nach oben

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Erschienen in:

01.03.2014

The impact of innovation intensity, scope, and spillovers on sales growth in Chinese firms

verfasst von: Suk Bong Choi, Christopher Williams

Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between innovation and sales growth of firms in China. Innovation theories suggest firms create the technological knowledge needed to have market impact with their products and drive sales growth in different ways. These include: (1) through firms’ overall innovation intensity, (2) through decisions on innovation scope (depth vs. diversity), and (3) through knowledge spillovers from technological neighbors. Little research exists on how effective these approaches are for emerging market firms in pursuit of growth. To address this, we integrate and test the effects of these different knowledge creation mechanisms using data from Chinese firms over a five-year period. Findings show that innovation intensity and knowledge spillovers positively impact sales growth. We also develop and test a model capturing the non-linear impact of innovation scope. As predicted, we find a U-shaped relationship for depth of innovation and an inverted U-shaped relationship for diversity of innovation.

Vorheriger Artikel Ownership structure and innovation: An emerging market perspective

Nächster Artikel How does slack affect product innovation in high-tech Chinese firms: The contingent value of entrepreneurial orientation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

We define innovation in this study as more than new technological development per se; it also includes new combinations of existing technologies as well as new ways of utilizing technology acquired from outside of the firm.

The IPC code of technological fields we applied was A Human necessities; B Performing operations, Transporting; C Chemistry and metallurgy; D Textiles and paper; E Fixed constructions; F Mechanical engineering, lighting, heating, weapons, blasting; G Physics; H Electricity (others).

Assuming away the effects of other variables, if any, the estimated regression equation for the non-linear model of the depth (DT) will be stated as: $ Sales\,Growth\left( {SG} \right)=3.18-1.21\left( {DT} \right)+0.78{{\left( {DT} \right)}^2}. $

To show how depth of innovation affects firm performance, a partial derivative of the non-linear regression equation is taken with respect to depth: $ \frac{{\partial \left( {SG} \right)}}{{\partial \left( {DT} \right)}}=-1.21+1.56\left( {DT} \right). $

Which will be 0, if DT = 0.77. This partial derivative will be negative if DT < 0.77; it will become positive if DT > 0.77. In other words, other factors being constant, the effect of depth of innovation on firm performance will be negative until innovation depth reaches 0.77.

In this way, the estimated regression equation for the non-linear model of the diversity (DI) will be stated as $ Sales\,Growth\left( {SG} \right)=3.18+0.99\left( {DI} \right)-0.99{{\left( {DI} \right)}^2}$. To show how diversity of innovation affects firm performance, a partial derivative of the non-linear regression equation is taken with respect to diversity:

$$ \frac{\partial (SG) }{\partial (DI) }=0.99-1.98(DI) $$

Which will be 0, if DI = 0.50. This partial derivative will be positive if DI < 0.50; it will become negative if DI > 0.50 in other words, other factors being constant, the effect of diversity of innovation on firm performance will be positive until innovation diversity reaches 0.50.

Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. 2001. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3): 197–220.

Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. 2001. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7): 521–543.

Arrow, K. J. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. In R. Nelson (Ed.). The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ashton, W. B., & Sen, R. K. 1989. Using patent information in technology business planning–Part I & II. Research Technology Management, 32(1): 36–42.

Auh, S., & Menguc, B. 2005. Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58: 1652–1661.

Bayus, B. L., Erickson, G., & Jacobson, R. 2003. The financial rewards of new product introductions in the personal computer industry. Management Science, 49(2): 197–210.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. 2004. Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33(10): 1477–1492.

Bernstein, J., & Mohnen, P. 1998. International R&D spillovers between US and Japanese R&D intensive sectors. Journal of International Economics, 44(2): 315–338.

Bierly, P., & Chakrabarti, A. 1996. Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue, 17: 123–135.

Bradley, M., Jarrell, G., & Kim, H. 1984. On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 39(3): 857–880.

Branstetter, L. G. 2001. Are knowledge spillovers international or intranational in scope? Microeconometric evidence from the US and Japan. Journal of International Economics, 53(1): 53–79.

Breschi, S., Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. 2000. Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Economic Journal, 110(April): 388–410.

Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. 1980. The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1): 239–253.

Carpenter, R. E., Lazonick, W., & O’Sullivan, M. 2003. The stock market and innovative capability in the new economy: The optical networking industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(5): 963–1034.

Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. 2002. R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92(4): 1169–1184.

Castrogiovanni, G. J. 2002. Organization task environments: Have they changed fundamentally over time?. Journal of Management, 28(2): 129–150.

Chaney, P. K., & Devinney, T. M. 1992. New product innovations and stock price performance. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 19(5): 677–695.

Chang, S. J., Chung, C., & Mahmood, I. P. 2006. When and how does business group affiliation promote firm innovation? A tale of two emerging economies. Organization Science, 17(5): 637–656.

Chang, P. L., & Shih, H. Y. 2004. The innovation systems of Taiwan and China: A comparative analysis. Technovation, 24: 529–539.

Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. 2000. Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 429–448.

Choi, S. B., Lee, S. H., & Williams, C. 2011. Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 40(3): 441–452.

Choi, S. B., Park, B. I., & Hong, P. 2012. Does ownership structure matter for firm technological innovation performance? The case of Korean firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3): 267–288.

Cohen, W., & Klepper, S. 1996. A reprise of size and R&D. Economic Journal, 106(July): 925–952.

Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128–152.

Crépon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairesse, J. 1998. Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7(2): 115–158.

Darroch, J. 2005. Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3): 101–115.

De Bondt, R. 1997. Spillovers and innovative activities. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(1): 1–28.

DeCarolis, D. M., & Deeds, D. L. 1999. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10): 953–968.

Dinopoulos, E., & Thompson, P. 1998. Schumpeterian growth without scale effects. Journal of Economic Growth, 3(4): 313–335.

Dosi, G. 1988. Sources, procedure and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3): 1120–1171.

Dosi, G., Giannetti, G., & Toninelli, P. A. 1992. Technology and enterprise in a historical perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1): 117–132.

Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2): 233–258.

Freeman, C. 1994. Technological revolutions and catching-up: ITC and NICs. In J. Fagerberg, B. Verspagen & N. von Tunzelman (Eds.). Dynamics of technology, trade and growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Froot, K. A., Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. 1994. A framework for risk management. Harvard Business Review, 72(6): 91–103.

Fung, M. K., & Chow, W. W. 2003. Identification of technological structures using patent statistics. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(4): 293–313.

Galunic, D. C., & Rodan, S. 1998. Resource recombination in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12): 1193–1201.

Garcia-Vega, M. 2006. Does technology diversification promote innovation? An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, 35(2): 230–246.

Geroski, P. 1994. Market structure, corporate performance and innovation activity. Oxford: Clarendon.

Grandstrand, O., & Oskarsson, C. 1994. Technology diversification in multi-tech corporations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 41(4): 355–364.

Greene, W. H. 1997. Econometric analysis. New York: Macmillan.

Griliches, Z. 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1): 92–116.

Griliches, Z. 1992. The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94(S): 29–47.

Gu, M., & Tse, E. 2010. Building innovative organizations in China: The “execution+” organization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1): 25–53.

Gu, S. 1999. China’s industrial technology: Market reform and organisational change. New York: Routledge.

Guan, J. C., & Ma, N. 2003. Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 23(9): 737–747.

Guan, J. C., Mok, C. K., Yam, C. M., Chin, K. S., & Pun, K. F. 2006. Technology transfer and innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese firms. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 73: 666–678.

Guan, J. C., Yam, R. C. M., Tang, E. P. Y., & Lau, A. K. W. 2009. Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition: Evidences in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 38: 802–812.

Halaby, C. N. 2004. Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 507–544.

Hall, B. 2002. A note on the bias in the Herfindahl based on count data. In A. Jaffe & M. Trajtenberg (Eds.). Patents, citations, and innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1994. Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School.

Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4): 716–749.

Hausman, J. A. 1978. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6): 1251–1272.

Helfat, C. E. 1997. Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5): 339–360.

Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. 2000. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 249–267.

Hsiao, C. 1986. Analysis of panel data. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hu, A. G., & Jefferson, G. H. 2004. Returns to research and development in Chinese industry: Evidence from state-owned enterprises in Beijing. China Economic Review, 15: 86–107.

Hu, A. G., & Jefferson, G. H. 2009. A great wall of patents: What is behind China’s recent patent explosion?. Journal of Development Economics, 90: 57–68.

Jaffe, A. B. 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. American Economic Review, 76(5): 984–1001.

Jaffe, A. B. 1998. The importance of spillovers in the policy mission of the advanced technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer, 23(2): 11–19.

Kamien, M. I., Muller, E., & Zang, I. 1992. Research joint ventures and R&D cartels. American Economic Review, 82(5): 1293–1306.

Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behaviour and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1183–1194.

Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. 1982. Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management, 12(1): 7–20.

Kim, J.-I. 2002. Total factor productivity growth in East Asia: Implications for the future. Asian Economic Papers, 1(2): 50–70.

Kim, L., & Nelson, R. R. 2000. Technology, learning and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kim, S. R. 1998. The Korean system of innovation and the semiconductor industry: A governance perspective. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(2): 275–309.

Kim, T. K., & Chang, S. M. 2005. The effects of patents on productivity in Korean manufacturing firms. Korean Economic Review, 53(3): 183–209 (in Korean).

Kotabe, M., Dunlap-Hinkler, D., Parente, R., & Mishra, H. A. 2007. Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(2): 259–282.

Lazonick, W. 2003. The theory of the market economy and the social foundations of the innovative enterprise. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24(1): 9–44.

Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1): 111–125.

Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Lerner, J. 1994. The important of patent scope: An empirical analysis. Rand Journal of Economics, 25: 319–333.

Leung, K., Chen, Z., Zhou, F., & Lim, K. 2011. The role of relational orientation as measured by face and renqing in innovative behavior in China: An indigenous approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-011-9277-1.

Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. 2001. Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 1123–1134.

Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. 2002. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 23(6): 469–490.

Li, J., & Zhou, C. H. 2008. Dual-edged tools of trade: How international joint ventures help and hinder capability building of Chinese firms. Journal of World Business, 43: 463–474.

Liu, H., Ding, X., Guo, H., & Luo, J. 2012. How does slack affect product innovation in high-tech Chinese firms: The contingent value of entrepreneurial orientation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:10.1007/s10490-012-9309-5.

Liu, X., & White, S. 2001. Comparing innovation systems: A framework and application to China’s transitional context. Research Policy, 30: 1091–1114.

Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. 1997. Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1): 83–117.

March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.

McGrath, R. G., & Nerkar, A. 2004. Real options reasoning and a new look at the investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1): 1–21.

Michie, J. 1998. Introduction: The internationalisation of the innovation process. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 5(3): 261–277.

Miller, D. J. 2006. Technological diversity, related diversification and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7): 601–619.

Molero, J., & Garcia, A. 2008. The innovative activity of foreign subsidiaries in the Spanish Innovation System: An evaluation of their impact from a sectoral taxonomy approach. Technovation, 28: 739–757.

Mu, Q. & Lee, K. 2005. Knowledge diffusion, market segmentation and technological catch up: The case of the telecommunication industry in China. Research Policy, 34(6): 759–783.

Narula, R., & Hagedoorn, J. 1999. Innovating through strategic alliances: Moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements. Technovation, 19: 283–294.

Nelson, R. 2004. The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research Policy, 33(3): 455–471.

Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

O’Sullivan, M. 2000. The innovative enterprise and corporate governance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(4): 393–416.

Pakes, A., & Griliches, Z. 1984. Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first look. In Z. Griliches (Ed.). R&D, patents and productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Pan, Y., Song, X., Goldschmidt, A., & French, W. A. 2010. A cross cultural investigation of work values among young executives in China and the USA. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 17: 283–298.

Park, J. Y. 1990. Testing for unit roots and cointegration by variable addition. Advances in Econometrics, 8: 107–133.

Park, B. I., & Ghauri, P. N. 2011. Key factors affecting acquisition of technological capabilities from foreign acquiring firms by small and medium sized local firms. Journal of World Business, 46: 116–125.

Redding, S. 2002. Path dependence, endogenous innovation and growth. International Economic Review, 43(4): 1215–1249.

Romer, P. 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): 71–102.

Rongping, M., & Wan, Q. 2008. The development of science and technology in China: A comparison with India and the United States. Technology in Society, 30: 319–329.

Saiki, T., Akano, Y., Watanabe, C., & Tou, Y. 2006. A new dimension of potential resources in innovation: A wider scope of patent claims can lead to new functionality development. Technovation, 26: 796–806.

Sakakibara, M., & Cho, D. 2002. Cooperative R&D in Japan and Korea: A comparison of industrial policy. Research Policy, 31(5): 673–692.

Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. Entrepreneurship as innovation. In R. Swedberg (Ed.). Entrepreneurship—The social science view: 51–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.

Shin, J., & Jalajas, D. 2010. Technological relatedness, boundary-spanning combination of knowledge and the impact of innovation: Evidence of an inverted-U relationship. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 21: 87–96.

Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. 2005. Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 259–276.

Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. 1996. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1): 21–38.

Sundbo, J. 1998. The theory of innovation: Entrepreneurs, technology and strategy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Suzuki, J., & Kodama, F. 2004. Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan: Two case studies of large Japanese firms. Research Policy, 33(3): 531–549.

Teece, D. J. 1988. Technological change and the nature of the firm. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.). Technical change and economic theory: 256–281. New York: Pinter Publishers.

Tegarden, L. F., Hatfield, D., & Echols, A. 1999. Doomed from the start: What is the value of selecting a future dominant design?. Strategic Management Journal, 20(6): 495–518.

Van den Bosch, F. A. J., Volberda, H. W., & de Boer, M. 1999. Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization Science, 10: 551–568.

van der Eerden, C., & Saelens, F. H. 1991. The use of science and technology indicators in strategic planning. Long Range Planning, 24(3): 18–25.

Vermeulen, F., & Barkema, H. 2002. Pace, rhythm, and scope: process dependence in building a profitable multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 637–653.

von Hippel, E. 1998. Economics of product development by users: The impact of sticky local information. Management Science, 44(5): 629–644.

Watanabe, C., Matsumoto, K., & Hur, J. Y. 2004. Technological diversification and assimilation of spillover technology: Canon’s scenario for sustainable growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(9): 941–959.

West, J., & Iansiti, M. 2003. Experience, experimentation and the accumulation of knowledge: The evolution of R&D in the semiconductor industry. Research Policy, 32(5): 809–825.

Whetten, D. A. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 29–55.

Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., & Peng, M. W. 2005. Guest editors’ introduction: Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 1–33.

Yam, R. C. M., Guan, J. C., Pun, K. F., & Tang, E. P. Y. 2004. An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: Some empirical findings in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 33(8): 1123–1140.

Yang, D., & Clarke, P. 2005. Globalisation and intellectual property in China. Technovation, 25(5): 545–555.

Yang, J., Liu, H., Gao, S., & Li, Y. 2012. Technological innovation of firms in China: Past, present, and future. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(3): 819–840.

Yang, Q., & Jiang, C. X. 2007. Location advantages and subsidiaries’ R&D activities in emerging economies: Exploring the effect of employee mobility. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(3): 341–358.

Zachariadis, M. 2003. R&D, innovation and technological progress: A test of the Schumpeterian framework without scale effects. Canadian Journal of Economics, 36(3): 566–586.

Zachariadis, M. 2004. R&D-induced growth in the OECD?. Review of Development Economics, 8(3): 423–439.

Zhang, Y., & Li, H. 2010. Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: The role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 88–109.

Zhang, Y., Li, H., & Schoonhoven, C. B. 2009. Intercommunity relationships and community growth in China’s high technology industries 1988–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 163–183.

Zhou, K. Z. 2006. Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: The case of China. Industrial Marketing Management, 35: 394–402.

Titel: The impact of innovation intensity, scope, and spillovers on sales growth in Chinese firms
verfasst von: Suk Bong Choi
Christopher Williams
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0217-4561
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9958
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9329-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Managerial ties, organizational learning, and opportunity capture: A social capital perspective

Transformational leadership, team climate, and team performance within the NPD team: Evidence from China

Erratum to: Asian family enterprises and family business research

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Unpacking the employee responses to ethical leadership: The role of collective moral emotion

Ownership structure and innovation: An emerging market perspective

Strategic action and customer mobility: Antecedents and consequences of strategic actions in the Korean mobile telecommunication service industry

Premium Partner