Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics 3/2021

27.04.2020 | Original Paper

The Effect of Large Corporate Donors on Non-profit Performance

verfasst von: Andrew R. Finley, Curtis Hall, Erica Harris, Stephen J. Lusch

Erschienen in: Journal of Business Ethics | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Using a dataset of corporate philanthropic gifts of $1 million or more, we examine the influence of corporate donors on the performance of recipient non-profit organizations (NPOs). We find that corporate donors positively influence NPO performance, specifically in the form of higher revenues per employee, program ratios, and fundraising returns. We find little evidence that large foundation or individual donors similarly enhance organizational performance. In additional analysis, we find that large corporate donations matter when the corporation is more likely to have influence over the recipient NPO. These findings suggest that corporate donors provide the monitoring and expertise needed to enhance organizational performance beyond simply providing funding to NPOs. Our results are robust to a two-stage model and propensity score matching to address endogeneity concerns. While prior research has examined the effect of corporate philanthropy on donor organization performance, we contribute to the literature by examining whether corporate philanthropy also improves recipient organization performance.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
We treat gifts from other grant-making entities as foundation gifts. When donations come from a foundation identified by the Million Dollar List as a corporate foundation (e.g., AT&T Foundation), we consider that donation as coming from the corporation (e.g., AT&T). The Million Dollar list is accessible at www.​milliondollarlis​t.​org.
 
2
A stream of literature examines NPOs’ manipulation of the program ratio (i.e., Yetman and Yetman 2013) by understating administrative or fundraising expenses. We expect corporate donors to be better able to detect program ratio manipulation, such that corporate philanthropy recipients should be less likely to appear better performing because of a manipulated program ratio. Further, while any manipulation would impact measurement of the ProgramRatio and FundraisingRatio, it does not impact the RevPerEmployee metric.
 
3
To further alleviate concerns about a mechanical relationship, we remove any gifts included in the Million Dollar List database from our RevPerEmployee or FundraisingRatio outcome variables measured in year t. Our results are robust to this modification.
 
4
Our results are robust to excluding NPOs without fundraising expenses from the analysis.
 
5
Of the 1184 NPO-years receiving a large corporate gift, 242 do not receive large gifts from foundations or individuals, 490 receive a large gift from a foundation but not an individual, 42 receive a large gift from an individual but not a foundation, and 410 receive gifts from foundations and individuals.
 
6
Multiplying the coefficient estimate of 0.413 in the RevPerEmployee specification by the standard deviation of CorporateDonorAmount (0.064) indicates a 2.7 percent increase in revenue per employee. We then multiply this percentage by the average unlogged revenue per employee in our sample, $389,597, to derive the $10,298 increase for the average NPO. For the FundraisingRatio specification, multiplying the coefficient estimate of 0.068 by the standard deviation of CorporateDonorAmount yields a 0.004 increase in the FundraisingRatio, which represents a 0.5 percent increase for the average NPO with an 86.3 percent fundraising ratio. We then multiply this percent increase by the average fundraising revenue in our sample, $57.8 M, to derive how much more fundraising revenue the average NPO retains.
 
7
We attempt to identify whether officers or directors from the corporate donor obtain seats on the NPOs board, but are not able to find sufficient matches using BoardEX to identify corporate officer and director names and data from Guidestar to identify NPO board members. When we regress BoardSize on corporate philanthropy and the controls from our model, excluding BoardSize2, we note that NPOs receiving large corporate gifts have 12.4 percent larger boards, suggesting that NPOs may create additional board seats corporate donors fill to better oversee NPO operations.
 
8
For example, assume over the seven-year period that an NPO has received $1 M donations from three different corporate donors. Donor one has donated once in the seven-year period. Donor two has donated three times in the seven-year period. Donor three has donated five times in the seven-year period. In this example, CorporateRepeatTotal will take the value of five (i.e., the number of times the most frequent donor has donated in the seven-year period). A limitation of this approach is that we do not have matched pairs of corporate donors and NPO recipients prior to 2005 to assess relationship durability over an even longer span.
 
9
We note that our results are robust to alternatively specifying a fully interacted model.
 
10
Once again, we note that our results are robust to alternatively specifying a fully interacted model.
 
11
We remove corporate donor recipients from the sample where the underlying information necessary to compute the donor characteristic is not available. Drawing inferences from these tests is difficult because many NPOs receive gifts from multiple corporations during the corporate philanthropy measurement window. Where this occurs, our proxy for each of our cross-sectional tests is an average of the various corporate donors, weighted by the gift amount.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aggarwal, R. K., Evans, M. E., & Nanda, D. (2012). Nonprofit boards: Size, performance and managerial incentives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1–2), 466–487.CrossRef Aggarwal, R. K., Evans, M. E., & Nanda, D. (2012). Nonprofit boards: Size, performance and managerial incentives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1–2), 466–487.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Amazeen, M. (2011). Gap (RED): Social responsibility campaign or window dressing? Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 167–182.CrossRef Amazeen, M. (2011). Gap (RED): Social responsibility campaign or window dressing? Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 167–182.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Andreasen, A. R. (1996). Profits for nonprofits: Find a corporate partner. Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 47–50. Andreasen, A. R. (1996). Profits for nonprofits: Find a corporate partner. Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 47–50.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1_suppl), 69–97.CrossRef Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1_suppl), 69–97.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012a). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(5), 726–758.CrossRef Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012a). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(5), 726–758.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012b). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses. Part 2: Partnership processes and outcomes. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 929–968.CrossRef Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012b). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses. Part 2: Partnership processes and outcomes. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 929–968.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Baber, W. R., Daniel, P. L., & Roberts, A. A. (2002). Compensation to managers of charitable organizations: An empirical study of the role of accounting measures of program activities. The Accounting Review, 77(3), 679–693.CrossRef Baber, W. R., Daniel, P. L., & Roberts, A. A. (2002). Compensation to managers of charitable organizations: An empirical study of the role of accounting measures of program activities. The Accounting Review, 77(3), 679–693.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Babiak, K., & Thibault, L. (2009). Challenges in multiple cross-sector partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(1), 117–143.CrossRef Babiak, K., & Thibault, L. (2009). Challenges in multiple cross-sector partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(1), 117–143.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Balmer, J., Fukukawa, K., & Gray, E. (2007). The Nature and Management of Ethical Corporate Identify: A Commentary on Corporate Identify, Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 7–15.CrossRef Balmer, J., Fukukawa, K., & Gray, E. (2007). The Nature and Management of Ethical Corporate Identify: A Commentary on Corporate Identify, Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 7–15.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783–827.CrossRef Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783–827.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Brown, W. A., & Guo, C. (2010). Exploring the key roles for nonprofit boards. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(3), 536–546.CrossRef Brown, W. A., & Guo, C. (2010). Exploring the key roles for nonprofit boards. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(3), 536–546.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Callen, J. L., Klein, A., & Tinkelman, D. (2003). Board composition, committees, and organizational efficiency: The case of nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 493–520.CrossRef Callen, J. L., Klein, A., & Tinkelman, D. (2003). Board composition, committees, and organizational efficiency: The case of nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 493–520.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Core, J. E., Guay, W. R., & Verdi, R. S. (2006). Agency problems of excess endowment holdings in not-for-profit firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41(3), 307–333.CrossRef Core, J. E., Guay, W. R., & Verdi, R. S. (2006). Agency problems of excess endowment holdings in not-for-profit firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41(3), 307–333.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cornforth, C. (2012). Nonprofit governance research: Limitations of the focus on boards and suggestions for new directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1116–1135.CrossRef Cornforth, C. (2012). Nonprofit governance research: Limitations of the focus on boards and suggestions for new directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1116–1135.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dawkins, J., & Lewis, S. (2003). CSR in stakeholder expectations: And their implication for company strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 185–193.CrossRef Dawkins, J., & Lewis, S. (2003). CSR in stakeholder expectations: And their implication for company strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 185–193.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Desai, M. A., & Yetman, R. J. (2015). Constraining managers without owners: Governance of the not-for-profit enterprise. Journal of Government & Nonprofit Accounting, 4(1), 53–72.CrossRef Desai, M. A., & Yetman, R. J. (2015). Constraining managers without owners: Governance of the not-for-profit enterprise. Journal of Government & Nonprofit Accounting, 4(1), 53–72.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.CrossRef Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fisman, R., & Glenn Hubbard, R. (2005). Precautionary savings and the governance of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11–12), 2231–2243.CrossRef Fisman, R., & Glenn Hubbard, R. (2005). Precautionary savings and the governance of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11–12), 2231–2243.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Frankental, P. (2001). Corporate social responsibility—A PR invention? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(1), 18–23.CrossRef Frankental, P. (2001). Corporate social responsibility—A PR invention? Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 6(1), 18–23.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gautier, A., & Pache, A. (2015). Research on corporate philanthropy: a review and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 343–369.CrossRef Gautier, A., & Pache, A. (2015). Research on corporate philanthropy: a review and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 343–369.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Giving USA Foundation. (2018). Giving USA 2018: The annual report of philanthropy for the Year 2017. Indianapolis, IN: The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. Giving USA Foundation. (2018). Giving USA 2018: The annual report of philanthropy for the Year 2017. Indianapolis, IN: The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaeser, E. L. (2003). Introduction. In E. L. Glaeser (Ed.), The governance of not-for-profit firms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Glaeser, E. L. (2003). Introduction. In E. L. Glaeser (Ed.), The governance of not-for-profit firms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenlee, J., Fischer, M., Gordon, T., & Keating, E. (2007). An investigation of fraud in nonprofit organizations: Occurrences and deterrents. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4), 676–694.CrossRef Greenlee, J., Fischer, M., Gordon, T., & Keating, E. (2007). An investigation of fraud in nonprofit organizations: Occurrences and deterrents. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4), 676–694.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harris, E. E. (2014). The impact of board diversity and expertise on nonprofit performance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(2), 113–130.CrossRef Harris, E. E. (2014). The impact of board diversity and expertise on nonprofit performance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(2), 113–130.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Harris, E. E., & Neely, D. (2018). Determinants and consequences of nonprofit transparency. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance. Forthcoming. Harris, E. E., & Neely, D. (2018). Determinants and consequences of nonprofit transparency. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance. Forthcoming.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris, E., Petrovits, C. M., & Yetman, M. H. (2015). The effect of nonprofit governance on donations: Evidence from the revised form 990. The Accounting Review, 90(2), 579–610.CrossRef Harris, E., Petrovits, C. M., & Yetman, M. H. (2015). The effect of nonprofit governance on donations: Evidence from the revised form 990. The Accounting Review, 90(2), 579–610.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.CrossRef Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2000). Board practices of especially effective and less effective local nonprofit organizations. The American Review of Public Administration, 30(2), 146–160.CrossRef Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2000). Board practices of especially effective and less effective local nonprofit organizations. The American Review of Public Administration, 30(2), 146–160.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Keeler, E. B., Melnick, G., & Zwanzinger, J. (1999). The changing effects of competition on non-profit and for-profit hospital pricing behavior. Journal of Health Economics, 18(1), 69–86.CrossRef Keeler, E. B., Melnick, G., & Zwanzinger, J. (1999). The changing effects of competition on non-profit and for-profit hospital pricing behavior. Journal of Health Economics, 18(1), 69–86.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2010). Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 182–200. Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2010). Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 182–200.
Zurück zum Zitat Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2015). Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 592–636.CrossRef Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2015). Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 592–636.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy, M., Arenas, D., & Batista, J. M. (2015). Value creation in cross-sector collaborations: the roles of experience and alignment. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 145–162.CrossRef Murphy, M., Arenas, D., & Batista, J. M. (2015). Value creation in cross-sector collaborations: the roles of experience and alignment. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 145–162.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Neely, D. G., & Tinkelman, D. (2013). The Whip Cancer Walk: A case of real earnings management in the nonprofit sector. Journal of Accounting Education, 31(3), 294–309.CrossRef Neely, D. G., & Tinkelman, D. (2013). The Whip Cancer Walk: A case of real earnings management in the nonprofit sector. Journal of Accounting Education, 31(3), 294–309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Newton, A. N. (2015). Executive compensation, organizational performance, and governance quality in the absence of owners. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 195–222.CrossRef Newton, A. N. (2015). Executive compensation, organizational performance, and governance quality in the absence of owners. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 195–222.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Okten, C., & Weisbrod, B. A. (2000). Determinants of donations in private nonprofit markets. Journal of Public Economics, 75(2), 255–272.CrossRef Okten, C., & Weisbrod, B. A. (2000). Determinants of donations in private nonprofit markets. Journal of Public Economics, 75(2), 255–272.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat O’Regan, K., & Oster, S. M. (2005). Does the structure and composition of the board matter? The case of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 21(1), 205–227.CrossRef O’Regan, K., & Oster, S. M. (2005). Does the structure and composition of the board matter? The case of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 21(1), 205–227.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ostrower, F., & Stone, M. (2006). Boards of nonprofit organizations: Research trends, findings, and prospects for the future. In W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Ostrower, F., & Stone, M. (2006). Boards of nonprofit organizations: Research trends, findings, and prospects for the future. In W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrovits, C., Shakespeare, C., & Shih, A. (2011). The causes and consequences of internal control problems in nonprofit organizations. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 325–357.CrossRef Petrovits, C., Shakespeare, C., & Shih, A. (2011). The causes and consequences of internal control problems in nonprofit organizations. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 325–357.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row Publishers. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinkston, T., & Carroll, A. (1996). A retrospective examination of CSR orientations: Have they changed? Journal of Business Ethics, 15(2), 199–206.CrossRef Pinkston, T., & Carroll, A. (1996). A retrospective examination of CSR orientations: Have they changed? Journal of Business Ethics, 15(2), 199–206.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.
Zurück zum Zitat Pucciarelli, F., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Business Horizons, 59(3), 311–320.CrossRef Pucciarelli, F., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Business Horizons, 59(3), 311–320.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufin, C. (2010). Odd couples: understanding the governance of firm-NGO alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 55–70.CrossRef Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufin, C. (2010). Odd couples: understanding the governance of firm-NGO alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 55–70.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2003). Comparing big givers and small givers: Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 195–211.CrossRef Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2003). Comparing big givers and small givers: Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 195–211.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Seitanidi, M. M., & Crane, A. (2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design, and institutionalization of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 413–429.CrossRef Seitanidi, M. M., & Crane, A. (2009). Implementing CSR through partnerships: Understanding the selection, design, and institutionalization of nonprofit-business partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 413–429.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Useem, M. (1987). Corporate philanthropy. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Useem, M. (1987). Corporate philanthropy. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Tulder, R., Seitandidi, M. M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 1–17.CrossRef Van Tulder, R., Seitandidi, M. M., Crane, A., & Brammer, S. (2016). Enhancing the impact of cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 1–17.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. (2008). Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19(1), 143–159.CrossRef Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. (2008). Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19(1), 143–159.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1159–1181.CrossRef Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1159–1181.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Weisbrod, B. A., & Dominguez, N. D. (1986). Demand for collective goods in private nonprofit markets: Can fundraising expenditures help overcome free-rider behavior? Journal of Public Economics, 30(1), 83–96.CrossRef Weisbrod, B. A., & Dominguez, N. D. (1986). Demand for collective goods in private nonprofit markets: Can fundraising expenditures help overcome free-rider behavior? Journal of Public Economics, 30(1), 83–96.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yetman, M. H., & Yetman, R. J. (2012). The effects of governance on the accuracy of charitable expenses reported by nonprofit organizations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 738–767.CrossRef Yetman, M. H., & Yetman, R. J. (2012). The effects of governance on the accuracy of charitable expenses reported by nonprofit organizations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 738–767.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yetman, M. H., & Yetman, R. J. (2013). Do donors discount low-quality accounting information? The Accounting Review, 88(3), 1041–1067.CrossRef Yetman, M. H., & Yetman, R. J. (2013). Do donors discount low-quality accounting information? The Accounting Review, 88(3), 1041–1067.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zolotoy, L., O’Sullivan, D., & Klein, J. (2019). Character cues and contracting costs: The relationship between philanthropy and the cost of capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 497–515.CrossRef Zolotoy, L., O’Sullivan, D., & Klein, J. (2019). Character cues and contracting costs: The relationship between philanthropy and the cost of capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 497–515.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Effect of Large Corporate Donors on Non-profit Performance
verfasst von
Andrew R. Finley
Curtis Hall
Erica Harris
Stephen J. Lusch
Publikationsdatum
27.04.2020
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Journal of Business Ethics / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04516-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

Journal of Business Ethics 3/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner