Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 4/2013

01.07.2013

The Construction of Corporate Social Responsibility in Network Societies: A Communication View

verfasst von: Friederike Schultz, Itziar Castelló, Mette Morsing

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The paper introduces the communication view on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which regards CSR as communicatively constructed in dynamic interaction processes in today’s networked societies. Building on the idea that communication constitutes organizations we discuss the potentially indeterminate, disintegrative, and conflictual character of CSR. We hereby challenge established mainstream views on CSR such as the instrumental view, which regards CSR as an organizational instrument to reach organizational aims such as improved reputation and financial performance, and the political-normative view on CSR, which highlights the societal conditions and role of corporations in creating norms. We argue that both the established views, by not sufficiently acknowledging communication dynamics in networked societies, remain biased in three ways: control-biased, consistency-biased, and consensus-biased. We discuss implications of these biases and propose a future research agenda for the communication view on CSR.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2009). Corporate sustainability reporting: A study in disingenuity? Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 279–288.CrossRef Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2009). Corporate sustainability reporting: A study in disingenuity? Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 279–288.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Århus (2013). The 1st International CSR Communication Conference, Århus University, 18–20 September, 2013. Århus (2013). The 1st International CSR Communication Conference, Århus University, 18–20 September, 2013.
Zurück zum Zitat Amsterdam (2011). CSR Communication Conference, VU University Amsterdam, 26–28 October, 2011. Amsterdam (2011). CSR Communication Conference, VU University Amsterdam, 26–28 October, 2011.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009). Constitutional amendments: "materializing" organizational communication. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1–64. Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009). Constitutional amendments: "materializing" organizational communication. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 1–64.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashforth, B., & Gibbs, B. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.CrossRef Ashforth, B., & Gibbs, B. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baden, C. (2010). Communication, contextualization, and cognition: Patterns & processes of frames’ influence on people’s interpretations of the EU constitution. The Netherlands: Eburon, Delft. Baden, C. (2010). Communication, contextualization, and cognition: Patterns & processes of frames’ influence on people’s interpretations of the EU constitution. The Netherlands: Eburon, Delft.
Zurück zum Zitat Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Epic and novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Epic and novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 363–399.CrossRef Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: Surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 363–399.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136.CrossRef Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks. How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks. How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett, W. L. (2003). New media power: The internet and global activism. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield. Bennett, W. L. (2003). New media power: The internet and global activism. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.CrossRef Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blaschke, S., Schoeneborn, D., & Seild, D. (2012). Organizations as networks of communication episodes: Turning the network perspective inside out. Organization Studies, 33(7), 879–906.CrossRef Blaschke, S., Schoeneborn, D., & Seild, D. (2012). Organizations as networks of communication episodes: Turning the network perspective inside out. Organization Studies, 33(7), 879–906.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 436–455.CrossRef Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 436–455.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bronn, P. S., & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20, 207–222. Bronn, P. S., & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20, 207–222.
Zurück zum Zitat Capriotti, P. (2011). Communicating corporate social responsibility through the internet and social media. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. New York: Wiley. Capriotti, P. (2011). Communicating corporate social responsibility through the internet and social media. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. New York: Wiley.
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll, C. E., & McCombs, M. E. (2003). Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public’s images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 36–46.CrossRef Carroll, C. E., & McCombs, M. E. (2003). Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public’s images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(1), 36–46.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Caruana, R., & Crane, A. (2008). Constructing consumer responsibility: Exploring the role of corporate communications. Organization Studies, 29(12), 1495–1519.CrossRef Caruana, R., & Crane, A. (2008). Constructing consumer responsibility: Exploring the role of corporate communications. Organization Studies, 29(12), 1495–1519.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Casselman, B. (2010). Chevron ad campaign answers critics hard-on. Wall Street Journal, October 18. Casselman, B. (2010). Chevron ad campaign answers critics hard-on. Wall Street Journal, October 18.
Zurück zum Zitat Castelló, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 11–29.CrossRef Castelló, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 11–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238–266. Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238–266.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen, C. C., & Meindl, J. R. (1991). The construction of leadership images in the popular press: The case of Donald Burr and people express. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 521–551.CrossRef Chen, C. C., & Meindl, J. R. (1991). The construction of leadership images in the popular press: The case of Donald Burr and people express. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 521–551.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Chouliaraki, L., & Morsing, M. (2010). Media, organizations, and identity. London: Palgrave MacMillan. Chouliaraki, L., & Morsing, M. (2010). Media, organizations, and identity. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen, L. T., & Cheney, G. (2000). Self-absorption and self-seduction in the Corporate Identity Game. In M. Schultz, M. J. Hatch, & M. H. Larsen (Eds.), The expressive organization. Linking identity, reputation and the corporate brand (pp. 246–270). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Christensen, L. T., & Cheney, G. (2000). Self-absorption and self-seduction in the Corporate Identity Game. In M. Schultz, M. J. Hatch, & M. H. Larsen (Eds.), The expressive organization. Linking identity, reputation and the corporate brand (pp. 246–270). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen, L. T., & Cheney, G. (2011). Interrogating the Communicative dimensions of corporate social responsibility. In Ø. Ihlen, J. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), Handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 491–504). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Christensen, L. T., & Cheney, G. (2011). Interrogating the Communicative dimensions of corporate social responsibility. In Ø. Ihlen, J. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), Handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 491–504). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen, L. T., & Cornelissen, J. (2011). Bridging corporate and organizational communication: Review, development and a look to the future. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(3), 383–414.CrossRef Christensen, L. T., & Cornelissen, J. (2011). Bridging corporate and organizational communication: Review, development and a look to the future. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(3), 383–414.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Cheney, G. (2008). Corporate communications: Convention, complexity and critique. London: Sage. Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Cheney, G. (2008). Corporate communications: Convention, complexity and critique. London: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20(3), 372–393.CrossRef Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20(3), 372–393.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cooren, F. (1999). The organizing property of communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Cooren, F. (1999). The organizing property of communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Zurück zum Zitat Copenhagen. (2011). Social media for social purposes conference. Copenhagen Business School. Copenhagen. (2011). Social media for social purposes conference. Copenhagen Business School.
Zurück zum Zitat Cramer, J., Jonker, J., & van der Heijden, A. (2004). Making sense of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 215–222.CrossRef Cramer, J., Jonker, J., & van der Heijden, A. (2004). Making sense of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 215–222.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cramer, J., van der Heijden, A., & Jonker, J. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Making sense through thinking and acting. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 380–389.CrossRef Cramer, J., van der Heijden, A., & Jonker, J. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Making sense through thinking and acting. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 380–389.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat De Cock, C. (1998). Organisational change and discourse: Hegemony, resistance and reconstitution. M@n@gement, 1(1), 1–22. De Cock, C. (1998). Organisational change and discourse: Hegemony, resistance and reconstitution. M@n@gement, 1(1), 1–22.
Zurück zum Zitat Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. State University of New York. Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. State University of New York.
Zurück zum Zitat Deetz, S. (1995). Transforming communication, transforming business: Building responsive and responsible workplaces. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Deetz, S. (1995). Transforming communication, transforming business: Building responsive and responsible workplaces. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Djelic, M., & Quack, S. (2012). The power of ‘limited liability’—Transnational communities and cross-border governance. In C. Marquis, M. Lounsbury, & R. Greenwood (Eds.), Communities and organizations. research in the sociology of organization (pp. 73–109). Djelic, M., & Quack, S. (2012). The power of ‘limited liability’—Transnational communities and cross-border governance. In C. Marquis, M. Lounsbury, & R. Greenwood (Eds.), Communities and organizations. research in the sociology of organization (pp. 73–109).
Zurück zum Zitat Eisenegger, M., & Schranz, M. (2011). CSR—Moralisierung des reputations managements. In J. von Raupp, S. Jarolimek, F. Schultz, & F. Wiesbaden (Eds.), Handbuch Corporate Social Responsibility, Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Grundlagen und empirische Fallstudien (pp. 71–96). Eisenegger, M., & Schranz, M. (2011). CSR—Moralisierung des reputations managements. In J. von Raupp, S. Jarolimek, F. Schultz, & F. Wiesbaden (Eds.), Handbuch Corporate Social Responsibility, Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Grundlagen und empirische Fallstudien (pp. 71–96).
Zurück zum Zitat Elving, W., Golob, U., Nielsen, A. E., Podnar, K., Schultz, F., & Thomson, C. (forthcoming). CSR and communication: The communication of the ethical position of an organization. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. Elving, W., Golob, U., Nielsen, A. E., Podnar, K., Schultz, F., & Thomson, C. (forthcoming). CSR and communication: The communication of the ethical position of an organization. Corporate Communications: An International Journal.
Zurück zum Zitat Esrock, S., & Leichty, G. (1998). Social responsibility and corporate web pages: Self-presentation or agenda-setting? Public Relations Review, 24(3), 305–319.CrossRef Esrock, S., & Leichty, G. (1998). Social responsibility and corporate web pages: Self-presentation or agenda-setting? Public Relations Review, 24(3), 305–319.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension. Towards a new economics. New York: The Free Press. Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension. Towards a new economics. New York: The Free Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernando, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the wake of the Asian Tsunami: Effect of time on the genuineness of CSR initiatives. European Management Journal, 8(1), 68–79.CrossRef Fernando, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the wake of the Asian Tsunami: Effect of time on the genuineness of CSR initiatives. European Management Journal, 8(1), 68–79.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fieseler, C., Fleck, M., & Meckel, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the blogosphere. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 599–614.CrossRef Fieseler, C., Fleck, M., & Meckel, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the blogosphere. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 599–614.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Flohr, A., Rieth, L., Schwindenhammer, S., & Wolf, K. D. (2010). The role of business in global governance: Corporations as norm entrepreneurs. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRef Flohr, A., Rieth, L., Schwindenhammer, S., & Wolf, K. D. (2010). The role of business in global governance: Corporations as norm entrepreneurs. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fombrun, C. (2005). Building corporate reputation through CSR initiatives: Evolving standards. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(1), 7–11.CrossRef Fombrun, C. (2005). Building corporate reputation through CSR initiatives: Evolving standards. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(1), 7–11.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks. A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks. A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedland, L. A., Hove, T., & Rojas, H. (2006). The networked public sphere. Javnost—The Public, 13(4), 5–26. Friedland, L. A., Hove, T., & Rojas, H. (2006). The networked public sphere. Javnost—The Public, 13(4), 5–26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gardberg, N., & Fombrun, C. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31, 329–346.CrossRef Gardberg, N., & Fombrun, C. (2006). Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31, 329–346.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.CrossRef Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.CrossRef Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giroux, H. (2006). It was such a handy term: Management fashions and pragmatic ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6), 1227–1260.CrossRef Giroux, H. (2006). It was such a handy term: Management fashions and pragmatic ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6), 1227–1260.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Göbbels, M. (2002). Reframing corporate social responsibility: The contemporary conception of a fuzzy notion. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam. Göbbels, M. (2002). Reframing corporate social responsibility: The contemporary conception of a fuzzy notion. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Zurück zum Zitat Gond, J. P., & Matten, D. (2007). Rethinking the business-society interface: Beyond the functionalist gap, ICCSR Research Paper Series. Nottingham: Nottingham University Business School. Gond, J. P., & Matten, D. (2007). Rethinking the business-society interface: Beyond the functionalist gap, ICCSR Research Paper Series. Nottingham: Nottingham University Business School.
Zurück zum Zitat Gond, J. P., Kang, J., & Moon, J. (2011). The government of self-regulation: On the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Economy and Society, 40(4), 640–671.CrossRef Gond, J. P., Kang, J., & Moon, J. (2011). The government of self-regulation: On the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Economy and Society, 40(4), 640–671.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Guthey, E., & Morsing, M. (forthcoming). CSR and the mediated emergence of strategic ambiguity CSR. Journal of Business Ethics. Guthey, E., & Morsing, M. (forthcoming). CSR and the mediated emergence of strategic ambiguity CSR. Journal of Business Ethics.
Zurück zum Zitat Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D., & Wickert, C. (2012). Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 815–845.CrossRef Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D., & Wickert, C. (2012). Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 815–845.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reasons and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Bacon Press. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reasons and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Bacon Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Habermas, J. (2001). The postnational constellation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Habermas, J. (2001). The postnational constellation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayward, M., & Rindova, V. (2004). Believing one’s own press: The causes and consequences of CEO celebrity. Strategic Management Journal, 25(7), 637–653.CrossRef Hayward, M., & Rindova, V. (2004). Believing one’s own press: The causes and consequences of CEO celebrity. Strategic Management Journal, 25(7), 637–653.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J. R., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 497–527.CrossRef Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J. R., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 497–527.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporation communication and impression management—New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 55–68.CrossRef Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporation communication and impression management—New perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 55–68.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ihlen, Ø., Bartlett, J., & May, S. (2011). The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. London: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRef Ihlen, Ø., Bartlett, J., & May, S. (2011). The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. London: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jahdi, K. S., & Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 103–113.CrossRef Jahdi, K. S., & Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 103–113.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economic, 3(2), 305–360.CrossRef Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economic, 3(2), 305–360.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437. Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.
Zurück zum Zitat Koschmann, M. A., Kuhn, T. R., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 332–354.CrossRef Koschmann, M. A., Kuhn, T. R., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 332–354.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility. Doing the most good for your company and your cause. New Jersey Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility. Doing the most good for your company and your cause. New Jersey
Zurück zum Zitat Krotz, F. (2007). Mediatisierung: Fallstudien zum Wandel von Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. Krotz, F. (2007). Mediatisierung: Fallstudien zum Wandel von Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Laufer, W. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 250–261. Laufer, W. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 250–261.
Zurück zum Zitat Leitch, S., & Davenport, S. (2007). Strategic ambiguity as a discourse practice: The role of keywords in the discourse on “Sustainable” biotechnology. Discourse Studies, 9(1), 43–61.CrossRef Leitch, S., & Davenport, S. (2007). Strategic ambiguity as a discourse practice: The role of keywords in the discourse on “Sustainable” biotechnology. Discourse Studies, 9(1), 43–61.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lozano, J. M. (2005). Towards the relational corporation: From managing stakeholder relationship to building stakeholder relationships (Waiting for Copernicus). Corporate Governance, 5(2), 60–77.CrossRef Lozano, J. M. (2005). Towards the relational corporation: From managing stakeholder relationship to building stakeholder relationships (Waiting for Copernicus). Corporate Governance, 5(2), 60–77.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRef Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRef Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat May, S. (2011). Organizational communication and corporate social responsibility. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 87–109). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRef May, S. (2011). Organizational communication and corporate social responsibility. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 87–109). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat May S., Cheney, G., & Roper, J. (Eds.) (2007). The debate over corporate social responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press. May S., Cheney, G., & Roper, J. (Eds.) (2007). The debate over corporate social responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRef Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell, R. K., Angle, B. R., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–865. Mitchell, R. K., Angle, B. R., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–865.
Zurück zum Zitat Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2001). Emergence of communication networks. In F. M. Jatblin & L. L. Utnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. New York: Sage. Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2001). Emergence of communication networks. In F. M. Jatblin & L. L. Utnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods. New York: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon, J., & Vogel, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, government, and civil society. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Moon, J., & Vogel, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, government, and civil society. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Morsing, M., & Beckmann, S. (Eds). (2006). Strategic CSR Communication. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishers. Morsing, M., & Beckmann, S. (Eds). (2006). Strategic CSR Communication. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.CrossRef Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Mutch, N., & Aitken, R. (2009). Being fair and being seen to be fair: Corporate reputation and CSR partnerships. Australasian Marketing Journal, 17(2), 92–98.CrossRef Mutch, N., & Aitken, R. (2009). Being fair and being seen to be fair: Corporate reputation and CSR partnerships. Australasian Marketing Journal, 17(2), 92–98.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nijhof, A., & Jeurissen, R. (2006). Editorial: A sensemaking perspective on corporate social responsibility: Introduction to the special issue. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 316–322.CrossRef Nijhof, A., & Jeurissen, R. (2006). Editorial: A sensemaking perspective on corporate social responsibility: Introduction to the special issue. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 316–322.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., & Reynes, S. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organizational Studies, 24, 195–216.CrossRef Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F., & Reynes, S. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organizational Studies, 24, 195–216.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. (2006). Corporative legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71–88.CrossRef Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. (2006). Corporative legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71–88.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere, democracy in a digital age. Malden, MA: Polity Press. Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere, democracy in a digital age. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (1997). Managing multiple identities: Discourse legitimacy and resources in the UK refugee system. Organization, 4(2), 159–185.CrossRef Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (1997). Managing multiple identities: Discourse legitimacy and resources in the UK refugee system. Organization, 4(2), 159–185.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pomering, A. (2011). Communicating corporate social responsibility through corporate image advertising. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 379–398). Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRef Pomering, A. (2011). Communicating corporate social responsibility through corporate image advertising. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 379–398). Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12). Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12).
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review.
Zurück zum Zitat Putnam, L. L., & Nicotera, A. M. (2008). Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication. Oxford: Routledge. Putnam, L. L., & Nicotera, A. M. (2008). Building theories of organization: The constitutive role of communication. Oxford: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Raupp, J., Jarolimek, S., & Schultz, F. (2011). Handbuch CSR. Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Grundlagen, disziplinäre Zugänge und methodische Herausforderungen. Mit Glossar. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. Raupp, J., Jarolimek, S., & Schultz, F. (2011). Handbuch CSR. Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Grundlagen, disziplinäre Zugänge und methodische Herausforderungen. Mit Glossar. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRef Scherer, A., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world—A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 889–931.CrossRef Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world—A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 889–931.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schoeneborn, D., & Trittin, H. (2013). Transcending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 193–211. Schoeneborn, D., & Trittin, H. (2013). Transcending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 193–211.
Zurück zum Zitat Schultz, F. (2011). Moral—Kommunikation—Organisation. Funktionen und Implikationen normativer Konzepte und Theorien des 20. und 21. Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. Schultz, F. (2011). Moral—Kommunikation—Organisation. Funktionen und Implikationen normativer Konzepte und Theorien des 20. und 21. Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
Zurück zum Zitat Schultz, F. (2013). Corporate social responsibility, reputation, and moral communication: A constructivist view. In C. Carroll (Ed.), Handbook of communication and corporate reputation (pp. 362–375). Wiley Blackwell. Schultz, F. (2013). Corporate social responsibility, reputation, and moral communication: A constructivist view. In C. Carroll (Ed.), Handbook of communication and corporate reputation (pp. 362–375). Wiley Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Schultz, F., Utz, S., & Göritz, A. (2011). Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 20–27.CrossRef Schultz, F., Utz, S., & Göritz, A. (2011). Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 20–27.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Schultz, F., & Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications. Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications: An international Journal, 15(1), 9–29.CrossRef Schultz, F., & Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications. Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications: An international Journal, 15(1), 9–29.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, XXXVIII, 225–243. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, XXXVIII, 225–243.
Zurück zum Zitat Shamir, R. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37(1), 1–19.CrossRef Shamir, R. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37(1), 1–19.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 21–571. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 21–571.
Zurück zum Zitat Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15, 350–363.CrossRef Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15, 350–363.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zurück zum Zitat Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.CrossRef Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vallaster, C., Lindgreen, A., & Maon, F. (2012). Strategically leveraging corporate social responsibility: A corporate branding perspective. California Management Review, 54(3), 34–60.CrossRef Vallaster, C., Lindgreen, A., & Maon, F. (2012). Strategically leveraging corporate social responsibility: A corporate branding perspective. California Management Review, 54(3), 34–60.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vogel, D. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47(Summer), 19–45.CrossRef Vogel, D. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47(Summer), 19–45.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waddock, S., & Googins, B. (2011). The paradoxes of communicating corporate social responsibility. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 23–44). Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRef Waddock, S., & Googins, B. (2011). The paradoxes of communicating corporate social responsibility. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 23–44). Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Waddock, S., & Graves, B. (1997). The corporate social performance—Financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRef Waddock, S., & Graves, B. (1997). The corporate social performance—Financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, S., & Groth, P. (2010). Measuring the dynamic bi-directional influence between content and social networks. Paper presented at 9th International Semantic Web Conference. Wang, S., & Groth, P. (2010). Measuring the dynamic bi-directional influence between content and social networks. Paper presented at 9th International Semantic Web Conference.
Zurück zum Zitat Wehmeier, S., & Schultz, F. (2011). Corporate communication and corporate social responsibility: A storytelling perspective. In O. Ihlen, J. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), Handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 467–488). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Wehmeier, S., & Schultz, F. (2011). Corporate communication and corporate social responsibility: A storytelling perspective. In O. Ihlen, J. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), Handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 467–488). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Zurück zum Zitat Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Zurück zum Zitat Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiggins, J. (2008). Arla says melamine scandal has cut China sales by half. Financial Times, November 10. Wiggins, J. (2008). Arla says melamine scandal has cut China sales by half. Financial Times, November 10.
Zurück zum Zitat Young, I. M. (2006). Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. Social Philosophy & Policy Foundation. Young, I. M. (2006). Responsibility and global justice: A social connection model. Social Philosophy & Policy Foundation.
Metadaten
Titel
The Construction of Corporate Social Responsibility in Network Societies: A Communication View
verfasst von
Friederike Schultz
Itziar Castelló
Mette Morsing
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1826-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

Journal of Business Ethics 4/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner