Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
ATZ-Fachkongress

Chassis.tech plus 2024


4 Kongresse in einer Veranstaltung

Treffen Sie in München die Fachleute von Chassis, Lenkung, Bremsen sowie Reifen/Räder.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
Erschienen in: European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 1/2022

12.07.2021 | Original Article

The status of legality verification of Chinese wood processing enterprises: based on a survey in Jiangsu and Zhejiang

verfasst von: Zhijie Guan, Xiaoyu Chen

Erschienen in: European Journal of Wood and Wood Products | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

With the rapid development of the timber industry, illegal logging of timber and its trade have become an important issue for world sustainable development. Many governmental and private sectors have taken measures to ensure the legality of wood, and wood legality verification is becoming more and more common. Chinese wood processing industries are mainly centralized in the region of Jiangsu and Zhejiang. In this paper, a questionnaire survey is used to investigate the status of legality verification of wood processing enterprises in Jiangsu and Zhejiang. The results show that applying for timber legality verification is conducive to the increase in enterprise benefits, but due to different levels of management and technology application rate, enterprises have deviations in their understanding of different legality certification systems. High certification costs and insufficient awareness of legality verification have become the main obstacles to applying for timber legality verification of wood processing enterprises in Jiangsu and Zhejiang. Based on this conclusion, this paper suggests some policies to promote the legality verification of Chinese wood processing enterprises.
Vorheriger Artikel Experimental investigation into fire performance of mixed species glulam beams under three-side fire exposure
Nächster Artikel Application of laser micro incisions in the fire-retardant treatment

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Acheampong E, Maryudi A (2020) Avoiding legality: timber producers’ strategies and motivations under FLEGT in Ghana and Indonesia. For Policy Econ 111:102047CrossRef
Bai RS, Li HX (2019) Research on impact assessment of CFCC on sustainable management of forest farm. Ecol Econ 35(10):160–165 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Bernstein S, Cashore B (2012) Complex global governance and domestic policies: four pathways of Influence. Int Affairs 88(3):585–604CrossRef
Brack D (2013) Combating illegal logging: interaction with WTO rules. Chatham House, London
Brack D, Buckrell J (2010) Controlling illegal logging: consumer-country measures. Chatham House, London
Cao XW (2018) Probe into the Training mode of professional talents of wood processing in secondary vocational schools. Sci Popul (Science Education) 1:120 (in Chinese)
Cashore B, Stone MW (2012) Can legality verification rescue global forest governance? Analysing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia. For Policy Econ 18:13–22CrossRef
Cashore B, Stone MW (2014) Does California need Delaware? Explaining Indonesian, Chinese, and United States support for legality compliance of internationally traded products. Regul Gov 8(1):49–73CrossRef
Chen J, Innes JL, Kozak RA (2011) An exploratory assessment of the attitudes of Chinese wood products manufacturers towards forest certification. J Environ Manag 92(11):2984–2992CrossRef
China Forestry Industry (2016) EU Timber Act and its impact. China For Ind 3:10 (in Chinese)
Davenport DS (2005) An alternative explanation for the failure of the UNCED forest negotiations. Glob Environ Polit 5(1):105–130CrossRef
European Commission (EC) (2003) Forest law enforcement, governance and trade (FLEGT)—proposal for an EU action plan (COM(2003) 251). European Commission, Brussels
European parliament (2010) Regulation (EU) NO 995/2010 of the European parliament and of the council. Off J  Eur Union 50:23–46
Espach R (2006) When is sustainable forestry sustainable? The forest stewardship council in Argentina and Brazil. Glob Environ Polit 6(2):55–84CrossRef
Greenpeace (2008) Responsible sourcing: solutions for corporate social responsibility and forest protection. Greenpeace, Beijing (in Chinese)
Hoare A (2015) Tackling illegal logging and the related trade. What progress and where next? Chatham House, London
Leslie AD (2004) The impacts and mechanics of certification. Int For Rev 6(1):30–39
Lesniewska F, McDermott CL (2014) FLEGT VPAs: laying a pathway to sustainability via legality lessons from Ghana and Indonesia. For Policy Econ 48:16–23CrossRef
Li JQ, Chen SZ (2015) Empirical analysis on the practical feasibility of timber legality verification work in China. Open J Polit Sci 5:167–169CrossRef
Liu Y, Zhi L (2012) Discuss on adoption of forest certification for famers under the background of collective forest tenure reform—analysis based on the survey of 492 famers in Yunnan. For Econ 2:33–36 (in Chinese with English abstract)CrossRef
Luo DW, Zhang ZG, Chen Y, Gu SJ (2017) Research on the identification and consumption tendency of green wood processing products. China For Econ 2:26–31 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Ma S, Tian MH, Li RD, Wei T, Zhang YZ (2020) Evaluation and enlightenment of strategies for responding to timber legality requirements based on the perspective of Chinese forest products export enterprises. World For Res 33(04):62–67 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Maryudi A (2016) Choosing timber legality verification as a policy instrument to combat illegal logging in Indonesia. For Policy Econ 68:99–104CrossRef
Miao DL, Tian H, Cheng BD (2014) A study of timber legality verification and its influence on Chinese woody forest product trade. World For Res 27:61–65 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Nathan I, Hansen CP, Cashore B (2014) Timber legality verification in practice: prospects for support and institutionalization. For Policy Econ 48:1–5CrossRef
Nathan I, Chen J, Hansen CP, Xu B, Li Y (2018) Facing the complexities of the global timber trade regime: how do Chinese wood enterprises respond to international legality verification requirements, and what are the implications for regime effectiveness? For Policy Econ 92:169–180CrossRef
Overdevest C, Zeitlin J (2014) Constructing a transnational timber legality assurance regime: architecture, accomplishment, challenges. For Policy Econ 48:6–15CrossRef
Peng Y, Tian MH, Wang XX (2012) Effect of “EU Diligence Regulation” on Chinese wooden furniture trade and its countermeasures. China For Prod Ind 39:12–16 (in Chinese with English abstract)CrossRef
Prestemon JP (2015) The impacts of the Lacey Act Amendment of 2008 on US hardwood lumber and hardwood plywood imports. For Policy Econ 50:31–44CrossRef
Qian J, Yang HQ, Nie Y (2018) Research process on illegal logging and related trade—based on the literature achievements of 1998–2017. For Econ 40(12):3–9 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Ramcilovic-Suominen S, Gritten D, Saastamoinen O (2010) Concept of livelihoods in the FLEGT voluntary partnership agreement and the expected impacts on the livelihood of forest communities in Ghana. Int For Rev 12(4):361–369
Rayner J, Humphreys D, Welch FP, Prabhu R, Verkooijen P (2010) Introduction. In: Rayner J, Buck A, Katila P (eds) Embracing complexity: meeting the challenges of international forest governance. International Union of Forest Research Organizations, Vienna, pp 9–18
Stevens J, Ahmad M, Ruddell S (1998) Forest products certification: a survey of manufacturers. For Prod J 48(6):43–48
Vidal N, Kozak R, Cohen D (2005) Chain of custody certification: an assessment of the North American solid wood sector. For Policy Econ 7:345–355CrossRef
Wang JX (2013) China forest certification standard framework. Certif Technol 1:39–40 (in Chinese)
Wang HY, Huang HB (2019) Research on the application of high and new technology in wood processing. Sci Technol Innov 32:138–139 (in Chinese)
Wang QW, Chen JM, Qian J (2015) Building the supervised structure of illegal logging and trading of wood. For Econ 37(11):44–47 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Xu R, Wang ZS, Lei B, Ye FR (2018) Investigation and analysis of sustainable development of wood processing enterprises—based on Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces. China For Econ 3:34–38 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Zeng W, Zeng YC, Li LM (2016) Impacts of wood legality trade requirement on Chinese wood product enterprises and its countermeasures—investigations in Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shandong provinces. Issues For Econ 36(6):525–529 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Metadaten
Titel
The status of legality verification of Chinese wood processing enterprises: based on a survey in Jiangsu and Zhejiang
verfasst von
Zhijie Guan
Xiaoyu Chen
Publikationsdatum
12.07.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Wood and Wood Products / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0018-3768
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-736X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-021-01731-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Brief Original

Investigating the physical properties of Carpinus species in three different regions of Iran

Original Article

Chemical characterization of pyrolysis liquids from Dyera costulata and evaluation of their bio-efficiency against subterranean termites, Coptotermes curvignathus

Original Article

Wood description and timber use investigation of Pachyelasma tessmannii (Harms) Harms

Original Article

Synthesis and characterization of biopolyols through biomass liquefaction of wood shavings and their application in the preparation of polyurethane wood composites

Original Article

Force distribution in self-tapping screws: experimental investigations with fibre Bragg grating measurement screws

Original Article

An investigation into collapse and shrinkage behaviour of Eucalyptus grandis and Eucalyptus grandis-urophylla wood