nach oben

Erschienen in:

21.07.2021

The effect of usability on the intention to use the e-learning system in a sustainable way: A case study at Universitas Indonesia

verfasst von: Arief Ramadhan, Achmad Nizar Hidayanto, Ghina Almira Salsabila, Intan Wulandari, Jessica Alexia Jaury, Nadia Nabila Anjani

Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

E-Learning has been massively used in higher education, one of which is in Universitas Indonesia. The e-learning system in Universitas Indonesia is called Student Centered E-Learning Environment Universitas Indonesia (SCELE UI). This research determines the effect of usability on the intention to use SCELE UI in a sustainable way. The Expectation Confirmation Model (ECM) is used as a basis of the research model. Perceived Usability, Learnability, Presentation, Navigation and Error variables are added to the model. The Partial Least Square is used to analyze and test the model. Of the 12 proposed hypotheses, 10 hypotheses were accepted and 2 hypotheses were rejected. This research gives theoretical and practical contributions. On the theoretical side, this research successfully proposes and examines the integration of usability and ECM in the context of sustain e-learning usage intention. This research reveals the indirect effect of Perceived Usability on continued usage intention of the e-learning system. On the practical side, this research also provides insights for developers and universities that can help them to effectively foster the improvement of their system that can ensure sustained usage by their students.

Vorheriger Artikel Mobile learning for early reading in Cambodia

Nächster Artikel Automatic recommendation system based on hybrid filtering algorithm

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abran, A., Khelifi, A., Suryn, W., & Seffah, A. (2003). Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards. Software Quality Journal, 11, 325–338.CrossRef

Ahmadi, N., Romoser, M. R., Guarnieri, L. M., Kry, T. G., & Porter-Fyke, E. I. (2019). Application of eye tracking technology in naturalistic usability assessment of an academic library website. In T. Z. Ahram and C. Falcão (Eds.): AHFE 2018, AISC 794 (pp. 729–740). Switzerland: Springer Nature.

Akrimi, Y., & Khemakhem, P. R. (2014). An analysis of perceived usability, perceived interactivity and website personality and their effects on consumer satisfaction. International Journal of Management Excellence, 2(3), 227–236.CrossRef

Akugizibwe, E., & Ahn, J. Y. (2020). Perspectives for effective integration of e-learning tools in university mathematics instruction for developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 889–903.CrossRef

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86.CrossRef

Alotaibi, K. J. (2017). Gathering of usability requirements by Saudi e-learning software developers. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT) (pp. 255–261). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITECH.2017.8080009

Alshammari, M., Anane, R., & Hendley, R. J., et al. (2015). Design and usability evaluation of adaptive e-learning systems based on learner knowledge and learning style. In J. Abascal (Ed.), INTERACT 2015, Part II, LNCS 9297 (pp. 584–591). Switzerland.

Alshehri, A., Rutter, M., & Smith, S. (2019). Assessing the relative importance of an e-learning system’s usability design characteristics based on students’ preferences. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 839–855. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.839CrossRef

Alves, R., & Nunes, N. J. (2016). Ceiling and threshold of PaaS tools: The role of learnability in tool adoption. In C. Bogdan et al. (Eds.): HCSE 2016/HESSD 2016, LNCS 9856 (pp. 335–347). Switzerland: Springer.

Ambalov, I. A. (2018). A meta-analysis of IT continuance: An evaluation of the expectation-confirmation model. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 1561–1571.CrossRef

Ammar, L. S., Trabelsi, A., & Mahfoudhi, A. (2016). A model-driven approach for usability engineering of interactive systems. Software Quality Journal, 24, 301–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-014-9266-y1892CrossRef

Ardito, C., Costabile, M. F., De Marsico, M., Lanzilotti, R., Levialdi, S., Roselli, T., & Rossano, V. (2006). An approach to usability evaluation of e-learning applications. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4, 270–283.CrossRef

Arning, K., Himmel, S., & Ziefle, M. (2016). You can(’t) teach an old dog new tricks: Analyzing the learnability of manufacturing software systems in older users. In J. Zhou and G. Salvendy (Eds.): ITAP 2016, PartII, LNCS 9755 (pp. 277–288). Switzerland: Springer.

Belanche, D., Casalo´, L., & Guinalı, M. (2012). Website usability, consumer satisfaction and the intention to use a website: The moderating effect of perceived risk. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19, 124–132.CrossRef

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.CrossRef

Bolen, M.C. (2020). Exploring the determinants of users’ continuance intention in smartwatches. Technology in Society, 60.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101209

Bourges-Waldegg, P., & Scrivener, A. (1998). Meaning: The central issue in cross-cultural HCI design. Interacting with Computers, 9(3), 287–309.CrossRef

Cabero-Almenara, J., Marín-Díaz, V., & Sampedro-Requena, B. E. (2016). Meta-analysis of research in e-learning published in Spanish journals. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(25). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0023-0

Casalo, L., Flavian, C., & Guinalíu, M. (2008). The role of perceived usability, reputation, satisfaction and consumer familiarity on the website loyalty formationprocess. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 325–345.CrossRef

Castañeda, L., & Selwyn, N. (2018). More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(22). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0109-y

Chen, C. P., Lai, H. M., & Ho, C. Y. (2015). Why do teachers continue to use teaching blogs? The roles of perceived voluntariness and habit. Computers & Education, 82, 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.017CrossRef

Chen, S. C., Yen, D. C., & Peng, S. C. (2018a). Assessing the impact of determinants in e-magazines acceptance: An empirical study. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 57, 49–58.CrossRef

Chen, Y., Yang, L., Zhang, M., & Yang, J. (2018b). Central or peripheral? Cognition elaboration cues’ effect on users’ continuance intention of mobile health applications in the developing markets. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 116, 33–45.CrossRef

Cheng, M., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2019). Cultural divides in acceptance and continuance of learning management system use: A longitudinal study of teenagers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 1613–1637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09680-5CrossRef

Cheng, Y. M. (2021). Can tasks and learning be balanced? A dual-pathway model of cloud-based e-learning continuance intention and performance outcomes. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2020-0440

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Macoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research. Mahwah (pp. 295–336). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Choi, B. C. F., & Lee, N. T. (2015). A study on mobile fitness application usage. In F. F. H. Nah & C. H. Tan (Eds.), HCIB 2015, LNCS 9191 (pp. 446–457). Switzerland.

Chow, W.C., & Shi, S. (2014). Investigating students’ satisfaction and continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, (pp. 1145 – 1149). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.193

Daghan, G., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2016). Modeling the continuance usage intention of online learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.066CrossRef

Darmawan, A. K., Siahaan, D. O., Susanto, T. D., Hoiriyah, Umam, B. A., & Bakir, B. (2020). Understanding Indonesian citizen's continuance itention to use mobile-based smart city: A perspective of modified expectation confirmation model (M-ECM). In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITACEE50144.2020.9239157

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008CrossRef

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success : A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.CrossRef

Demangeot, C., & Broderick, A. J. (2006). Exploring the experiential intensity of online shopping environments. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 9(4), 325–351.CrossRef

Digión, L. B., & Sosa, M., et al. (2012). Communicability and usability for the interface in e-learning. In F. V. Cipolla-Ficarra (Ed.), ADNTIIC 2011, LNCS 7547 (pp. 165–172). Berlin.

Eltahir, M. E., Al-Qatawneh, S., Al-Ramahi, N., & Alsalhi, N. (2019). The perspective of students and faculty members on the efficiency and usability of e-learning courses at Ajman university: A case study. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 388–403. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.590CrossRef

Eze, S. C., Chinedu-Eze, V. C., & Bello, A. O. (2018). The utilisation of e-learning facilities in the educational delivery system of Nigeria: a study of M-University. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(34). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0116-z

Fang, X., & Holsapple, C. W. (2011). A model-driven approach for usability engineering of interactive systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 13, 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-010-9227-3CrossRef

Fernandez, A., Abrahão, S., & Insfran, E. (2011). A web usability evaluation process for model-driven web development. In H. Mouratidis and C. Rolland (Eds.): CAiSE 2011, LNCS 6741 (pp. 108–122). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Findlater, L., & Mcgrenere, J. (2008). Impact of screen size on performance, awareness, and user satisfaction with adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1247–1256). https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357249

Findlater, L., Moffatt, K., Mcgrenere, J., & Dawson, J. (2009). Ephemeral adaptation: The use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1655–1664). https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518956

Flavián, C., Longás, L., & Lozano, J. (2013). E-learning and market orientation in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 18, 69–83.CrossRef

Fu, X., Zhang, J., & Chan, F. T. S. (2018). Determinants of loyalty to public transit: A model integrating satisfaction-loyalty theory and expectation-confirmation theory. Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice, 113, 476–490.

Gajos, K., Wobbrock, J., & Weld, D. (2008). Improving the performance of motor-impaired users with automatically - generated, ability-based interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1257–1266). https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357250

Gamberini, L., & Valentini, E. (2003). Web usability today: Theories, approach and methods. In G. Riva & C. Galimberti (Eds.), Towards CyberPsychology: Mind, Cognitions and Society in the Internet Age (pp. 109–126). Amsterdam.

Geng, R., & Tian, J. (2015). Improving web navigation usability by comparing actual and anticipated usage. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 45(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2014.2363125MathSciNetCrossRef

Ghavifekr, S., & Mahmood, H. (2017). Factors affecting use of e-learning platform (SPeCTRUM) among University students in Malaysia. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 75–100.CrossRef

Greenberg, S., & Witten, I. (1985). Adaptive personalized interfaces - A question of viability. Behaviour and Information Technology, 4, 31–45.CrossRef

Harefa, E. B. (2020). Usability measurement of google classroom applications as e-learning for students of department of building engineering education IKIP gunung sitoli. Indonesian Science Education Research, 2(1), 11–14.

Heimgartner, R. (2005). Towards cross-cultural adaptive human-machine-interaction in automotive navigation systems. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Internationalisation of Products and Systems (pp. 97–111).

Heimgartner, R., Tiede, L. W., Leimbach, J., Zehner, S., & Windl, H. (2007). Towards cultural adaptability to broaden universal access in future interfaces of driver information systems. In Stephanidis C. (Ed.), Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Ambient Interaction (pp. 383–392). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012). Using partial least squares path modeling in advertising research: Basic concepts and recent issues. Handbook of Research on International Advertising. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781001042.00023CrossRef

Höck, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2006). Strategic networks in the software industry: An empirical analysis of the value continuum. In IFSAM VIIIth World Congress.

Holden, H. (2009). Assessing teachers’ acceptance and usage behavior of current job-related technologies. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Maryland Baltimore, County, Baltimore, MD. UMI # 3389007

Holzinger, A. (2005). Usability engineering methods for software developers. Communications of the ACM, 48(1), 71–74.CrossRef

Hook, K. (1997). Evaluating the utility and usability of an adaptive hypermedia system. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (pp. 179–186). https://doi.org/10.1145/238218.238320

Hussain, W., Hussain, O. K., Hussain, F. K., & Khan, M. Q. (2017). Usability evaluation of english, local and plain languages to enhance on-screen text readability: A use case of Pakistan. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-016-0146-0CrossRef

Ibrahim, Y., & Hidayat-ur-Rehman, I. (2021). COVID-19 crisis and the continuous use of virtual classes. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 8(4), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2021.04.014CrossRef

Islam, A. K. M. N. (2011). Antecedents of post-adoption expectations. T. Skersys et al. (Eds.): I3E 2011, IFIP AICT 353 (pp. 269–281). IFIP International Federation for Information Processing.

ISO 9241–11. (2018). Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 11: usability: Definitions and concepts. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en. Accessed 3 Mar 2021

Kabir, M. A., Hossin, M. A., Mahmud, S. M. H., Noori, S. R. H., & Bhuiyan, T. (2018). Usability evaluation of mobile applications: An empirical analysis of supply chain management systems. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer and Communications (pp. 2525–2531). https://doi.org/10.1109/CompComm.2018.8780831

Kersten, G., Kersten, M., & Rakowski, W. (2002). Software and culture: Beyond the internationalization of the interface. Journal of Global Information Management, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2002100105

Kiili, K. (2002). Evaluating WAP usability: “What Usability?” Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education. https://doi.org/10.1109/WMTE.2002.1039245CrossRef

Kim, B. (2010). An empirical investigation of mobile data service continuance: Incorporating the theory of planned behavior into the expectation–confirmation model. Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 7033–7039.CrossRef

Kim, M. H., Ko, S. M., Mun, J. S., Ji, Y. G., & Jung, M. R. (2007). A usability study on personalized EPG (pEPG) UI of digital TV. In J. Jacko (Ed.): Human-Computer Interaction, Part III, HCII 2007, LNCS 4552 (pp. 892–901). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Kipkurui, N. G. P., & Ikoha, A. (2014). Evaluating usability of e-learning systems in universities. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(8).https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2014.050815

Kumar, A., Tadayoni, R., & Sorensen, L. T. (2015). Metric based efficiency analysis of educational erp system usability-using fuzzy model. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Image Information Processing (pp. 382–386). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIIP.2015.7414801

Kumar, J. A., & Bervell, B. (2019). Google Classroom for mobile learning in higher education: Modelling the initial perceptions of students. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 1793–1817.CrossRef

Kumar, J. A., Bervell, B., & Osman, S. (2020). Google classroom: Insights from Malaysian higher education students’ and instructors’ experiences. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4175–4195.CrossRef

Lacka, E., & Chong, A. (2016). Usability perspective on social media sites’ adoption in the B2B context. Industrial Marketing Management, 54, 80–91.CrossRef

Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation–confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54, 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002

Leung, L., & Chen, C. (2019). E-health/m-health adoption and lifestyle improvements: Exploring the roles of technology readiness, the expectation-confirmation model, and health-related information activities. Telecommunications Policy, 43, 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.01.005CrossRef

Lin, C. C. (2013). Exploring the relationship between technology acceptance model and usability test. Information Technology and Management, 14, 243–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-013-0162-0CrossRef

Lin, T. C., Huang, S. L., & Hsu, C. J. (2015). A dual-factor model of loyalty to IT product – The case of smartphones. International Journal of Information Management, 35, 215–228.CrossRef

Mabanza, N. (2018). Evaluating the usability of flat panel displays: A case study of the faculty of engineering and information technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems (icABCD). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICABCD.2018.8465477

Milicevic, V., Denic, N., Milicevic, Z., Arsic, L., Spasic-Stojkovic, M., Petkovic, D., Stojanovic, J., Krkic, M., Milovancevic, N. S., & Jovanovic, A. (2021). E-learning perspectives in higher education institutions. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120618CrossRef

Moraga, M. A., Calero, C., Piattini, M., & Diaz, O. (2007). Improving a portlet usability model. Software Quality Journal, 15, 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-006-9008-xCrossRef

Nascimento, B., Oliveira, T., & Tam, C. (2018). Wearable technology: What explains continuance intention in smartwatches? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.03.017CrossRef

Ngampornchai, A., & Adams, J. (2016). Students’ acceptance and readiness for e-learning in Northeastern Thailand. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(34). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0034-x

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston, EEUU: AP Professional

Nouman, N., & Umer, A. (2019). Web navigation and usability analysis of educational websites in Pakistan. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Digital Information Processing and Communications (ICDIPC) (pp. 57–62). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIPC.2019.8723704

Obienu, A. C., & Amadin, F. I. (2020). User acceptance of learning innovation: A structural equation modelling based on the GUAM framework. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10341-xCrossRef

Oghuma, A. P., Libaque-Saenz, C. F., Wong, S. F., & Chang, Y. (2016). An expectation-confirmation model of continuance intention to use mobile instant messaging. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 34–47.CrossRef

Oghuma, A. P., Chang, Y., Libaque-Saenz, C. F., Park, M. C., & Rho, J. J. (2015). Benefit-confirmation model for post-adoption behavior of mobile instant messaging applications: A comparative analysis of KakaoTalk and Joyn in Korea. Telecommunications Policy, 39, 658–677.CrossRef

Olsina, L., Santos, L., & Lew, P. (2014). Evaluating mobileapp usability: A holistic quality approach. In S. Casteleyn, G. Rossi, and M. Winckler (Eds.): ICWE 2014, LNCS 8541 (pp. 111–129). Switzerland: Springer.

Oulasvirta, A., Engelbrecht, K., Jameson, A., & Möller, S. (2019). The usability of spoken dialogue system design. Designing Human Interface in Speech Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24156-6_7CrossRef

Pangestu, H., & Karsen, M. (2016). Evaluation of usability in online learning. In International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech) (pp. 267–271). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2016.7930342

Pirhonen, A. (2005). Supporting a user facing a novel application: Learnability in OOBE. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 9, 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-004-0323-6CrossRef

Rafla, T., Robillard, P. N., & Desmarais, M. (2007). A method to elicit architecturally sensitive usability requirements: Its integration into a software development process. Software Quality Journal, 15, 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-006-9009-9CrossRef

Raita, E., & Oulasvirta, A. (2014). Mixed feelings? The relationship between perceived usability and user experience in the wild. In The 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (pp. 26–30)

Ramadiani, A. R., Selamat, M. H., Abdullah, R., Pa, N. C., & Azainil. (2016). User difficulties in e-learning system. In 2nd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech). https://doi.org/10.1109/icsitech.2016.7852626

Rauf, A., Batool, S., Rehman, S. U., & Shahid, A. A. (2010). Survey based usability evaluation of Ms Word. In Proceedings of the International Conference on User Science Engineering (i-USEr) (pp. 195–198). https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716750

Reinecke, K., & Bernstein, A. (2007). Culturally adaptive software: Moving beyond internationalization. In Aykin N. (Ed.) Usability and Internationalization. Global and Local User Interfaces (pp. 201–210). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

Reinecke, K., & Bernstein, A. (2011). Improving performance, perceived usability, and aesthetics with culturally adaptive user interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/1970378.1970382CrossRef

Reinecke, K., Schenkel, S., & Bernstein, A. (2010). Modeling a user’s culture. In E. G. Blanchard & D. Allard (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Culturally - Aware Information Technology: Perspectives and Models (pp. 242–264). USA.

Revythi, A., & Tselios, N. (2019). Extension of technology acceptance model by using system usability scale to assess behavioral intention to use e-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2341–2355.CrossRef

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Jan-Michael, B. (2015). SmartPLS 3. http://www.smartpls.com. Accessed 14 March 2021

Rosenbaum, S. (1989). Usability evaluations versus usability testing: When and why? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(4), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.44533CrossRef

Safsouf, Y., Mansouri, K., & Poirier, F. (2020). Smart learning environment, measure online student satisfaction: a case study in the context of higher education in Morocco. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEIT48248.2020.9113189

Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K., & Tarhini, A. (2019). Factors affecting the E-learning acceptance: A case study from UAE. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 509–530.CrossRef

Saputra, R., Isnaini, N., Adhy, S., Bahtiar, N., Abidin, Z., & Suharto, E. (2020). Factors influencing student’s adoption of e-learning in Indonesian secondary schools. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICoS51170.2020.9299109

Sauro, J. (2013). How to measure learnability. MeasuringU mixed-methods research and software firm. https://measuringu.com/measure-learnability/. Accessed 12 March 2021

Scholtz, B. M., Mahmud, I., & Ramayah, T. (2016). Does usability matter? an analysis of the impact of usability on technology acceptance in ERP settings. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 11, 309–330. https://doi.org/10.28945/3591CrossRef

Scholtz, B., Calitz, A., & Cilliers, C. (2013). Usability evaluation of a medium-sized ERP system in higher education. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 16(2), 148–161.

Seaborn, K., Satoh, Y., & Fels, D. I. (2016). usability and safety of a hud during powered chair navigation: A pilot study. In M. Antona and C. Stephanidis (Eds.): UAHCI 2016, Part III, LNCS 9739 (pp. 628–638). Switzerland: Springer.

Sears, A., & Shneiderman, B. (1994). Split menus: Effectively using selection frequency to organize menus. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/174630.174632

Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R. B., & Padda, H. K. (2006). Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model. Software Quality Journal, 14, 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-006-7600-8CrossRef

Sholiq, Auda, R.A., Subriadi, A.P., Tjahyanto, A., & Wulandari, A.D. (2021). Measuring software quality with usability, efficiency, and portability characteristics. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 704. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/704/1/012039

Singh, A., & Wesson, J. L. (2009). Evaluation criteria for assessing the usability of ERP systems. In Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists (pp. 87–95). New York : ACM.

Stone, R. W., & Baker-Eveleth, L. (2013). Students’ expectation, confirmation, and continuance intention to use electronic textbooks. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 984–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.007CrossRef

Suzianti, A., & Paramadini, S.A. (2021). Continuance intention of e-learning: The Condition and Its Connection with Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7 (97). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010097

Tam, C., Santos, D., & Oliveira, T. (2020). Exploring the influential factors of continuance intention to use mobile Apps: Extending the expectation confirmation model. Information Systems Frontiers, 22, 243–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9864-5CrossRef

Tesavrita, C., Suryadi, K., & Wiratmadja, I. I. (2016). Web Usability and Self-Efficacy in Promoting Individual Knowledge Sharing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) (pp. 16–20). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2016.7797827

Venkatesh, V., & Goyal, S. (2010). Expectation disconfirmation and technology adoption: Polynomial modeling and response surface analysis. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 281–303.CrossRef

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., Chan, F. K. Y., Hu, P. J. H., & Brown, S. A. (2011). Extending the twostage information systems continuance model: Incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context. Information Systems Journal, 21(6), 527–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00373CrossRef

Wang, L. Y. K., Lew, S. K., Lau, S. H., & Leow, M. C. (2019). Usability factors predicting continuance of intention to use cloud e-learning application. Heliyon, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01788

Watanabe, W. M., de Mattos Fortes, R. P., & Pimentel, M. D. G. C. (2011). The link-offset-scale mechanism for improving the usability of touch screen displays on the web. In P. Campos et al. (Eds.): INTERACT 2011, Part III, LNCS 6948 (pp. 356–372). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Weichbroth, P. (2020). Usability of mobile applications: A systematic literature study. IEEE Access, 8, 55563–55577. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2981892CrossRef

Xu, F., & Du, J. T. (2018). Factors influencing users’ satisfaction and loyalty to digital libraries in Chinese universities. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 64–72.CrossRef

Yeung, P., & Jordan, E. (2006). Understanding the continued usage of business e-learning courses in HK corporations. In D. Kumar & J. Tumer, (Eds.): Education for the 21st Century-Impact of ICT and Digital Resources (pp. 245–254). Boston: Springer.

Yu, Y., & Liu, Z. (2008). Research on system usability of digital libraries in China. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Electronic Design, Test & Applications. https://doi.org/10.1109/DELTA.2008.22CrossRef

Yuan, H., Lao, C. C., Hu, S. L., Zhang, Q. L., & Liang B. K. (2019). Design and usability of the touch-based interface of CNC presses. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Application (ITCA) (pp. 39–52). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITCA49981.2019.00016

Yusuf, S. U., Taslim, J., Adnan, W. A. W., & Baharudin, S. K. (2014). Usability evaluation of human resource management information system (HRMIS). In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr) (pp. 204–209). https://doi.org/10.1109/IUSER.2014.7002703

Zali, Z., & Fadzlah, A. F. A. (2016). An initial theoretical usability evaluation model for assessing defence mobile e-based application system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICICTM) (pp. 198–202). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICTM.2016.7890800

Zardari, B. A., Hussain, Z., Arain, A. A., Rizvi, W. H., & Vighio, M. S. (2020). QUEST e-learning portal: Applying heuristic evaluation, usability testing and eye tracking. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00774-zCrossRef

Titel: The effect of usability on the intention to use the e-learning system in a sustainable way: A case study at Universitas Indonesia
verfasst von: Arief Ramadhan
Achmad Nizar Hidayanto
Ghina Almira Salsabila
Intan Wulandari
Jessica Alexia Jaury
Nadia Nabila Anjani
Publikationsdatum: 21.07.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Education and Information Technologies / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10613-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

A comparative study of computer and mobile-assisted pronunciation training: The case of university students in Taiwan

Effect of instructional methods on pre-service science teachers learning outcomes: a meta-analysis

A meta-analysis and bibliographic review of the effect of nine factors on online learning outcomes across the world

A systematic literature review of web-based student response systems: Advantages and challenges

Student online communication skills: Enhancing the comparability of self-reports among different groups of students

Identification and evaluation of technology trends in K-12 education from 2011 to 2021