreative rights of developmentally disabled persons: equal rights to procreation and sterilization. Journal of Family Law / University of Louisville School of Law, 31(4), 947–979. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0026928667&partnerID=40&md5=e1c62c713419762150c52b60c7562c50 (Last checked on October 16th, 2019).

Jiménez Lara, A., & Huete García, A. (2010). Políticas públicas sobre discapacidad en España. Hacia una perspectiva basada en los Derechos [Public regulations regarding disability in Spain. Towards a rights-based perspective]. Política y Sociedad, 47(1), 137–152 Retrieved from https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/POSO/article/view/POSO1010130137A (Last checked on October 16th, 2019).

Jiménez Pérez, G., & Serrato Calero, M. M. (2014). Del padecimiento a la diversidad: Un camino hermenéutico [From complain to diversity: a hermeneutic way]. Revista Española de Discapacidad, 2(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.5569/2340-5104.02.02.10.CrossRef

Johnson, L. (1997). Expanding eugenics or improving health care in China: Commentary on the provisions of the standing committee of the Gansu people’s congress concerning the prohibition of reproduction by intellectually impaired persons. Journal of Law and Society, 24(2), 199–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00043.CrossRefPubMed

JOICFP. (1997). Japan discloses 16,520 “eugenic” sterilizations. Joicfp News, (281), 6. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84921426281&partnerID=40&md5=7126bcda8cd74b2160170b95131029b3 (Last checked on October 16th, 2019).

Kempton, W., & Kahn, E. (1991). Sexuality and people with intellectual disabilities: A historical perspective. Sexuality and Disability, 9(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101735.CrossRef

Kingdom, E. (1985). Consent, coercion and consortium: the sexual politics of sterilisation. Journal of Law and Society, 12(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/1410245.CrossRefPubMed

Koester, C. E. (2016). An Evil Hitherto unchecked: eugenics and the 1917 Ontario Royal Commission on the Care and Control of the Mentally Defective and Feeble-Minded. Canadian Bulletin of Medical History, 33(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.3138/cbmh.33.1.59.CrossRefPubMed

Koupernik, C. (2001). Eugenics and psychiatry. Annales Medico-Psychologiques, 159(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4487(00)00004-4.CrossRef

Ladd-Taylor, M. (2014). Contraception or eugenics? Sterilization and “mental retardation” in the 1970s and 1980s. Canadian Bulletin of Medical History = Bulletin Canadien d’histoire de La Médecine, 31(1), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.3138/cbmh.31.1.189.CrossRefPubMed

Lee, K., Devine, A., Marco, M. J., Zayas, J., Gill-Atkinson, L., & Vaughan, C. (2015). Sexual and reproductive health services for women with disability: a qualitative study with service providers in the Philippines. BMC Womens Health, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0244-8.

Leonard, T. C. (2003). “More merciful and not less effective”: eugenics and american economics in the progressive era. History of Political Economy, 35(4), 687–712. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-35-4-687.CrossRef

Linton, K. F., Rueda, H. A., & Williams, L. R. (2017). Disability, intimacy, and sexual health: A social work perspective. Washington, DC: NASW Press.

Lombardo, P. A. (1985). Three generations, no imbeciles: new light on Buck v. Bell. New York University Law Review, 60(1), 30–62. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0022046694&partnerID=40&md5=682f61c228ab176f043ebd398308cae5 (Last checked on July 7th, 2019).

Lombardo, P. A. (2003). Taking eugenics seriously: three generations of ??? are enough? Florida State University Law Review. Florida State University. College of Law, 30(2), 191–218. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0345920889&partnerID=40&md5=bcb53df0669344c6b2ac68b9b95e8383 (Last checked on May 28th, 2019).

Lynöe, N. (2007). Race Enhancement through sterilization: Swedish experiences. International Journal of Mental Health, 36(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.2753/IMH0020-7411360102.CrossRef

McIntyre, M. (2007). Buck v. Bell and beyond: A revised standard to evaluate the best interests of the mentally disabled in the sterilization context. University of Illinois Law Review, (4), 1303–1327.

McIvor, C. L. (1982). Equitable jurisdiction to order sterilizations. Washington Law Review (Seattle, Wash.: 1962), 57(2), 373–387. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0020097323&partnerID=40&md5=724191da9b7c4e290730158b5151aed5 (Last checked on July 8th, 2019).

McLaren, A. (1986). The creation of a haven for “human thoroughbreds”: the sterilization of the feeble-minded and the mentally ill in British Columbia. The Canadian Historical Review, 67(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.3138/CHR-067-02-01.

Morán, J. M. (2006). Epistemología, Ciencia y Paradigma en Trabajo Social [Epistemology, science and paradigm in social work]. Sevilla: Aconcagua Libros.

Mosby’s Medical Dictionary . (2009). (8th ed.) St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier.

Moscoso, M., & Platero, R. L. (2017). Cripwashing: the abortion debates at the crossroads of gender and disability in the Spanish media. Continuum. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 31(3), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1275158.CrossRef

Murdock, C. W. (1974). Sterilization of the retarded: a problem or a solution? California Law Review, 62(3), 917–935. https://doi.org/10.2307/3479751.CrossRefPubMed

Noack, T., & Fangerau, H. (2007). Eugenics, euthanasia, and aftermath. International Journal of Mental Health, 36(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.2753/IMH0020-7411360111.

O’Brien, G. V, & Bundy, M. E. (2009). Reaching beyond the “Moron”: Eugenic control of secondary disability groups. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 36(4), 153–171. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol36/iss4/10 (Last checked on June 21th, 2019).

ONU. (2006). Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad. [Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities]. Nueva York: Organización de las Naciones Unidas. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/documents/tccconvs.pdf (Last checked on June 29th, 2019).

ONU. (2008). Informe del Relator Especial sobre la tortura y otros tratos o penas crueles, inhumanos o degradantes [United Nations. Special Rapporteur’s report on torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatments or punishments]. Nueva York: ONU. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session22/A-HRC-22-53_sp.pdf (Last checked on June 29th, 2019).

Onwuegbuzie, A., & Frels, R. (2016). 7 steps to a comprehensive literature review: a multimodel & cultural approach. London: Sage.

Open Society Foundations. (2011). Sterilization of women and girls with disabilities. Public Health Program. Retrieved from https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/publications/sterilization-women-and-girls-disabilities-0 (Last checked on April 1st, 2020).

Ouimet, J., & de Man, A. F. (1998). Correlates of attitudes toward the application of eugenics to the treatment of people with intellectual disabilities. Social Behavior and Personality, 26(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1998.26.1.69.CrossRef

Parker, M. (2013). “Forced sterilization”: clarifying and challenging intuitions and models. Journal of Law and Medicine, 20(3), 512–527 Retrieved from https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:303774.PubMed

Park, D. C., & Radford, J. P. (1998). From the case files: Reconstructing a history of involuntary sterilisation. Disability and Society, 13(3), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599826669.CrossRefPubMed

Patel, P. (2017). Forced sterilization of women as discrimination. Public Health Reviews, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0060-9.

Platero Méndez, R. L. (2014). Metáforas y articulaciones para una pedagogía crítica de la Interseccionalidad [Metaphors and organizations for a critical pegagogy of Intersectionality]. Cuaderns de Psicología, 16(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.1219.CrossRef

Radford, J. P. (1991). Sterilization versus segregation - control of the feebleminded, 1900–1938. Social Science & Medicine, 33(4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(91)90327-9.CrossRef

Raine, S. (2012). Federal sterilization policy: Unintended consequences. Virtual Mentor, 14(2), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.2.mhst1-1202.CrossRefPubMed

Rating, D. (2016). Neurology and epileptology in National Socialism. Zeitschrift Fur Epileptologie, 29(4), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10309-016-0072-3.CrossRef

Reilly, P. R. (2015). Eugenics and involuntary sterilization: 1907–2015. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 16(1), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-024930.CrossRefPubMed

Rioux, M. H. (1979). Sterilization. Canadian Doctor, 45(5). Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0018471598&partnerID=40&md5=8ff921bf14b2b0f0c3e0866f00048a34 (Last checked on June 22th, 2019).

Ross, D. H. (1981). Sterilization of the developmentally disabled: shedding some myth-conceptions. Florida State University Law Review. Florida State University. College of Law, 9(4), 599–643. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0019607061&partnerID=40&md5=d6a82a17c72a3d9dde302ae6bff2ac39 (Last checked on July 8th, 2019).

Rothman, B. K. (2020). Weaving a Family: Untangling Race and Adoption. Boston: United States [kindle android version].

Savell, K. (2004). Sex and the sacred: sterilization and bodily integrity in English and Canadian law. McGill Law Journal. Revue de Droit de McGill, 49(4), 1093–1141. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33645117371&partnerID=40&md5=a812dcf9cf098b087f7c288d13ec3def (Last checked on April 14th, 2019).

Serrato Calero, M. M., Díaz Jiménez, R. M., & Corona Aguilar, A. (2018). Violencias contra mujeres con discapacidad en España: La incansable lucha por ser visibles [Violences towards women with disabilities in Spain: The tireless struggle to become visible]. Revista Latinoamericana en Discapacidad, Sociedad y Derechos Humanos, 2(2), 132–145 Retrieved from http://redcdpd.net/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/116 (Last checked on June 22th, 2019).

Scott, E. S. (1986). Sterilization of mentally retarded persons: reproductive rights and family privacy. Duke Law Journal, 1986(5), 806–865. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0022805563&partnerID=40&md5=472233414b28d043119c25608be69e43 (Last checked on April 15th, 2019).

Shaw, R. H. (1976). Constitutional law-legislative naiveté in involuntary sterilization laws. Wake Forest Law Review, 12(4), 1064–1081. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0017207471&partnerID=40&md5=247295249678e87f6a33323163b8547d (Last checked on April 16th, 2019).

Shaw, J. (1990). Sterilisation of mentally handicapped people: judges rule ok? The Modern Law Review, 53(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1990.tb01795.x.CrossRefPubMed

Sherlock, R. K., & Sherlock, R. D. (1982). Sterilizing the retarded: constitutional, statutory and policy alternatives. North Carolina Law Review, 60(5), 943–983. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0020137990&partnerID=40&md5=31d681b93772adc564b145e5a4ec2ad3 (Last checked on February 4th, 2019).

Silverstein, P. H. (1979). Vermont’s voluntary sterilization statutes and the rights of the mentally handicapped. Vermont Law Review, 4(2), 331–352. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0018510465&partnerID=40&md5=3532c64dde15c517d4692cfcffeeb169 (Last checked on June 22th, 2019).

Smith, G. P. (1988). Limitations on reproductive autonomy for the mentally handicapped. The Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 4, 71–89. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0023967334&partnerID=40&md5=f546709b92a8b11b82044c0ed1a1aef1 (Last checked on October 9th, 2019).

Starkman, B. (1973). The control of life: unexamined law and the life worth living. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 11(1), 175–185. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0015635461&partnerID=40&md5=7470a278c38d03ed95f714cd8c6a5bbb (Last checked on July 7th, 2019).

Steele, L. (2016). Court authorised sterilisation and human rights: inequality, discrimination and violence against women and girls with disability. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 39(3), 1002–1037.

Stein, S., & Tepper, M. (2016). Sexuality. In Health care for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities across the lifespan (pp. 1365–1381). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18096-0_110.CrossRef

Stubblefield, A. (2007). “Beyond the pale”: tainted whiteness, cognitive disability, and eugenic sterilization. Hypatia, 22(2), 162–181. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4640067 (Last checked on July 7th, 2019).

Tännsjö, T. (1998). Compulsory sterilisation in Sweden. Bioethics, 12(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00110.CrossRefPubMed

Thomann, K. D., & Rauschmann, M. (2001). Orthopedists and patients under the National Socialist dictatorship. Orthopade, 30(10), 696–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001320170030.CrossRefPubMed

Thomson, M. (1992). Sterilization, segregation and community care: Ideology and solutions to the problem of mental deficiency in inter-war Britain. History of Psychiatry, 3(12), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X9200301205.CrossRefPubMed

Tilley, E., Walmsley, J., Earle, S., & Atkinson, D. (2012). ‘The Silence is Roaring’: sterilization, reproductive rights and women with intellectual disabilities. Disability & Society, 27(3), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.654991.CrossRef

Tsuchiya, T. (1997). Eugenic sterilizations in Japan and recent demands for an apology: a report. Ethics and Intellectual Disability, 3(1), 1–4. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0031215677&partnerID=40&md5=db3efd0ff693290519abf71e139e4a7f (Last checked on April 6th, 2019).

Von Grabowski, M. T. W. (2015). Orthopaedics in Germany under the influence Of National-Socialist Healt-Politic in the years 1933–1945. Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja, 17(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.5604/15093492.1143542.CrossRef

Waxman, B. F. (1994). Up against eugenics: Disabled women’s challenge to receive reproductive health services. Sexuality and Disability, 12(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547889.CrossRefPubMed

Wehmeyer, M. L. (2003). Eugenics and Sterilization in the Heartland. Mental Retardation, 41(1), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2003)041<0057:EASITH>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefPubMed

WHO (2001) Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud [World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health]. Ginebra: Secretaría de la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Retrieved from https://www.imserso.es/InterPresent2/groups/imserso/documents/binario/435cif.pdf (Last checked on June 29th, 2019).

WHO (2013). Plan de Acción sobre Salud Mental de 2013 a 2020 [World Health Organization. Mental Health Action Plan 2013–2020]. Ginebra: Secretaríade la Organización Mundial de la Salud. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/mental_health/publications/action_plan/en/ (Last checked on June 29th, 2019).

Wu, J., Braunschweig, Y., Harris, L. H., Horner-Johnson, W., Ernst, S. D., & Stevens, B. (2019). Looking back while moving forward: a justice-based, intersectional approach to research on contraception and disability. Contraception, 99(5), 267–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.01.006.CrossRefPubMed

Yupanqui Concha, A., & Ferrer Pérez, V. A. (2019). Análisis de la producción científica mundial sobre esterilización forzada de mujeres con discapacidad entre 1997 y 2016 [Analysis of the world scientific production about forced sterilization of women with disabilities between 1997 and 2016]. Gaceta Sanitaria, 33(4), 381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.08.008.CrossRefPubMed

Zampas, C., & Lamackova, A. (2011). Forced and coerced sterilization of women in Europe. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 114(2), 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.05.002.CrossRef

Zumpano-Canto, J. (1996). Nonconsensual sterilization of the mentally disabled in North Carolina: an ethics critique of the statutory standard and its judicial interpretation. The Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 13(1), 79–111. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0030229880&partnerID=40&md5=7cc436c0a199ac12771f4822aed5fa59 (Last checked on July 9th, 2019).

Titel: Systematized Review and Meta-synthesis of the Sterilization of Women with Disabilities in the Field of Social Science: from Macroeugenics to Microeugenics
verfasst von: Mª de las Mercedes Serrato Calero
Ángel M. Delgado-Vázquez
Rosa M. Díaz Jiménez
Publikationsdatum: 13.08.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Sexuality Research and Social Policy / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1868-9884
Elektronische ISSN: 1553-6610
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00488-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Sexual Health Information Sources, Needs, and Preferences of Young Adult Sexual Minority Cisgender Women and Non-binary Individuals Assigned Female at Birth

Integrating Pre- and Post-exposure Prophylaxes Programs for HIV Prevention Guidelines in Manila, Philippines

Black Transgender Women and the School-to-Prison Pipeline: Exploring the Relationship Between Anti-trans Experiences in School and Adverse Criminal-Legal System Outcomes

Cisgender and Transgender Sex Workers from Colombia: The Relation Between Burnout Syndrome and Working Conditions in a Prohibitionist-Regulatory Law

Perceived Importance and Enjoyment of Sexuality in Late Midlife: Cohort Differences in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA)

Simpson’s Paradox in LGBTQ+ Policy: a Case Study