nach oben

Marketing Letters

Erschienen in:

01.09.2016

The effects of behavioral, cognitive, and decisional control in co-production service experiences

verfasst von: Carol L. Esmark, Stephanie M. Noble, John E. Bell, David A. Griffith

Erschienen in: Marketing Letters | Ausgabe 3/2016

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Companies are encouraging customers to participate in the process of creating and delivering their offering(s). In this strategy, not only do providers select a level of customer co-production, but also the level of customer control. This study examines the effects of control types (cognitive, behavioral, and decisional) and their interaction on customers’ affective responses in service operations with varying levels of co-production. An extensive two-study design, across two service contexts, tests the interaction of different levels of co-production and control types on customers’ affective responses. Results show when decisional control is low, one additional control type (behavioral or cognitive) in the operational process can compensate for low decisional control. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Vorheriger Artikel The unrealized value of incentivized eWOM recommendations

Nächster Artikel A method for evaluating and selecting field experiment locations

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Past research established that positive affective responses lead to repeat patronage intentions with a provider (e.g., Bearden and Teel 1983). We included behavioral intentions in our survey and replicated these relationships.

Scenarios were moderately realistic for participants. The mean for realism was 5.53 (on a 9-point scale anchored by “1” not at all realistic to “9” very realistic).

An incremental F test shows that including the 3-way interaction adds significantly to the model [F(1, 199) = 12.19, p < 0.001) over the main effects and the 2-way interactions in low co-production. The R-squared change is 0.05. The results show that the 3-way interaction does not add significantly to the model for the high co-production situation, as expected (p = 0.482; R-squared change = 0.002).

Studies 1–2 used realism as a control. Since Study 2 data consisted of consumers’ real experiences, several additional controls ensured we could differentiate control and co-production effects from other variables. These controls consisted of information control (Wu and Lin 2006; Ariely 2000), how acceptable the person found the tasks to be and their ability to complete the tasks, as well as aspects of satisfaction with the experience.

In Study 2, the incremental F test shows that adding the 3-way interaction adds marginal significance to the model [F(1136) = 2.69, p = 0.10] over the main effects and the 2-way interactions. The change in R-squared is 0.011. However, as in Study 1, the 3-way interaction in high co-production does not add significantly to the model (p = 0.947, R-squared change = 0.004).

Arevalo F (2009) The Role of Emotional Attachment in Co-Production (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma.

Ariely, D. (2000). Controlling the information flow: effects on consumers’ decision making and preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 233–248.CrossRef

Auh, Bell, S. J., McLeod, C. S., & Shih, E. (2007). Co-production and customer loyalty in financial services. Journal of Retailing, 83(3), 359–370.CrossRef

Averill, J. R. (1973). Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress. Psychological Bulletin, 80(4), 286–303.CrossRef

Bearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. (1983). Selected determinants of customer satisfaction and complain reports. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(February), 21–28.CrossRef

Bendapudi, N., & Leone, R. P. (2003). Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production. Journal of Marketing, 67(1), 14–28.CrossRef

Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic.

Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: a theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic.

Cermak, D. S. P., File, K. M., & Prince, R. A. (1994). Customer participation in service specification and delivery. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10(2), 90–100.CrossRef

Dabholkar, P. A. (1996). Consumer evaluations of new technology based self-service options: an investigation of alternative models of service quality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1), 29–51.CrossRef

Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2000). Understanding the customer base of service providers: an examination of the differences between switchers and stayers. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 65–87.CrossRef

Globerson, S., & Maggard, M. J. (1991). A conceptual model of self-service. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 11(4), 33–43.CrossRef

Gruen, T. W., Summer, J. O., & Acito, F. (2000). Relationship marketing activities, commitment, and membership behaviors in professional associations. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 34–49.CrossRef

Hilton, T., & Hughes, T. (2013). Co-production and self-service: the application of service dominant logic. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(7/8), 861–881.CrossRef

Hui, M. K., & Bateson, J. E. G. (1991). Perceived control and the effects of crowding and consumer choice on the service experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 174–184.CrossRef

Hui, M. K. D., & Tse, K. (1996). What to tell consumers in waits of different lengths: an integrative model of service evaluations. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 81–90.CrossRef

Johnson, D. S., Bardhi, F., & Dunn, D. T. (2008). Understanding how technology paradoxes affect customer satisfaction with self-service technology: the role of performance ambiguity and trust in technology. Psychology and Marketing, 25, 416–443.CrossRef

Kellogg, D. L., Youngdahl, W., & Bowen, D. E. (1997). On the relationship between customer participation and satisfaction: two frameworks. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(3), 206–219.CrossRef

Langer, E. J., & Saegert, S. (1977). Crowding and cognitive control. Journal of Personality and Social Psych, 35(3), 175–182.CrossRef

Lengnick-Hall, C. A. (1996). Customer contributions to quality: a different view of the customer-oriented firm. Academy of Management Review, 21(July), 791–824.

Li, M., Choi, T. Y., Rabinovich, E., & Crawford, A. (2013). Self-service operations at research stores: the role of inter-customer interactions. Production and Operations Management, 22(4), 888–914.CrossRef

Lovelock, C. H., & Young, R. F. (1979). Look to consumers to increase productivity. Harvard Business Review, 57, 168–179.

Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & O’Brien, M. (2007). Competing through service: insights from service-dominant logic. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 5–18.CrossRef

Marzocchi, G. L., & Zammit, A. (2006). Self-scanning technologies in retail: determinants of adoption. The Service Industries Journal, 26(6), 651–669.CrossRef

Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-service technologies: understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 50–64.CrossRef

Miller, E. G., Kahn, B. E., & Luce, M. F. (2008). Consumer wait management strategies for negative service events: a coping approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(5), 635–648.CrossRef

Mills, R. T., & Krantz, D. S. (1979). Information, choice, and reactions to stress: a field experiment in a blood bank with a laboratory analogue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(4), 608–620.CrossRef

Mills, P. K., Chase, R. B., & Margulies, N. (1983). Motivating the client/employee system as a service production strategy. The Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 301–310.

Oliver, R. W., Rust, R. T., & Varki, S. (1998). Real time marketing. Marketing Management, 7(4), 28–37.

Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96.CrossRef

Roth, A. V., & Menor, L. J. (2003). Insights into service operations management: a research agenda. Production and Operations Management, 12(2), 145–164.CrossRef

Sawyer, A. G. (1975). Demand artifacts in laboratory experiments in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(4), 20–30.CrossRef

Shockley, J., Roth, A. V., & Fredendall, L. D. (2011). An information-processing approach for evaluating in-store retail operational design strategies. Decision Sciences, 42(3), 619–653.CrossRef

Skjølsvik, T., Løwendahl, B. R., Kvålshaugen, R., & Fosstenløkke, S. M. (2007). Choosing to learn and learning to choose: strategies for client co-production and knowledge development. California Management Review, 49(3), 110–128.CrossRef

Underhill, P. (2009). Why we buy: the science of shopping. New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc.

Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRef

Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 345–411.CrossRef

Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 131–134.CrossRef

Wu, L. L., & Lin, J. Y. (2006). The quality of consumers’ decision‐making in the environment of e‐commerce. Psychology and Marketing, 23(4), 297–311.CrossRef

Xue, M., & Field, J. M. (2008). Service co-production with information stickiness and incomplete contracts: implications for consulting services design. Production and Operations Management, 17(3), 357–372.CrossRef

Xue, M., Hein, G. R., & Harker, P. T. (2005). Consumer and co-producer roles in e-service: analyzing efficiency and effectiveness of e-service designs. International Journal of Electronic Business, 3(2), 174–197.CrossRef

Titel: The effects of behavioral, cognitive, and decisional control in co-production service experiences
verfasst von: Carol L. Esmark
Stephanie M. Noble
John E. Bell
David A. Griffith
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Marketing Letters / Ausgabe 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0923-0645
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-059X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9348-z

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2016

Indicators of opinion leadership in customer networks: self-reports and degree centrality

When a picture’s worth a thousand words: The effects of visual construal priming on information acquisition and choice

From digital media influencers to celebrity endorsers: attributions drive endorser effectiveness

Assessing sales contest effectiveness: the role of salesperson and sales district characteristics

Investigating the impact of customer stochasticity on firm price discrimination strategies using a new Bayesian mixture scale heterogeneity model

The effect of attribute-based and alternative-based processing on consumer choice in context