nach oben

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Erschienen in:

15.07.2017

The role of scaffold interactivity in supporting self-regulated learning in a community college online composition course

verfasst von: Katherine Kellen, Pavlo Antonenko

Erschienen in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This study addressed some of the challenges of supporting self-regulated learning in community college online English composition. This course used a flexible learning design, providing a choice of procedural scaffolds to support self-regulation of learning tasks by students. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the use of two procedural scaffolds, a custom-designed, interactive checklists tool and a non-interactive calendar tool, and the core assignment submission and metacognition of online English composition students. Measures included clickstream data for procedural scaffold usage, a count of core assignment submissions, and Metacognitive Awareness Inventory scores. Results indicated that use of the custom-designed interactive checklists tool better supported submission of core assignments by students than the non-interactive calendar tool. While metacognition awareness scores increased across the study, no significant association with procedural scaffold use was found. Implications for future practice support the continued and extended use of interactive procedural scaffolds to support online students through task completion for complex processes such as academic writing.

Nächster Artikel Transforming undergraduate biology learning with inquiry-based instruction

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research, 64, 201–252.CrossRef

Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC, Oakland, CA. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf.

Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading, and learning with adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.

Azevedo, R., Cromley, J., Moos, D., Greene, J., & Winters, F. (2011). Adaptive content and process scaffolding: A key to facilitating students’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53(1), 106–140.

Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25, 725–739.CrossRef

Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. In J. M. Spector et al. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 505–518). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Belland, B. R., Kim, C., & Hannafin, M. J. (2013). A framework for designing scaffolds that improve motivation and cognition. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 243–270. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.838920.CrossRef

Bendixen, L. D., & Hartley, K. (2003). Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(1), 15–30. (Retrieved from Education Full Text).CrossRef

Bergamin, P. B., Werlen, E., Siegenthaler, E., & Ziska, S. (2012). The relationship between flexible and self-regulated learning in open and distance universities. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 13(2), 101–123. (Retrieved from Education Full Text).

Bonwell, C., & Sutherland, T. (1996). The active learning continuum: Choosing activities to engage students in the classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 67, 3–16. (Retrieved from Wiley Online Library).CrossRef

Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.) National Research Council (US)/Committee on Learning Research and, Educational Practice, & National Research Council (US)/Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school expanded ed. United States of America: National Academy Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRef

Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281. (Retrieved from Education Full Text).CrossRef

Chen, S. Y., Fan, J.-P., & Macredie, R. D. (2006). Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: Experts versus novices. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 251–266.CrossRef

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5), 513–540. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-1278-3.CrossRef

De Jong, T., & van der Hulst, A. (2002). The effects of graphical overviews on exploratory behaviour and knowledge acquisition in hypertext environments. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 18, 219–232.CrossRef

Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.

Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (1st ed., pp. 1–31). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Dunlap, L. K., & Dunlap, G. (1989). A self-monitoring package for teaching subtraction with regrouping to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 309–314.CrossRef

Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley.CrossRef

Glaser, C., & Brunstein, J. (2007). Improving fourth-grade students’ composition skills: Effects of strategy instruction and self-regulation procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 297–310.CrossRef

Goldrick-Rab, S. (2010). Challenges and opportunities for improving community college student success. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 437–469. doi:10.3102/0034654310370163.CrossRef

Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 334–372. doi:10.3102/003465430303953.CrossRef

Grotzer, T. A. (2002). Expanding our vision for educational technology: Procedural, conceptual, and structural knowledge. Educational Technology, 42(2), 52–59. (Retrieved from Education Full Text).

Henry, J., & Meadows, J. (2008). An absolutely riveting online course: Nine principles for excellence in web-based teaching. Canadian Journal of Learning And Technology/La Revue Canadienne De L’Apprentissage Et De La Technologie, 34(1). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/179/177.

Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37–52. doi:10.1007/BF02504914.CrossRef

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2006). Design principles for scaffolding technology-based inquiry. In A. M. O’Donnell, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, & G. Erkens (Eds.), Collaborative reasoning, learning and technology (pp. 147–170). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hung, D. (2001). Theories of learning and computer-mediated instructional technologies. Educational Media International, 38(4), 281–287. doi:10.1080/09523980110105114.CrossRef

Jonassen, D. H., & Wang, S. (1993). Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(1), 1–8. (Retrieved from Education Full Text).

Kim, M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education, 56(2), 403–417. doi:10.1016/j.compuedu.2010.08.024.CrossRef

Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 221–247. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90021-K.CrossRef

Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25, 117–131.CrossRef

Locke, E., & Latham, G. (2002). Building a practical useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35 year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705.CrossRef

Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2007). Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning. Metacognition & Learning, 2(2), 141–155. doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9012-y.CrossRef

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Miller, R. B., Behrens, J. T., & Greene, B. A. (1993). Goals and perceived ability: Impact on student valuing, self-regulation, and persistence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 2–14. doi:10.1006/ceps.1993.1002.CrossRef

Mills, R. J., Paper, D., Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2002). Hypertext navigation—An intrinsic component of the corporate intranet. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42, 49–50.

Moos, D., & Azevedo, R. (2006). The role of goal structure in undergraduates’ use of self-regulatory processes in two hypermedia learning tasks. Journal of Educational Media and Hypermedia, 15(1), 49–86. (Retrieved from Education Full Text).

Murray, D. M. (1978). Teach the motivating force of revision. The English Journal, 67(7), 56–60. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/814742.

Niederhauser, D. S., Reynolds, R. E., Salmen, D. L., & Skolmoski, P. (2000). The influence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 237–255.CrossRef

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x.CrossRef

Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.-F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers’ prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 58, 327–345.CrossRef

Proske, A., Narciss, S., & Korndle, H. (2007). Interactivity and learners’ achievement in web-based learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 511–531.

Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2.CrossRef

Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 285–307. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3.CrossRef

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. Retrieved from https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2nKniiL1qBzLTE4UzVvaVVqeEk/edit.

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2014). Does online learning impede degree completion? A national study of community college students. Computers & Education, 75(0), 103–111. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.009.

Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2009). Understanding adult learners’ self-regulation in online environments: A qualitative study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 36(3), 263–274. (Retrieved from Education Full Text).

Spiro, R. J., Collins, B. P., Thota, J. J., & Feltovich, P. J. (2003). Cognitive flexibility theory: Hypermedia for complex learning, adaptive knowledge application, and experience acceleration. Educational Technology, 44(5), 5–10.

Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia (pp. 163–205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Stegmann, K., Mu, J., Gehlen-Baum, V., & Fischer, F. (2011). The myth of over-scripting: Can novices be supported too much? In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.), Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: CSCL2011 conference proceedings (vol 1, pp. 406–413).

The College Board. (2014). Accuplacer program manual. New York: The College Board.

Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5–22. doi:10.1007/BF02504714.CrossRef

Winne, P. (2011). A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation and performance (pp. 15–32). New York: Routledge.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x/pdf.

Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339.CrossRef

Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 29–36. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.29.CrossRef

Zimmerman, B. J., & Pons, M. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. doi:10.2307/1163093.CrossRef

Titel: The role of scaffold interactivity in supporting self-regulated learning in a community college online composition course
verfasst von: Katherine Kellen
Pavlo Antonenko
Publikationsdatum: 15.07.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1042-1726
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-1233
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9160-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Learning experience assessment of flipped courses

An application of corresponding fields model for understanding exclusion in online social networks

E-textbook as object and mediator: interactions between instructor and student activity systems

Exploring the potential of LMS log data as a proxy measure of student engagement

EFL medical students’ metacognitive strategy use for hypertext reading comprehension

An ecological model for university faculty members’ thinking about technology

Premium Partner