Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
MTZ-Fachkongress

Antriebe und Energiesysteme von morgen


Austausch von Automobil- und Energiewirtschaft

Am 14./15. Mai geht es in Chemnitz um die Mobilitätswende durch Elektro- und Wasserstofffahrzeuge.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Introduction Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2023 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

3. The Performance of Socially Responsible Investing: A Review

verfasst von : Lisa Gianmoena, Luca Spataro

Erschienen in: ESG Integration and SRI Strategies in the EU

Verlag: Springer Nature Switzerland

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter provides a comprehensive examination of the existing empirical literature on socially responsible investments (SRI) compared to traditional investments. More precisely, it focuses on analysing various studies that have explored the performance of SRI mutual funds and portfolios in comparison to non-SRI investments. The authors also discuss the different theories that support the possible outcomes of these studies. Our research indicates that SRI do not result in worse returns and seem to perform similarly to standard assets, but with less volatility, particularly during times of crisis. However, there are methodological issues in estimating the full financial and non-financial performance of SRI, leaving the question of whether SRI strategies outperform traditional investment strategies still unanswered. The authors suggest that future research should aim to assess the overall value of SRI, not just its financial returns, by developing new measures that consider both the economic and social value of SRI.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Vorheriges Kapitel Theory of Socially Responsible Investment: A Review
Nächstes Kapitel SRI: An Insight on the Evolution of Its Definition and a Focus on the European ESG Regulation
Fußnoten
1
We recall that fund managers mainly adopt three screening methods to identify SRI: negative screening (exclusion), positive screening (inclusion) and best in class (best performer in relation to the financial, social and environmental performance of each sector). Negative screening excludes companies involved in sectors that might be harmful to the environment or the society. Positive screening promotes companies with best ESG practices. Finally, the “best in class” screening selects those companies in a specific sector that demonstrate the best ESG credentials in their area of business. In some cases, companies identify a hybrid screening process considering all, or part of, the three methods mentioned above. (Capelle‐Blancard & Monjon, 2014; Erragraguy & Revelli, 2015; Leite & Cortez, 2015; Chap. 4).
 
Literatur
Angel, J. J., & Rivoli, P. (1997). Does ethical investing impose a cost upon the firm? A theoretical perspective. The Journal of Investing, 6(4), 57–61.
Auer, B. R. (2016). Do socially responsible investment policies add or destroy European stock portfolio value? Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 381–397.CrossRef
Auer, B. R., & Schuhmacher, F. (2016). Do socially (ir)responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 59, 51–62.CrossRef
Badía, G., Cortez, M. C., & Ferruz, L. (2020). Socially responsible investing worldwide: Do markets value corporate social responsibility? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2751–2764.CrossRef
Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1101–1122.CrossRef
Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320.CrossRef
Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Otten, R. (2007). The ethical mutual fund performance debate: New evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 111–124.CrossRef
Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 1751–1767.CrossRef
Bauer, R., Otten, R., & Rad, A. T. (2006). Ethical investing in Australia: Is there a financial penalty? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 14, 33–48.CrossRef
Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R., Dalò, A., & Herzel, S. (2015). Socially responsible and conventional investment funds: Performance comparison and the global financial crisis. Applied Economics, 47(25), 2541–2562.CrossRef
Berry, T. C., & Junkus, J. C. (2013). Socially responsible investing: An investor perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4), 707–720.CrossRef
Bollen, N. P. (2007). Mutual fund attributes and investor behavior. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(3), 683–708.CrossRef
Borgers, A., Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., & Ter Horst, J. (2013). Stakeholder relations and stock returns: On errors in investors’ expectations and learning. Journal of Empirical Finance, 22, 159–175.CrossRef
Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial Management, 35(3), 97–116.CrossRef
Brooks, C., & Oikonomou, I. (2018). The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 1–15.
Capelle-Blancard, G., Desroziers, A., & Zerbib, O. D. (2021). Socially Responsible Investing Strategies under Pressure: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(9), 178–197.CrossRef
Capelle-Blancard, G., & Monjon, S. (2014). The performance of socially responsible funds: Does the screening process matter? European Financial Management, 20(3), 494–520.CrossRef
Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82.CrossRef
Climent, F., & Soriano, P. (2011). Green and good? The investment performance of US environmental mutual funds. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(2), 275–287.CrossRef
Cortez, M. C., Silva, F., & Areal, N. (2009). The performance of European socially responsible funds. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 573–588.CrossRef
Cortez, M. C., Silva, F., & Areal, N. (2012). Socially responsible investing in the global market: The performance of US and European funds. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 17, 254–271.CrossRef
Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K., (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61, 51–63.
Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., & Ter Horst, J. (2011). A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(8), 2137–2147.CrossRef
Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 621–640.CrossRef
El Ghoul, S., & Karoui, A. (2022). Fund performance and social responsibility: New evidence using social active share and social tracking error. Journal of Banking & Finance, 143, 106598.CrossRef
Erragraguy, E., & Revelli, C. (2015). Should Islamic investors consider SRI criteria in their investment strategies? Finance Research Letters, 14, 11–19.CrossRef
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.CrossRef
Fernandez-Izquierdo, A., & Mattalin-Saez, J. C. (2008). Performance of ethical mutual funds in Spain: Sacrifice or premium? Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 247–260.CrossRef
Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A Regression Discontinuity Approach. Management Science, 61(11), 2549–2568.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Galema, R., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2008). The stocks at stake: Return and risk in socially responsible investment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), 2646–2654.CrossRef
Gil-Bazo, J., Ruiz-Verdú, P., & Santos, A. A. (2010). The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: The role of fees and management companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 243–263.CrossRef
Glode, V. (2011). Why mutual funds “underperform.” Journal of Financial Economics, 99(3), 546–559.CrossRef
Goldreyer, E. F., & Diltz, J. D. (1999). The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: Incorporating sociopolitical information in portfolio selection’. Managerial Finance, 25(1), 23–36.CrossRef
Hamilton, S., Jo, H., & Statman, M. (1993). Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(6), 62–66.CrossRef
Halbritter, G., & Dorfleitner, G. (2015). The wages of social responsibility—where are they? A critical review of ESG investing. Review of Financial Economics, 26, 25–35.CrossRef
Henke, H. M. (2016). The effect of social screening on bond mutual fund performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 67, 69–84.CrossRef
Herzel, S., Nicolosi, M., & Stărică, C. (2012). The cost of sustainability in optimal portfolio decisions. The European Journal of Finance, 18(3–4), 333–349. 1
Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15–36.CrossRef
Humphrey, J. E., & Tan, D. T. (2014). Does it really hurt to be responsible? Journal of Business Ethics, 122(3), 375–386.CrossRef
Jones, S., van der Laan, S., Frost, G., & Loftus, J. (2008). The investment performance of socially responsible investment funds in Australia. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 181–203.CrossRef
Kempf, A., & Osthoff, P. (2007). The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance. European Financial Management, 13 (5), 908–922.
Kreander, N., Gray, R. H., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2005). Evaluating the performance of ethical and non-ethical funds: A matched pair analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32, 1465–1493.CrossRef
Lean, H. H., Ang, W. R., & Smyth, R. (2015). Performance and performance persistence of socially responsible investment funds in Europe and North America. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 34, 254–266.CrossRef
Lee, D. D., Faff, R. W., & Rekker, S. A. (2013). Do high and low-ranked sustainability stocks perform differently? International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 21(2), 116–132.CrossRef
Leite, P., & Cortez, M. C. (2015). Performance of European socially responsible funds during market crises: Evidence from France. International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 132–141.CrossRef
Leite, C., Cortez, M. C., Silva, F., & Adcock, C. (2018). The performance of socially responsible equity mutual funds: Evidence from Sweden. Business Ethics: A European Review, 27(2), 108–126.CrossRef
Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2017). On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Finance, 72(2), 853–909.CrossRef
Magnier, B., Luchet, M., & Schaff, E. (2008). Performance analysis of sustainable and responsible equity funds. Altedia IC Investment Consulting.
Markowitz, W. (1959). Variations in rotation of the earth, results obtained with the dual-rate moon camera and photographic zenith tubes. In Symposium-international astronomical union (Vol. 11, 26–33). Cambridge University Press.
Mollet, J. C., & Ziegler, A. (2014). Socially responsible investing and stock performance: New empirical evidence for the US and European stock markets. Review of Financial Economics, 23(4), 208–216.CrossRef
Moneva, J. M., & Ortas, E. (2010). Corporate environmental and financial performance: A multivariate approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(2), 193–210.CrossRef
Nakai, M., Yamaguchi, K., & Takeuchi, K. (2016). Can SRI funds better resist global financial crisis? Evidence from Japan. International Review of Financial Analysis, 48, 12–20.CrossRef
Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2014). Socially responsible funds and market crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 180–193.CrossRef
Omura, A., Roca, E., & Nakai, M. (2021). Does responsible investing pay during economic downturns: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Finance Research Letters, 42, 101914.CrossRef
Reboredo, J. C., Quintela, M., & Otero, L. A. (2017). Do investors pay a premium for going green? Evidence from alternative energy mutual funds. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 73, 512–520.CrossRef
Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: Evidence from socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 302–332.CrossRef
Revelli, C., & Viviani, J. L. (2015). Financial performance of socially responsible investing (SRI): What have we learned? A meta-analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(2), 158–185.CrossRef
Scholtens, B. (2005). Style and performance of Dutch socially responsible investment funds. The Journal of Investing, 14, 63–72.CrossRef
Schröder, M. (2004). The performance of socially responsible investments: Investment funds and indices. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 18(2), 122.CrossRef
Sievänen, R. (2013). The non-response of pension funds to climate change and human rights. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 3(3), 204–222.CrossRef
Statman, M., & Glushkov, D. (2009). The wages of social responsibility. Financial Analysts Journal, 65(4), 33–46.CrossRef
Trinks, P. J., & Scholtens, B. (2017). The opportunity cost of negative screening in socially responsible investing. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 193–208.CrossRef
Van de Velde, E., Vermeir, W., & Corten, F. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Corporate Governance, 5(3), 129–138.CrossRef
Wimmer, M. (2012). ESG-persistence in socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 3(1), 9–15.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Performance of Socially Responsible Investing: A Review
verfasst von
Lisa Gianmoena
Luca Spataro
Copyright-Jahr
2023
Buch
ESG Integration and SRI Strategies in the EU

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-36456-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-36457-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2023

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36457-0_3