Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research 3/2015

01.04.2015

The Usability of Asset Index as an Indicator of Household Economic Status in Turkey: Comparison with Expenditure and Income Data

verfasst von: Baris Ucar

Erschienen in: Social Indicators Research | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Information on expenditure and income are the most widely used tolls for differentiating economic status of households. In many surveys it’s hard to compile data on expenditure and income. In such cases questioning the availability of household amenities would serve as a tool for constructing an asset index and thus differentiating economic status of households. This study is conducted to see the extent of compatibility of an asset index with expenditure and income which serve as a tool for differentiating economic status of households. The data source used in the study is the 2012 Turkish Statistical Institute Household Budget Survey. This survey has the property to be the only survey which encompasses all the three variables in Turkey. An asset index was constructed by using Principal Components Analysis and comparisons were made among the indicators. This study showed that asset index quite well overlaps expenditure and income quintiles at the lowest and highest quintiles. More than 60 % of those in the lowest expenditure quintile are also in the lowest asset index quintile. Overlapping is much less for the quintiles in between. The results don’t indicate whether asset index or other indicators are differentiating economic status of households better. In either case asset index can be considered to be an efficient tool for differentiating the lowest quintile. Pearson’s correlation coefficient analyses were conducted among the indicators. The coefficient is 0.75 between expenditure and income quintiles. It is 0.64 between asset index and expenditure quintiles and 0.63 between asset index and income quintiles. These values imply that the relationship between asset index, expenditure and income quintiles can be regarded to be quite high.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Azzarri, C., et al. (2006). Monitoring poverty without consumption data—An application using the Albania Panel Survey. Eastern European Economics, 44(1), 59–82.CrossRef Azzarri, C., et al. (2006). Monitoring poverty without consumption data—An application using the Albania Panel Survey. Eastern European Economics, 44(1), 59–82.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ferguson, B., et al. (2002). Estimating permanent income using indicator variables, evidence and information for policy cluster. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. Ferguson, B., et al. (2002). Estimating permanent income using indicator variables, evidence and information for policy cluster. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Zurück zum Zitat Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. H. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38, 115–132. Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. H. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38, 115–132.
Zurück zum Zitat Foreit, K. G. F, & Schreiner, M. (2011). Comparing alternative measures of poverty: Assets-based wealth index vs. expenditures-based poverty score. Measure evaluation PRH working paper No. 11–113. Foreit, K. G. F, & Schreiner, M. (2011). Comparing alternative measures of poverty: Assets-based wealth index vs. expenditures-based poverty score. Measure evaluation PRH working paper No. 11–113.
Zurück zum Zitat Howe, L. D. (2009). The wealth index as a measure of socioeconomic position. PhD thesis, London School of Hygiene Tropical Medicine. Howe, L. D. (2009). The wealth index as a measure of socioeconomic position. PhD thesis, London School of Hygiene Tropical Medicine.
Zurück zum Zitat HUIPS (Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies). (2009). Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, 2008. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ministry of Health General Directorate of Mother and Child Health and Family Planning, T.R. Prime Ministry Undersecretary of State Planning Organization and TUBITAK. HUIPS (Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies). (2009). Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, 2008. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ministry of Health General Directorate of Mother and Child Health and Family Planning, T.R. Prime Ministry Undersecretary of State Planning Organization and TUBITAK.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindelow, M. (2006). Sometimes more equal than others: How health inequalities depend on the choice of welfare indicator. Health Economics, 15(3), 263–279.CrossRef Lindelow, M. (2006). Sometimes more equal than others: How health inequalities depend on the choice of welfare indicator. Health Economics, 15(3), 263–279.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat McKenzie, D. J. (2005). Measuring inequality with asset indicators. Journal of Population Economics, 18(2), 229–260.CrossRef McKenzie, D. J. (2005). Measuring inequality with asset indicators. Journal of Population Economics, 18(2), 229–260.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rutstein, S. O., & Johnson, K., (2004). The DHS Wealth Index. DHS Comparative Reports No. 6. ORC Macro, Calverton, MD. Rutstein, S. O., & Johnson, K., (2004). The DHS Wealth Index. DHS Comparative Reports No. 6. ORC Macro, Calverton, MD.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahn, D. E., & Stifel, D. (2000). Poverty comparisons over time and across countries in Africa. World Development, 28(12), 2123–2155.CrossRef Sahn, D. E., & Stifel, D. (2000). Poverty comparisons over time and across countries in Africa. World Development, 28(12), 2123–2155.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sahn, D. E., & Stifel, D. (2003). Exploring alternative measures of welfare in the absence of expenditure data. Review of Income and Wealth, 49(4), 463–489.CrossRef Sahn, D. E., & Stifel, D. (2003). Exploring alternative measures of welfare in the absence of expenditure data. Review of Income and Wealth, 49(4), 463–489.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Skoufias, E., & Coady, D. P. (2007). Are the welfare losses from imperfect targeting important? Economica, 74(296), 756–776.CrossRef Skoufias, E., & Coady, D. P. (2007). Are the welfare losses from imperfect targeting important? Economica, 74(296), 756–776.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Sumarto, S., Suryadarma, D., & Suryahadi, A. (2007). Predicting consumption poverty using non-consumption indicators: Experiments using Indonesian data. Social Indicators Research, 81(3), 543–578.CrossRef Sumarto, S., Suryadarma, D., & Suryahadi, A. (2007). Predicting consumption poverty using non-consumption indicators: Experiments using Indonesian data. Social Indicators Research, 81(3), 543–578.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wagstaff, A., & Watanabe, N. (2003). What difference does the choice of SES make in health inequality measurement? Health Economics, 12(10), 885–890.CrossRef Wagstaff, A., & Watanabe, N. (2003). What difference does the choice of SES make in health inequality measurement? Health Economics, 12(10), 885–890.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ward, P., Owens, T., & Kahyrara, G. (2002). Developing proxy predictors for household expenditure and income poverty. Oxford Policy Management. Ward, P., Owens, T., & Kahyrara, G. (2002). Developing proxy predictors for household expenditure and income poverty. Oxford Policy Management.
Metadaten
Titel
The Usability of Asset Index as an Indicator of Household Economic Status in Turkey: Comparison with Expenditure and Income Data
verfasst von
Baris Ucar
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Social Indicators Research / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0670-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Social Indicators Research 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner