nach oben

International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)

Erschienen in:

28.07.2022 | Original Paper

Thermal analysis for improvement of mechanical properties in fused filament fabricated parts

verfasst von: Md Aftab Alam, Krishnanand, Abhishek Patel, Rajesh Purohit, Mohammad Taufik

Erschienen in: International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Additive manufacturing techniques are widely used in the present manufacturing era because of their ability to manufacture intricate products. Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the most commonly adopted additive manufacturing technology, which involves the extrusion of the semi-solid polymer through the nozzle to be deposited in layers to form the part. In FFF, the polymer melt being deposited, forms the bonds with the neighboring pre-deposited melt during the part fabrication. The pre-deposited melt is at the low temperature compared to the polymer melt extruding out of the nozzle; hence the heat transfer occurs due to temperature gradient by the mode of conduction and convection. The commercialization of the FFF technology in a wide range of industrial applications still seems to be constrained due to several drawbacks such as insufficient mechanical properties, poor surface quality, and low dimensional accuracy. The grade of FFF-produced products is affected by various process parameters, for example, layer thickness, build orientation, raster width, or print speed. In FFF, process parameters are optimized to improve the quality of the final printed part. The cost of post-processing is also reduced as a result of parameter optimization. In this study, the influence of the convection coefficient on bond formation was investigated, and a model for predicting bond size in terms of convection coefficient is discussed for a given set of parameters. This work also aims to study the effects of thermal properties on neck formation and the effects of neck formation on strength, surface finish, and dimensional accuracy of the printed parts. In addition, this study reveals the problems and difficulties found in previous works, potential future scope in this area has been analyzed, and new research approaches are suggested.

Vorheriger Artikel Wear parameter optimization for CrN/TiAlSiN coating using novel BWM integrated TODIM decision-making approach

Nächster Artikel Analytical and numerical analysis of an internally and/or externally pressurized thick-walled sphere made of radially nonuniform material

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Bellehumeur, C., Li, L., Sun, Q., Gu, P.: Modeling of bond formation between polymer filaments in the fused deposition modeling process. J. Manuf. Process. 6, 170–178 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-6125(04)70071-7CrossRef

Ravi, A.K., Deshpande, A., Hsu, K.H.: An in-process laser localized pre-deposition heating approach to inter-layer bond strengthening in extrusion based polymer additive manufacturing. J. Manuf. Process. 24, 179–185 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.08.007CrossRef

Gurrala, P.K., Regalla, S.P.: Part strength evolution with bonding between filaments in fused deposition modelling: this paper studies how coalescence of filaments contributes to the strength of final FDM part. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 9, 141–149 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2014.913400CrossRef

Chacón, J.M., Caminero, M.A., García-Plaza, E., Núñez, P.J.: Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Mater. Des. 124, 143–157 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065CrossRef

Turner, B.N., Strong, R., Gold, S.A.: A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyp. J. 20, 192–204 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2013-0012CrossRef

Rao, Y., Wei, N., Yao, S., Wang, K., Peng, Y.: A process-structure-performance modeling for thermoplastic polymers via material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 39, 101857 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.101857CrossRef

Krishnanand, S., Soni, S., Nayak, A., Taufik, M.: Generation of tool path in fused filament fabrication. In: Lect. Notes Mech. Eng., Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2021: pp. 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3033-0_14

Kishore, V., Ajinjeru, C., Nycz, A., Post, B., Lindahl, J., Kunc, V., Duty, C.: Infrared preheating to improve interlayer strength of big area additive manufacturing (BAAM) components. Addit. Manuf. 14, 7–12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.11.008CrossRef

Tamburrino, F., Barone, S., Paoli, A., Razionale, A.V.: Post-processing treatments to enhance additively manufactured polymeric parts: a review. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 16, 218–251 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2021.1917039CrossRef

10.

Lavecchia, F., Guerra, M.G., Galantucci, L.M.: Chemical vapor treatment to improve surface finish of 3D printed polylactic acid (PLA) parts realized by fused filament fabrication. Prog. Addit. Manuf. 7, 65–75 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00213-2CrossRef

11.

Vaezi, M., Yang, S.: Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK for biomedical applications. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 10, 123–135 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.1097053CrossRef

12.

Ngo, T.D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K.T.Q., Hui, D.: Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos. Part B Eng. 143, 172–196 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012CrossRef

13.

Podroužek, J., Marcon, M., Ninčević, K., Wan-Wendner, R.: Bio-inspired 3D infill patterns for additive manufacturing and structural applications. Materials (Basel). 12, 499 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12030499CrossRef

14.

Cholleti, E.R., Gibson, I.: ABS nano composite materials in additive manufacturing. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/455/1/012038CrossRef

15.

Serdeczny, M.P., Comminal, R., Pedersen, D.B., Spangenberg, J.: Numerical simulations of the mesostructure formation in material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 28, 419–429 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.024CrossRef

16.

Kim, M.K., Lee, I.H., Kim, H.C.: Effect of fabrication parameters on surface roughness of FDM parts. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 19, 137–142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-018-0016-0CrossRef

17.

Sun, Q., Rizvi, G.M., Bellehumeur, C.T., Gu, P.: Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid Prototyp. J. 14, 72–80 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540810862028CrossRef

18.

Li, L., Sun, Q., Bellehumeur, C., Gu, P.: Investigation of bond formation in FDM process investigation of bond formation in FDM process. Trans. North Am. Manuf. Res. Inst. SME. 31, 400–407 (2019)

19.

Bhalodi, D.V., Zalavadiya, K.S., Gurrala, P.K.: Parametric study to predict the bond formation in FDM process. Int. J. Mater. Mech. Manuf. 6, 313–316 (2018)

20.

Syrlybayev, D., Zharylkassyn, B., Seisekulova, A., Akhmetov, M., Perveen, A., Talamona, D.: Optimisation of strength properties of FDM printed parts—a critical review. Polymers (Basel). 13, 1587 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101587CrossRef

21.

Dey, A., Yodo, N.: A systematic survey of FDM process parameter optimization and their influence on part characteristics. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 3, 64 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp3030064CrossRef

22.

Garzon-Hernandez, S., Garcia-Gonzalez, D., Jérusalem, A., Arias, A.: Design of FDM 3D printed polymers: an experimental-modelling methodology for the prediction of mechanical properties. Mater. Des. 188, 108414 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108414CrossRef

23.

Conley, W.H., Deferrari, R.J.: Principles and applications. J. Higher Educ. 23, 225 (1952). https://doi.org/10.2307/1976787CrossRef

24.

Rodríguez, J.F., Thomas, J.P., Renaud, J.E.: Mechanical behavior of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) fused deposition materials. Experimental investigation. Rapid Prototyp. J. 7, 148–158 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540110395547CrossRef

25.

Dhinesh, S.K., Arun Prakash, S., Senthil Kumar, K.L., Megalingam, A.: Study on flexural and tensile behavior of PLA, ABS and PLA-ABS materials. Mater. Today Proc. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.546CrossRef

26.

Wang, P., Zou, B., Ding, S.: Modeling of surface roughness based on heat transfer considering diffusion among deposition filaments for FDM 3D printing heat-resistant resin. Appl. Therm. Eng. 161, 114064 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114064CrossRef

27.

Raju, T.N., Ramach, V., Raju, R.: An experimental investigation on surface quality and dimensional accuracy of FDM components, (n.d.). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.670.108 (accessed May 26, 2022).

28.

Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C., Baciu, F., Marinescu, R.: FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review. Polym. Test. 69, 157–166 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020CrossRef

29.

Yin, J., Lu, C., Fu, J., Huang, Y., Zheng, Y.: Interfacial bonding during multi-material fused deposition modeling (FDM) process due to inter-molecular diffusion. Mater. Des. 150, 104–112 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.029CrossRef

30.

Ouballouch, A., Lasri, L., Ouahmane, I., El Alaiji, R., Sallaou, M., Ettaqi, S.: Optimization of PLA parts manufactured by the Fused Deposition Modeling Technology. In: 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. Technol. Manag. Oper. Decis. ICTMOD 2018, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2018;288–292. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITMC.2018.8691133

31.

Jain, P.K., Pandey, P.M., Rao, P.V.M.: Experimental investigations for improving part strength in selective laser sintering. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 3, 177–188 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/17452750802065893CrossRef

32.

Tao, Y., Wang, H., Li, Z., Li, P., Shi, S.Q.: Development and application ofwood flour-filled polylactic acid composite filament for 3d printing. Materials (Basel) (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10040339CrossRef

33.

Vanaei, H., Shirinbayan, M., Deligant, M., Raissi, K., Fitoussi, J., Khelladi, S., Tcharkhtchi, A.: Influence of process parameters on thermal and mechanical properties of <scp>polylactic acid</scp> fabricated by fused filament fabrication. Polym. Eng. Sci. 60, 1822–1831 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.25419CrossRef

34.

Kuznetsov, V., Solonin, A., Urzhumtsev, O., Schilling, R., Tavitov, A.: Strength of PLA components fabricated with fused deposition technology using a desktop 3D printer as a function of geometrical parameters of the process. Polymers (Basel). 10, 313 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10030313CrossRef

35.

Rodríguez-Panes, A., Claver, J., Camacho, A.: The influence of manufacturing parameters on the mechanical behaviour of PLA and ABS pieces manufactured by FDM: a comparative analysis. Materials (Basel). 11, 1333 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081333CrossRef

36.

Aloyaydi, B., Sivasankaran, S., Mustafa, A.: Investigation of infill-patterns on mechanical response of 3D printed poly-lactic-acid. Polym. Test. 87, 106557 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106557CrossRef

37.

Polylactic Acid: PLA Biopolymer Technology and Applications | Request PDF, (n.d.). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286177523_Polylactic_Acid_PLA_Biopolymer_Technology_and_Applications (accessed May 20, 2022)

38.

Yan, Y., Zhang, R., Hong, G., Yuan, X.: Research on the bonding of material paths in melted extrusion modeling. Mater. Des. 21, 93–99 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0261-3069(99)00058-8CrossRef

39.

Triyono, J., Sukanto, H., Saputra, R.M., Smaradhana, D.F.: The effect of nozzle hole diameter of 3D printing on porosity and tensile strength parts using polylactic acid material. Open Eng. 10, 762–768 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2020-0083CrossRef

40.

Chua, B.-L., Baek, S.-H., Park, K., Ahn, D.-G.: Numerical investigation of deposition characteristics of PLA on an ABS plate using a material extrusion process. Materials (Basel). 14, 3404 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123404CrossRef

41.

Abeykoon, C., Sri-Amphorn, P., Fernando, A.: Optimization of fused deposition modeling parameters for improved PLA and ABS 3D printed structures. Int. J. Light. Mater. Manuf. 3, 284–297 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003CrossRef

42.

Partain, S.C.: Fused deposition modeling with localized pre-deposition heating using forced air, Montana State University - Bozeman, College of Engineering, 2007. https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/bitstream/1/2016/1/PartainS0507.pdf (accessed May 26, 2022)

43.

Bellini, A., Güçeri, S.: Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp. J. 9, 252–264 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540310489631CrossRef

44.

Yardimci, M.A., Güçeri, S.: Conceptual framework for the thermal process modelling of fused deposition. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2, 26–31 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552549610128206CrossRef

45.

Zmeskal, O., Marackova, L., Lapcikova, T., Mencik, P., Prikryl, R.: Thermal properties of samples prepared from polylactic acid by 3D printing, in: AIP Conf. Proc., American Institute of Physics Inc., 2020;020022. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0033857

46.

Jiang, K.Y., Gu, Y.H.: Controlling parameters for polymer melting and extrusion in FDM. Key Eng. Mater. (2004). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.259-260.667CrossRef

47.

Vollmer, M., Möllmann, K.-P.: Some basic concepts of heat transfer. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527630868.ch4

48.

Pokluda, O., Bellehumeur, C.T., Vlachopoulos, J.: Modification of Frenkel’s model for sintering. AIChE J. 43, 3253–3256 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690431213CrossRef

49.

Sood, A.K., Ohdar, R.K., Mahapatra, S.S.: Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater. Des. 31, 287–295 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016CrossRef

50.

Nickel, A.H., Barnett, D.M., Prinz, F.B.: Thermal stresses and deposition patterns in layered manufacturing. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 317, 59–64 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01179-0CrossRef

51.

Anitha, R., Arunachalam, S., Radhakrishnan, P.: Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00980-3CrossRef

52.

Coogan, T.J., Kazmer, D.O.: Bond and part strength in fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp. J. 23, 414–422 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2016-0050CrossRef

53.

Shofner, M.L., Lozano, K., Rodríguez-Macías, F.J., Barrera, E.V.: Nanofiber-reinforced polymers prepared by fused deposition modeling. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 89, 3081–3090 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.12496CrossRef

54.

Sezer, H.K., Eren, O.: FDM 3D printing of MWCNT re-inforced ABS nano-composite parts with enhanced mechanical and electrical properties. J. Manuf. Process. 37, 339–347 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.004CrossRef

55.

Dul, S., Fambri, L., Pegoretti, A.: Filaments production and fused deposition modelling of ABS/carbon nanotubes composites. Nanomaterials (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8010049CrossRef

56.

Bardot, M., Schulz, M.D.: Biodegradable Poly(Lactic Acid) nanocomposites for fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Nanomaterials 10, 2567 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10122567CrossRef

57.

Coppola, B., Cappetti, N., Di Maio, L., Scarfato, P., Incarnato, L.: 3D printing of PLA/clay nanocomposites: influence of printing temperature on printed samples properties. Materials (Basel). 11, 1947 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11101947CrossRef

58.

Qiu, D., Langrana, N.A.: Void eliminating toolpath for extrusion-based multi-material layered manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp. J. 8, 38–45 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540210413293CrossRef

59.

Mamaghani Shishavan, S., Azdast, T., Rash Ahmadi, S.: Investigation of the effect of nanoclay and processing parameters on the tensile strength and hardness of injection molded Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene-organoclay nanocomposites. Mater. Des. 58, 527–534 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.014CrossRef

60.

Pavlidou, S., Papaspyrides, C.D.: A review on polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 33, 1119–1198 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.07.008CrossRef

61.

Francis, V., Jain, P.K.: Experimental investigations on fused deposition modelling of polymer-layered silicate nanocomposite. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 11, 109–121 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1172431CrossRef

62.

Rajpurohit, S.R., Dave, H.K.: Effect of process parameters on tensile strength of FDM printed PLA part. Rapid Prototyp. J. 24, 1317–1324 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2017-0134CrossRef

63.

Hernandez, R., Slaughter, D., Whaley, D., Tate, J., Asiabanpour, B., Analyzing the tensile, compressive, and flexural properties of 3D printed ABS P430 plastic based on printing orientation using fused deposition modeling, Solid Free. Fabr. 2016 Proc. 27th Annu. Int. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp. - An Addit. Manuf. Conf. SFF 2016. 2016;939–950

64.

Ziemian, S., Okwara, M., Ziemian, C.W.: Tensile and fatigue behavior of layered acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. Rapid Prototyp. J. 21, 270–278 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2013-0086CrossRef

65.

Jain, P.K., Pandey, P.M., Rao, P.V.M.: Effect of delay time on part strength in selective laser sintering. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 43, 117–126 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/S00170-008-1682-3CrossRef

66.

Garg, A., Bhattacharya, A.: An insight to the failure of FDM parts under tensile loading: finite element analysis and experimental study. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 120, 225–236 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.11.032CrossRef

67.

Aliheidari, N., Tripuraneni, R., Ameli, A., Nadimpalli, S.: Fracture resistance measurement of fused deposition modeling 3D printed polymers. Polym. Test. 60, 94–101 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.03.016CrossRef

68.

(PDF) Prediction of neck growth due to inter and intra-layer bonding for high strength parts in additive manufacturing, (n.d.). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264545454_Prediction_of_Neck_Growth_due_to_Inter_and_Intra-Layer_Bonding_for_High_Strength_Parts_in_Additive_Manufacturing (accessed May 20, 2022)

69.

Chadha, A., Ul Haq, M.I., Raina, A., Singh, R.R., Penumarti, N.B., Bishnoi, M.S.: Effect of fused deposition modelling process parameters on mechanical properties of 3D printed parts. World J. Eng. 16, 550–559 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-09-2018-0329CrossRef

70.

Ćwikła, G., Grabowik, C., Kalinowski, K., Paprocka, I., Ociepka, P.: The influence of printing parameters on selected mechanical properties of FDM/FFF 3D-printed parts. In: IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., Institute of Physics Publishing, 2017;012033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/227/1/012033

71.

Kulkarni, P., Dutta, D.: Deposition strategies and resulting part stiffnesses in fused deposition modeling. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans. ASME. 121, 93–103 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2830582CrossRef

72.

Ang, K.C., Leong, K.F., Chua, C.K., Chandrasekaran, M.: Investigation of the mechanical properties and porosity relationships in fused deposition modelling-fabricated porous structures. Rapid Prototyp. J. 12, 100–105 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610652447CrossRef

73.

Zhang, Y., Chou, K.: A parametric study of part distortions in fused deposition modelling using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 222, 959–968 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM990CrossRef

74.

Radhwan, H., Shayfull, Z., Abdellah, A.E.H., Irfan, A.R., Kamarudin, K.: Optimization parameter effects on the strength of 3D-printing process using Taguchi method. In: AIP Conf. Proc., American Institute of Physics Inc., 2019;020154. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5118162

75.

Vicente, C.M.S., Martins, T.S., Leite, M., Ribeiro, A., Reis, L.: Influence of fused deposition modeling parameters on the mechanical properties of ABS parts. Polym. Adv. Technol. 31, 501–507 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4787CrossRef

76.

Croccolo, D., De Agostinis, M., Olmi, G.: Experimental characterization and analytical modelling of the mechanical behaviour of fused deposition processed parts made of ABS-M30. Comput. Mater. Sci. 79, 506–518 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.06.041CrossRef

77.

Reddy, B.V., Reddy, N.V., Ghosh, A.: Fused deposition modelling using direct extrusion. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2, 51–60 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/17452750701336486CrossRef

78.

A Visual Tool to Improve Layered Manufacturing Part Quality, (n.d.). https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/73466 (accessed May 26, 2022)

79.

Sahu, R.K., Mahapatra, S.S., Sood, A.K.: A study on dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modeling (FDM) processed parts using fuzzy logic. J. Manuf. Sci. Prod. 13, 183–197 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1515/jmsp-2013-0010CrossRef

80.

Bhalodi, D., Zalavadiya, K., Gurrala, P.K.: Influence of temperature on polymer parts manufactured by fused deposition modeling process. J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 1–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1616-zCrossRef

81.

Akande, S.O.: Dimensional accuracy and surface finish optimization of fused deposition modelling parts using desirability function analysis. Int. J. Eng. Res. (2015). https://doi.org/10.17577/ijertv4is040393

82.

Wang, T.M., Xi, J.T., Jin, Y.: A model research for prototype warp deformation in the FDM process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 33, 1087–1096 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0556-9CrossRef

83.

Xiaoyong, S., Liangcheng, C., Honglin, M., Peng, G., Zhanwei, B., Cheng, L.: Experimental analysis of high temperature PEEK materials on 3D printing test. In: Proc. - 9th Int. Conf. Meas. Technol. Mechatronics Autom. ICMTMA 2017, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017; 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMTMA.2017.0012

84.

Tardif, X., Pignon, B., Boyard, N., Schmelzer, J.W.P., Sobotka, V., Delaunay, D., Schick, C.: Experimental study of crystallization of PolyEtherEtherKetone (PEEK) over a large temperature range using a nano-calorimeter. Polym. Test. 36, 10–19 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.03.013CrossRef

85.

Wu, W.Z., Geng, P., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Rosen, D.W., Zhang, H.B.: Manufacture and thermal deformation analysis of semicrystalline polymer polyether ether ketone by 3D printing. Mater. Res. Innov. 18, S5-12-S5-16 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1179/1432891714Z.000000000898CrossRef

86.

Durgun, I., Ertan, R.: Experimental investigation of FDM process for improvement of mechanical properties and production cost. Rapid Prototyp. J. 20, 228–235 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2012-0091CrossRef

87.

Jatti, V.S., Jatti, S.V., Patel, A.P., Jatti, V.S.: A study on effect of fused deposition modeling process parameters on mechanical properties. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 8, 689–693 (2019)

88.

Garg, A., Bhattacharya, A., Batish, A.: Chemical vapor treatment of ABS parts built by FDM: analysis of surface finish and mechanical strength. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 89, 2175–2191 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9257-1CrossRef

89.

Francis, V., Jain, P.K.: Investigation on the effect of surface modification of 3D printed parts by nanoclay and dimethyl ketone, Https://Doi.Org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1401717. 2017;33:1080–1092. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2017.1401717

90.

Frone, A.N., Batalu, D., Chiulan, I., Oprea, M., Gabor, A.R., Nicolae, C.-A., Raditoiu, V., Trusca, R., Panaitescu, D.M.: Morpho-structural, thermal and mechanical properties of PLA/PHB/cellulose biodegradable nanocomposites obtained by compression molding, extrusion, and 3D printing. Nanomaterials 10, 51 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010051CrossRef

91.

Suh, C.H., Jung, Y.C., Kim, Y.S.: Effects of thickness and surface roughness on mechanical properties of aluminum sheets. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 24, 2091–2098 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-010-0707-7CrossRef

92.

Ahn, D., Kweon, J.H., Kwon, S., Song, J., Lee, S.: Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209, 5593–5600 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.016CrossRef

93.

Vasudevarao, B., Natarajan, D.P., Henderson, M.: Sensitivity of Rp surface finish to process, Solid Free. Fabr. Proc. 2000;251–258. http://prism.asu.edu/publications/papers/paper00_srpsfppv.pdf

94.

Ahn, D., Kim, H., Lee, S.: Surface roughness prediction using measured data and interpolation in layered manufacturing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209, 664–671 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.050CrossRef

95.

Es-Said, O.S., Foyos, J., Noorani, R., Mendelson, M., Marloth, R., Pregger, B.A.: Effect of layer orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyped samples. Mater. Manuf. Process. 15, 107–122 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/10426910008912976CrossRef

96.

Taufik, M., Jain, P.K.: Role of build orientation in layered manufacturing: a review. Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 27, 47–73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMTM.2013.058637CrossRef

97.

Chennakesava, P. and Shivraj Narayan, Y.: Fused deposition modeling – insights. Int. Conf. Adv. Des. Manuf. 2014;1345–1350. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269702639_Fused_Deposition_Modeling_-_Insights (accessed May 26, 2022).

98.

Boschetto, A., Giordano, V., Veniali, F.: 3D roughness profile model in fused deposition modelling. Rapid Prototyp. J. 19, 240–252 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541311323254CrossRef

99.

Ippolito, R., Iuliano, L., Gatto, A.: Benchmarking of rapid prototyping techniques in terms of dimensional accuracy and surface finish. CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. 44, 157–160 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62296-3CrossRef

100.

Gadelmawla, E.S., Koura, M.M., Maksoud, T.M.A., Elewa, I.M., Soliman, H.H.: Roughness parameters. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 123, 133–145 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00060-2CrossRef

101.

Galantucci, L.M., Lavecchia, F., Percoco, G.: Experimental study aiming to enhance the surface finish of fused deposition modeled parts. CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. 58, 189–192 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.071CrossRef

102.

Huang, B., Singamneni, S.: Raster angle mechanics in fused deposition modelling. J. Compos. Mater. 49, 363–383 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998313519153CrossRef

103.

Górski, F., Kuczko, W., Wichniarek, R.: Influence of process parameters on dimensional accuracy of parts manufactured using fused deposition modelling technology. Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 7, 27–35 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5604/20804075.1062340CrossRef

104.

Alafaghani, A., Qattawi, A., Alrawi, B., Guzman, A.: Experimental optimization of fused deposition modelling processing parameters: a design-for-manufacturing approach. In: Procedia Manuf., Elsevier B.V., 2017;791–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.079

105.

Akhoundi, B., Behravesh, A.H.: Effect of filling pattern on the tensile and flexural mechanical properties of FDM 3D printed products. Exp. Mech. 59, 883–897 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-018-00467-yCrossRef

106.

Luis Pérez, C.J.: Analysis of the surface roughness and dimensional accuracy capability of fused deposition modelling processes. Int. J. Prod. Res. 40, 2865–2881 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540210146099CrossRef

107.

Hanon, M.M., Zsidai, L., Ma, Q.: Accuracy investigation of 3D printed PLA with various process parameters and different colors. Mater. Today Proc. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.1246CrossRef

108.

Beniak, J., Križan, P., Šooš, L., Matuš, M.: Research on shape and dimensional accuracy of FDM produced parts. In: IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., Institute of Physics Publishing, 2019; 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/501/1/012030

109.

Wang, C.C., Lin, T.W., Hu, S.S.: Optimizing the rapid prototyping process by integrating the Taguchi method with the Gray relational analysis. Rapid Prototyp. J. 13, 304–315 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540710824814CrossRef

110.

Nidagundi, V.B., Keshavamurthy, R., Prakash, C.P.S.: Studies on parametric optimization for fused deposition modelling process. Mater. Today Proc. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.097CrossRef

111.

Bähr, F., Westkämper, E.: Correlations between influencing parameters and quality properties of components produced by fused deposition modeling. Procedia CIRP (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.048CrossRef

112.

D’Amico, A.A., Debaie, A., Peterson, A.M.: Effect of layer thickness on irreversible thermal expansion and interlayer strength in fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp. J. 23, 943–953 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-05-2016-0077CrossRef

113.

Zhou, J.G., Herscovici, D., Chen, C.C.: Parametric process optimization to improve the accuracy of rapid prototyped stereolithography parts. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 40, 363–379 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00068-1CrossRef

114.

Raghunath, N., Pandey, P.M.: Improving accuracy through shrinkage modelling by using Taguchi method in selective laser sintering. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 47, 985–995 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.07.001CrossRef

Titel: Thermal analysis for improvement of mechanical properties in fused filament fabricated parts
verfasst von: Md Aftab Alam
Krishnanand
Abhishek Patel
Rajesh Purohit
Mohammad Taufik
Publikationsdatum: 28.07.2022
Verlag: Springer Paris
Erschienen in: International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1955-2513
Elektronische ISSN: 1955-2505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00981-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

Prediction of EDMed micro-hole quality characteristics using hybrid bio-inspired machine learning-based predictive approaches

Study and parameter optimization with AISI P20 + Ni in Wire EDM performance using RSM and hybrid DBN based SAR

Industry 5.0 or industry 4.0S? Introduction to industry 4.0 and a peek into the prospective industry 5.0 technologies

Analysis of damage in mono composite leaf spring subjected to multiple cracks scenario

An efficient approach for metaheuristic-based optimization of composite laminates using genetic programming

Analytical and numerical analysis of an internally and/or externally pressurized thick-walled sphere made of radially nonuniform material

Premium Partner