Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quality of Life Research
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 1/2014

01.02.2014

The development and validation of the Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16)© to assess the impact of disease on the partner or family member

verfasst von: Catherine Jane Golics, Mohammad Khurshid Azam Basra, Andrew Yule Finlay, Sam Salek

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

The impact of patients’ illness on family members has proven to be both widespread and severe. Currently, there is no generic instrument that can be used to measure the impact of illnesses on the partner or family members of patients. This study describes the development of the Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16)©.

Methods

A total of 30 items were generated from the content of previous interviews with family members. Qualitative and quantitative feedback from expert panels was collected. Items were reduced using both Rasch analysis and factor analysis, and full psychometric testing was carried out including construct validity and reliability.

Results

Collapsing response categories, removing misfitting items and combining residually correlating items produced a good fit to the Rasch model (n = 240, total χ 2 = 56.6, df = 48, p = 0.18). Factor analysis produced a 16-item measure with two factors. The FROM showed high internal consistency (n = 120, Cronbach’s α = 0.80–0.89), high reproducibility (n = 51, intraclass correlation = 0.85–0.92) and a mean completion time of 2 min. Construct validity was proven through the correlation between the FROM and the WHOQOL-BREF total scores (n = 119, r = −0.53–0.52, p < 0.001), and the correlation between the FROM and the patient’s overall health score (n = 120, r = −0.45–0.48, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The FROM-16 is both reliable and valid for use. It has a potential for wide use, including clinical (healthcare professionals or researchers in all medical specialties), industrial and social sciences. The FROM can be used to identify areas where family members need further support, as well as identify those individuals most affected by the patient’s illness.
Vorheriger Artikel The Functional Living Index-Cancer is a reliable and valid instrument in Chinese cancer patients
Nächster Artikel Few items in the thyroid-related quality of life instrument ThyPRO exhibited differential item functioning

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Basra, M. K., Sue-Ho, R., & Finlay, A. Y. (2007). The Family Dermatology Life Quality Index: Measuring the secondary impact of skin disease. British Journal of Dermatology, 156(3), 528–538.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Swanberg, J. E. (2006). Making it work: Informal caregiving, cancer, and employment. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 24(3), 1–18.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Poston, D., Turnbull, A., Park, J., Mannan, H., Marquis, J., & Wang, M. (2003). Family quality of life: A qualitative inquiry. Mental Retardation, 41(5), 313–328.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Basra, M. K., & Finlay, A. Y. (2007). The family impact of skin diseases: The Greater Patient concept. British Journal of Dermatology, 156(5), 929–937.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Kornblith, A. B., Herr, H. W., Ofman, U. S., Scher, H. I., & Holland, J. C. (1994). Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. The value of a data base in clinical care. Cancer, 73(11), 2791–2802.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Rees, J., O’Boyle, C., & MacDonagh, R. (2001). Quality of life: Impact of chronic illness on the partner. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 94(11), 563–566.PubMedCentralPubMed
7.
Breau, G. M., Camfield, C. S., Camfield, P. R., & Breau, L. M. (2008). Evaluation of the responsiveness of the Impact of Pediatric Epilepsy Scale. Epilepsy and Behaviour, 13(3), 454–457.CrossRef
8.
Ben-Gashir, M. A., Seed, P. T., & Hay, R. J. (2002). Are quality of family life and disease severity related in childhood atopic dermatitis? Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 16(5), 455–462.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Golics, C. J., Basra, M. K. A., Finlay, A. Y., & Salek, M. S. (2013). The impact of disease on family members: A critical aspect of medical care. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (in press).
10.
Golics, C. J., Salek, M. S., Basra, M. K. A., & Finlay, A. Y. (2013). The impact of patients’ disease on family quality of life: An experience from 26 specialties. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. doi:10.​1177/​0141076812472616​.
11.
Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299–310.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221–233.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Haynes, N. S., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 238–247.CrossRef
14.
Jones, P. W., Harding, G., Berry, P., Wiklund, I., Chen, W. H., & Kline Leidy, N. (2009). Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. European Respiratory Journal, 34(3), 648–654.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Pallant, J. F., & Tennant, A. (2007). An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: An example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46(Pt 1), 1–18.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Hansen, T., Lambert, H. C., & Faber, J. (2012). Validation of the Danish version of the McGill Ingestive Skills Assessment using classical test theory and the Rasch model. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(10), 859–868.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Fisher, W. P. (1992). Reliability statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6(3), 238.
18.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.CrossRef
19.
Pallant, J. F. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version 12) (2nd ed.). In J. F. Pallant. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
20.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for number of factors. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 1(2), 245–276.CrossRef
21.
Finch, H. (2006). Comparison of the performance of varimax and promax rotations: Factor structure recovery for dichotomous items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43, 39–52.CrossRef
22.
Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRef
23.
Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2008). Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to their development and use (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
24.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Issacs, B. J., Brown, I., Brown, R. I., Baum, N., Myerscough, T., Neikrug, S., et al. (2007). The international family quality of life project: Goals and description of a survey tool. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 4(3), 177–185.CrossRef
26.
Stein, R. E., & Riessman, C. K. (1980). The development of an impact-on-family scale: Preliminary findings. Medical Care, 18(4), 465–472.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Golics, C. J., Basra, M. K. A., Salek, M. S., & Finlay, A. Y. (2011). Diseases profoundly affect the quality of life of family members of patients. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 131(Suppl 2), S39.
28.
Grant, J. S., & Davis, L. L. (1997). Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(3), 269–274.CrossRef
29.
Uhlig, T., Lillemo, S., Moe, R. H., Stamm, T., Cieza, A., Boonen, A., et al. (2007). Reliability of the ICF core set for rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 66(8), 1078–1084.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Heppner, P. P., Kivlighan, D. M., & Wampold, B. E. (1992). Research design in counseling. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
31.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319.CrossRef
32.
Ponterotto, J. G., & Ruckdeschel, D. E. (2007). An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105(3 Pt 1), 997–1014.PubMed
33.
Housman, T. S., Patel, M. J., Camacho, F., Feldman, S. R., Fleischer, A. B., Jr, & Balkrishnan, R. (2002). Use of the Self-Administered Eczema Area and Severity Index by parent caregivers: Results of a validation study. British Journal of Dermatology, 147(6), 1192–1198.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Ware, J. E., Jr, & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The development and validation of the Family Reported Outcome Measure (FROM-16)© to assess the impact of disease on the partner or family member
verfasst von
Catherine Jane Golics
Mohammad Khurshid Azam Basra
Andrew Yule Finlay
Sam Salek
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2014
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0457-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Quality of Life Research 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Brief Communication

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Italian version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot and ankle diseases

OriginalPaper

Cognitive interviewing of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

OriginalPaper

Should patients perception of health status be integrated in the prognostic assessment of heart failure patients? A prospective study

OriginalPaper

Don’t middle your MIDs: regression to the mean shrinks estimates of minimally important differences

Brief Communication

Psychometric analysis of the Swedish translation of the WHO well-being index

OriginalPaper

PROMIS® Parent Proxy Report Scales for children ages 5–7 years: an item response theory analysis of differential item functioning across age groups

Premium Partner

    Bildnachweise