nach oben

Public Organization Review

Erschienen in:

01.09.2014

The Consequences of Conflict: An Evaluation of Racial Disparity and Organizational Performance

verfasst von: Erin K. Melton

Erschienen in: Public Organization Review | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The study of public administration is based primarily on two schools of thought; some theorists espousing political control with others supporting the inner check. Heretofore, studies have failed to examine the effects of goal conflict on relationships between political principals and bureaucratic agents. Using Texas school districts, this analysis demonstrates that goal conflict has significant effects on student performance. Goal conflict also influences relationships among school boards, teachers, and school district populations. Overall, this study advances the discipline in that it determines the ramifications of goal conflict for political principals, bureaucracies, and the public being served utilizing the most common form of bureaucracy, school districts. The arguments and implications embedded in this analysis speak to the age-old public administration question of how to reconcile bureaucracy with democracy.

Nächster Artikel Social Networking and Individual Perceptions: Examining Predictors of Participation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Beginning in spring of 2003, the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) replaced the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS). The data in this analysis include 1995–2002 and therefore include scores from the TAAS examination method only.

In mathematics, the Euclidean distance or Euclidean metric is the ordinary distance between two points that one would measure with a ruler, which can be proven by repeated application of the Pythagorean theorem. By using this formula as distance, Euclidean space becomes a metric space of either one, two, or three dimensions.

The variance inflation factors (VIF) for these measures do not indicate “harmful collinearity”, defined by Kennedy (1998) as any VIF greater than 10. The variation inflation factors are 2.38, 2.03, and 1.84, for goal conflict among the teachers and district population, school board and district population, and school board and teachers, respectively.

Aberbach, J. (1987). The congressional committee intelligence system. Congress and the presidency, 14, 51–76.

Arnold, R. D. (1979). Congress and the bureaucracy: A theory of influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Black, P. E. (2004). “Euclidean distance.” Dictionary of algorithms and data structure, U.S. Institute of Standards and Technology. http://www.nist.gov/dads, Accessed 30 November 2007.

Burtless, G. (1996). Does money matter? the effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.

Calvert, R. L., McCubbins, M. D., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). A theory of political control and agency discretion. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 588–611.CrossRef

Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). “Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence.” Report by Center for Study of Teaching and Policy. Seattle: University of Washington.

Davis, K. C. (1971). Discretionary justice. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Dodd, L. C., & Schott, R. L. (1979). Congress and the administrative state. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal 32(3), 543–576.

Evans, W. N., Murray, S. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1997). Schoolhouses, Courthouses, and Statehouses After Serrano. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 16(1), 10–31.

Fiorina, M. (1981). Congressional control of the bureaucracy: A mismatch of incentives and capabilities. In L. C. Dodd & B. L. Oppenheimer (Eds.), Congress reconsidered. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Frederickson, H. G., & Smith, K. B. (2003). The public administration theory primer. Boulder: Westview Press.

Gallas, N. (1985). Representativeness: a new merit principle. Public Personnel Management, 14, 25–31.

Guinier, L. (1994). The tyranny of the majority: Fundamental fairness in representative democracy. New York: Free Press.

Guy, M. E. (1992). Summing up what we know. In M. E. Guy (Ed.), Women and men of the states: Public administrators at the state level. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

Hadwiger, D. F. (1973). Experience of black framers home administration local office chiefs. Public Personnel Management, 2, 49–54.

Hero, R. E., & Tolbert, C. (1995). Latinos and substantive representation in the House of Representatives. American Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 640–652.CrossRef

Hindera, J. J. (1993). Representative bureaucracy: further evidence of active representation in the EEOC district offices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(4), 415–430.

Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup Conflict in Organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior 25, 189–244.

Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (1998). The black-white score gap. Washington: Brookings.

Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., & Snoek, J. D. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. New York: Wiley.

Kennedy, P. (1998). A guide to econometrics (4th ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

Kerr, B., & Miller, W. (1997). Latino representation: it’s direct and indirect. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 1066–1071.CrossRef

Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Glenview: Antioch.

Kingsley, D. (1944). Representative bureaucracy. Yellow Springs: Antioch.

Kranz, H. (1976). The participatory bureaucracy: Women and minorities in a more representative public service. Lexington: Lexington Books.

Krislov, S. (1974). Representative bureaucracy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Lasswell, H. D. (1936). Politics: Who gets what, when, how? New York: McGraw-Hill.

Locke, E. A., Smith, K. G., Erez, M., Shah, D. O., & Schaffer, A. (1994). The effects of intra-individual goal conflict on performance. Journal of Management, 20(1), 67–91.CrossRef

McCubbins, M. (1985). The legislative design of regulatory structure. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 721–748.CrossRef

McCubbins, M., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 165–179.CrossRef

McCubbins, M., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Structure and process as solutions to the politician’s principal-agent problem. Virginia Law Review, 74, 431–482.CrossRef

Meier, K. (1975). Representative bureaucracy: an empirical analysis. American Political Science Review, 69, 526–542.CrossRef

Meier, K. (1993). Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.

Meier, K., & O’Toole, L. (2006). Bureaucracy in a democratic state: A governance perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Meier, K., & Stewart, J., Jr. (1992). The impact of representative bureaucracies: educational systems and public policies. American Review of Public Administration, 22(3), 157–171.CrossRef

Mitnick, B. (1975). The theory of agency. Public Choice, 24(1), 27–42.CrossRef

Moe, T. (1985). Control and feedback in economic regulation: the case of the NLRB. American Political Science Review, 79, 1094–1117.CrossRef

Mosher, F. (1982). Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press.

Niskanen, W. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine.

Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay. New York: Random House.

Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E., & Kain, J. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.CrossRef

Selden, S. C. (1997). The promise of representative bureaucracy. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

Simon, H. (1947). Administrative behavior. New York: The Free Press.

Terry, L. D. (2003). Leadership of public bureaucracies: The administrator as conservator. (2nd ed.), Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

Turner, R. B. (1956). Role-taking, role standpoint, and reference-group behavior. The American Journal of Sociology, 61(Jan.), 316–324.CrossRef

Waldo, D. (1946). The administrative state. San Francisco: Chandler.

Waldo, D. (1952). Development of theory of democratic administration. American Political Science Review, 46, 81–103.CrossRef

Weingast, B. (1984). The congressional-bureaucratic system: A principal-agent perspective (with applications to the SEC). Public Choice, 44, 147–91.

Wenglisky, H. (1997). How educational expenditures improve student performance and how they don't. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Widmer, C. (1993). Role conflict, role ambiguity, and role overloads on boards of directors of nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(winter), 339–356.

Wise, L. R. (1990). Social equity in civil service systems. Public Administration Review, 50, 567–575.CrossRef

Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. W. (1994). Bureaucratic dynamics. Boulder: Westview Press.

Titel: The Consequences of Conflict: An Evaluation of Racial Disparity and Organizational Performance
verfasst von: Erin K. Melton
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Public Organization Review / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1566-7170
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7098
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0219-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

Social Networking and Individual Perceptions: Examining Predictors of Participation

Anti-Corruption Initiatives and E-Government: A Cross-National Study

Managing to Reinvent Strong Publicness in a Privatized World

Who is Appointed to What Position? The Politics of Appointment in Quangos of Korea

A Comparative Study of Institutionalizing Public Plant Breeding

Stress, Task, and Relationship Orientations of Dutch: Do Age, Gender, Education, and Government Work Experience Make a Difference?

Premium Partner